Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Author index
Search
Yuri Enomoto 1 Article
Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
Daisuke Ide, Tomohiko Richard Ohya, Mitsuaki Ishioka, Yuri Enomoto, Eisuke Nakao, Yuki Mitsuyoshi, Junki Tokura, Keigo Suzuki, Seiichi Yakabi, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Masahiro Igarashi, Akio Nakashima, Masayuki Saruta, Shoichi Saito, Junko Fujisaki
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):655-664.   Published online May 31, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.009
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventional ESD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events.
Results
En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm2/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group.
Conclusions
PCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Novel adjustable traction “noose knot” method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Junki Tokura, Daisuke Ide, Keigo Suzuki, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Masahiro Igarashi, Shoichi Saito
    Endoscopy.2024; 56(S 01): E55.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of salvage endoscopy in the treatment of residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Juan Du, Ting Zhang, Lei Wang, Hao Zhang, Wenquan Yi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(6): 3027.     CrossRef
  • Is there a best choice of equipment for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection?
    Francesco Cocomazzi, Sonia Carparelli, Nunzia Labarile, Antonio Capogreco, Marco Gentile, Roberta Maselli, Jahnvi Dhar, Jayanta Samanta, Alessandro Repici, Cesare Hassan, Francesco Perri, Antonio Facciorusso
    Expert Review of Medical Devices.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Difficult colorectal polypectomy: Technical tips and recent advances
    Sukit Pattarajierapan, Hiroyuki Takamaru, Supakij Khomvilai
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(17): 2600.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial
    Gianluca Andrisani, Cesare Hassan, Margherita Pizzicannella, Francesco Pugliese, Massimiliano Mutignani, Chiara Campanale, Giorgio Valerii, Carmelo Barbera, Giulio Antonelli, Francesco Maria Di Matteo
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(6): 987.     CrossRef
  • Combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, a practical solution for difficult cases
    Dong-Hoon Yang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 626.     CrossRef
  • 4,552 View
  • 304 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP