-
Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
-
Ga-Yeong Shin, Hyun Ho Choi, Jae Myung Park, Sang Yoon Kim, Jun Young Park, Donghoon Kang, Yu Kyung Cho, Sung Soo Kim, Myung-Gyu Choi
-
Clin Endosc 2023;56(3):325-332. Published online March 21, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147
-
-
 Graphical Abstract
 Abstract
 PDF PubReader ePub
 - Background
/Aims: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas.
Methods
Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions were collected from three hospitals. Gastric adenoma cases were identified in the hospital database using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-codes. The non-adenoma group included patients without gastric adenoma codes. The diagnostic accuracy for gastric adenoma was analyzed based on the pathological reports of the resected specimen.
Results
Among 5,095 endoscopic resections with codes for benign gastric lesions, 3,909 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 2,831 and 1,078 patients were allocated to the adenoma and non-adenoma groups, respectively. Regarding the overall diagnosis of gastric adenoma with ICD-10 codes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.7%, 88.5%, 95.2%, and 96.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between the tertiary and secondary centers.
Conclusions
Administrative codes of gastric adenoma, according to ICD-10 codes, showed good accuracy and can serve as a useful tool to study prognosis of these patients in real-world data studies in the future.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Adenoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Jae Myung Park, Songhee Cho, Ga-Yeong Shin, Jayoun Lee, Minjee Kim, Hyeon Woo Yim
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(12): 2166. CrossRef
-
2,844
View
-
127
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
1
Crossref
-
Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy
-
Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(3):319-331. Published online May 16, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.094
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has been used to diagnose a wide variety of upper gastrointestinal diseases. In particular, EGD is used to screen high-risk subjects of gastric cancer. Quality control of EGD is important because the diagnostic rate is examiner-dependent. However, there is still no representative quality indicator that can be uniformly applied in EGD. There has been growing awareness of the importance of quality control in improving EGD performance. Therefore, we aimed to review the available and emerging quality indicators for diagnostic EGD.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by - Current status of quality control in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the emerging role of artificial intelligence
Lihui Zhang, Liwen Yao, Zihua Lu, Honggang Yu
Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(1): 5. CrossRef - Simethicone and N-acetyl cysteine in improving mucosal visibility: Towards a “clearer view” during endoscopy
Akash Roy, Mahesh K. Goenka
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 43(5): 863. CrossRef - Relationship between observation time and detection rate of focal lesions in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a single-center, retrospective study
Li Dong, Xiaodan Zhang, Yuting Xuan, Peiling Xiong, Yumei Ning, Bing Zhang, Fan Wang, Qiu Zhao, Jun Fang
BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - The Effect of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy on Intraocular Pressure
Maddalena De Bernardo, Antonella Santonicola, Marco Gioia, Livio Vitiello, Ferdinando Cione, Sergio Pagliarulo, Paola Iovino, Nicola Rosa
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(5): 1224. CrossRef - The Diagnostic Performance of Linked Color Imaging Compared to White Light Imaging in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Jae Gon Lee, In Kyung Yoo, Abdullah Ozgur Yeniova, Sang Pyo Lee
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(3): 444. CrossRef - Optimal number of images and 2-year interval affect cancer detection in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy: An observational study
Kazuhiro Ksahiwagi, Toshifumi Yoshida, Kayoko Fukuhara, Rieko Bessho, Hitoshi Ichikawa, Nagamu Inoue, Hiromasa Takaishi, Yasushi Iwao, Takanori Kanai
Medicine.2024; 103(26): e38774. CrossRef - Sistema de auditoría automática para la exploración endoscópica del estómago con Inteligencia Artificial – Gastro UNAL: Gastroendoscopy UNit for Automatic Labeling
Martín Alonso Gómez Zuleta, Diego Fernando Bravo Higuera, Josué Andre Ruano Balseca, María Jaramillo González, Fabio Augusto González Osorio, Edgar Eduardo Romero Castro
Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2024; 39(2): 133. CrossRef - Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer
Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(5): 781. CrossRef - Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia: A Latin American Perspective
Arnoldo Riquelme, Felipe Silva, Diego Reyes, Gonzalo Latorre
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2024; 24(3): 218. CrossRef - Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Quality Improvement and the Role of Topical Antiperistaltic Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Eoghan Burke, Patricia Harkins, Mayilone Arumugasamy
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic Imaging for the Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Pre-Neoplastic Conditions of the Stomach
Bruno Costa Martins, Renata Nobre Moura, Angelo So Taa Kum, Carolina Ogawa Matsubayashi, Sergio Barbosa Marques, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
Cancers.2023; 15(9): 2445. CrossRef - The effect of short-term training about depth predicting score on the diagnostic ability of invasion depth for differentiated early gastric Cancer among non-expert endoscopists
Hui Li, Hui Hu, Ping Geng, Panhui Guo, Yuanrong Zhu, Lulu Zeng, Jun Liu, Xiangpeng Hu
BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Variation in the rate of detection of minute and small early gastric cancers at diagnostic endoscopy may reflect the performance of individual endoscopists
Daisuke Murakami, Masayuki Yamato, Yuji Amano, Takayoshi Nishino, Makoto Arai
BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2023; 10(1): e001143. CrossRef - Improving the quality of the esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer
Jae Myung Park
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 453. CrossRef - Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends
Caesar Ferrari, Micheal Tadros
Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 15(1): 1. CrossRef - Antispasmodic Agent Administration Improves Gastric Neoplasm Detection Rates during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2022; 22(3): 246. CrossRef - Clinical features of gastric adenoma detected within 3 years after negative screening endoscopy in Korea
Hyun Young Kim
Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
-
11,801
View
-
632
Download
-
14
Web of Science
-
17
Crossref
-
Comparison of the Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
-
Sang Yoon Kim, Ki-Nam Shim, Joo-Ho Lee, Ji Young Lim, Tae Oh Kim, A. Reum Choe, Chung Hyun Tae, Hye-Kyung Jung, Chang Mo Moon, Seong-Eun Kim, Sung-Ae Jung
-
Clin Endosc 2019;52(6):565-573. Published online July 17, 2019
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.019
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most efficient imaging modality for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). However, abdominopelvic computed tomography (APCT) has other advantages in evaluating the characteristics, local extension, or invasion of SETs to adjacent organs. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of EUS and APCT based on surgical histopathology results.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data from 53 patients who underwent both EUS and APCT before laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric SETs from January 2010 to December 2017 at a single institution. On the basis of histopathology results, we assessed the diagnostic ability of the 2 tests.
Results
The overall accuracy of EUS and APCT was 64.2% and 50.9%, respectively. In particular, the accuracy of EUS vs. APCT for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), leiomyomas, and ectopic pancreas was 83.9% vs. 74.2%, 37.5% vs. 0.0%, and 57.1% vs. 14.3%, respectively. Most of the incorrect diagnoses with EUS involved hypoechoic lesions originating in the fourth echolayer, with the most common misdiagnosed lesions being GISTs mistaken for leiomyomas and vice versa.
Conclusions
APCT showed a lower overall accuracy than EUS; however, APCT remains a useful modality for malignant/potentially malignant gastric SETs.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by - Guidelines in Practice: The Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
Brian C. Jacobson, Vanessa M. Shami
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 119(3): 397. CrossRef - Advances in Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Xinrui Guo, Xiaohan Zhao, Gang Huang, Yanbo Yu
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(1): 27. CrossRef - Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) of the Luminal Gastrointestinal Tract
Giovanna Impellizzeri, Giulio Donato, Claudio De Angelis, Nico Pagano
Diagnostics.2024; 14(10): 996. CrossRef - Current Practice in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Localized Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Zachary Lee, Divya Mohanraj, Abraham Sachs, Madhavi Kambam, Sandra DiBrito
International Journal of Translational Medicine.2024; 4(3): 387. CrossRef - Efficacy of EUS-guided keyhole biopsies in diagnosing subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
Sen Verhoeve, Cynthia Verloop, Marco Bruno, Valeska Terpstra, Lydi Van Driel, Lars Perk, Lieke Hol
Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(10): E1183. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound and Gastric Sub-Epithelial Lesions: Ultrasonographic Features, Tissue Acquisition Strategies, and Therapeutic Management
Marzia Varanese, Marco Spadaccini, Antonio Facciorusso, Gianluca Franchellucci, Matteo Colombo, Marta Andreozzi, Daryl Ramai, Davide Massimi, Roberto De Sire, Ludovico Alfarone, Antonio Capogreco, Roberta Maselli, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Fugazza, Alessa
Medicina.2024; 60(10): 1695. CrossRef - III BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS STATEMENT ON ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
Ricardo Rangel de Paula PESSOA, Alexandre Moraes BESTETTI, Victor Lira de OLIVEIRA, Wladimir Campos de ARAUJO, Simone GUARALDI, Rodrigo Roda RODRIGUES SILVA, Francisco Antonio Araujo OLIVEIRA, Maria Sylvia Ierardi RIBEIRO, Fred Olavo Aragão Andrade CARNEI
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Correlation of preoperative CT features with intra- and postoperative parameters of endoscopic resection in patients with gastric submucosal tumor (1~3 cm)
Yuxiang Chen, Mo Chen, Zhu Wang, Junchao Wu, Jinlin Yang, Li Yang, Kai Deng
Surgical Endoscopy.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Enhanced dual-mode imaging: Superior photoacoustic and ultrasound endoscopy in live pigs using a transparent ultrasound transducer
Jaewoo Kim, Dasom Heo, Seonghee Cho, Mingyu Ha, Jeongwoo Park, Joongho Ahn, Minsu Kim, Donggyu Kim, Da Hyun Jung, Hyung Ham Kim, Hee Man Kim, Chulhong Kim
Science Advances.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - The value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in differential diagnosis and evaluation of malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (<50mm)
Jiali Wu, Mengqi Zhuang, Yubao Zhou, Xiang Zhan, Weiwei Xie
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(5): 542. CrossRef - ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
Brian C. Jacobson, Amit Bhatt, Katarina B. Greer, Linda S. Lee, Walter G. Park, Bryan G. Sauer, Vanessa M. Shami
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(1): 46. CrossRef - Approach to Small Gastric Subepithelial Lesions
Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2023; 23(1): 28. CrossRef - Computed tomography features of gastric leiomyoma versus gastric stromal tumor: a case–control study with propensity score matching
Qi Wang, Lijia Wang, Xiaohui Qi, Xiang Liu, Qiao Xie, Yifeng Wang, Gaofeng Shi
Journal of International Medical Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New?
Thomas Vasilakis, Dimitrios Ziogas, Georgios Tziatzios, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Eleni Koukoulioti, Christina Kapizioni, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Antonio Facciorusso, Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
Diagnostics.2023; 13(13): 2176. CrossRef - The effect of endoscopic ultrasound on the precise selection of endoscopic treatment for submucosal tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract
Jian-Hua Li, Shu-Min Qin, Tian-Wen Liu, Jun-Qian Chen, Ying-Ting Li
BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Systematic Endoscopic Approach for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Gwang Ha Kim
Gut and Liver.2022; 16(1): 19. CrossRef - Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
Pierre H. Deprez, Leon M.G. Moons, Dermot OʼToole, Rodica Gincul, Andrada Seicean, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes, Gloria Fernández-Esparrach, Marcin Polkowski, Michael Vieth, Ivan Borbath, Tom G. Moreels, Els Nieveen van Dijkum, Jean-Yves Blay, Jeanin E. van Hooft
Endoscopy.2022; 54(04): 412. CrossRef - Prediction of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors before Operation: A Retrospective Analysis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Yu-Ning Lin, Ming-Yan Chen, Chun-Yi Tsai, Wen-Chi Chou, Jun-Te Hsu, Chun-Nan Yeh, Ta-Sen Yeh, Keng-Hao Liu
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(2): 297. CrossRef - Advancements in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Osamu Goto, Mitsuru Kaise, Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Gut and Liver.2022; 16(3): 321. CrossRef - DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT FOR LEIOMYOMA OF THE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
V. O. Shaprynskyi, Yu. V. Babii
Kharkiv Surgical School.2022; (4-5): 46. CrossRef - A scoring model for radiologic diagnosis of gastric leiomyomas (GLMs) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT): Differential diagnosis from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)
Jian-Xia Xu, Qiao-Ling Ding, Yuan-Fei Lu, Shu-Feng Fan, Qin-Pan Rao, Ri-Sheng Yu
European Journal of Radiology.2021; 134: 109395. CrossRef - A Nomogram for Predicting Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery during the Endoscopic Resection of Subepithelial Tumors of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
Shun-Wen Hsiao, Mei-Wen Chen, Chia-Wei Yang, Kuo-Hua Lin, Yang-Yuan Chen, Chew-Teng Kor, Siou-Ping Huang, Hsu-Heng Yen
Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 2160. CrossRef - Ultrasonido endoscópico, aplicaciones actuales en tumores sólidos gastrointestinales
Gabriel Alonso Mosquera-Klinger, Jhon Jaime Carvajal Gutiérrez, Alavaro Andrés Gómez Venegas, Sebastián Niño Ramírez, Raúl Cañadas Garrido
Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología.2020; 35(4): 506. CrossRef - Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography or Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography: Which is Better?
Eun Young Park, Gwang Ha Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(6): 519. CrossRef
-
7,134
View
-
199
Download
-
19
Web of Science
-
24
Crossref
|
KSGE
