Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Hiroyuki Okada 4 Articles
Diagnostic Ability of Convex-Arrayed Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Major Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer
Yuki Fujii, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Hironari Kato, Yosuke Saragai, Saimon Takada, Sho Mizukawa, Shinichiro Muro, Daisuke Uchida, Takeshi Tomoda, Shigeru Horiguchi, Noriyuki Tanaka, Hiroyuki Okada
Clin Endosc 2019;52(5):479-485.   Published online May 16, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.163
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for major vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer and to evaluate the relationship between EUS findings and pathological distance.
Methods
In total, 57 consecutive patients who underwent EUS for pancreatic cancer before surgery were retrospectively reviewed. EUS image findings were divided into four types according to the relationship between the tumor and major vessel (types 1 and 2: invasion, types 3 and 4: non-invasion). We also compared the EUS findings and pathologically measured distances between the tumors and evaluated vessels.
Results
The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS diagnosis for vascular invasion were 89%, 92%, and 91%, respectively, in the veins and 83%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, in the arteries. The pathologically evaluated distances of cases with type 2 EUS findings were significantly shorter than those of cases with type 3 EUS findings in both the major veins (median [interquartile range], 96 [0–742] µm vs. 2,833 [1,076–5,694] µm, p=0.012) and arteries (623 [0–854] µm vs. 3,097 [1,396–6,000] µm, p=0.0061). All cases with a distance of ≥1,000 µm between the tumors and main vessels were correctly diagnosed.
Conclusions
Tumors at a distance ≥1,000 µm from the main vessels were correctly diagnosed by EUS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Staging and Vascular Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer
    Mohammed A El-Nady, Khalid A Ead, Mustafa A Haridy, Nour Shaheen, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Saad R Abdelwahid, Mohammed F Mohammed, Omran Mohamed, Safwat S Sawy, Emad Abdelrazzak, Amro M Hassan
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound vs. contrast-enhanced computed tomography in local staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a bi-national multicenter study
    Wisam Sbeit, Mahmoud Salman, Abed Khalaileh, Ahmad Zoabi, Zakhar Bramnik, David Hovel, Mahmud Mahamid, Eran Israeli, Lior Katz, Reem Khoury, Nama Mubariki, Andrea Lisotti, Halim Awadie, Tawfik Khoury
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 35(9): 974.     CrossRef
  • Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Abhirup Chatterjee, Jimil Shah
    Diagnostics.2023; 14(1): 78.     CrossRef
  • The expanding role of endoscopic ultrasound elastography
    Jahnvi Dhar, Jayanta Samanta
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 15(5): 841.     CrossRef
  • Experience of introduction of endoscopic ultrasonography into daily clinical practice in a surgical hospital
    A.V. Zhdanov, E.G. Solonitsyn, E.A. Korymasov
    Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya.2020; 26(5): 24.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer
    Seong-Hun Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(5): 397.     CrossRef
  • 5,456 View
  • 123 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transgastric Drainage of an IntraAbdominal Abscess following Gastrectomy
Satoru Kikuchi, Tetsushi Kubota, Shinji Kuroda, Masahiko Nishizaki, Shunsuke Kagawa, Hironari Kato, Hiroyuki Okada, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Clin Endosc 2019;52(4):373-376.   Published online February 15, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.134
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transgastric drainage has been performed as a less invasive procedure for pancreatic fistulas and intra-abdominal abscesses occurring after surgery in recent years. However, there are no reports of EUS-guided transgastric drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses following gastrectomy. This case report describes 2 patients who developed an intra-abdominal abscess following gastrectomy and underwent EUS-guided transgastric drainage. Both patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction for gastric cancer. The intra-abdominal abscesses were caused by postoperative pancreatic fistula that developed following gastrectomy. One patient underwent naso-cystic drainage and the other underwent only a needle puncture of the abscess cavity. EUS-guided drainage was performed safely and effectively, although 1 patient developed gastroduodenal anastomotic leakage related to this procedure. In summary, EUS-guided transgastric drainage is safe and technically feasible even in post-gastrectomy patients. However, it is necessary to be careful if this procedure is performed in the early period following gastrectomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Case of Intra-abdominal Abcess following a Pancreatic Fistula after Gastrectomy Treated with Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transgastric Drainage
    Kenichi ISHIBAYASHI, Toshikatsu TSUJI, Daisuke YAMAMOTO, Hirotaka KITAMURA, Shinichi KADOYA, Hiroyuki BANDO
    Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2020; 81(6): 1097.     CrossRef
  • 6,789 View
  • 125 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
A “Back Light System” for Identification of Sites for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Masses: A Prospective, Randomized Study with a Crossover Design
Ryo Harada, Hironari Kato, Soichiro Fushimi, Hirofumi Inoue, Daisuke Uchida, Yutaka Akimoto, Takeshi Tomoda, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Yasuhiro Noma, Naoki Yamamoto, Shigeru Horiguchi, Koichiro Tsutsumi, Hiroyuki Okada
Clin Endosc 2019;52(4):334-339.   Published online May 16, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.004
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: We applied a back light system (BLS) with a magnifying glass to improve the ability to assess the adequacy of specimen sampling using endosonography. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of the BLS in sampling of specimens by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses.
Methods
This was a prospective, randomized, crossover, single-center clinical trial. An endosonographer evaluated adequacy on gross visual inspection and identified whitish specimen sampling sites with and without the BLS according to a randomization sequence in the first and second passes with a 25-G needle. On cytological evaluation, the presence of well-defined pancreatic ductal epithelium was evaluated by a cytopathologist who was blinded to any clinical information.
Results
A total of 80 consecutive patients were eligible during the study period. Adequacy was observed for 52 specimens (65%) with the BLS and 54 (68%) without the BLS (p=0.88). In assessment of specimen adequacy on gross examination, only fair agreement was observed both with and without BLS (kappa score 0.40 and 0.29, respectively).
Conclusions
The BLS did not influence the ability to identify specimen sampling sites or reliable assessment of specimen site adequacy using gross visual inspection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tissue processing of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens from solid pancreatic lesions
    Kenji Notohara, Kaori Nakamura
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2024; 51(2): 261.     CrossRef
  • Macroscopic qualitative evaluation of solid pancreatic lesion specimens from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsies
    Kaori Nakamura, Kenji Notohara, Ryoji Nishizaki, Etsuji Ishida, Midori Sato, Akemi Kodera, Junya Itakura, Motowo Mizuno
    Pancreatology.2023; 23(8): 1028.     CrossRef
  • Unfortunately, a “Back Light System” As a Global Positioning System Failed to Guide the Route in 25-G Fine-Needle Aspiration
    Rungsun Rerknimitr, Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(4): 295.     CrossRef
  • 4,801 View
  • 88 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Predictive Factors for Inaccurate Diagnosis of Swollen Lymph Nodes in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Yuki Fujii, Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Kaori Masu, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Yujiro Kawakami, Toji Murabayashi, Fumisato Kozakai, Yutaka Noda, Hiroyuki Okada, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2019;52(2):152-158.   Published online January 7, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.125
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for inaccurate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes without rapid on-site cytopathological evaluation.
Methods
Eighty-three consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA for abdominal or mediastinal lymph nodes from January 2008 to June 2017 were included from a prospectively maintained EUS-FNA database and retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA for the detection of neoplastic diseases were calculated. Candidate factors for inaccurate diagnosis (lymph node size and location, needle type, puncture route, number of passes, and causative disease) were evaluated by comparison between accurately diagnosed cases and others.
Results
The final diagnosis of the punctured lymph node was classified as neoplastic (65 cases: a metastatic lymph node, malignant lymphoma, or Crow-Fukase syndrome) or non-neoplastic (18 cases: a reactive node or amyloidosis). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. On multivariate analyses, small size of the lymph node was the sole predictive factor for inaccurate EUS-FNA diagnosis with a significant difference (odds ratios, 19.8; 95% confidence intervals, 3.15–124; p=0.0015).
Conclusions
The lymph node size of <16 mm was the only independent factor associated with inaccurate EUS-FNA diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Role of EBUS‐TBNA/EUS‐FNA and mass spectrometry for diagnosis and typing of lymph node amyloidosis: 10‐year experience in two tertiary care academic centers
    Asghar Naqvi, Michael Bonert, Christian Finley, Katarzyna Czarnecka‐Kujawa, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Joerg Schwock, Vathany Kulasingam, Rohan John, Hyang‐Mi Ko
    Cancer Cytopathology.2023; 131(11): 724.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Deep-Seated Lymphadenopathies and Spleen Lesions: A Monocentric Experience
    Flaminia Bellisario, Fabia Attili, Fabrizia Campana, Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Silvia Bellesi, Elena Maiolo, Eleonora Alma, Rosalia Malafronte, Giuseppe Macis, Luigi Maria Larocca, Salvatore Annunziata, Francesco D’Alò, Stefan Hohaus
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(17): 2839.     CrossRef
  • Lymph node FNA cytology: Diagnostic performance and clinical implications of proposed diagnostic categories
    Vladislav V. Makarenko, Michelle E. DeLelys, Robert P. Hasserjian, Amy Ly
    Cancer Cytopathology.2022; 130(2): 144.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT)-positive mediastinal lymphadenopathies in patients with thoracic or extra-thoracic mali
    Dominique Béchade, Carine Bellera, Lisa Gauquelin, Isabelle Soubeyran, Pippa McKelvie-Sebileau, Marc Debled, François Chomy, Guilhem Roubaud, Marianne Fonck, Simon Pernot, Alexandre Roch, Anne-Laure Cazeau
    Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology.2022; 46(5): 101912.     CrossRef
  • High Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Linbin Chen, Yin Li, Xiaoyan Gao, Shiyong Lin, Longjun He, Guangyu Luo, Jianjun Li, Chunyu Huang, Guobao Wang, Qing Yang, Hongbo Shan
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(8): 2763.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions, Subepithelial Lesions, and Lymph Nodes Using Endoscopic Ultrasound
    Akashi Fujita, Shomei Ryozawa, Masafumi Mizuide, Yuki Tanisaka, Tomoya Ogawa, Masahiro Suzuki, Hiromune Katsuda, Yoichi Saito, Tomoaki Tashima, Kazuya Miyaguchi, Eiichi Arai, Tomonori Kawasaki, Yumi Mashimo
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(5): 1076.     CrossRef
  • Primary localized gastric amyloidosis: A scoping review of the literature from clinical presentations to prognosis
    Xin-Yu Lin, Dan Pan, Li-Xuan Sang, Bing Chang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(12): 1132.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Biopsy Device for Lymphadenopathy
    Yuki Tanisaka, Masafumi Mizuide, Akashi Fujita, Tomoya Ogawa, Ryuichiro Araki, Masahiro Suzuki, Hiromune Katsuda, Youichi Saito, Kazuya Miyaguchi, Tomoaki Tashima, Yumi Mashimo, Masami Yasuda, Shomei Ryozawa, Konstantinos Triantafyllou
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • How to Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of EUS-FNA in Abdominal and Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy?
    Tae Hyeon Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(2): 93.     CrossRef
  • 6,150 View
  • 88 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP