-
Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions in proximity to a colonic diverticulum
-
Nobuaki Ikezawa, Takashi Toyonaga, Shinwa Tanaka, Tetsuya Yoshizaki, Toshitatsu Takao, Hirofumi Abe, Hiroya Sakaguchi, Kazunori Tsuda, Satoshi Urakami, Tatsuya Nakai, Taku Harada, Kou Miura, Takahisa Yamasaki, Stuart Kostalas, Yoshinori Morita, Yuzo Kodama
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(3):417-425. Published online May 12, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.245
-
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for diverticulum-associated colorectal lesions is generally contraindicated because of the high risk of perforation. Several studies on patients with such lesions treated with ESD have been reported recently. However, the feasibility and safety of ESD for lesions in proximity to a colonic diverticulum (D-ESD) have not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of D-ESD.
Methods D-ESD was defined as ESD for lesions within approximately 3 mm of a diverticulum. Twenty-six consecutive patients who underwent D-ESD were included. Two strategic approaches were used depending on whether submucosal dissection of the diverticulum-related part was required (strategy B) or not (strategy A). Treatment outcomes and adverse events associated with each strategy were analyzed.
Results The en bloc resection rate was 96.2%. The rates of R0 and curative resection in strategies A and B were 80.8%, 73.1%, 84.6%, and 70.6%, respectively. Two cases of intraoperative perforation and one case of delayed perforation occurred. The delayed perforation case required emergency surgery, but the other cases were managed conservatively.
Conclusions D-ESD may be a feasible treatment option. However, it should be performed in a high-volume center by expert hands because it requires highly skilled endoscopic techniques.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for diverticulum using combination of countertraction and circumferential-inversion method
Hiroshi Takayama, Yoshinori Morita, Toshitatsu Takao, Douglas Motomura, Madoka Takao, Takashi Toyonaga, Yuzo Kodama Endoscopy.2024; 56(S 01): E91. CrossRef - Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for resection of ileocecal valve neoplasia: a French retrospective multicenter case series
Clara Yzet, Timothée Wallenhorst, Jérémie Jacques, Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira, Jérôme Rivory, Florian Rostain, Louis-Jean Masgnaux, Jean Grimaldi, Romain Legros, Pierre Lafeuille, Jérémie Albouys, Fabien Subtil, Marion Schaefer, Mathieu Pioche Endoscopy.2024; 56(10): 790. CrossRef - The role of cap-assisted endoscopy and its future implications
Sol Kim, Bo-In Lee Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 293. CrossRef - Strategies to successfully complete complex ESD in the colon
David Barquero Declara, Alex Blasco Pelicano, Claudia Berbel Comas, Alfredo Mata Bilbao Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(07): E914. CrossRef - Novel technique “short myotomy” during endoscopic submucosal dissection for a diverticulum‐associated colonic lesion
Ryosuke Kobayashi, Kingo Hirasawa, Shin Maeda Digestive Endoscopy.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Successful planned piecemeal endoscopic resection using gel immersion and an over-the-scope clip for a lesion extensively extended into the colonic diverticulum
Tomoaki Tashima, Takahiro Muramatsu, Tomonori Kawasaki, Tsubasa Ishikawa, Shomei Ryozawa VideoGIE.2023; 8(4): 167. CrossRef - Future therapeutic implications of new molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer
Sen Lu, Cheng-You Jia, Jian-She Yang World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(16): 2359. CrossRef - Iatrogenic colorectal perforation caused by a clip
Hirotaka Oura, Yasuki Hatayama, Erika Nomura, Harutoshi Sugiyama, Daisuke Murakami, Makoto Arai, Takayoshi Nishino Endoscopy.2023; 55(S 01): E1091. CrossRef
-
4,442
View
-
185
Download
-
7
Web of Science
-
8
Crossref
|