-
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms in patients with liver cirrhosis
-
Young Kwon Choi, Jin Hee Noh, Do Hoon Kim, Hee Kyong Na, Ji Yong Ahn, Jeong Hoon Lee, Kee Wook Jung, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(3):381-389. Published online April 20, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.242
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub
- Background
/Aims: The treatment of superficial esophageal neoplasms (SENs) in cirrhotic patients is challenging and rarely investigated. We evaluated the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to determine the efficacy and safety of treating SENs in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Methods
The baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients who underwent ESD for SENs between November 2005 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.
Results
ESD was performed in 437 patients with 481 SENs, including 15 cirrhotic patients with 17 SENs. En bloc resection (88.2% vs. 97.0%) and curative resection (64.7% vs. 78.9%) rates were not different between the cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis groups (p=0.105 and p=0.224, respectively). Bleeding was more common in cirrhotic patients (p=0.054), and all cases were successfully controlled endoscopically. The median procedure and hospitalization duration did not differ between the groups. Overall survival was lower in cirrhotic patients (p=0.003), while disease-specific survival did not differ between the groups (p=0.85).
Conclusions
ESD could be a safe and effective treatment option for SENs in patients with cirrhosis. Detailed preprocedural assessments are needed, including determination of liver function, esophageal varix status, and remaining life expectancy, to identify patients who will obtain the greatest benefit.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasia in close proximity to esophageal varices: a multicenter international experience
Shruti Mony, Bing Hu, Abel Joseph, Hiroyuki Aihara, Lorenzo Ferri, Amit Bhatt, Amit Mehta, Peng-Sheng Ting, Alex Chen, Andrew Kalra, Jad Farha, Manabu Onimaru, Long He, Qi Luo, Andrew Y. Wang, Haruhiro Inoue, Saowanee Ngamruengphong
Endoscopy.2024; 56(02): 119. CrossRef - Risk associated with endoscopic treatment of early upper gastrointestinal cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis and management strategies
Yu-Yong Tan, Yu-Min Qing, Jian Gong, De-Liang Liu
World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2024; 32(2): 102. CrossRef - Radical chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer complicated with liver cirrhosis
Hejing Bao, Hehong Bao, Liping Lin, Yuhuan Wang, Longbin Zhang, Li Zhang, Han Zhang, Lingxiang Liu, Xiaolong Cao
PeerJ.2024; 12: e18065. CrossRef - Endoscopic management of early esophageal cancer in patients with concomitant cirrhosis
Zhenming Zhang, Linlin Zhu
Chinese Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early cancers or precancerous lesions of the upper GI tract in cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric varices: 10-year experience from a large tertiary center in China
Shuai Zhang, Ying-Di Liu, Ning-Li Chai, Yi Yao, Fei Gao, Bo Liu, Zhan-Di He, Lu Bai, Xin Huang, Chao Gao, En-Qiang Linghu, Lian-Yong Li
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(6): 1031. CrossRef - Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with esophageal varices: Multicenter retrospective study
Yosuke Toya, Waku Hatta, Tomohiro Shimada, Tamotsu Matsuhashi, Takeharu Shiroki, Yu Sasaki, Tetsuya Tatsuta, Jun Nakamura, Norihiro Hanabata, Yohei Horikawa, Ko Nagino, Tomoyuki Koike, Atsushi Masamune, Yoshihiro Harada, Tetsuya Ohira, Katsunori Iijima, Y
Digestive Endoscopy.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Treatment of Early-Stage Cancer or Precancerous Lesion in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
Yuyong Tan, Yumin Qing, Deliang Liu, Jian Gong
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(20): 6509. CrossRef
-
3,240
View
-
160
Download
-
5
Web of Science
-
7
Crossref
|
KSGE
