Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Lubna Kamani 4 Articles
Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Common Bile Duct Dilatation without Identifiable Etiology Detected from Cross-Sectional Imaging
Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Penprapai Hongsrisuwan, Lubna Kamani, Kotchakon Maipang, Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya
Clin Endosc 2022;55(1):122-127.   Published online January 3, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.122
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is warranted when cross-sectional imaging demonstrates common bile duct (CBD) dilatation without identifiable causes. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of EUS in CBD dilatation of unknown etiology.
Methods
Retrospective review of patients with dilated CBD without definite causes undergoing EUS between 2012 and 2017.
Results
A total of 131 patients were recruited. The mean age was 63.2±14.1 years. The most common manifestation was abnormal liver chemistry (85.5%). The mean CBD diameter was 12.2±4.1 mm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of EUS-identified pathologies, including malignancy, choledocholithiasis, and benign biliary stricture (BBS), was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.00). The AUROC of EUS for detecting malignancy, choledocholithiasis, and BBS was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.97), 1.00 (95% CI, 1.00-1.00), and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99), respectively. Male sex, alanine aminotransferase ≥3× the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase ≥3× the ULN, and intrahepatic duct dilatation were predictors for pathological obstruction, with odds ratios of 5.46 (95%CI, 1.74-17.1), 5.02 (95% CI, 1.48-17.0), 4.63 (95% CI, 1.1-19.6), and 4.03 (95% CI, 1.37-11.8), respectively.
Conclusions
EUS provides excellent diagnostic value in identifying the etiology of CBD dilatation detected by cross-sectional imaging.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Incidental findings of gallbladder and bile ducts – Management strategies: Normal findings, anomalies, “silent gallstones” and bile duct dilatation - A World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) position paper
    Christian Jenssen, Christian P. Nolsøe, Torben Lorentzen, Jae Young Lee, Nitin Chaubal, Kathleen Möller, Caroline Ewertsen, Xin Wu Cui, Edda Leonor Chaves, Alina Popescu, Yi Dong, Christoph F. Dietrich
    WFUMB Ultrasound Open.2024; 2(1): 100034.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound in dilated common bile duct with non-diagnostic cross-sectional imaging
    Ankit Mahajan, Kshaunish Das, Kishalaya, Debashis Misra, Kausik Das, Gopal Krishna Dhali
    BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of unexplained extrahepatic bile duct dilatation
    Long-Jiang Chen, Xiao-Yi Wang, Jian-Hua Dai, Zhi-Gang Tang
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 35(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • The Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Ultrasound Connection: Unity Is Strength, or the Endoscopic Ultrasonography Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Concept
    Claudio Giovanni De Angelis, Eleonora Dall’Amico, Maria Teresa Staiano, Marcantonio Gesualdo, Mauro Bruno, Silvia Gaia, Marco Sacco, Federica Fimiano, Anna Mauriello, Simone Dibitetto, Chiara Canalis, Rosa Claudia Stasio, Alessandro Caneglias, Federica Me
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(20): 3265.     CrossRef
  • Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Evaluating Unexplained Isolated Common Bile Duct Dilation on Imaging
    Seifeldin Hakim, Amrita Sethi
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(1): 47.     CrossRef
  • 4,467 View
  • 214 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Ergonomic Injuries in Endoscopists and Their Risk Factors
Lubna Kamani, Hamid Kalwar
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):356-362.   Published online March 3, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.200
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Prolonged repetitive strain caused by the continuous performance of complex endoscopic procedures enhances the risk of ergonomic injuries among health-care providers (HCPs), specifically endoscopists. This study aimed to assess the risk factors of ergonomic injuries among endoscopists and non-endoscopists.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Gastroenterology Department of Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 92 HCPs were enrolled, of whom 61 were involved in endoscopic procedures and 31 were non-endoscopists. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire during national gastroenterology conferences and analyzed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp. Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Of the total study population, 95.08% of endoscopists were observed to have ergonomic injuries, whereas only 54.83% of non-endoscopists had ergonomic injuries (p<0.00). The most common injury associated with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain sites was back (41%), leg (23%), and hand (19.7%) pain among endoscopists. Of 28 endoscopists performing ≥20 procedures/week, 26 had MSK injury. However, 95.08% of endoscopists had developed MSK injury irrespective of working hours (>5 or <5 hr/wk).
Conclusions
Endoscopists are at high risk of developing ergonomic injuries, representing the negative potential of the endoscopy-associated workload. To overcome these issues, an appropriate strategic framework needs to be designed to avoid occupational compromises.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ergonomic wellness for the trainee in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Nikko Gimpaya, William T. Tran, Samir C. Grover
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2024; 40(5): 348.     CrossRef
  • Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injury Rates, Risk Factors, and Ergonomics in Different Endoscopic Specialties: A Review
    Veronica Bessone, Daniel B. Roppenecker, Sven Adamsen
    Healthcare.2024; 12(9): 885.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence and sex differences in endoscopy-related injuries: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Azizullah Beran, Mouhand F. Mohamed, John J. Guardiola, Tarek Aboursheid, Alejandra Vargas, Tarek Nayfeh, Khaled Elfert, Mohammad Shaear, Hala Fatima, Jeffrey J. Easler, Mohammad Al-Haddad, Nabil Fayad, Patrick Young, Samir A. Shah, Douglas K. Rex
    iGIE.2024; 3(3): 401.     CrossRef
  • Musculoskeletal injury and ergonomics in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopic practice
    Wenly Ruan, Catharine M. Walsh, Swati Pawa, Sharlene L. D’Souza, Promila Banerjee, Shivangi Kothari, Graham A. McCreath, Douglas S. Fishman
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(1): 248.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing Ergonomics in Pediatric Endoscopy Training and Practice
    Catharine M. Walsh
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2023; 33(2): 235.     CrossRef
  • Musculoskeletal Injuries in the Endoscopy Practitioner Risk Factors, Ergonomic Challenges and Prevention—Narrative Review and Perspectives
    Tadej Durič, Ivana Cibulková, Jan Hajer
    Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 14(3): 352.     CrossRef
  • American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of ergonomics for prevention of endoscopy-related injury: methodology and review of evidence
    Swati Pawa, Richard S. Kwon, Douglas S. Fishman, Nirav C. Thosani, Amandeep Shergill, Samir C. Grover, Mohammad Al-Haddad, Stuart K. Amateau, James L. Buxbaum, Audrey H. Calderwood, Jean M. Chalhoub, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu, Madhav Desai, Sherif E. Elhana
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(4): 492.     CrossRef
  • Protecting Gastroenterologists through Rehabilitation Training: An Overlooked Area of Concern
    Sun-Hye Ko, Myong Ki Baeg
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(6): 829.     CrossRef
  • Ergonomía en endoscopia digestiva: prevalencia, tipos de trastornos musculoesqueléticos y factores de riesgo en endoscopistas de Colombia
    Camilo de Jesús Blanco Avellaneda, Robin German Prieto Ortiz, Ricardo Aníbal Cepeda Vásquez, Jose Bareño Silva, Carlos Arturo Gonzalez Salazar, Lázaro Antonio Arango Molano, Nairo Javier Senejoa Nuñez
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2022; 37(2): 174.     CrossRef
  • Gesundheitszustand des Endoskopiepersonals in Österreich
    Gerlinde Weilguny-Schöfl, Werner Dolak, Martina Fellinghauer, Theresia Schober, Rainer Schöfl
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2022; 60(11): 1625.     CrossRef
  • Musculoskeletal Pains and Their Risk Factors in Endoscopists
    Gi-young Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(3): 295.     CrossRef
  • 3,959 View
  • 154 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Changing Trends in Biliary Stenting for Unresectable Malignant Perihilar Obstructions
Lubna Kamani, Muhammad Arshad
Clin Endosc 2020;53(6):636-637.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.165
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 4,155 View
  • 81 Download
Close layer
Redesigning the Landscape for Women and Leadership: Insights Gained from the Covid-19 Pandemic. On Behalf of Women in Gastroenterology Network Asia Pacific (WIGNAP) and Women in Endoscopy (WIE)
Lubna Kamani, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Jeanin E.Van Hooft, Amrita Sethi, Sharmila Sachithanandan
Clin Endosc 2020;53(5):620-622.   Published online September 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.202
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Emerging Leaders Committee: Turning a new page for APAGE to nurture the next generation of Asia‐Pacific leaders in digestive health
    Rashid N. Lui, Ting Ting Chan, Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Mu‐Ming Chien, Viet‐Hang Dao, Jalpa Devi, Daniel Q. Huang, Eun‐Hyo Jin, Tsevelnorov Khurelbaatar, Zaheer Nabi, Koji Otani, Mara Teresa T. Panlilio, Sang Hyoung Park, Rabbinu Rangga Pribadi, Yuqi Q
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(8): 1453.     CrossRef
  • 4,308 View
  • 77 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP