Clinical Endoscopy

Yu Kyung Cho

9 Articles

What method can we choose if rapid on-site evaluation is not available for the endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions?: Yu Kyung Cho; Clin Endosc 2024;57(1):53-55. Published online January 26, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.299

PDF PubReader ePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Role of macroscopic on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy: Results of a multicentric prospective study
Hussein H Okasha, Hiwa A Hussein, Khaled M Ragab, Omar Abdallah, Fedoua Rouibaa, Borahma Mohamed, Fahd Ghalim, Mahmoud Farouk, Mohamed Lasheen, Mohamed A Elbasiony, Ahmed E Alzamzamy, Ahmed El Deeb, Hassan Atalla, Mahmoud El-Ansary, Sahar Mohamed, Moaz El
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 16(11): 595. CrossRef

1,763 View
118 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Prevalence, natural progression, and clinical practices of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions in Korea: a multicenter study: Younghee Choe, Yu Kyung Cho, Gwang Ha Kim, Jun-Ho Choi, Eun Soo Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Eun Kwang Choi, Tae Hyeon Kim, Seong-Hun Kim, Do Hoon Kim, The Research Group for Endoscopic Ultrasound in Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Clin Endosc 2023;56(6):744-753. Published online August 25, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.005

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and natural progression of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract.
Methods
The medical records of patients with UGI SELs who underwent endoscopic screening at eight university hospitals between January and December 2010 were retrospectively investigated. The follow-up evaluations were performed until December 2016.
Results
UGI SELs were found in 1,044 of the 65,233 participants screened (endoscopic prevalence, 1.60%; the total number of lesions, 1,062; mean age, 55.1±11.2 years; men, 53.6%). The median follow-up period was 48 (range, 8–74) months. SELs were most frequently found in the stomach (63.8%) and had a mean size of 9.9±6.1 mm. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was performed in 293 patients (28.1%). The most common lesions were leiomyomas, followed by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and ectopic pancreas. The proportions of SELs with malignant potential according to size were 3% (<1 cm), 22% (1–2 cm), 27% (2–3 cm), and 38% (≥3 cm). In gastric SELs larger than 1 cm, resections were performed in 20 patients because of an increase in size, of which 12 were found to be GISTs.
Conclusions
The prevalence of UGI SELs was 1.60%. Further, 23% of gastric SELs ≥1 cm were precancerous lesions, most followed by EUS and clinical decisions without initial pathological confirmation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection in treating large esophageal subepithelial lesions
Huiting Lin, Songfeng Chen, Niandi Tan, Qianjun Zhuang, Xingyu Jia, Dianxuan Jiang, Yinglian Xiao, Jinhui Wang
Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(3): 1672. CrossRef
Natural Course and Long-Term Outcomes of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: A Systematic Review
Masaya Iwamuro, Hiroyuki Okada, Motoyuki Otsuka
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(4): 1055. CrossRef
Rapidly Growing Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor on the Esophagus
Ji Hye Park, Sung Eun Kim, Seun Ja Park, Moo In Park, Won Moon, Jae Hyun Kim, Kyoungwon Jung, Myung Hun Lee
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2025; 25(1): 64. CrossRef
Advancements in Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Osamu Goto, Kazutoshi Higuchi, Eriko Koizumi, Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Gut and Liver.2025; 19(2): 151. CrossRef
Endoscopic mucosal resection of a large duodenal polyp
Ye Rin Chae, Ga Hee Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(2): 331. CrossRef
A Case of Esophageal MALT Lymphoma Mimicking a Subepithelial Tumor
Ha Eun Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Min Ji Kim, Kyung Bin Kim, Dong Chan Joo, Hye Kyung Jeon, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 83(4): 157. CrossRef
Small gastric subepithelial lesions: A sand in the eye
Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Nikhil Sonthalia, Rashid N. Lui
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(7): 1207. CrossRef
Endoscopic treatment of a large Brunner’s gland hamartoma in the duodenum
Ha Eun Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Kyungbin Kim
Endoscopy.2024; 56(S 01): E546. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis of Gastric Mesenchymal Tumors Using Digital Endosonography Image Analysis
Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Ji Woo Kim, Kwang Baek Kim
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(13): 3725. CrossRef
An Esophageal Leiomyoma with Cystic Degeneration Mimicking a Malignant Neoplasm
Gwang Ha Kim, Dong Chan Joo, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Kyungbin Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

4,162 View
205 Download
11 Web of Science
10 Crossref

Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection: Ga-Yeong Shin, Hyun Ho Choi, Jae Myung Park, Sang Yoon Kim, Jun Young Park, Donghoon Kang, Yu Kyung Cho, Sung Soo Kim, Myung-Gyu Choi; Clin Endosc 2023;56(3):325-332. Published online March 21, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas.
Methods
Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions were collected from three hospitals. Gastric adenoma cases were identified in the hospital database using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-codes. The non-adenoma group included patients without gastric adenoma codes. The diagnostic accuracy for gastric adenoma was analyzed based on the pathological reports of the resected specimen.
Results
Among 5,095 endoscopic resections with codes for benign gastric lesions, 3,909 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 2,831 and 1,078 patients were allocated to the adenoma and non-adenoma groups, respectively. Regarding the overall diagnosis of gastric adenoma with ICD-10 codes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.7%, 88.5%, 95.2%, and 96.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between the tertiary and secondary centers.
Conclusions
Administrative codes of gastric adenoma, according to ICD-10 codes, showed good accuracy and can serve as a useful tool to study prognosis of these patients in real-world data studies in the future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Adenoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Jae Myung Park, Songhee Cho, Ga-Yeong Shin, Jayoun Lee, Minjee Kim, Hyeon Woo Yim
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(12): 2166. CrossRef

3,371 View
130 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Accredited Endoscopy Unit Program of Korea: Overview and Qualification: Jung-Wook Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Jin-Oh Kim, Jae-Young Jang, the Quality Management Committee of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Clin Endosc 2019;52(5):426-430. Published online September 30, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.166

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy introduced the Accredited Endoscopy Unit Program to enhance endoscopy unit quality through systematic quality management in 2012. It was gradually expanded from training hospitals to institutions with 100+ beds, and the criteria for certification were applied according to the actual conditions of each institution. On the basis of the continuous communication with the institutions and feedback, the Accredited Endoscopy Unit Program certification criteria were revised in 2019 and introduced as follows: (1) the qualification criteria for endoscopy doctors and nurses; (2) facilities and equipment; (3) endoscopic examination process; (4) performance; (5) disinfection and infection control; and (6) endoscopic sedation. The assessment items consist of essential and recommended items. All essential items must be met for accreditation to be awarded. The assessment criteria for each evaluation area were revised as follows: (1) upgrading assessment criteria; (2) qualification of endoscopists and reinforcement of quality control education; (3) detailed standards for safety, disinfection, endoscopic sedation, and management instructions; and (4) presentation of new performance measurement of endoscopy and colonoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Korea: A Nationwide Survey and Population-Based Study
Yunho Jung, Jung-Wook Kim, Jong Pil Im, Yu Kyung Cho, Tae Hee Lee, Jae-Young Jang
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Total polyp number may be more important than size and histology of polyps for prediction of metachronous high-risk colorectal neoplasms
Hyuk Yoon, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Nayoung Kim, Dong Ho Lee
BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopist-Driven Sedation Practices in South Korea: Re-evaluation Considering the Nationwide Survey in 2019
Seon-Young Park, Jun Kyu Lee, Chang-Hwan Park, Byung-Wook Kim, Chang Kyun Lee, Hong Jun Park, Byung Ik Jang, Dong Uk Kim, Jin Myung Park, Jae Min Lee, Young Sin Cho, Hyung Ku Chon, Seung Young Seo, Woo Hyun Paik
Gut and Liver.2022; 16(6): 899. CrossRef
Accreditation of digestive endoscopy services: a method of quality assuring?
Giancarlo Spinzi, Angelo Milano, Maurizio Capelli
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2021; 15(1): 1. CrossRef
Important Quality Metrics and Standardization in Endoscopy
Tossapol Kerdsirichairat, Eun Ji Shin
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2021; 31(4): 727. CrossRef
A Nationwide Survey on the Facilities and Personnel for Endoscopic Sedation: Results from 50 Qualified Endoscopy Units of Teaching Hospitals Accredited by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE)
Seon-Young Park, Jun Kyu Lee, Jung-Wook Kim, Tae Hee Lee, Chang-Hwan Park, Jae-Yong Jang, Byung-Wook Kim, Byung Ik Jang
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(6): 843. CrossRef
Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Youn I Choi, Jong-Joon Lee, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Dong Kyun Park, Kwang An Kwon
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(10): 3286. CrossRef

4,949 View
116 Download
6 Web of Science
7 Crossref

Revision of Quality Indicators for the Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea: Jun Ki Min, Jae Myung Cha, Yu Kyung Cho, Jie-Hyun Kim, Soon Man Yoon, Jong Pil Im, Yunho Jung, Jeong Seop Moon, Jin-Oh Kim, Yoon Tae Jeen; Clin Endosc 2018;51(3):239-252. Published online May 31, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.075

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Gastroscopy and colonoscopy are widely used for the early diagnosis of stomach and colorectal cancer. The present revision integrates recent data regarding previous quality indicators and novel indicators suggested for gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea. The new indicators, developed by the Quality Improvement Committee of the Korean Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vary in the level of supporting evidence, and most are based solely on expert opinion. Updated indicators validated by clinical research were prioritized, but were chosen by expert consensus when such studies were absent. The resultant quality indicators were graded according to the levels of consensus and recommendations. The updated indicators will provide a relevant guideline for high-quality endoscopy. The future direction of quality indicator development should include relevant outcome measures and an evidence-based approach to support proposed performance targets.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

GastroHUN an Endoscopy Dataset of Complete Systematic Screening Protocol for the Stomach
Diego Bravo, Juan Frias, Felipe Vera, Juan Trejos, Carlos Martínez, Martín Gómez, Fabio González, Eduardo Romero
Scientific Data.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Association of Intensive Endoscopic Burden with Esophageal Cancer Detection: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Yeunji Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Bumhee Park, Gil Ho Lee, Sun Gyo Lim, Sung Jae Shin, Choong-Kyun Noh, Kee Myung Lee
Gut and Liver.2025; 19(1): 59. CrossRef
Current status of quality control in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the emerging role of artificial intelligence
Lihui Zhang, Liwen Yao, Zihua Lu, Honggang Yu
Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(1): 5. CrossRef
Performance of the National Cancer Screening Program for Gastric Cancer in Korea
Young-Il Kim
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2024; 24(3): 231. CrossRef
Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea
Dong Jun Kim, Nan-He Yoon, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, Sunhwa Lee, Seongju Kim, Ji Eun Kim, Hooyeon Lee
Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(4): 1164. CrossRef
Interval Advanced Gastric Cancer After Negative Endoscopy
Tae Jun Kim, Jeung Hui Pyo, Young Hye Byun, Sung Chul Choi, Jin Pyo Hong, Yang Won Min, Hyuk Lee, Byung-Hoon Min, Poong-Lyul Rhee, Jae J. Kim, Jun Haeng Lee
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 21(5): 1205. CrossRef
Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators
Yuri Kim, Jeong Hoon Lee, Gin Hyug Lee, Ga Hee Kim, Gunn Huh, Seung Wook Hong, Hwoon-Yong Jung
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(1): 1. CrossRef
Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition
Su Young Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Soon Man Yoon, Yunho Jung, Jong Wook Kim, Sun-Jin Boo, Eun Hye Oh, Seong Ran Jeon, Seung-Joo Nam, Seon-Young Park, Soo-Kyung Park, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong Hoon Baek, Mi-Young Choi, Suyeon Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Hyung Kil Kim, Joo
Intestinal Research.2023; 21(1): 20. CrossRef
Quality indicators in the endoscopic detection of gastric cancer
Vikneswaran Namasivayam, Noriya Uedo
DEN Open.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Influence of Face Shields on the Quality of Colonoscopy in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Jin Wook Lee, Hyo Jeong Lee, Dae Sung Kim, Jiyoung Yoon, Seung Wook Hong, Ha Won Hwang, Jong-Soo Lee, Gwang-Un Kim, Sinwon Lee, Jaewon Choe, Jin Hwa Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Gut and Liver.2022; 16(3): 404. CrossRef
Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 319. CrossRef
Utilization and quality assessment of digestive endoscopy in China: results from 5-year consecutive nationwide surveys
Lei Xin, Ye Gao, Zhiyuan Cheng, Tianjiao Wang, Han Lin, Yanan Pang, Chang Sun, Zengjun Fu, Zhaoshen Li, Xudong Ma, Luowei Wang
Chinese Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Reduced detection rate of artificial intelligence in images obtained from untrained endoscope models and improvement using domain adaptation algorithm
Junseok Park, Youngbae Hwang, Hyun Gun Kim, Joon Seong Lee, Jin-Oh Kim, Tae Hee Lee, Seong Ran Jeon, Su Jin Hong, Bong Min Ko, Seokmin Kim
Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
A scoping review on population-centered indicators for cancer care continuum
Vasuki Rajaguru, Jieun Jang, Jeoung A. Kwon, Jae Hyun Kim, Jaeyong Shin, Mison Chun
Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 Revised Edition
Su Young Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Soon Man Yoon, Yunho Jung, Jong Wook Kim, Sun-Jin Boo, Eun Hye Oh, Seong Ran Jeon, Seung-Joo Nam, Seon-Young Park, Soo-Kyung Park, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong Hoon Baek, Mi-Young Choi, Suyeon Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Hyung Kil Kim, Joo
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(3): 115. CrossRef
Antispasmodic Agent Administration Improves Gastric Neoplasm Detection Rates during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2022; 22(3): 246. CrossRef
Korean guidelines for postpolypectomy colonoscopic surveillance: 2022 revised edition
Su Young Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Soon Man Yoon, Yunho Jung, Jong Wook Kim, Sun-Jin Boo, Eun Hye Oh, Seong Ran Jeon, Seung-Joo Nam, Seon-Young Park, Soo-Kyung Park, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong Hoon Baek, Mi-Young Choi, Suyeon Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Hyung Kil Kim, Joo
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(6): 703. CrossRef
Current Endoscopy Training in Korea and Future Aspects
Young-Eun Joo
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(5): 207. CrossRef
Colonoscopy quality in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities in Korea
Jae Gon Lee, Dong Soo Han, Young-Eun Joo, Dae-Seong Myung, Dong Il Park, Seul Ki Kim, Yunho Jung, Won Hyun Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Joon Seok Yoon, Chang Soo Eun
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2021; 36(Suppl 1): S35. CrossRef
Association of Regular Endoscopic Screening with Interval Gastric Cancer Incidence in the National Cancer Screening Program
Choong-Kyun Noh, Eunyoung Lee, Gil Ho Lee, Sun Gyo Lim, Bumhee Park, Sung Jae Shin, Jae Youn Cheong, Kee Myung Lee
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 11(1): 230. CrossRef
Impacts of age and sedation on cardiocerebrovascular adverse events after diagnostic GI endoscopy: a nationwide population-based study
Sang Yoon Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Min Ho Kim, Seong-Eun Kim, Hye-Kyung Jung, Ki-Nam Shim, Sung-Ae Jung
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(3): 591. CrossRef
Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Youn I Choi, Jong-Joon Lee, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Dong Kyun Park, Kwang An Kwon
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(10): 3286. CrossRef
Endoscopy training in Korea
Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2019; 34(2): 237. CrossRef
Updates on the Facilities, Procedures, and Performance of the Accredited Endoscopy Unit
Tae Hee Lee, Jin Young Yoon, Chang Nyol Paik, Hyuk Soon Choi, Jae-Young Jang
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(5): 431. CrossRef
Quality Indicators and Outcome Measures of Endoscopy in the National Cancer Screening Program
Jun Ki Min, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Yunho Jung, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyo-Joon Yang
Yonsei Medical Journal.2019; 60(11): 1054. CrossRef

7,542 View
191 Download
24 Web of Science
25 Crossref

Feedback Survey of the Effect, Burden, and Cost of the National Endoscopic Quality Assessment Program during the Past 5 Years in Korea: Yu Kyung Cho, Jeong Seop Moon, Dong Su Han, Yong Chan Lee, Yeol Kim, Bo Young Park, Il-Kwun Chung, Jin-Oh Kim, Jong Pil Im, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun Gun Kim, Sang Kil Lee, Hang Lak Lee, Jae Young Jang, Eun Sun Kim, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon, Ethics and Quality Control Committee of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Clin Endosc 2016;49(6):542-547. Published online March 2, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.113

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: In Korea, the nationwide gastric cancer screening program recommends biennial screening for individuals aged 40 years or older by way of either an upper gastrointestinal series or endoscopy. The national endoscopic quality assessment (QA) program began recommending endoscopy in medical institutions in 2009. We aimed to assess the effect, burden, and cost of the QA program from the viewpoint of medical institutions.
Methods
We surveyed the staff of institutional endoscopic units via e-mail.
Results
Staff members from 67 institutions replied. Most doctors were endoscopic specialists. They responded as to whether the QA program raised awareness for endoscopic quality (93%) or improved endoscopic practice (40%). The percentages of responders who reported improvements in the diagnosis of gastric cancer, the qualifications of endoscopists, the quality of facilities and equipment, endoscopic procedure, and endoscopic reprocessing were 69%, 60%, 66%, 82%, and 75%, respectively. Regarding reprocessing, many staff members reported that they had bought new automated endoscopic preprocessors (3%), used more disinfectants (34%), washed endoscopes longer (28%), reduced the number of endoscopies performed to adhere to reprocessing guidelines (9%), and created their own quality education programs (59%). Many responders said they felt that QA was associated with some degree of burden (48%), especially financial burden caused by purchasing new equipment. Reasonable quality standards (45%) and incentives (38%) were considered important to the success of the QA program.
Conclusions
Endoscopic quality has improved after 5 years of the mandatory endoscopic QA program.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Monthly endoscopy surveillance culture facilitates detection of breaches in the scope reprocessing procedure: 5‐year experience in an endoscopy center
Shu‐Hui Chen, Theophile Liu, Huei‐Wen Lai, Hui‐Lan Chang, Hsu‐Heng Yen
Advances in Digestive Medicine.2022; 9(2): 103. CrossRef
A nationwide survey on the effectiveness of training on endoscope reprocessing within the national cancer screening program in Korea
Hye Young Shin, Da Hun Jang, Jae Kwan Jun
American Journal of Infection Control.2021; 49(8): 1031. CrossRef
Polyp missing rate and its associated risk factors of referring hospitals for endoscopic resection of advanced colorectal neoplasia
Jae Gyu Shin, Hyung Wook Kim, Su Bum Park, Cheol Woong Choi, Dae Hwan Kang, Su Jin Kim, Hyeong Seok Nam, Dae Gon Ryu
Medicine.2017; 96(19): e6742. CrossRef
Education and Training Guidelines for the Board of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Hee Seok Moon, Eun Kwang Choi, Ji Hyun Seo, Jeong Seop Moon, Ho June Song, Kyoung Oh Kim, Jong Jin Hyun, Sung Kwan Shin, Beom Jae Lee, Sang Heon Lee
Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(4): 345. CrossRef
How to Improve the Quality of Screening Endoscopy in Korea: National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program
Yu Kyung Cho
Clinical Endoscopy.2016; 49(4): 312. CrossRef
How Can We Propagate the National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program and Improve the Quality of Endoscopic Screening?
Dong-Hoon Yang
Gut and Liver.2016; 10(5): 657. CrossRef
The Importance of an Endoscopic Quality Assessment Program Reflecting Real Practice
In Kyung Yoo, Yoon Tae Jeen
Clinical Endoscopy.2016; 49(6): 495. CrossRef

10,580 View
138 Download
5 Web of Science
7 Crossref

How to Improve the Quality of Screening Endoscopy in Korea: National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program: Yu Kyung Cho; Clin Endosc 2016;49(4):312-317. Published online July 29, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.084

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

In Korea, gastric cancer screening, either esophagogastroduodenoscopy or upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS), is performed biennially for adults aged 40 years or older. Screening endoscopy has been shown to be associated with localized cancer detection and better than UGIS. However, the diagnostic sensitivity of detecting cancer is not satisfactory. The National Endoscopy Quality Improvement (QI) program was initiated in 2009 to enhance the quality of medical institutions and improve the effectiveness of the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP). The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy developed quality standards through a broad systematic review of other endoscopic quality guidelines and discussions with experts. The standards comprise five domains: qualifications of endoscopists, endoscopic unit facilities and equipment, endoscopic procedure, endoscopy outcomes, and endoscopic reprocessing. After 5 years of the QI program, feedback surveys showed that the perception of QI and endoscopic practice improved substantially in all domains of quality, but the quality standards need to be revised. How to avoid missing cancer in endoscopic procedures in daily practice was reviewed, which can be applied to the mass screening endoscopy. To improve the quality and effectiveness of NCSP, key performance indicators, acceptable quality standards, regular audit, and appropriate reimbursement are necessary.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Simethicone and N-acetyl cysteine combination as premedication before esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Double-blind randomized controlled trial
Veeraraghavan Krishnamurthy, Abel Joseph, Shreyas Venkataraman, George Kurian
Endoscopy International Open.2022; 10(05): E585. CrossRef
Trends in the Performance of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program for Gastric Cancer from 2007 to 2016
Ji Eun Ryu, Eunji Choi, Kyeongmin Lee, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, Kyu Won Jung, Kui Son Choi
Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 54(3): 842. CrossRef
Current Endoscopy Training in Korea and Future Aspects
Young-Eun Joo
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(5): 207. CrossRef
Clinical features of gastric adenoma detected within 3 years after negative screening endoscopy in Korea
Hyun Young Kim
Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Response
Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 94(4): 876. CrossRef
A Nationwide Survey on the Facilities and Personnel for Endoscopic Sedation: Results from 50 Qualified Endoscopy Units of Teaching Hospitals Accredited by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE)
Seon-Young Park, Jun Kyu Lee, Jung-Wook Kim, Tae Hee Lee, Chang-Hwan Park, Jae-Yong Jang, Byung-Wook Kim, Byung Ik Jang
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(6): 843. CrossRef
Screening for gastric cancer: East and West, features of diagnostic criteria
A. A. Avanesyan, O. V. Chukina, Yu. V. Kokovina, T. M. Chirkina, I. G. Bakulin
Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology.2020; (9): 73. CrossRef
Endoscopy training in Korea
Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2019; 34(2): 237. CrossRef
Establishing a model to measure and predict the quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy
Luo-Wei Wang, Han Lin, Lei Xin, Wei Qian, Tian-Jiao Wang, Jian-Zhong Zhang, Qian-Qian Meng, Bo Tian, Xu-Dong Ma, Zhao-Shen Li
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(8): 1024. CrossRef
Factors related to paradoxical reactions during propofol-induced sedated endoscopy
Seung Hwa Lee, Gyu Min Lee, Dong Ryul Lee, Jung Un Lee
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 54(3): 371. CrossRef
Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View
Mickael Chevallay, Minoa Jung, Felix Berlth, Chon Seung-Hun, Philippe Morel, Stefan Mönig
Journal of Oncology.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Quality Indicators and Outcome Measures of Endoscopy in the National Cancer Screening Program
Jun Ki Min, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Yunho Jung, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyo-Joon Yang
Yonsei Medical Journal.2019; 60(11): 1054. CrossRef
Needs assessment survey for simulation‐based training for gastrointestinal endoscopy nurses
Sol Yu, Young Sook Roh
Nursing & Health Sciences.2018; 20(2): 247. CrossRef
Screening for gastric cancer with magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy in asymptomatic individuals
An-Jing Zhao, Yang-Yang Qian, Hui Sun, Xi Hou, Jun Pan, Xiao Liu, Wei Zhou, Yi-Zhi Chen, Xi Jiang, Zhao-Shen Li, Zhuan Liao
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 88(3): 466. CrossRef
Gastrointestinal endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire is a valid tool to measure patient satisfaction in Asian country
Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Jung Won Jeon, Hyun Phil Shin, Kwang Ro Joo, Joung Il Lee
Medicine.2018; 97(29): e11477. CrossRef
An Adjusted Level of Adenoma Detection Rate is Necessary for Adults Below 50 Years Old
Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Jeong Eun Shin, Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Gun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Sun-Jin Boo, Jun Lee, Yunho Jung, Hyun Jung Lee, Hoon Sup Koo, Young-Eun Joo
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2018; 52(8): 703. CrossRef
Trends in Gastric Cancer Incidence According to the Clinicopathological Characteristics in Korea, 1999-2014
Bang Wool Eom, Kyu-Won Jung, Young-Joo Won, Hannah Yang, Young-Woo Kim
Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(4): 1343. CrossRef
Training in Endoscopy: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(4): 318. CrossRef
Does the interval of screening endoscopy affect survival in gastric cancer patients?
Jieun Kim, Su Mi Kim, Man Ho Ha, Jeong Eun Seo, Min-Gew Choi, Jun Ho Lee, Tae Sung Sohn, Sung Kim, Sin-Ho Jung, Jae Moon Bae
Medicine.2016; 95(49): e5490. CrossRef

9,567 View
212 Download
19 Web of Science
19 Crossref

Performance and Clinical Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Intramural Lesions: Hea Jung Sung, Yu Kyung Cho, Eun Young Park, Sung Jin Moon, Chul Hyun Lim, Jin Su Kim, Jae Myung Park, In Seok Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Myung-Gyu Choi, Kyu Yong Choi; Clin Endosc 2013;46(6):627-632. Published online November 19, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.6.627

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

We evaluated the performance, clinical role, and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in gastrointestinal intramural lesions.

Methods

Procedural and pathologic data were reviewed from consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA for intramural lesions. Final diagnoses were determined by surgical histopathologic conformation and the diagnosis of malignancy, including clinical follow-up with repeat imaging.

Results

Forty-six patients (mean age, 47 years; 24 males) underwent EUS-FNA. Lesions were located in the stomach (n=31), esophagus (n=5), and duodenum (n=10). The median lesion size was 2 cm (range, 1 to 20.6). Final diagnoses were obtained in 22 patients (48%). EUS-FNA was diagnostic in 40 patients (87%). The diagnostic accuracy of cytology for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions was 82%; diagnostic error occurred in three patients (6%). The cytologic results influenced clinical judgment in 78% cases. The primary reasons for negative or no clinical impact were false-negative results, misdirected patient management, and inconclusive cytology.

Conclusions

EUS-FNA exhibited an 87% diagnostic yield for gastrointestinal intramural lesions; the accuracy of cytology for differentiating malignancy was 82%. The limitations of EUS-FNA were primarily because of nondiagnostic sampling (9%) and probable diagnostic error (6%); these factors may influence the clinical role of EUS-FNA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Feasibility and clinical value of linear endoscopic ultrasonography imaging in the lower gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions
Li Tao, Yajun Chen, Qianqian Fang, Fan Xu, Qianwei Yu, Lijiu Zhang, Xiangpeng Hu
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumors: Impact of rapid onsite evaluation and correlation with histopathologic follow‐up
Syed M. Gilani, Thiruvengadam Muniraj, Harry R. Aslanian, Guoping Cai
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2021; 49(2): 203. CrossRef
Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Focusing on Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Eun Young Kim
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2015; 15(1): 9. CrossRef
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy without Rapid On-Site Cytologic Examination: A Time to Change the Paradigm?
Yeon Suk Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(3): 207. CrossRef

6,659 View
59 Download
4 Crossref

Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps: Chul-Hyun Lim, Myung-Gyu Choi, Won Chul Kim, Jin Soo Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Jae Myung Park, In Seok Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Kyu Yong Choi, In-Sik Chung; Clin Endosc 2012;45(1):62-66. Published online March 31, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

It is believed that disposable biopsy forceps are more costly than reusable biopsy forceps. In this study, we evaluated performance and cost of disposable forceps versus reusable forceps in esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy.

Methods

Between October 2009 and July 2010, we enrolled 200 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Biopsies were performed with 100 disposable or 5 reusable forceps by random assignment. Seventy-five additional patients were studied to estimate durability of reusable forceps. The assisting nurses estimated the performance of the forceps. The evaluation of costs included purchase prices and reprocessing costs. The adequacy of the sample was estimated according to the diameter of the obtained tissue.

Results

Performance of disposable forceps was estimated as excellent in 97.0%, good in 2.0% and adequate in 1.0%. Reusable forceps were estimated as excellent in 36.0%, good in 36.0%, adequate in 25.1% and inadequate in 2.9%. The performance of reusable forceps declined with the number of uses. The reprocessing cost of reusable forceps for one biopsy session was calculated as ₩8,021. The adequacy of the sample was excellent for both forceps.

Conclusions

Disposable forceps showed excellent performance. Considering the reprocessing costs of reusable forceps, usage of disposable forceps with a low price should be considered.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Multisociety guidance for sterilization and high-level disinfection
Erica S. Shenoy, David J. Weber, Kathleen McMullen, Zachary Rubin, Priya Sampathkumar, Joshua K. Schaffzin, Emily Sickbert-Bennett, Laraine Washer, Deborah S. Yokoe, Audrey H. Calderwood, Raymond Chinn, Michelle Day, Sylvia Garcia-Houchins, Waleed Javaid,
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.2025; : 1. CrossRef
International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption
Alessandro Repici, Kareem Khalaf, Edoardo Troncone, Sharmila Subramaniam, Cesare Hassan, Pradeep Bhandari, Lars AABAKKEN, Sarah ABERE, Maisam W. AKROUSH, Abed AL-LEHIBI, Eduardo ALBÉNIZ, Asma ALKANDARI, Majid A. ALMADI, Andrea ANDERLONI, Amol BAPAYE, Napo
Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(2): 322. CrossRef
Single‐use accessories and endoscopes in the era of sustainability and climate change—A balancing act
Zaheer Nabi, Raymond S. Y. Tang, Sridhar Sundaram, Sundeep Lakhtakia, D. Nageshwar Reddy
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(1): 7. CrossRef
Ressourcenschonung aus Sicht der Hygiene
Susanne Kolbe-Busch, Iris F. Chaberny
Die Chirurgie.2023; 94(3): 220. CrossRef
An Economic Analysis of Direct Costs of Distal Radius Fixation and the Implications of a Disposable Distal Radius Kit
Jonathan Lans, Ritsaart F. Westenberg, Svenna H.W.L. Verhiel, Rohit Garg, Jesse B. Jupiter, Neal C. Chen
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.2021; 35(9): e346. CrossRef
Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories
Dae Young Cheung, Byung Ik Jang, Sang Wook Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyung Keun Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Won Jae Yoon, Yong Kang Lee, Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho, Hyun Phil Shin, Sun Young Cho, Woon Geon Shin, Kee Don Choi, Byung-Wook Kim, Joong Goo Kwon, Hee Ch
Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(3): 276. CrossRef
Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guidelines for Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories; Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, Korean College of Helicobact
Dae Young Cheung, Byung Ik Jang, Sang Wook Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyung Keun Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Won Jae Yoon, Yong Kang Lee, Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho, Hyun Phil Shin, Sun Young Cho, Woon Geon Shin, Kee Don Choi, Byung-Wook Kim, Joong Goo Kwon, Hee Ch
The Korean Journal of Medicine.2020; 95(5): 325. CrossRef
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing
Byoung Kwan Son, Byung-Wook Kim, Won Hee Kim, Dae-Sung Myung, Young-Seok Cho, Byung Ik Jang
Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(2): 143. CrossRef
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing
Byung-Wook Kim, Byoung Kwan Son, Won Hee Kim, Dae-Sung Myung, Young-Seok Cho, Byung Ik Jang
The Korean Journal of Medicine.2017; 92(3): 239. CrossRef
Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps
J.A. Cartwright, T.L. Hill, S. Smith, D. Shaw
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2016; 30(4): 1002. CrossRef
Percutaneous forceps biopsy in biliary malignancies
Tomáš Andrašina, Jiří Pánek, Tomáš Rohan, Petra Kovalčíková, Tomáš Grolich, Lenka Ostrížková, Vlastimil Válek
Česká radiologie.2016; 70(4): 228. CrossRef
Current Status of Endoscope Reprocessing in Korea
Young-Seok Cho
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(1): 1. CrossRef
Role of Clinical Endoscopy in Emphasizing Endoscope Disinfection
Ji Kon Ryu, Eun Young Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Il Ju Choi, Ki Baik Hahm
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(5): 351. CrossRef
High-level disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing
King-Wah Chiu
World Journal of Experimental Medicine.2015; 5(1): 33. CrossRef
Is non-woven fabric a useful method of packaging instruments for operation theatres in resource constrained settings?
GS Devadiga, VMP Thomas, S Shetty, MS Setia
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology.2015; 33(2): 243. CrossRef
Steps of Reprocessing and Equipments
Yong Kook Lee, Jeong Bae Park
Clinical Endoscopy.2013; 46(3): 274. CrossRef

8,460 View
109 Download
16 Crossref

Author index