Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Jeong Eun Shin 3 Articles
Medical disputes related to advanced endoscopic procedures with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasonography for the management of pancreas and biliary tract diseases
Yoon Suk Lee, Jae-Young Jang, Jun Yong Bae, Eun Hye Oh, Yehyun Park, Yong Hwan Kwon, Jeong Eun Shin, Jun Kyu Lee, Tae Hee Lee, Chang Nyol Paik
Clin Endosc 2023;56(4):499-509.   Published online March 28, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.208
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-related adverse events (AEs) that eventually lead to medical disputes or claims on medical professional liability.
Methods
Medical disputes for ERCP/EUS-related AEs filed in the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency between April 2012 and August 2020 were evaluated using corresponding medical records. AEs were categorized into three sections: procedure-related, sedation-related, and safety-related AEs.
Results
Among a total of 34 cases, procedure-related AEs were 26 (76.5%; 12 duodenal perforations, 7 post-ERCP pancreatitis, 5 bleedings, 2 perforations combined with post-ERCP pancreatitis); sedation-related AEs were 5 (14.7%; 4 cardiac arrests, 1 desaturation), and safety-related AEs were 5 (8.8%; 1 follow-up loss for stent removal, 1 asphyxia, 1 fall). Regarding clinical outcomes, 20 (58.8%) were fatal and eventually succumbed to AEs. For the types of medical institutions, 21 cases (61.8%) occurred at tertiary or academic hospitals, and 13 (38.2%) occurred at community hospitals.
Conclusions
The ERCP/EUS-related AEs filed in Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency showed distinct features: duodenal perforation was the most frequent AE, and clinical outcomes were fatal, resulting in at least more than permanent physical impairment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Diagnostic Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasonography–Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Pancreas: A Comparison between Liquid-Based Preparation and Conventional Smear
    Jung-Soo Pyo, Dae Hyun Lim, Kyueng-Whan Min, Nae Yu Kim, Il Hwan Oh, Byoung Kwan Son
    Medicina.2024; 60(6): 930.     CrossRef
  • 2,307 View
  • 111 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories
Dae Young Cheung, Byung Ik Jang, Sang Wook Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyung Keun Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Won Jae Yoon, Yong Kang Lee, Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho, Hyun Phil Shin, Sun Young Cho, Woon Geon Shin, Kee Don Choi, Byung-Wook Kim, Joong Goo Kwon, Hee Chan Yang, Tae-Geun Gweon, Hyun Gun Kim, Dong-Won Ahn, Kwang Bum Cho, Sun Hee Kim, Kyong Hwa Hwang, Hee Hyuk Im
Clin Endosc 2020;53(3):276-285.   Published online May 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.106
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The area of endoscopic application has been continuously expanded since its introduction in the last century and the frequency of its use also increased stiffly in the last decades. Because gastrointestinal endoscopy is naturally exposed to diseased internal organs and contact with pathogenic materials, endoscopy mediated infection or disease transmission becomes a major concern in this field. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is not for single use and the proper reprocessing process is a critical factor for safe and reliable endoscopy procedures. What needed in these circumstances is a practical guideline for reprocessing the endoscope and its accessories which is feasible in the real clinical field to guarantee acceptable prevention of pathogen transmission. This guideline contains principles and instructions of the reprocessing procedure according to the step by step. And it newly includes general information and updated knowledge about endoscopy-mediated infection and disinfection. Multiple societies and working groups participated to revise; Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, the Korean Society of Gastroenterology, Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Nurses and Associates and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Through this cooperation, we enhanced communication and established a better concordance. We still need more researches in this field and fill up the unproven area. And our guidelines will be renewed accordingly.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and safety of three-dimensional magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal and small bowel examination
    Dong Jun Oh, Yea Je Lee, Sang Hoon Kim, Joowon Chung, Hyun Seok Lee, Ji Hyung Nam, Yun Jeong Lim, Thomas Lui Ka Luen
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(5): e0295774.     CrossRef
  • EUS-Guided Vascular Interventions: Recent Advances
    Sahib Singh, Saurabh Chandan, Sumant Inamdar, Kambiz S. Kadkhodayan, Jahnvi Dhar, Jayanta Samanta, Antonio Facciorusso
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(16): 4835.     CrossRef
  • Current status of the gastric cancer screening program in Korea
    Young-Il Kim, Il Ju Choi
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(5): 250.     CrossRef
  • Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement
    Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro, Heiko Pohl, Deepak Agrawal, Marianna Arvanitakis, Robin Baddeley, Elzbieta Bak, Pradeep Bhandari, Michael Bretthauer, Patricia Burga, Leigh Donnelly, Axel Eickhoff, Bu'Hussain Hayee, Michal F. Kaminski,
    Endoscopy.2022; 54(08): 797.     CrossRef
  • Current Evidence for a Paradigm Shift in Gastric Cancer Prevention From Endoscopic Screening toHelicobacter pyloriEradication in Korea
    Young-Il Kim, Il Ju Choi
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2022; 22(3): 169.     CrossRef
  • General guideline in the endoscopy room to avoid air-borne infection during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 688.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial
    Kwang Hyun Chung, Jeong Don Chae, Wonho Choe, Hyo Young Lee, Il Hwan Oh, Byoung Kwan Son
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 674.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopes that Complete Pre-Cleaning may be Stored Overnight until Next Morning for the Subsequent Reprocessing
    Soo-Jeong Cho
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(4): 449.     CrossRef
  • Accreditation program for gastrointestinal endoscopes reprocessing in Italy: An on-site survey
    Giancarlo Spinzi, Angelo Milano, Piero Brosolo, Paola Da Massa Carrara, Maurizio Labardi, Alberto Merighi, Luisa Riccardi, Francesco Torresan, Maurizio Capelli
    Endoscopy International Open.2021; 09(11): E1627.     CrossRef
  • Sans Standardization: Effective Endoscope Reprocessing
    Sameer K. Avasarala, Lawrence F. Muscarella, Atul C. Mehta
    Respiration.2021; 100(12): 1208.     CrossRef
  • 9,307 View
  • 328 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Updates on the Disinfection and Infection Control Process of the Accredited Endoscopy Unit
Jeong Eun Shin, Yunho Jung, Jeong Hoon Lee, Byoung Kwan Son, Jae-Young Jang, Hyung-Keun Kim, Byung Ik Jang, The Quality Management Committee and the Disinfection Management Committee of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Clin Endosc 2019;52(5):443-450.   Published online September 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.173
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
A thorough disinfection and infection control process associated with gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly important for the health and safety of the examinee and the medical staff involved in the procedure. Endoscopic reprocessing and disinfection are two of the most important steps in quality control of endoscopy. In 2019, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy updated the Accreditation of Qualified Endoscopy Unit assessment items for these quality indicators. Assessment of disinfection and infection control comprises 28 mandatory items in the categories of disinfection education, pre-cleaning, cleaning, disinfection, rinsing, drying, reprocessing, storage, endoscopic accessories, water bottle and connectors, space/facilities, personal protective equipment, disinfection ledger, and regulations regarding infection control and disinfection.
The updated Accreditation of Qualified Endoscopy Unit assessment items are useful for improving the quality of endoscopy by ensuring thorough inspection of endoscopic disinfection and infection control.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Analysis of sterilization efficiency and application cost of three low temperature sterilization methods
    Hui Chen, Jiawei Liu, Aiying Zeng, Nian Qin
    Review of Scientific Instruments.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intensive reprocessing of reusable bronchoscopes can reduce the false positive rate of Xpert MTB/RIF caused by nucleic acid residue
    Xingxing Jin, Qianfang Hu, Yishi Li, Xia Zhang, Wan Tao, Houyu Zhong, Qinghai Zhao
    Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases.2024; 37: 100476.     CrossRef
  • Infection control in the bronchoscopy suite: effective reprocessing and disinfection of reusable bronchoscopes
    Mamta S. Chhabria, Fabien Maldonado, Atul C. Mehta
    Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine.2023; 29(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy in surgery
    María Rita Rodríguez-Luna, Silvana Perretta
    Frontiers in Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Features of the work of an endoscopic nurse in Russia and other countries
    E. Yu. Pinina, S. S. Pirogov, N. Yu. Zarubina, A. S. Vodoleev, E. S. Karpova, A. D. Kaprin
    Filin’s Clinical endoscopy.2023; 62(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Korea: A Nationwide Survey and Population-Based Study
    Yunho Jung, Jung-Wook Kim, Jong Pil Im, Yu Kyung Cho, Tae Hee Lee, Jae-Young Jang
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A nationwide survey on the effectiveness of training on endoscope reprocessing within the national cancer screening program in Korea
    Hye Young Shin, Da Hun Jang, Jae Kwan Jun
    American Journal of Infection Control.2021; 49(8): 1031.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness Between Daily and After-Each-Case Room Disinfection of the Endoscopy Unit
    Bo Jin, Yue Hu, Liang Huang, Xiaoyun Cheng, Jin Zhao, Xuejing Yang, Xiling Sun, Tieer Gan, Bin Lu
    Frontiers in Public Health.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sans Standardization: Effective Endoscope Reprocessing
    Sameer K. Avasarala, Lawrence F. Muscarella, Atul C. Mehta
    Respiration.2021; 100(12): 1208.     CrossRef
  • Sharing Our Experience of Operating an Endoscopy Unit in the Midst of a COVID-19 Outbreak
    Jimin Han, Eun Young Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(2): 243.     CrossRef
  • 4,903 View
  • 158 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP