Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Michael E. Cannon 1 Article
Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary after endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts?
Seifeldin Hakim, Mihajlo Gjeorgjievski, Zubair Khan, Michael E. Cannon, Kevin Yu, Prithvi Patil, Roy Tomas DaVee, Sushovan Guha, Ricardo Badillo, Laith Jamil, Nirav Thosani, Srinivas Ramireddy
Clin Endosc 2022;55(6):801-809.   Published online November 10, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.150
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Current society guidelines recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 to 5 days after endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). The overall quality of the evidence supporting this recommendation is low. In this study, we aimed to assess cyst infection and adverse event rates after EUS-FNA of PCLs among patients treated with or without postprocedural prophylactic antibiotics.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent EUS-FNA of PCLs between 2015 and 2019 at two large-volume academic medical centers with different practice patterns of postprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis. Data on patient demographics, cyst characteristics, fine-needle aspiration technique, periprocedural and postprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis, and adverse events were retrospectively extracted.
Results
A total of 470 EUS-FNA procedures were performed by experienced endosonographers for the evaluation of PCLs in 448 patients, 58.7% of whom were women. The mean age was 66.3±12.8 years. The mean cyst size was 25.7±16.9 mm. Postprocedural antibiotics were administered in 274 cases (POSTAB+ group, 58.3%) but not in 196 cases (POSTAB– group, 41.7%). None of the patients in either group developed systemic or localized infection within the 30-day follow-up period. Procedure-related adverse events included mild abdominal pain (8 patients), intra-abdominal hematoma (1 patient), mild pancreatitis (1 patient), and perforation (1 patient). One additional case of pancreatitis was recorded; however, the patient also underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Conclusions
The incidence of infection after EUS-FNA of PCLs is negligible. Routine use of postprocedural antibiotics does not add a significant benefit.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Patrick T. Magahis, Ankit Chhoda, Tyler M. Berzin, James J. Farrell, Drew N. Wright, Anam Rizvi, Mark Hanscom, David L. Carr-Locke, Kartik Sampath, Reem Z. Sharaiha, SriHari Mahadev
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 119(11): 2174.     CrossRef
  • III BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS STATEMENT ON ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
    Ricardo Rangel de Paula PESSOA, Alexandre Moraes BESTETTI, Victor Lira de OLIVEIRA, Wladimir Campos de ARAUJO, Simone GUARALDI, Rodrigo Roda RODRIGUES SILVA, Francisco Antonio Araujo OLIVEIRA, Maria Sylvia Ierardi RIBEIRO, Fred Olavo Aragão Andrade CARNEI
    Arquivos de Gastroenterologia.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3,515 View
  • 140 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP