Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Systematic review, meta-analysis

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Systematic review, meta-analysis
13 Systematic review, meta-analysis
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Umair Iqbal, Hafsa Anwar, Hafiz Umair Siddiqui, Muhammad Ali Khan, Faisal Kamal, Bradley D. Confer, Harshit S. Khara
Clin Endosc 2021;54(4):534-541.   Published online June 25, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.071
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: More than 100 million people to date have been affected by the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of bleeding complications. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of COVID-19 patients with signs and symptoms of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).
Methods
A systematic literature search was carried out for articles published until until November 11, 2020, in the Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. We included studies on COVID-19 patients with signs and symptoms of GIB.
Results
Our search yielded 49 studies, of which eight with a collective 127 patients (86 males and 41 females) met our inclusion criteria. Conservative management alone was performed in 59% of the patients, endoscopic evaluation in 31.5%, and interventional radiology (IR) embolization in 11%. Peptic ulcer disease was the most common endoscopic finding, diagnosed in 47.5% of the patients. Pooled overall mortality was 19.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 12.7%-27.6%) and pooled mortality secondary to GIB was 3.5% (95% CI; 1.3%–9.1%). The pooled risk of rebleeding was 11.3% (95% CI; 6.8%–18.4%).
Conclusions
The majority of COVID-19 patients with GIB responded to conservative management, with a low mortality rate associated with GIB and the risk of rebleeding. Thus, we suggest limiting endoscopic and IR interventions to those with hemodynamic instability and those for whom conservative management was unsuccessful.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prevalence and outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Sawai Singh Rathore, Zario Shai Wint, Aman Goyal, Bijay Mukesh Jeswani, Ameer Mustafa Farrukh, María Alejandra Nieto‐Salazar, Thanmai Reddy Thugu, Snigdha Erva, Raafay Mehmood, Adriana Carolina Toro‐velandia, Hamam Aneis, Sunny Ratnani, Ibrahim Marouf Yas
    Reviews in Medical Virology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inpatient outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: analysis of a nationally representative sample
    Mohammad Aldiabat, Saqr Alsakarneh, Tyrell Daniel, Muhammad Ali Butt, Balaji Jagdish, James Rock, Aarushi Sudan, Majd Al-Ahmad, Ahmad Jabri, Yassine Kilani, Tarek Odah, Laith Alhuneafat, Mir Zulqarnain, Jana G. Hashash, Hassan Ghoz
    Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.2024; 37(2): 239.     CrossRef
  • Increasing inpatient mortality of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
    Waqas Rasheed, Gnanashree Dharmarpandi, Ola Al-Jobory, Anass Dweik, Muhammad Anil, Sameer Islam
    Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.2023; 36(3): 286.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes in Patients Admitted for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and COVID-19 Infection: A Study of Two Years of the Pandemic
    Sergiu Cazacu, Daniela Burtea, Vlad Iovănescu, Dan Florescu, Sevastița Iordache, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Victor Sacerdotianu, Bogdan Ungureanu
    Life.2023; 13(4): 890.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence, causes, medical interventions, and mortality outcome of acute gastrointestinal bleeding among COVID-19 inpatients
    Mai N. Luu, Thinh P. Dang, Minh-Cong H. Vo, Duc T. Quach
    Current Medical Research and Opinion.2023; 39(5): 731.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With New Coronavirus Infection COVID-19
    V. D. Anosov, S. A. Domrachev, S. V. Ovchinnikov, N. O. Solovyov
    Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care".2023; 12(3): 458.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Endoscopic Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients With Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Hassan Ashktorab, Tiziano Russo, Gholamreza Oskrochi, Giovanni Latella, Sara Massironi, Martina Luca, Lakshmi G. Chirumamilla, Adeyinka O. Laiyemo, Hassan Brim
    Gastro Hep Advances.2022; 1(4): 487.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Who Have Gastrointestinal Bleeds Requiring Intervention: A Case-Control Study
    Ahmad Abulawi, Ali Al-Tarbsheh, Annie Leamon, Paul Feustel, Amit Chopra, Asra Batool
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical features of thrombosis and bleeding in COVID-19
    Mari R. Thomas, Marie Scully
    Blood.2022; 140(3): 184.     CrossRef
  • Mortality Rate in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Associated with Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Before and During Covid-19 Pandemic
    Petrica Popa, Sevastita Iordache, Dan Nicolae Florescu, Vlad Florin Iovanescu, Alexandru Vieru, Valentin Barbu, Maria-Cristina Bezna, Dragos Ovidiu Alexandru, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Sergiu Marian Cazacu
    Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2022; Volume 15: 2679.     CrossRef
  • Coronavirus Disease in the Abdomen
    Mark A. Anderson, Mark A. Khauli, Reece J. Goiffon, Avinash Kambadakone
    Advances in Clinical Radiology.2022; 4(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Сauses, risk factors, diagnostics and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with a novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19)
    A. A. Sheptulin, S. S. Kardasheva, A. A. Kurbatova
    Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal).2022; 100(7-8): 341.     CrossRef
  • The frequency of ulcerative-erosive defects and ulcerative bleeding of the gastroduodenal zone in patients with coronavirus infection COVID-19
    N. N. Butorin, V. V. Tsukanov, R. V. Asyayev, M. N. Butorina, A. V. Vasyutin, J. L. Tonkikh
    Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; (5): 5.     CrossRef
  • 6,081 View
  • 186 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
Close layer
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rajat Garg, Amandeep Singh, Manik Aggarwal, Jaideep Bhalla, Babu P. Mohan, Carol Burke, Tarun Rustagi, Prabhleen Chahal
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):379-389.   Published online April 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.276
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm.
Methods
We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (through May 2020) to identify studies reporting the outcomes of UEMR for ≥10 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. The assessed outcomes were recurrence rate on the first follow-up, en bloc resection, incomplete resection, and adverse events after UEMR.
Results
A total of 1276 polyps from 16 articles were included in our study. The recurrence rate was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3–12) and 5.9% (95% CI, 3.6–9.4) for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 and ≥20 mm, respectively. For nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and incomplete resection rates were 57.7% (95% CI, 42.4–71.6), 58.9% (95% CI, 42.4–73.6), and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8–2.6), respectively. The rates of pooled adverse events, intraprocedural bleeding, and delayed bleeding were 7.0%, 5.4%, and 2.9%, respectively. The rate of perforation and postpolypectomy syndrome was 0.8%.
Conclusions
Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that UEMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥10 mm is safe and effective with a low rate of recurrence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Polypectomy Techniques for Pedunculated and Nonpedunculated Polyps
    Karl Kwok, Sasan Mosadeghi, Daniel Lew
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 25(4): 361.     CrossRef
  • Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Matheus Henrique Gonçalves de Souza, Paula Arruda do Espirito Santo, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Luciano Lenz
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic treatment of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer
    Yunho Jung
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 642.     CrossRef
  • EMR and ESD: Indications, techniques and results
    Mamoon Ur Rashid, Mohammad Alomari, Sadaf Afraz, Tolga Erim
    Surgical Oncology.2022; 43: 101742.     CrossRef
  • Safety and effectiveness of underwater cold snare resection without submucosal injection of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions
    Andrew W. Yen, Joseph W. Leung, Malcom Koo, Felix W. Leung
    Endoscopy International Open.2022; 10(06): E791.     CrossRef
  • Underwater or conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for intermediate‐sized colorectal neoplasm?
    Li‐Chun Chang
    Advances in Digestive Medicine.2021; 8(3): 133.     CrossRef
  • 4,465 View
  • 141 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Insufflation of Carbon Dioxide versus Air During Colonoscopy Among Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
John Alexander Lata Guacho, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Bruna Furia Buzetti Hourneaux de Moura, Megui Marilia Mansilla Gallegos, Thomas McCarty, Ricardo Katsuya Toma, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Clin Endosc 2021;54(2):242-249.   Published online March 25, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.275
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Carbon dioxide is increasingly used in insufflation during colonoscopy in adult patients; however, air insufflation remains the primary practice among pediatric gastroenterologists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate insufflation using CO2 versus air in colonoscopies in pediatric patients.
Methods
Individualized search strategies were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and LILACS databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane working methodology. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were selected for the present meta-analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated for outcomes including procedure time and abdominal pain immediately and 24 hours post-procedure.
Results
The initial search yielded 644 records, of which five RCTs with a total of 358 patients (CO2: n=178 versus air: n=180) were included in the final analysis. The procedure time was not different between the CO2 and air insufflation groups (mean difference, 10.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.55 to 24.22; p=0.11). Abdominal pain immediately post-procedure was significantly lower in the CO2 group (risk difference, -0.15; 95% CI; -0.26 to -0.03; p=0.01) while abdominal pain at 24 hours post-procedure was similar (risk difference, -0.05; 95% CI; -0.11 to 0.01; p=0.11).
Conclusions
Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data, CO2 insufflation reduced abdominal pain immediately following the procedure, while pain was similar at 24 hours post-procedure. These results suggest that CO2 is a preferred insufflation technique when performing colonoscopy in pediatric patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Elevations in End-Tidal CO2 With CO2 Use During Pediatric Endoscopy With Airway Protection: Is This Physiologically Significant?
    Chinenye R. Dike, Andrew Huang Pacheco, Elizabeth Lyden, David Freestone, Ojasvini Choudhry, Warren P. Bishop, Mohanad Shukry
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition.2023; 76(5): 660.     CrossRef
  • 5,267 View
  • 150 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
The Role of Needle-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review
Yung Ka Chin, Clement Chun Ho Wu, Damien Meng Yew Tan
Clin Endosc 2021;54(1):38-47.   Published online March 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.200-IDEN
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The prevalence of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) has increased recently due to the increased use of cross-sectional abdominal imaging and the ageing global population. Current diagnostic techniques are inadequate to distinguish between PCLs that require surgery, close surveillance, or expectant management. This has resulted in increased morbidity from both inappropriately aggressive and conservative management strategies. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) has allowed microscopic examination and visual delineation of the surface epithelium of PCLs. Landmark studies in this decade have correlated nCLE and histological findings and identified characteristics differentiating various types of PCLs. Subsequent studies have confirmed the high diagnostic yield of nCLE and its diagnostic utility in PCLs with an equivocal diagnosis. Moreover, nCLE has been shown to improve the diagnostic yield of PCLs. This will help avoid unnecessary pancreatic surgery, which carries significant morbidity and mortality risks. The early detection of high-grade dysplasia in PCLs will provide early surgical treatment and improve outcomes for pancreatic cancer. Despite the high upfront cost of nCLE, the improved diagnostic accuracy and resultant appropriate management have resulted in improved cost effectiveness. Refining the procedure technique and limiting the procedure length have significantly improved the safety of nCLE. A structured training program and device improvements to allow more complete mapping of the pancreatic cyst epithelium will be crucial for the widespread adoption of this promising technology.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Molecular Pathology of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions with a Focus on Malignant Progression
    Yan Hu, Dan Jones, Ashwini K. Esnakula, Somashekar G. Krishna, Wei Chen
    Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1183.     CrossRef
  • Applications and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound in Digestive System Diseases
    Jia Huang, Xiaofei Fan, Wentian Liu
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(17): 2815.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided fine needle aspiration-based clues to mistaken or uncertain identity: serous pancreatic cysts
    Michele T. Yip-Schneider, Rodica Muraru, Rachel C. Kim, Howard H. Wu, Stuart Sherman, Aditya Gutta, Mohammad A. Al-Haddad, John M. Dewitt, C. Max Schmidt
    HPB.2023; 25(12): 1587.     CrossRef
  • Current trends in the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms in Korea: a national survey
    Hyung Ku Chon, Sung Hoon Moon, Sang Wook Park, Woo Hyun Paik, Chang Nyol Paik, Byoung Kwan Son, Tae Jun Song, Dong Won Ahn, Eaum Seok Lee, Yun Nah Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Jae Min Lee, Tae Joo Jeon, Chang-Hwan Park, Kwang Bum Cho, Dong Wook Lee
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2022; 37(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Diagnosis of Biliary and Pancreatic Disorders: A Systematic Analysis
    Do Han Kim, Somashekar G. Krishna, Emmanuel Coronel, Paul T. Kröner, Herbert C. Wolfsen, Michael B. Wallace, Juan E. Corral
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(2): 197.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy and agreement of a large panel of endosonographers for endomicroscopy-guided virtual biopsy of pancreatic cystic lesions
    Jorge D. Machicado, Bertrand Napoleon, Anne Marie Lennon, Samer El-Dika, Stephen P. Pereira, Damien Tan, Rahul Pannala, Mohit Girotra, Pradermchai Kongkam, Helga Bertani, Yunlu Feng, Hao Sijie, Ning Zhong, Vincent Valantin, Sarah Leblanc, Alice Hinton, So
    Pancreatology.2022; 22(7): 994.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Focused Review on Cyst Clinicopathological Features and Advanced Diagnostics
    Wei Chen, Nehaal Ahmed, Somashekar G. Krishna
    Diagnostics.2022; 13(1): 65.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Value of Endomicroscopy for Gastrointestinal Diseases: New Possibilities and Concepts
    Ralf Kiesslich
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 23(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • 5,383 View
  • 221 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Survival Benefit of Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Byung Hyo Cha, Myoung-Jin Jang, Sang Hyub Lee
Clin Endosc 2021;54(1):100-106.   Published online January 15, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.254
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare but aggressive disease with a poor survival. Recent trials have shown improved survival with intraductal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the survival benefit of endoscopic RFA for unresectable extrahepatic CCA with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).
Methods
A systematic search from 1970 to 2020 was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials. gov. We selected eligible studies reporting relative risks, hazard ratios (HRs), or odds ratios, adjusted by controlling for confounding factors of survival rate and stent patency duration, among patients with extrahepatic CCA with MBO treated with RFA with stent insertion or stent insertion only.
Results
A total of eight trials (three randomized and five nonrandomized) with a total of 420 patients were included in the metaanalysis. Pooled overall survival analysis favored RFA treatment with stent insertion (HR, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34– 0.64; I2=47%; p=0.09); however, no significant difference was found in the duration of stent patency between the groups (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.57–1.09; I2=7%; p=0.36).
Conclusions
RFA therapy with stent insertion may confer a survival benefit compared with stent insertion only in patients with CCA and MBO.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intraductal radiofrequency ablation plus biliary stent versus stent alone for malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matheus de Oliveira Veras, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Thomas R. McCarty, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Oliveira, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo Gomes, Davi Lucena Landim, Felipe Giacobo Nunes, Tomazo Antônio Prince Franzini, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, W
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(01): E23.     CrossRef
  • Reply to Chandrasekhara and Aggarwal
    Matheus de Oliveira Veras, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(05): E640.     CrossRef
  • Consensus statements on endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary strictures

    Journal of Digestive Diseases.2024; 25(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Radiofrequency Ablation on Survival Outcomes and Stent Patency in Patients with Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Daniele Balducci, Michele Montori, Francesco Martini, Marco Valvano, Federico De Blasio, Maria Eva Argenziano, Giuseppe Tarantino, Antonio Benedetti, Emanuele Bendia, Marco Marzioni, Luca Maroni
    Cancers.2024; 16(7): 1372.     CrossRef
  • Impact of temperature-controlled endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score–matched analysis
    Il Sang Shin, Jong Ho Moon, Yun Nah Lee, Jun Ho Myeong, Tae Hoon Lee, Jae Kook Yang, Young Deok Cho, Sang-Heum Park
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(04): E535.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility and safety of trans-biliary cryoablation: Preclinical evaluation of a novel flexible cryoprobe
    Chao Zhang, Linzhong Zhu, Shousheng Tang, Jukun Wang, Yu Li, Xin Chen, Chunjing Bian, Dongbin Liu, Guokun Ao, Tao Luo
    Cryobiology.2023; 111: 40.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Stent Versus Stent-alone Treatments for Malignant Biliary Strictures
    Hayat Khizar, Yufei Hu, Yanhua Wu, Kamran Ali, Junaid Iqbal, Muhammad Zulqarnain, Jianfeng Yang
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2023; 57(4): 335.     CrossRef
  • Development of novel biliary metal stent with coil-spring structure and its application in vivo swine biliary stricture model
    In Rae Cho, Sang Hyub Lee, Jin Ho Choi, Namyoung Park, Min Woo Lee, Joo Seong Kim, Seok Jeong, Don Haeng Lee, Tae-Won Jeong, Byoung-Yun Ki, Woo Hyun Paik, Ji Kon Ryu, Yong-Tae Kim
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • In-stent radiofrequency ablation with uncovered metal stent placement for tumor ingrowth/overgrowth causing self-expandable metal stent occlusion in distal malignant biliary obstruction: multicenter propensity score–matched study
    Namyoung Park, Min Kyu Jung, Eui Joo Kim, Woo Hyun Paik, Jae Hee Cho
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(4): 694.     CrossRef
  • ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures
    B. Joseph Elmunzer, Jennifer L. Maranki, Victoria Gómez, Anna Tavakkoli, Bryan G. Sauer, Berkeley N. Limketkai, Emily A. Brennan, Elaine M. Attridge, Tara J. Brigham, Andrew Y. Wang
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(3): 405.     CrossRef
  • Effect of radiofrequency ablation in addition to biliary stent on overall survival and stent patency in malignant biliary obstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zahid Ijaz Tarar, Umer Farooq, Mustafa Gandhi, Ghulam Ghous, Saad Saleem, Faisal Kamal, Zaid Imam, Laith Jamil
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 35(6): 646.     CrossRef
  • Impact of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation on survival of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a narrative review
    Elena Di Girolamo, Andrea Belli, Alessandro Ottaiano, Vincenza Granata, Valentina Borzillo, Luca Tarotto, Fabiana Tatangelo, Raffaele Palaia, Corrado Civiletti, Mauro Piccirillo, Valentina D’Angelo, Francesco Fiore, Pietro Marone, Guglielmo Nasti, Frances
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a randomised trial
    Jana Jarosova, Lea Zarivnijova, Ivana Cibulkova, Jan Mares, Peter Macinga, Alzbeta Hujova, Premysl Falt, Ondrej Urban, Jan Hajer, Julius Spicak, Tomas Hucl
    Gut.2023; 72(12): 2286.     CrossRef
  • Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chenming Liu, Jiaming Dong, Yuxing Liu, Siyuan Zhang, Ruanchang Chen, Haijun Tang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intraductal Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma
    Abhishek Agnihotri, David E. Loren
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(2): 200.     CrossRef
  • Silver Nanofunctionalized Stent after Radiofrequency Ablation Suppresses Tissue Hyperplasia and Bacterial Growth
    Yubeen Park, Dong-Sung Won, Ga-Hyun Bae, Dae Sung Ryu, Jeon Min Kang, Ji Won Kim, Song Hee Kim, Chu Hui Zeng, Wooram Park, Sang Soo Lee, Jung-Hoon Park
    Pharmaceutics.2022; 14(2): 412.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Intraductal RFA Plus Stent versus Stent-Only Treatment for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    David M. de Jong, Jeska A. Fritzsche, Amber S. Audhoe, Suzanne S. L. Yi, Marco J. Bruno, Rogier P. Voermans, Lydi M. J. W. van Driel
    Cancers.2022; 14(9): 2079.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation and Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
    Nadia V. Guardado, Kaysey Llorente, Benoit Blondeau
    Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2021; 30(3): 491.     CrossRef
  • 4,154 View
  • 152 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of Aspiration Therapy on Obesity-Related Comorbidities: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Pichamol Jirapinyo, Diogo T. H. de Moura, Laura C. Horton, Christopher C. Thompson
Clin Endosc 2020;53(6):686-697.   Published online February 28, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.181
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Aspiration therapy (AT) involves endoscopic placement of a gastrostomy tube with an external device that allows patients to drain 30% of ingested calories after meals. Its efficacy for inducing weight loss has been shown. This study aimed to assess the effect of AT on obesity-related comorbidities.
Methods
A meta-analysis of studies that assessed AT outcomes was conducted through December 2018. Primary outcomes were changes in comorbidities at 1 year following AT. Secondary outcomes were the amount of weight loss at up to 4 years and pooled serious adverse events (SAEs).
Results
Five studies with 590 patients were included. At 1 year, there were improvements in metabolic conditions: mean difference (MD) in systolic blood pressure: -7.8 (-10.7 – -4.9) mm Hg; MD in diastolic blood pressure: -5.1 (-7.0 – 3.2) mm Hg; MD in triglycerides: -15.8 (-24.0 – -7.6) mg/dL; MD in high-density lipoprotein: 3.6 (0.7–6.6) mg/dL; MD in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): -1.3 (-1.8 – -0.8) %; MD in aspartate transaminase: -2.7 (-4.1 – -1.3) U/L; MD in alanine transaminase: -7.5 (-9.8 – -5.2) U/L. At 1 (n=218), 2 (n=125), 3 (n=46), and 4 (n=27) years, the patients experienced 17.8%, 18.3%, 19.1%, and 18.6% total weight loss (TWL), corresponding to 46.3%, 46.2%, 48.0%, and 48.7% excess weight loss (EWL) (p<0.0001 for all). Subgroup analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials (n=225) showed that AT patients lost more weight than did controls by 11.6 (6.5–16.7) %TWL and 25.6 (16.0–35.3) %EWL and experienced greater improvement in HbA1c and alanine transaminase by 1.3 (0.8–1.8) % and 9.0 (3.9–14.0) U/L. The pooled SAE rate was 4.1%.
Conclusions
Obesity-related comorbidities significantly improved at 1 year following AT. Additionally, a subgroup of patients who continued to use AT appeared to experience significant weight loss that persisted up to at least 4 years.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Update on Endoscopic Treatments for Obesity
    Fernanda Pessorrusso, Sagar V. Mehta, Shelby Sullivan
    Current Obesity Reports.2024; 13(2): 364.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass liner in obesity management and glycemic control
    Willian Ferreira Igi, Victor Lira de Oliveira, Ayah Matar, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 309.     CrossRef
  • Updates in Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies
    Hammad Qureshi, Naba Saeed, Manol Jovani
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(3): 1126.     CrossRef
  • The Role Bariatric Surgery and Endobariatric Therapies in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
    Aaron Yeoh, Robert Wong, Ashwani K. Singal
    Clinics in Liver Disease.2023; 27(2): 413.     CrossRef
  • Obesity management for cardiovascular disease prevention
    Rama Hritani, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Anurag Mehta, Charles German
    Obesity Pillars.2023; 7: 100069.     CrossRef
  • Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review
    Maheeba Abdulla, Nafeesa Mohammed, Jehad AlQamish
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(40): 5526.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic removal of a weight-loss device with stoma closure using a tack-and-suture device
    Areebah Waseem, Joseph Wawrzynski, Daniel B. Maselli, Ashley Kucera, Chase Wooley, Christopher McGowan
    VideoGIE.2023; 8(11): 441.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Pichamol Jirapinyo, Thomas R. McCarty, Russell D. Dolan, Raj Shah, Christopher C. Thompson
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 20(3): 511.     CrossRef
  • Endobariatrics: well past infancy and maturing rapidly
    Shreesh Shrestha, Esha Shrestha, Tilak Shah
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2022; 38(6): 592.     CrossRef
  • Advances in endobariatrics: past, present, and future
    Abhishek Shenoy, Allison R Schulman
    Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Various Novel and Emerging Technologies in Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Treatments
    Hee Kyong Na, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for High-Risk Patients, High Body Mass Index (> 50 kg/m2) Patients, and Contraindication to Abdominal Surgery
    Renjie Li, Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker, Andreas Adler, Maximilian Specht, Wael Eskander, Mahmoud Ismail, Harun Badakhshi, Manoel Passos Galvao, Ricardo Zorron
    Obesity Surgery.2021; 31(8): 3400.     CrossRef
  • Obesity Primer for the Practicing Gastroenterologist
    Pichamol Jirapinyo, Christopher C. Thompson
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 116(5): 918.     CrossRef
  • Bariatric and metabolic endoscopy: impact on obesity and related comorbidities
    Amit Mehta, Reem Z. Sharaiha
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 14: 263177452110191.     CrossRef
  • Advanced endoscopic gastrointestinal techniques for the bariatric patient: implications for the anesthesia provider
    Andrew Kim, Joshua A. Spiro, Thomas J. Hatzidais, Norman D. Randolph, Rosie Q. Li, Diana Ayubcha, Mark S. Weiss
    Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.2021; 34(4): 490.     CrossRef
  • Preparing for the NASH Epidemic: A Call to Action
    Fasiha Kanwal, Jay H. Shubrook, Zobair Younossi, Yamini Natarajan, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Mary E. Rinella, Stephen A. Harrison, Christos Mantzoros, Kim Pfotenhauer, Samuel Klein, Robert H. Eckel, Davida Kruger, Hashem El-Serag, Kenneth Cusi
    Gastroenterology.2021; 161(3): 1030.     CrossRef
  • Preparing for the NASH epidemic: A call to action
    Fasiha Kanwal, Jay H. Shubrook, Zobair Younossi, Yamini Natarajan, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Mary E. Rinella, Stephen A. Harrison, Christos Mantzoros, Kim Pfotenhauer, Samuel Klein, Robert H. Eckel, Davida Kruger, Hashem El-Serag, Kenneth Cusi
    Metabolism.2021; 122: 154822.     CrossRef
  • Preparing for the NASH epidemic: A call to action
    Fasiha Kanwal, Jay H. Shubrook, Zobair Younossi, Yamini Natarajan, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Mary E. Rinella, Stephen A. Harrison, Christos Mantzoros, Kim Pfotenhauer, Samuel Klein, Robert H. Eckel, Davida Kruger, Hashem El‐Serag, Kenneth Cusi
    Obesity.2021; 29(9): 1401.     CrossRef
  • Preparing for the NASH Epidemic: A Call to Action
    Fasiha Kanwal, Jay H. Shubrook, Zobair Younossi, Yamini Natarajan, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Mary E. Rinella, Stephen A. Harrison, Christos Mantzoros, Kim Pfotenhauer, Samuel Klein, Robert H. Eckel, Davida Kruger, Hashem El-Serag, Kenneth Cusi
    Diabetes Care.2021; 44(9): 2162.     CrossRef
  • Endobariatrics and Metabolic Endoscopy: Can We Solve the Obesity Epidemic with Our Scope?
    Jad Farha, Shahem Abbarh, Zadid Haq, Mohamad I. Itani, Andreas Oberbach, Vivek Kumbhari, Dilhana Badurdeen
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 5,686 View
  • 134 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided, Percutaneous, and Transjugular Liver Biopsy: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Thomas R. McCarty, Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Basile Njei, Marvin Ryou, Harry R. Aslanian, Thiruvengadam Muniraj
Clin Endosc 2020;53(5):583-593.   Published online September 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.211
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Percutaneous liver biopsy (PCLB) or transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) have traditionally been performed to obtain a sample of hepatic tissue; however, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUSLB) has become an attractive alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of EUSLB, PCLB, and TJLB.
Methods
Search strategies were developed in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Major outcomes included the following: adequacy of biopsy specimens (i.e., complete portal triads [CPT], total specimen length [TSL] in mm, and length of longest piece [LLP]) in mm), and rate of adverse events. Only studies comparing all biopsy approaches (i.e., EUSLB, PCLB, and TJLB) were included.
Results
Five studies (EUSLB [n=301]; PCLB [n=176]; and TJLB [n=179]) were included. Biopsy cumulative adequacy rates for EUSLB, PCLB, and TJLB were 93.51%, 98.27%, and 97.61%, respectively. Based on the subgroup analysis limited to EUS biopsy needles in current clinical practice, there was no difference in biopsy adequacy or adverse events for EUSLB compared to PCLB and TJLB (all p>0.050). A comparison of EUSLB and PCLB revealed no difference between specimens regarding both CPT (p=0.079) and LLP (p=0.085); however, a longer TSL (p<0.001) was observed. Compared to TJLB, EUSLB showed no difference in LLP (p=0.351), fewer CPT (p=0.042), and longer TSL (p=0.005).
Conclusions
EUSLB appears to be a safe, minimally invasive procedure that is comparable to PCLB and TJLB regarding biopsy specimens obtained and rate of adverse events associated with each method.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic procedures in hepatology: Current trends and new developments
    Wim Laleman, Emma Vanderschueren, Zain Seyad Mehdi, Reiner Wiest, Andres Cardenas, Jonel Trebicka
    Journal of Hepatology.2024; 80(1): 124.     CrossRef
  • Gut-liver axis: Pathophysiological concepts and medical perspective in chronic liver diseases
    Susana G. Rodrigues, Schalk van der Merwe, Aleksander Krag, Reiner Wiest
    Seminars in Immunology.2024; 71: 101859.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of diagnostic outcomes, safety, and cost of Franseen-tip 19G versus 22G needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsies
    Ankit Dalal, Nagesh Kamat, Gaurav Patil, Amol Vadgaonkar, Sanil Parekh, Sehajad Vora, Amit Maydeo
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(02): E291.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in liver transplant recipients: A preliminary experience
    Wei Rao, Yue-Ping Jiang, Jin-Zhen Cai, Man Xie
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy and Diagnostic Adequacy Between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided and Percutaneous Liver Biopsies: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
    Mansoor Ahmad, Taslova Tahsin Abedin, Faria Khilji, Kinan Obeidat, Lam Vinh Sieu, Sandipkumar S Chaudhari, Divine Besong Arrey Agbor, Danish Allahwala
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative accuracy of endosonographic shear wave elastography and transcutaneous liver stiffness measurement: a pilot study
    Divyanshoo R. Kohli, Daniel Mettman, Nevene Andraws, Erin Haer, Jaime Porter, Ozlem Ulusurac, Steven Ullery, Madhav Desai, Mohammad S. Siddiqui, Prateek Sharma
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of outcomes
    Saurabh Chandan, Smit Deliwala, ShahabR Khan, BabuP Mohan, BanreetS Dhindsa, Jay Bapaye, Hemant Goyal, LenaL Kassab, Faisal Kamal, HarlanR Sayles, GursimranS Kochhar, DouglasG Adler
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2023; 12(2): 171.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy
    Daryl Ramai, Viraaj Pannu, Antonio Facciorusso, Banreet Dhindsa, Joseph Heaton, Andrew Ofosu, Saurabh Chandan, Marcello Maida, Barbara Lattanzi, Eduardo Rodriguez, Vicky H. Bhagat, Jayanta Samanta, Monique T. Barakat
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(4): 784.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Advances in Hepatology
    Emma Vanderschueren, Jonel Trebicka, Wim Laleman
    Seminars in Liver Disease.2023; 43(02): 176.     CrossRef
  • Quality of Tissue Samples Obtained by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
    José Lariño-Noia, Javier Fernández-Castroagudín, Daniel de la Iglesia-García, Héctor Lázare, Laura Nieto, Sol Porto, Nicolau Vallejo-Senra, Esther Molina, Alba San Bruno, Xurxo Martínez-Seara, Julio Iglesias-García, Silvia García-Acuña, J. Enrique Domíngu
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(10): 1821.     CrossRef
  • Endo-hepatology: Updates for the clinical hepatologist
    Frances Lee, Tarun Rustagi, R. Todd Frederick
    Clinical Liver Disease.2023; 22(2): 42.     CrossRef
  • Technical Success, Sample Adequacy, and Complications of  Pediatric Transjugular Liver Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Karen Smayra, Shahid Miangul, Nathanael Yap, Ao Shi, Fatma Abdulsalam, Maamoun Adra, Hayato Nakanishi, Jake Ball, Tara A. Betts, Christian A. Than, Aneeta Parthipun
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2023; 68(10): 3846.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in diagnosing hepatic focal lesions
    Hussein Hassan Okasha, Hanane Delsa, Abdelmoneim Alsawaf, Ahmed Morad Hashim, Hani M Khattab, Dalia Abdelfatah, Abeer Abdellatef, Amr Albitar
    World Journal of Methodology.2023; 13(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Chinese expert consensus on multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases
    Yihebali Chi, Liming Jiang, Susheng Shi, Shun He, Chunmei Bai, Dan Cao, Jianqiang Cai, Qichen Chen, Xiao Chen, Yiqiao Deng, Shunda Du, Zhen Huang, Li Huo, Yuan Ji, Jie Li, Wenhui Lou, Jie Luo, Xueying Shi, Lijie Song, Bei Sun, Huangying Tan, Feng Wang, Xu
    Journal of Pancreatology.2023; 6(4): 139.     CrossRef
  • Distinct ways to perform a liver biopsy: The core technique setups and updated understanding of these modalities
    Chao Sun, Xingliang Zhao, Lei Shi, Xiaofei Fan, Xiaolong Qi
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2023; 12(6): 437.     CrossRef
  • Endo-Hepatology: The Buzz Goes Much beyond Liver Biopsy—A Narrative Review
    Rajesh Puri, Zubin Sharma, Swapnil Dhampalwar, Abhishek Kathuria, Bimal Sahu
    Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 14(04): 227.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in comparison to percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Antonio Facciorusso, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Daryl Ramai, Carlo Fabbri, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Andrea Lisotti, Nicola Muscatiello, Christian Cotsoglou, Pietro Fusaroli
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 16(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy Using Newer 19G FNB Needles Compared to Percutaneous and Transjugular Liver Biopsy: A Tertiary Center Experience
    Harsh K. Patel, George Therapondos, Gretchen Galliano, Ricardo. Romero, John Evans, Ari Cohen, Muhammad F. Mubarak, Janak N. Shah, Abdul Hamid El Chafic
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a meta-analysis
    Keyu Zeng, Zhenpeng Jiang, Jie Yang, Kefei Chen, Qiang Lu
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 57(5): 545.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventions in the management of pancreatic cancer
    Tossapol Kerdsirichairat, Eun Ji Shin
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 14(4): 191.     CrossRef
  • Endohepatology – current status
    Jerome C. Edelson, Natalie E. Mitchell, Don C. Rockey
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2022; 38(3): 216.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic and interventional EUS in hepatology: An updated review
    Vaneet Jearth, Sridhar Sundaram, SurinderSingh Rana
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2022; 11(5): 355.     CrossRef
  • A Gene Expression Signature to Select Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients for Liver Transplantation
    Hugo Pinto-Marques, Joana Cardoso, Sílvia Silva, João L. Neto, Maria Gonçalves-Reis, Daniela Proença, Marta Mesquita, André Manso, Sara Carapeta, Mafalda Sobral, Antonio Figueiredo, Clara Rodrigues, Adelaide Milheiro, Ana Carvalho, Rui Perdigoto, Eduardo
    Annals of Surgery.2022; 276(5): 868.     CrossRef
  • Endo‐hepatology: The changing paradigm of endoscopic ultrasound in cirrhosis
    Achintya Dinesh Singh, Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Christina C. Lindenmeyer
    Clinical Liver Disease.2022; 20(6): 209.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility and Safety of Transjugular Liver Biopsy for Japanese Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases
    Makoto Iijima, Takahiro Arisaka, Akira Yamamiya, Keiichi Tominaga, Kazunori Nagashima, Akira Kanamori, Satoshi Masuyama, Yuichi Majima, Kenichi Goda, Kazuyuki Ishida, Atsushi Irisawa
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(1): 131.     CrossRef
  • Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade
    Gwang Ha Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Do Hyun Park, Jimin Han
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 633.     CrossRef
  • Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Liver Disease: Where Do We Stand?
    Tajana Pavic, Ivana Mikolasevic, Dominik Kralj, Nina Blazevic, Anita Skrtic, Ivan Budimir, Ivan Lerotic, Davor Hrabar
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 2021.     CrossRef
  • 6,167 View
  • 174 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 27 Crossref
Close layer
Methods that Assist Traction during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Literature Review
Georgios Tziatzios, Alanna Ebigbo, Stefan Karl Gölder, Andreas Probst, Helmut Messmann
Clin Endosc 2020;53(3):286-301.   Published online January 9, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.147
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established method for the treatment of early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms. Adequate submucosal exposure is one of the most significant factors related to an effective and safe dissection. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effcacy and safety of various methods that assist traction during ESD of precancerous and earlystage neoplastic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. We performed an electronic search of the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases for relevant studies published up to May 2019. Trials exclusively recruiting patients undergoing ESD for superficial gastrointestinal cancer were considered eligible for inclusion. Thirty-three articles including 3,134 patients met the inclusion criteria. The studies evaluated different approaches for widening the endoscopic view, including magnetic anchor-guided ESD (3 studies), use of a second endoscope (5 studies), clip-involving technique (21 studies), and miscellaneous methods (4 studies). Among them, only 6 were randomized controlled trials evaluating different approaches. Overall, the implementation of methods that assist traction during ESD significantly improved the operating time and R0 resection rate and decreased the rate of complications (bleeding and perforation). Interventions that assist traction seem effcacious in improving tissue traction, thus facilitating ESD performance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Impact of Traction Methods on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy for Gastric Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chengu Niu, Jing Zhang, Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula, Bryan E-Xin, Mahesh Napel, Patrick I. Okolo
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(1): 129.     CrossRef
  • Facilitating endoscopic full‐thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors with a novel snare traction method (with video)
    Lei Gu, Xiaotong Wang, Miao Ouyang, Fujun Li, Yu Wu, Xiaowei Liu
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(3): 535.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Resection of Malignancies in the Upper GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm
    Ulrike Walburga Denzer
    Visceral Medicine.2024; 40(3): 116.     CrossRef
  • Building the Toolbox of Devices to Optimize a Practice in Submucosal Endoscopy
    Rahil H. Shah, Sunil Amin
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2023; 33(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Error-Correcting Mean-Teacher: Corrections instead of consistency-targets applied to semi-supervised medical image segmentation
    Robert Mendel, David Rauber, Luis A. de Souza, João P. Papa, Christoph Palm
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2023; 154: 106585.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review
    Diogo Libânio, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes, Barbara Bastiaansen, Raf Bisschops, Michael J. Bourke, Pierre H. Deprez, Gianluca Esposito, Arnaud Lemmers, Philippe Leclercq, Roberta Maselli, Helmut Messmann, Oliver Pech, Mathieu Pioche, Michael Vieth, Bas L.A.M. We
    Endoscopy.2023; 55(04): 361.     CrossRef
  • Multi-loop traction device facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo pilot study and an inaugural clinical experience
    Hiroaki Matsui, Naoto Tamai, Toshiki Futakuchi, Shunsuke Kamba, Akira Dobashi, Kazuki Sumiyama
    BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Novel Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Double-Endoscope and Snare-Based Traction
    Chu-Kuang Chou, Kun-Feng Tsai, Cheng-Hao Tseng, Ching-Tai Lee, Kuo-Hsin Yang, Min-Chi Chang, Chao-Wen Hsu
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(7): 936.     CrossRef
  • Novel articulating through-the-scope traction device
    Cem Simsek, Christopher C. Thompson, Khaled J. Alkhateeb, Sebastian A. Jofre, Hiroyuki Aihara
    VideoGIE.2022; 7(10): 353.     CrossRef
  • “String-to-ring” traction technique for endoscopic submocosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors
    A. A. Mitrakov, S. S. Pirogov, N. N. Mitrakova, S. V. Gamayunov, M. V. Timoshchenko, R. A. Gagaev
    Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; (5): 97.     CrossRef
  • Combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, a practical solution for difficult cases
    Dong-Hoon Yang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 626.     CrossRef
  • A novel training model to simulate thread traction in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection – a video vignette
    Shih‐Feng Huang, Chao‐Wen Hsu
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(4): 1012.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastric dysplasia and early cancer: Current evidence and what the future may hold
    Edward Young, Hamish Philpott, Rajvinder Singh
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(31): 5126.     CrossRef
  • Double-endoscope assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for treating tumors in rectum and distal colon by expert endoscopists: a feasibility study
    A. Ebigbo, G. Tziatzios, S. K. Gölder, A. Probst, H. Messmann
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2020; 24(12): 1293.     CrossRef
  • 6,468 View
  • 269 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
Current Status in the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy: Is Endoscopic Drainage Feasible?- A Systematic Review
Ryota Sagami, Kenji Hayasaka, Hidefumi Nishikiori, Hideaki Harada, Yuji Amano
Clin Endosc 2020;53(2):176-188.   Published online January 9, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.177
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The bleeding complication risk of surgery or percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) may increase in patients with acute cholecystitis receiving antithrombotic therapy (ATT). Endoscopic gallbladder drainage (EGBD) may be recommended for such patients. English articles published between 1991 and 2018 in peer-reviewed journals that discuss cholecystectomy, PTGBD, and EGBD in patients with ATT or coagulopathy were reviewed to assess the safety of the procedures, especially in terms of the bleeding complication. There were 8 studies on cholecystectomy, 3 on PTGBD, and 1 on endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) in patients receiving ATT. With respect to EGBD, 28 studies on ETGBD (including 1 study already mentioned above) and 26 studies on endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) were also analyzed. The overall bleeding complication rate in patients with ATT who underwent cholecystectomy was significantly higher than that in patients without ATT (6.5% [23/354] vs. 1.2% [26/2,224], p<0.001). However, the bleeding risk of cholecystectomy and PTGBD in patients receiving ATT was controversial. The overall technical success, clinical success, and bleeding complication rates of ETGBD vs. EUS-GBD were 84% vs. 96% (p<0.001), 92% vs. 97% (p<0.001), and 0.65% vs. 2.1% (p=0.005), respectively. One patient treated with ETGBD experienced bleeding complication among 191 patients with bleeding tendency. ETGBD may be an ideal drainage procedure for patients receiving ATT from the viewpoint of bleeding, although EUS-GBD is also efficacious.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients: the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) guidelines
    Federico Coccolini, Eugenio Cucinotta, Andrea Mingoli, Mauro Zago, Gaia Altieri, Alan Biloslavo, Roberto Caronna, Ismail Cengeli, Enrico Cicuttin, Roberto Cirocchi, Luigi Cobuccio, Gianluca Costa, Valerio Cozza, Camilla Cremonini, Giovanni Del Vecchio, Gi
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(2): 331.     CrossRef
  • Elective Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Gallbladder Stenting for Acute Cholecystitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Shinjiro Kobayashi, Kazunari Nakahara, Saori Umezawa, Keisuke Ida, Atsuhito Tsuchihashi, Satoshi Koizumi, Junya Sato, Keisuke Tateishi, Takehito Otsubo
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2024; 34(2): 171.     CrossRef
  • Endosonografische Drainage der Gallenblase wegen akuter Cholezystitis bei Patienten mit hohem Operationsrisiko
    Markus Zachäus, Michael Bartels, Andreas Flade, Andreas Schubert-Hartmann, Regina Lamberts, Alireza Sepehri-Shamloo, Ulrich Paul Halm
    Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.2023; 148(02): 140.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and aspiration in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy
    Takayuki Iwamoto, Takahiro Suda, Takanori Inoue, Yasutoshi Nozaki, Rui Mizumoto, Yuki Arimoto, Takashi Ohta, Shinjiro Yamaguchi, Yoshiki Ito, Hideki Hagiwara, Rizaldy Taslim Pinzon
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(8): e0288463.     CrossRef
  • Strategy Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage to Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage, Following Failed Emergent Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage
    Ryota Sagami, Kazuhiro Mizukami, Takao Sato, Hidefumi Nishikiori, Kazunari Murakami
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(22): 7034.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis
    Anri Kaneta, Hirotaka Sasada, Takuma Matsumoto, Tsuyoshi Sakai, Shuichi Sato, Takashi Hara
    BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound in the management of acute cholecystitis
    J.L. Teh, Mihai Rimbas, Alberto Larghi, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 60-61: 101806.     CrossRef
  • Interventional endoscopic ultrasound
    Christoph F. Dietrich, Barbara Braden, Christian Jenssen
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2021; 37(5): 449.     CrossRef
  • The Bad Gallbladder
    Miloš Buhavac, Ali Elsaadi, Sharmila Dissanaike
    Surgical Clinics of North America.2021; 101(6): 1053.     CrossRef
  • 6,300 View
  • 196 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Role of Cardiac Septal Occluders in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Fistulas: A Systematic Review
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura, Alberto Baptista, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura, Christopher Thompson
Clin Endosc 2020;53(1):37-48.   Published online July 9, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.030
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Treating gastrointestinal (GI) fistulas endoscopically is challenging owing to an established epithelial tract. The variety of endoscopic approaches is transforming endoscopy into a first-line therapy. However, many sessions are often required, with variable success rates. Owing to these limitations, the off-label use of cardiac septal occluders (CSOs) has been reported.
We searched for articles related to CSOs in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and LILACS databases and gray literature. The primary outcomes included technical success, clinical success, and safety of CSOs in GI fistula management.
A total of 25,574 records were identified, and 19 studies ultimately satisfied the inclusion criteria. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Of the 22 fistulas, 77.27% had successful closure, with a mean follow-up period of 32.02 weeks. The adverse event rate was 22.72%, with no associated mortality. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses showed no significant difference in the success of closure and adverse events in relation to several variables among the subgroups.
The use of CSOs appeared to be technically feasible, effective, and safe in the treatment of GI fistulas. The satisfactory results derived from this sparse literature suggest that it can be an option in the management of GI fistulas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic closure of a recto-pelvic fistula with a cardiac septal occluder device
    Ayowumi A. Adekolu, Ethan M. Cohen, Sardar Momin Shah-Khan, Soban Maan, Joyce Foryoung, Ademola Ajibade, Shyam Thakkar, Shailendra Singh
    VideoGIE.2024; 9(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • Cardiac Septal Occluder for Refractory Anastamotic Leak
    Marcel Tomaszewski, Cameron McAlister, Janarthanan Sathananthan, Fergal Donnellan
    Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2023; 6(5): 153.     CrossRef
  • Use of atrial septal occluder in the treatment of chronic fistula following post-esophagectomy anastomotic leak
    Manisha Daminda Kariyawasam, Jonathan Liang Yap, Zehao Tan, Tiffany Lye, Weng Hoong Chan, Jeremy Tian Hui Tan, Chin Hong Lim
    Endoscopy.2023; 55(S 01): E1005.     CrossRef
  • Closure of a Bronchoesophageal Fistula After Lung Transplantation With an Amplatzer Occluder Device
    Erik J. Orozco-Hernandez, David McGiffin, Gregory Von Mering, Mustafa Ahmed, Joseph Thachuthara-George, Kondal R. Kyanam-Kabir-Baig, Charles W. Hoopes
    Annals of Thoracic Surgery Short Reports.2023; 1(2): 332.     CrossRef
  • Choosing the best endoscopic approach for post-bariatric surgical leaks and fistulas: Basic principles and recommendations
    Victor Lira de Oliveira, Alexandre Moraes Bestetti, Roberto Paolo Trasolini, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(7): 1173.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic closure of refractory upper GI–tracheobronchial fistulas with a novel occluder: a prospective, single-arm, single-center study (with video)
    Lurong Li, Yun Wang, Chang Zhu, Jianyu Wei, Weifeng Zhang, Huaiming Sang, Han Chen, Haisheng Qian, Miao Xu, Jiahao Liu, Shuxian Jin, Yu Jin, Wangjian Zha, Wei Song, Yi Zhu, Jiwang Wang, Simon K. Lo, Guoxin Zhang
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(5): 859.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Treatment of Non-malignant Esophageal Perforation: Time to Go Vacuum?
    Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Bruno Salomão Hirsch, Heli Clóvis de Medeiros Neto, Victor Lira de Oliveira, Alexandre Moraes Bestetti, Bruna Furia Buzetti Hourneaux de Moura, Mouen A. Khashab, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2023; 21(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Technical Review on Endoscopic Treatment Devices for Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Postsurgical Leaks
    Renato Medas, Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto, Eiji Sakai
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Management of a Chronic Gastrocutaneous Fistula after Bariatric Revisional Surgery Using a Novel Cardiac Septal Occluder
    Mariana Kumaira Fonseca, Nelson Heitor Vieira Coelho, João Luiz Langer Manica, Rafael Ramos Ramblo, Ingrid Elisa Spier, Artur Pacheco Seabra
    GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 30(Suppl. 1): 52.     CrossRef
  • Catheter-based deployment of vascular plugs for the management of challenging gastric fistulae
    Prashanth Rau, Philip McNamara, Ikechukwu Achebe, Dimitri Belkin, Odel Zadeh, Neil B. Marya
    VideoGIE.2023; 8(12): 497.     CrossRef
  • Long-term endoscopic follow-up after closure of a post-bariatric surgery fistula with a cardiac septal defect occluder
    Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Mateus Bond Boghossian, Bruno Salomão Hirsch, Thomas R. McCarty, Alberto Jose Baptista, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    Endoscopy.2022; 54(03): E127.     CrossRef
  • Status of bariatric endoscopy–what does the surgeon need to know? A review
    Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Anna Carolina Batista Dantas, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Thomas R McCarty, Flávio Roberto Takeda, Marco Aurelio Santo, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2022; 14(2): 185.     CrossRef
  • Tailored endoscopic treatment of tracheo-oesophageal fistula using preoperative holographic assessment and a cardiac septal occluder
    Stefano Siboni, Angelo Fabio D'Aiello, Massimo Chessa, Luigi Bonavina
    BMJ Case Reports.2022; 15(3): e248981.     CrossRef
  • Closure of recurrent colovaginal fistulas using AMPLATZER occluder device
    Joseph Simmons, Ahmed Sherif, Jason Mader, Saba Altarawneh, Mehiar El-Hamdani, Wesam Frandah
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2022; 9(1): e000921.     CrossRef
  • Acquired Benign Tracheoesophageal Fistula
    Hasnain S. Bawaadam, Matthew Russell, Yaron B. Gesthalter
    Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology.2022; 29(3): e38.     CrossRef
  • Adequate Management of Postoperative Complications after Esophagectomy: A Cornerstone for a Positive Outcome
    Imad Kamaleddine, Alexander Hendricks, Magdalena Popova, Clemens Schafmayer
    Cancers.2022; 14(22): 5556.     CrossRef
  • Colovaginal fistula closure using a cardiac septal defect occluder
    Omar Sadiq, Stephen Simmer, Andrew Watson, Marvin Eng, Tiberio Frisoli, Tobias Zuchelli
    VideoGIE.2021; 6(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • Cardiac septal occluder for closure of persistent gastrogastric fistula
    Ki-Yoon Kim, Matthew J. Skinner
    VideoGIE.2021; 6(7): 294.     CrossRef
  • Role and possibilities of endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in the treatment of transmural defects of upper gastrointestinal tract
    Vladimir Alekseevich Porkhanov, Stanislav Nikolayevich Pyatakov, Alexander Gennadievich Baryshev, Denis Mikhailovich Melnik, Maxim Sergeevich Shevchenko, Mikhail Ilyich Bykov, Svetlana Nikolaevna Pyatakova
    Hirurg (Surgeon).2021; (1): 5.     CrossRef
  • A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks
    Mihajlo Gjeorgjievski, Zaid Imam, Mitchell S. Cappell, Laith H. Jamil, Michel Kahaleh
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2021; 55(7): 551.     CrossRef
  • 7,641 View
  • 272 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref
Close layer
Efficacy of Nasobiliary Tubes and Biliary Stents in Management of Patients with Bile Leak after Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
Ali Raza, Anam Omer, Sara Iqbal, Vineet Gudsoorkar, Pramoda Koduru, Kumar Krishnan
Clin Endosc 2019;52(2):159-167.   Published online March 29, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.118
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Bile leak is one of the most common complications of liver transplantation. The treatment options for bile leaks include conservative management, surgical re-intervention, percutaneous drainage and endoscopic drainage. We aimed to perform a systematic review to identify the efficacy of endoscopic treatment in the resolution of post-transplant bile leaks. Methods: Two independent reviewers performed systematic literature search in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, grey literature and relevant references in May 2017. Human studies in English with documented post-liver transplant bile leaks were included. Results: Thirty-four studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled efficacy of biliary stents for the resolution of post-transplant bile leaks was 82.43% compared with 87.15% efficacy of nasobiliary tubes. The efficacy of biliary stents was lower for anastomotic leaks (69.23%) compared to T-tube (90.9%) or cut-surface/ cystic duct stump related leaks (92.8%). Similarly, the efficacy of nasobiliary tube was also lower for anastomotic leaks (58.33%) compared to T-tube or cut-surface related leaks (100%). Conclusions: In this systematic review, the overall efficacy was 82.43% in biliary stent group, and 87.15% in nasobiliary tube group. Both biliary stent and nasobiliary tube were more effective in managing non-anastomotic leaks compared to anastomotic leaks.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Application of percutaneous biliary drainage in the treatment of post-operative bile leakage after liver rupture: A case report
    Jinlong Chen, Zhikuan Wang, Lixin Zhang, Xi Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Hong Chen, Xiaoqiang Tong, Yanchao Dong
    Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A nomogram for prediction of ERCP success in patients with bile duct leaks: a multicenter study
    De-xin Chen, Sheng-xin Chen, Sen-lin Hou, Gui-hai Wen, Hai-kun Yang, Da-peng Shi, Qing-xin Lu, Ya-qi Zhai, Ming-yang Li
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(5): 2465.     CrossRef
  • Complications in Post-Liver Transplant Patients
    Carlotta Agostini, Simone Buccianti, Matteo Risaliti, Laura Fortuna, Luca Tirloni, Rosaria Tucci, Ilenia Bartolini, Gian Luca Grazi
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(19): 6173.     CrossRef
  • Nasobiliary drainage: an effective treatment for pruritus in cholestatic liver disease
    Wafaa Ahmed, Rebecca Jeyaraj, David Reffitt, John Devlin, Abid Suddle, John Hunt, Michael A Heneghan, Phillip Harrison, Deepak Joshi
    Frontline Gastroenterology.2022; 13(5): 416.     CrossRef
  • A case of combined use of endoscopic drainage and percutaneous drainage for traumatic liver injury type III b
    Shigekuni Okumura, Jun Oda, Yousuke Minami, Masaru Hirayama, Kennta Aida
    Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine.2021; 28(3): 210.     CrossRef
  • Biliary Complications Following Adult Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors and Implications at a High-volume US Center
    Abraham J. Matar, Katie Ross-Driscoll, Lisa Kenney, Hannah K. Wichmann, Joseph F. Magliocca, William H. Kitchens
    Transplantation Direct.2021; 7(10): e754.     CrossRef
  • The Need for a Better-Designed Study of the Outcomes of Endoscopic Management of Bile Leak
    Hyung Ku Chon, Eun Ji Shin, Seong-Hun Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(6): 633.     CrossRef
  • 6,058 View
  • 100 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Using a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review
Deepanshu Jain, Bharat Singh Bhandari, Nikhil Agrawal, Shashideep Singhal
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):450-462.   Published online June 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.024
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Surgery remains the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis except in high-risk candidates where percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD), endoscopic transpapillary cystic duct stenting (ET-CDS), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) are potential choices. PT-GBD is contraindicated in patients with coagulopathy or ascites and is not preferred by patients owing to aesthetic reasons. ET-CDS is successful only if the cystic duct can be visualized and cannulated. For 189 patients who underwent EUS-GBD via insertion of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), the composite technical success rate was 95.2%, which increased to 96.8% when LAMS was combined with co-axial self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). The composite clinical success rate was 96.7%. We observed a small risk of recurrent cholecystitis (5.1%), gastrointestinal bleeding (2.6%) and stent migration (1.1%). Cautery enhanced LAMS significantly decreases the stent deployment time compared to non-cautery enhanced LAMS. Prophylactic placement of a pigtail stent or SEMS through the LAMS avoids re-interventions, particularly in patients, where it is intended to remain in situ indefinitely. Limited evidence suggests that the efficacy of EUS-GBD via LAMS is comparable to that of PT-GBD with the former showing better results in postoperative pain, length of hospitalization, and need for antibiotics. EUS-GBD via LAMS is a safe and efficacious option when performed by experts.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • International Consensus Recommendations for Safe Use of LAMS for On- and Off-Label Indications Using a Modified Delphi Process
    Sebastian Stefanovic, Douglas G. Adler, Alexander Arlt, Todd H. Baron, Kenneth F. Binmoeller, Michiel Bronswijk, Marco J. Bruno, Jean-Baptiste Chevaux, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Helena Degroote, Pierre H. Deprez, Peter V. Draganov, Pierre Eisendrath, Marc
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 119(4): 671.     CrossRef
  • Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue approach in cases of unsuccessful biliary drainage
    Alessandro Fugazza, Kareem Khalaf, Katarzyna M Pawlak, Marco Spadaccini, Matteo Colombo, Marta Andreozzi, Marco Giacchetto, Silvia Carrara, Chiara Ferrari, Cecilia Binda, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Andrea Anderloni, Alessandro Repici
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(1): 70.     CrossRef
  • Role of advanced endoscopy in the management of inflammatory digestive diseases (pancreas and biliary tract)
    Toshiharu Ueki, Toru Maruo, Yoshinori Igarashi, Akira Yamamiya, Keiichi Tominaga, Atsushi Irisawa, Hitoshi Yoshida, Terumi Kamisawa, Mamoru Takenaka, Hiroyuki Isayama
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(5): 546.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage Conversion versus Conservative Treatment Following Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage in High-Risk Surgical Patients
    Hyung Ku Chon, Seong-Hun Kim, Tae Hyeon Kim
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(2): 348.     CrossRef
  • Acalculous Cholecystitis in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review
    Evanthia Thomaidou, Eleni Karlafti, Matthaios Didagelos, Kalliopi Megari, Eleni Argiriadou, Karolina Akinosoglou, Daniel Paramythiotis, Christos Savopoulos
    Viruses.2024; 16(3): 455.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with transmural use of LAMS in patients with liver cirrhosis: International multicenter study
    Faisal Nimri, Yervant Ichkhanian, Brianna Shinn, Thomas E. Kowalski, David E. Loren, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, Alina Tantau, Martha Arevalo, Ashraf Taha, Omar Shamaa, Maria Chavarria Viales, Mouen A. Khashab, Stephen Simmer, Sumit Singla, Cyru
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(06): E740.     CrossRef
  • Salvage endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy as a bridge to definitive surgical therapy for duodenal adenocarcinoma presenting with duodenal stent obstruction
    Tiffany Z. Yu, Abishek Agnihotri, Richard Zheng, Babar Bashir, Nayeem Nasher, Charles J. Yeo, Avinoam Nevler, Harish Lavu, Wilbur B. Bowne, Anand Kumar
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 16(3): 387.     CrossRef
  • Lumen-apposing-metal stent misdeployment in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainages: A systematic review focusing on issues and rescue management
    Elia Armellini, Flavio Metelli, Andrea Anderloni, Anna Cominardi, Giovanni Aragona, Michele Marini, Fabio Pace
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(21): 3341.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021
    Naotaka Fujita, Ichiro Yasuda, Itaru Endo, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takuji Iwashita, Toshiharu Ueki, Kenichiro Uemura, Akiko Umezawa, Akio Katanuma, Yu Katayose, Yutaka Suzuki, Junichi Shoda, Toshio Tsuyuguchi, Toshifumi Wakai, Kazuo Inui, Michiaki Unno, Yoshifu
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(9): 801.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, Indications, and Criteria of Arteriovenous Fistula Ligation Following Kidney Transplant: A Patient-Driven Approach
    Aimee H Dubin, Julia Martin-Velez, Nathan T Shenkute, Alexander H Toledo
    Experimental and Clinical Transplantation.2023; 21(6): 487.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the long-term outcomes of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage and endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for calculous cholecystitis in poor surgical candidates: a multicenter propensity score–matched analysis
    Tadahisa Inoue, Michihiro Yoshida, Yuta Suzuki, Rena Kitano, Kenji Urakabe, Kenichi Haneda, Fumihiro Okumura, Itaru Naitoh
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(3): 362.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transluminal Gallbladder Drainage in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis
    Shayan S. Irani, Neil R. Sharma, Andrew C. Storm, Raj J. Shah, Prabhleen Chahal, Field F. Willingham, Lee Swanstrom, Todd H. Baron, Eran Shlomovitz, Richard A. Kozarek, Joyce A. Peetermans, Edmund McMullen, Evelyne Ho, Schalk W. van der Merwe
    Annals of Surgery.2023; 278(3): e556.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Naso-gallbladder Drainage Using a Dedicated Catheter for Acute Cholecystitis After Transpapillary Metal Stent Placement for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
    Tadahisa Inoue, Rena Kitano, Mayu Ibusuki, Kazumasa Sakamoto, Satoshi Kimoto, Yuji Kobayashi, Yoshio Sumida, Yukiomi Nakade, Kiyoaki Ito, Masashi Yoneda
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2023; 68(12): 4449.     CrossRef
  • Current status of endoscopic management of cholecystitis
    Se Woo Park, Sang Soo Lee
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(3): 439.     CrossRef
  • Gallstone Disease in Cirrhosis—Pathogenesis and Management
    Bipadabhanjan Mallick, Anil C. Anand
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology.2022; 12(2): 551.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage in Pancreatobiliary Diseases
    Tae Hyeon Kim, Hyung Ku Chon
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 79(5): 203.     CrossRef
  • Determinants of outcomes of transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: systematic review with proportion meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Carlo Fabbri, Cecilia Binda, Monica Sbrancia, Elton Dajti, Chiara Coluccio, Giorgio Ercolani, Andrea Anderloni, Alessandro Cucchetti
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(11): 7974.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Study of Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis: A Comprehensive Review
    Yantao Fu, Liwei Pang, Wanlin Dai, Shuodong Wu, Jing Kong
    Digestive Diseases.2022; 40(4): 468.     CrossRef
  • Successful treatment of cholecystolithiasis by ERCP: A case report and literature review (with video)
    Ge Zhang, Jie Lin Li, Ming Ji, Shu Tian Zhang, Peng Li, Yong Jun Wang, Yong Dong Wu
    Journal of Digestive Diseases.2022; 23(5-6): 341.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic and Therapeutic Indications for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) in Patients with Pancreatic and Biliary Disease—Novel Interventional Procedures
    Manfred Prager, Elfi Prager, Christian Sebesta, Christian Sebesta
    Current Oncology.2022; 29(9): 6211.     CrossRef
  • Biliary Sepsis Due to Recurrent Acute Calculus Cholecystitis (ACC) in a High Surgical-Risk Elderly Patient: An Unexpected Complication
    Giacomo Sermonesi, Alessia Rampini, Girolamo Convertini, Raffaele Bova, Nicola Zanini, Riccardo Bertelli, Carlo Vallicelli, Francesco Favi, Giacomo Stacchini, Enrico Faccani, Nicola Fabbri, Fausto Catena
    Pathogens.2022; 11(12): 1423.     CrossRef
  • Use of Transmural Cholecystic Stents for Management of Acute Cholecystitis
    Mary Bokenkamp, Pedro Teixeira
    Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery.2022; 11(3): 176.     CrossRef
  • Identification of risk factors for obstructive cholecystitis following placement of biliary stent in unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: a 5-year retrospective analysis in single center
    Jang Han Jung, Se Woo Park, Bomi Hyun, Jin Lee, Dong Hee Koh, Doocheol Chung
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(6): 2679.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage
    Zain A. Sobani, Christina Ling, Tarun Rustagi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(7): 2154.     CrossRef
  • Managing Gallstone Disease in the Elderly
    Ankit Chhoda, Saurabh S. Mukewar, SriHari Mahadev
    Clinics in Geriatric Medicine.2021; 37(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • Percutaneous Cholecystolithotomy: An Alternative to Cholecystectomy after Cholecystostomy Tube Placement in the Truly High-Risk Surgical Patient
    Taylor S. Riall
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2021; 232(2): 201.     CrossRef
  • Gallbladder: Role of Interventional Radiology
    Matthew Antalek, Ahsun Riaz, Albert A. Nemcek
    Seminars in Interventional Radiology.2021; 38(03): 330.     CrossRef
  • Interventional endoscopic ultrasound
    Christoph F. Dietrich, Barbara Braden, Christian Jenssen
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2021; 37(5): 449.     CrossRef
  • New Stents for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Procedures
    Gunn Huh, Tae Jun Song
    The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract.2021; 26(4): 248.     CrossRef
  • Gallbladder Cryoablation: Other Endoscopic Options for High-Risk Patients with Cholecystitis
    Jason Jones, Harry R. Aslanian, Thiruvengadam Muniraj
    The American Journal of Medicine.2021; 134(11): e565.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage for Cholecystitis in Poor Surgical Candidates: An Updated Comprehensive Review
    Tadahisa Inoue, Michihiro Yoshida, Yuta Suzuki, Rena Kitano, Fumihiro Okumura, Itaru Naitoh
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(21): 4842.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy in surgery
    Ahmet Serdar Karaca, M. Mahir Özmen, Ahmet Çınar Yastı, Seher Demirer
    Turkish Journal of Surgery.2021; 37(2): 83.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage: Current Perspectives


    Alessandro Fugazza, Matteo Colombo, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni
    Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2020; Volume 13: 193.     CrossRef
  • An unusual complication of pyloric ring obstruction caused by flange of lumen apposing metal stent in endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage
    Seung Young Seo, Chang Hun Lee, In Hee Kim, Sang Wook Kim, Seung Ok Lee, Soo Teik Lee, Seong-Hun Kim
    Medicine.2020; 99(27): e21017.     CrossRef
  • Endoprosthetics for luminal obstruction
    Alessandro Fugazza, Antonio Capogreco, Alessandro Repici
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 22(4): 192.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Enteroenterostomy for Afferent Limb Syndrome
    Hicham El Bacha, Sarah Leblanc, Benoit Bordacahar, Bertrand Brieau, Maximillien Barret, Eric Savier, Olivier Soubrane, Bertand Dousset, Frederic Prat
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2020; 7(8): e00442.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for the management of acute calculus cholecystitis patients unfit for urgent cholecystectomy
    Tae Hyeon Kim, Dong Eun Park, Hyung Ku Chon, Ezio Lanza
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(10): e0240219.     CrossRef
  • When cholecystostomy tube and transpapillary stents for recurrent cholecystitis fail due to large gallstones: rescue with laser lithotripsy via cholecystoduodenal fistula
    Jennifer T. Higa, Shayan S. Irani
    VideoGIE.2020; 5(12): 660.     CrossRef
  • Which Are the Most Suitable Stents for Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound?
    Se Woo Park, Sang Soo Lee
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(11): 3595.     CrossRef
  • Conversion of percutaneous cholecystostomy to transmural endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage in malignant biliary obstruction
    Motoyasu Kan, Yusuke Hashimoto, Taro Shibuki, Gen Kimura, Kumiko Umemoto, Kazuo Watanabe, Mitsuhito Sasaki, Hideaki Takahashi, Hiroshi Imaoka, Izumi Ohno, Shuichi Mitsunaga, Masafumi Ikeda
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2019; 8(2): 87.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Methods for Gallbladder Drainage
    Jennifer T. Higa, Shayan S. Irani
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2019; 17(3): 357.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic EUS: New tools, new devices, new applications
    Barbara Braden, Vipin Gupta, ChristophFrank Dietrich
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2019; 8(6): 370.     CrossRef
  • Adverse events with lumen-apposing metal stents in endoscopic gallbladder drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    BabuP Mohan, Ravishankar Asokkumar, Mohammed Shakhatreh, Rajat Garg, Suresh Ponnada, Udayakumar Navaneethan, DouglasG Adler
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2019; 8(4): 241.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes and limitations in EUS-guided gallbladder drainage
    AnthonyYuen Bun Teoh
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2019; 8(7): 40.     CrossRef
  • Cholécystite aiguë de réanimation
    T. Degroote, V. Chhor, M. Tran, F. Philippart, C. Bruel
    Médecine Intensive Réanimation.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients
    Alejandro L. Suarez, Song Mingjun, Thiruvengadam Muniraj, Priya Jamidar, Harry Aslanian
    VideoGIE.2018; 3(11): 364.     CrossRef
  • De-novo Gastrointestinal Anastomosis with Lumen Apposing Metal Stent
    Deepanshu Jain, Ankit Chhoda, Abhinav Sharma, Shashideep Singhal
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(5): 439.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in management of acalculous cholecystitis
    Bryan Balmadrid
    F1000Research.2018; 7: 1660.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound guided gallbladder drainage - is it ready for prime time?
    Umesha Boregowda, Chandraprakash Umapathy, Arpitha Nanjappa, Helen Wong, Madhav Desai, Marina Roytman, Thimmaiah Theethira, Shreyas Saligram
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics.2018; 9(6): 47.     CrossRef
  • 7,135 View
  • 258 Download
  • 44 Web of Science
  • 49 Crossref
Close layer
Carbon Dioxide versus Air Insufflation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Ramkaji Baniya, Sunil Upadhaya, Jahangir Khan, Suresh K Subedi, Tabrez S Mohammed, Balvant K Ganatra, Ghassan Bachuwa
Clin Endosc 2017;50(5):464-472.   Published online May 18, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.161
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with air insufflation is commonly used for the staging and treatment of early gastric carcinoma. However, carbon dioxide (CO2) use has been shown to cause less post-procedural pain and fewer adverse events. The objective of this study was to compare the post-procedural pain and adverse events associated with CO2 and air insufflation in ESD.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the two approaches in ESD. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to analyze the data. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results
Four RCTs with a total of 391 patients who underwent ESD were included in our meta-analysis. The difference in maximal post-procedural pain between the two groups was statistically significant (MD, -7.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.6 – -1.21; p=0.020). However, no significant differences were found in the length of procedure, end-tidal CO2, rate of perforation, and postprocedural hemorrhage between the two groups. The incidence of overall adverse events was significantly lower in the CO2 group (OR, 0.51; CI, 0.32–0.84; p=0.007).
Conclusions
CO2 insufflation in gastric ESD is associated with less post-operative pain and discomfort, and a lower risk of overall adverse events compared with air insufflation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management of perforations during endoscopic resection
    Ludovico Alfarone, Marco Spadaccini, Alessandro Repici, Cesare Hassan, Roberta Maselli
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 69: 101900.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of post-ERCP complications
    Lotfi Triki, Andrea Tringali, Marianna Arvanitakis, Tommaso Schepis
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 69: 101906.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review
    Diogo Libânio, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes, Barbara Bastiaansen, Raf Bisschops, Michael J. Bourke, Pierre H. Deprez, Gianluca Esposito, Arnaud Lemmers, Philippe Leclercq, Roberta Maselli, Helmut Messmann, Oliver Pech, Mathieu Pioche, Michael Vieth, Bas L.A.M. We
    Endoscopy.2023; 55(04): 361.     CrossRef
  • The future of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer
    Raquel Ortigão, Diogo Libânio, Mário Dinis‐Ribeiro
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 125(7): 1110.     CrossRef
  • Massive pneumoperitoneum with abdominal pain and fever mimicking delayed perforation following endoscopic resection: A case report
    Jen‐Hao Yeh, Jen‐Chieh Chen, Chia‐Chang Hsu, Wen‐Lun Wang, Chih‐Wen Lin
    Advances in Digestive Medicine.2021; 8(2): 121.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Management of Iatrogenic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Perforations Based on the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Position Statement
    Young Jung Kim, Chang Hwan Park
    The Korean Journal of Medicine.2021; 96(4): 318.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection: How to be more efficient?
    Thomas Lambin, Jérôme Rivory, Timothée Wallenhorst, Romain Legros, Frédéric Monzy, Jérémie Jacques, Mathieu Pioche
    Endoscopy International Open.2021; 09(11): E1720.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement – Update 2020
    Gregorios A. Paspatis, Marianna Arvanitakis, Jean-Marc Dumonceau, Marc Barthet, Brian Saunders, Stine Ydegaard Turino, Angad Dhillon, Maria Fragaki, Jean-Michel Gonzalez, Alessandro Repici, Roy L.J. van Wanrooij, Jeanin E. van Hooft
    Endoscopy.2020; 52(09): 792.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Healing of Ulcers after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Eunju Jeong, In kyung Yoo, Ozlem Ozer Cakir, Hee Kyung Kim, Won Hee Kim, Sung Pyo Hong, Joo Young Cho
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(5): 472.     CrossRef
  • Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Is It an Urgent Need?
    Chang Seok Bang, Gwang Ho Baik
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(5): 407.     CrossRef
  • 9,238 View
  • 148 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP