Clinical Endoscopy

Seung Uk Jeong

2 Articles

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Perirectal Abscess Drainage without Drainage Catheter: A Case Series: Eun Kwang Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Seung Uk Jeong, Soo-Young Na, Sun-Jin Boo, Heung Up Kim, Byung-Cheol Song; Clin Endosc 2017;50(3):297-300. Published online April 11, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.123

A perirectal abscess is a relatively common disease entity that occurs as a postsurgical complication or as a result of various medical conditions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage was recently described as a promising alternative treatment. Previous reports have recommended placement of a drainage catheter through the anus for irrigation, which is inconvenient to the patient and carries a risk of accidental dislodgement. We report four cases of perirectal abscess that were successfully treated with only one or two 7 F double pigtail plastic stent placements and without a drainage catheter for irrigation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Pelvic abscess treatment: A novel experience with UNICO drainage
Salvatore Fazzotta, Paolo Locurto, Marco Airò Farulla, Luigi Antonio Lazzaro, Giovanni D’Ippolito, Maria Amico, Pietro Fodale, Pietro Termini, Giovanni Ciaccio
Il Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of the Italian Association of Hospital Surgeons.2024; 44(1): e42. CrossRef
Endoscopic techniques for management of large colorectal polyps, strictures and leaks
Stuart R. Gordon, Lauren S. Eichenwald, Hannah K. Systrom
Surgery Open Science.2024; 20: 156. CrossRef
Anorectal pathology in the HIV population: a guide for radiologists
Derek Vos, Margaret Wang, Sita Ramaiya, Elias G. Kikano, Sree H. Tirumani, Daniel A. Smith
Abdominal Radiology.2022; 47(5): 1762. CrossRef
Practical approach to linear endoscopic ultrasound examination of the rectum and anal canal
Hussein Hassan Okasha, Katarzyna M. Pawlak, Amr Abou-elmagd, Ahmed El-Meligui, Hassan Atalla, Mohamed O. Othman, Sameh Abou Elenin, Ahmed Alzamzamy, Reem Ezzat Mahdy
Endoscopy International Open.2022; 10(10): E1417. CrossRef
A brief literature review of catheter-based drainage of perirectal abscesses
Vitaley Kovalev, Benjamin Hopkins
World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2022; 11(1): 1. CrossRef
EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series
Andrea Lisotti, Anna Cominardi, Igor Bacchilega, Romano Linguerri, Pietro Fusaroli
VideoGIE.2020; 5(8): 380. CrossRef
Rectal Endoscopic Ultrasound in Clinical Practice
Stephen Hasak, Vladimir Kushnir
Current Gastroenterology Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef

8,522 View
167 Download
5 Web of Science
7 Crossref

Comparison between Midazolam Used Alone and in Combination with Propofol for Sedation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Yu Seok Kim, Myung-Hwan Kim, Seung Uk Jeong, Byung Uk Lee, Sang Soo Lee, Do Hyun Park, Dong-Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee; Clin Endosc 2014;47(1):94-100. Published online January 24, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.1.94

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an uncomfortable procedure that requires adequate sedation for its successful conduction. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the combined use of intravenous midazolam and propofol for sedation during ERCP.

Methods

A retrospective review of patient records from a single tertiary care hospital was performed. Ninety-four patients undergoing ERCP received one of the two medication regimens, which was administered by a nurse under the supervision of a gastroenterologist. Patients in the midazolam (M) group (n=44) received only intravenous midazolam, which was titrated to achieve deep sedation. Patients in the midazolam pulse propofol (MP) group (n=50) initially received an intravenous combination of midazolam and propofol, and then propofol was titrated to achieve deep sedation.

Results

The time to the initial sedation was shorter in the MP group than in the M group (1.13 minutes vs. 1.84 minutes, respectively; p<0.001). The recovery time was faster in the MP group than in the M group (p=0.031). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to frequency of adverse events, pain experienced by the patient, patient discomfort, degree of amnesia, and gag reflex. Patient cooperation, rated by the endoscopist as excellent, was greater in the MP group than in the M group (p=0.046).

Conclusions

The combined use of intravenous midazolam and propofol for sedation during ERCP is more effective than midazolam alone. There is no difference in the safety of the procedure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite
Katherine B. Hagan, Selvi Thirumurthi, Raju Gottumukkala, John Vargo
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2016; 14(2): 194. CrossRef
Sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized controlled study of patient-controlled propofol sedation and that given by a nurse anesthetist
Andreas Nilsson, Benjamin Grossmann, Eric Kullman, Eva Uustal, Folke Sjöberg, Lena Nilsson
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 50(10): 1285. CrossRef
Non‐radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy
Wenming Wu, Douglas O. Faigel, Gang Sun, Yunsheng Yang
Digestive Endoscopy.2014; 26(6): 691. CrossRef
Monitored Anesthesia Care for Sedation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Young Duck Shin
Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract.2014; 19(2): 59. CrossRef
Prerequisites of Colonoscopy
Kyong Hee Hong, Yun Jeong Lim
Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(4): 324. CrossRef

7,937 View
94 Download
5 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Author index