Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Previous issues
19 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Volume 48(1); January 2015
Prev issue Next issue
Commentarys
Current Status of Endoscope Reprocessing in Korea
Young-Seok Cho
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):1-3.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.1
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Role of Clinical Endoscopy in Emphasizing Endoscope Disinfection
    Ji Kon Ryu, Eun Young Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Il Ju Choi, Ki Baik Hahm
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(5): 351.     CrossRef
  • 5,150 View
  • 65 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Many Options to Manage Laterally Spreading Tumors
Dong Kyung Chang
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):4-5.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.4
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 4,708 View
  • 58 Download
Close layer
Is the Balloon Dilation Duration in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation (EPBD) Related to the Occurrence of Post-EPBD Pancreatitis?
Dong Uk Kim
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):6-7.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.6
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Dilation Time in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Common Bile Duct Stones
    Yong-Hua Shen, Liu-Qing Yang, Yu-Ling Yao, Lei Wang, Yi-Yang Zhang, Jun Cao, Qi-Bin He, Xiao-Ping Zou, Yun-Hong Li
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2017; 27(5): 351.     CrossRef
  • 5,183 View
  • 49 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Focused Review Series: Advanced Endoscopic Treatment For Pancreaticobiliary Diseases
Preoperative Drainage for Malignant Biliary Strictures: Is It Time for Self-Expanding Metallic Stents?
Jason Roque, Shiaw-Hooi Ho, Khean-Lee Goh
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):8-14.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.8
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Palliation of jaundice improves the general health of the patient and, therefore, surgical outcomes. Because of the complexity and location of strictures, especially proximally, drainage has been accompanied by increased morbidity due to sepsis. Another concern is the provocation of an inflammatory and fibrotic reaction around the area of stent placement. Preoperative biliary drainage with self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion can be achieved via a percutaneous method or through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A recently published multicenter randomized Dutch study has shown increased morbidity with preoperative biliary drainage. A Cochrane meta-analysis has also shown a significantly increased complication rate with preoperative drainage. However, few of these studies have used a SEMS, which allows better biliary drainage. No randomized controlled trials have compared preoperative deployment of SEMS versus conventional plastic stents. The outcomes of biliary drainage also depend on the location of the obstruction, namely the difficulty with proximal compared to distal strictures. Pathophysiologically, palliation of jaundice will benefit all patients awaiting surgery. However, preoperative drainage often results in increased morbidity because of procedure-related sepsis. The use of SEMS may change the outcome of preoperative biliary drainage dramatically.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Outcomes of double-layer continuous suture hepaticojejunostomy in pancreatoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy
    Niccolò Napoli, Emanuele F. Kauffmann, Rosilde Caputo, Michael Ginesini, Fabio Asta, Cesare Gianfaldoni, Gabriella Amorese, Fabio Vistoli, Ugo Boggi
    HPB.2022; 24(10): 1738.     CrossRef
  • Current Endoscopic Management of Malignant Biliary Stricture
    Chi-Chih Wang, Tzu-Wei Yang, Wen-Wei Sung, Ming-Chang Tsai
    Medicina.2020; 56(3): 114.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and risk of biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy: review of current status
    Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, David Fuks, Raffaele Dalla Valle, Manuela Cesaretti, Vincenzo Violi, Renato Costi
    Surgery Today.2018; 48(4): 371.     CrossRef
  • Progress in Study on Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    宝志 刘
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2018; 08(02): 199.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of preoperative biliary drainage from a single tertiary center: Is there still a role for plastic stents?
    Michael Xiang Ma, Marcus Woon Soon Chin, Melissa Jennings, Chiang Siah, Simon Edmunds
    Journal of Digestive Diseases.2017; 18(3): 179.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic management of malignant biliary stenosis. Update and highlights for standard clinical practice
    MªJosé Domper Arnal, Miguel Ángel Simón Marco
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of the effect of interval from presentation to surgery on outcome in patients with peri-ampullary malignancy
    Bassem Amr, Golnaz Shahtahmassebi, Christopher D. Briggs, Matthew J. Bowles, Somaiah Aroori, David A. Stell
    HPB.2016; 18(4): 354.     CrossRef
  • Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of malignant biliary obstruction before primary surgical resection
    Tae Jun Song, Jae Hoon Lee, Sang Soo Lee, Ji Woong Jang, Jung Wook Kim, Tae Jin Ok, Dong Wook Oh, Do Hyun Park, Dong Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim, Song Cheol Kim, Chul Nam Kim, Sung Cheol Yun
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016; 84(5): 814.     CrossRef
  • Current status of preoperative drainage for distal biliary obstruction
    Harutoshi Sugiyama
    World Journal of Hepatology.2015; 7(18): 2171.     CrossRef
  • 7,768 View
  • 98 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Focused Review Series: Advanced Endoscopic Treatment for Pancreaticobiliary Diseaseses
Endoscopic Ablation Therapy for Biliopancreatic Malignancies
Jason Roque, Shiaw-Hooi Ho, Nageshwar Reddy, Khean-Lee Goh
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):15-19.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.15
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Biliopancreatic malignancies such as cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has notoriously been diagnosed late. As such most therapy have been palliative in nature. Cholangioscopy allows for an earlier diagnosis to be made. Brachytherapy with the insertion of catheter with iridium-132 seeds, percutaneously or through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was the earliest ablative techniques used. It has been shown to have a beneficial effect only in prolonging survival. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has also been used for several years. stenting with PDT versus stenting alone for unresectable CCA showed a marked survival benefit with the addition of PDT. However the most exciting endoscopic ablative modality appears to be intraductal radiofrequency ablation using the Habib catheter and device. Several case series have shown the effectiveness of this technique in ablating tumors. This technique is evolving and coupled with early diagnosis of CCA through cholangioscopy will allow for a curative therapy. The crux to the effective treatment of early cancerous lesions in the bile or pancreatic duct is the early diagnosis of such lesions. Effective endoscopic ablative therapy is now available with the advent of radiofrequency ablation probes that can be passed through the duodenoscope via ERCP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical and cost effectiveness of endoscopic bipolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review
    Fiona Beyer, Stephen Rice, Giovany Orozco-Leal, Madeleine Still, Hannah O’Keefe, Nicole O’Connor, Akvile Stoniute, Dawn Craig, Stephen Pereira, Louise Carr, John Leeds
    Health Technology Assessment.2023; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Impact of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation on survival of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a narrative review
    Elena Di Girolamo, Andrea Belli, Alessandro Ottaiano, Vincenza Granata, Valentina Borzillo, Luca Tarotto, Fabiana Tatangelo, Raffaele Palaia, Corrado Civiletti, Mauro Piccirillo, Valentina D’Angelo, Francesco Fiore, Pietro Marone, Guglielmo Nasti, Frances
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Management of Pancreatobiliary Malignancies
    Dong Wook Lee, Eun Young Kim
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(5): 1635.     CrossRef
  • Survival Benefit of Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review with MetaAnalysis
    Byung Hyo Cha, Myoung-Jin Jang, Sang Hyub Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(1): 100.     CrossRef
  • Biliary endoscopy in the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis and its complications
    Brian M. Fung, James H. Tabibian
    Liver Research.2019; 3(2): 106.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic and therapeutic single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy with SpyGlassDS™: results of a multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Felicia Turowski, Ulrich Hügle, Arno Dormann, Matthias Bechtler, Ralf Jakobs, Uwe Gottschalk, Ellen Nötzel, Dirk Hartmann, Albrecht Lorenz, Frank Kolligs, Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker, Andreas Adler, Olaf Becker, Bertram Wiedenmann, Nataly Bürgel, Hanno Trö
    Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(9): 3981.     CrossRef
  • Klinischer Stellenwert der modularen Cholangioskopie
    C. Bojarski, F. Turowski
    Der Gastroenterologe.2017; 12(3): 202.     CrossRef
  • Radiofrequency ablation for management of malignant biliary obstruction: a single-center experience and review of the literature
    Amit Kumar Dutta, Umesh Basavaraju, Laura Sales, John Samuel Leeds
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2017; 11(8): 779.     CrossRef
  • Endoluminal Nd:YAG laser application in ex vivo biliary porcine tissue
    Roberta Rea, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Margareth Martino, Monica Pandolfi, Paola Saccomandi, Carla Rabitti, Anna Crescenzi, Guido Costamagna
    Lasers in Medical Science.2017; 32(6): 1411.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic management of hilar stricture
    Abhishek Gulati, Payal Thakkar, Shyam Thakkar
    Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016; 18(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Therapeutic Cholangioscopy
    Tomazo Antonio Prince Franzini, Renata Nobre Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2016; 2016: 1.     CrossRef
  • Review of endoscopic radiofrequency in biliopancreatic tumours with emphasis on clinical benefits, controversies and safety
    María-Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez, Bertrand Napoléon
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(37): 8257.     CrossRef
  • Aktuelle Therapiekonzepte für lokale Cholangiokarzinome
    D. Seehofer, T.B. Brunner, H. Wege
    Der Onkologe.2015; 21(11): 1054.     CrossRef
  • 7,552 View
  • 93 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
Close layer
Burdick's Technique for Biliary Access Revisited
Mahesh Kumar Goenka, Vijay Kumar Rai
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):20-23.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.20
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The precut sphincterotomy is used to facilitate selective biliary access in cases of difficult biliary cannulation. Needle-knife precut papillotomy is the standard of care but is associated with a high rate of complications such as pancreatitis, duodenal perforation, bleeding, etc. Sometimes during bowing of the sphincterotome/cannula and the use of guide wire to facilitate biliary cannulation, inadvertent formation of a false passage occurs in the 10 to 11 o'clock direction. Use of this step to access the bile duct by the intramucosal incision technique was first described by Burdick et al., and since then two more studies have also substantiated the safety and efficacy of this non-needle type of precut sphincterotomy. In this review, we discuss this non-needle technique of precut sphincterotomy and also share our experience using this "Burdick's technique."

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Causes and Countermeasures of Difficult Selective Biliary Cannulation: A Large Sample Size Retrospective Study
    Yang Liu, Wei Liu, Junbo Hong, Guohua Li, Youxiang Chen, Yong Xie, Xiaojiang Zhou
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2021; 31(5): 533.     CrossRef
  • Difficult Biliary Cannulation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: An Overview of Advanced Techniques
    Brian M. Fung, Teodor C. Pitea, James H. Tabibian
    EMJ Hepatology.2021; : 73.     CrossRef
  • Difficult Biliary Access
    Anish Mammen, Gregory Haber
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2015; 25(4): 619.     CrossRef
  • 6,463 View
  • 113 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Recent Advances in Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampulla of Vater Tumors: Endoscopic Ultrasonography, Intraductal Ultrasonography, and Pancreatic Stent Placement
Jimin Han, Dong Wook Lee, Ho Gak Kim
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):24-30.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.24
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Since it was first described nearly three decades ago, endoscopic papillectomy (EP) has been utilized as a less invasive, alternative therapy for adenoma of the major duodenal papilla. In this article, we review the recent advances in EP, especially those pertaining to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS), and pancreatic stent placement for the prevention of postpapillectomy pancreatitis. Because EUS and IDUS have similar diagnostic accuracies, either modality can be used for the preprocedural evaluation of ampullary tumors. Nevertheless, further technical refinements are required for a more precise evaluation. Given the paucity of data on the usefulness of EUS and/or IDUS during follow-up after EP, a well-designed study is warranted. Furthermore, pancreatic stent placement appears to have a protective effect against postpapillectomy pancreatitis; however, a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a larger number of patients is needed to assess this finding. Moreover, since pancreatic stent placement after EP is not always successful, various novel techniques have been developed to ensure reliable stent placement. Despite the recent advances in EP, further technical refinements and studies are needed to confirm their efficacy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • International Digestive Endoscopy Network consensus on the management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Seung Joo Kang, Chung Hyun Tae, Chang Seok Bang, Cheol Min Shin, Young-Hoon Jeong, Miyoung Choi, Joo Ha Hwang, Yutaka Saito, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Christopher Khor, Vu Van Khien, Kee Don Choi, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Oh Young Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 141.     CrossRef
  • IDEN Consensus on Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Seung Joo Kang, Chung Hyun Tae, Chang Seok Bang, Cheol Min Shin, Young-Hoon Jeong, Miyoung Choi, Joo Ha Hwang, Yutaka Saito, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Christopher Khor, Vu Van Khien, Kee Don Choi, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Oh Young Lee
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 83(6): 217.     CrossRef
  • Effect of prophylactic endoscopic clipping for prevention of delayed bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: a multicenter randomized trial
    Se Woo Park, Tae Jun Song, Jin Seok Park, Jae Hyuk Jun, Tae Young Park, Dong Wook Oh, Sang Soo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim
    Endoscopy.2022; 54(08): 787.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy analysis of hemostatic spray following endoscopic papillectomy: A multicenter comparative study
    Kyong Joo Lee, Tae Hoon Lee, Jae Hee Cho, Jong Jin Hyun, Sung Ill Jang, Seok Jeong, Jin‐Seok Park, Jae Kook Yang, Don Haeng Lee, Dong Ki Lee, Sang Heum Park
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(11): 2138.     CrossRef
  • 10,067 View
  • 148 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Rare Nonneoplastic Cysts of Pancreas
Yeon Suk Kim, Jae Hee Cho
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):31-38.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.31
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Pancreatic cysts represent a small proportion of pancreatic diseases, but their incidence has been recently increasing. Most pancreatic cysts are identified incidentally, causing a dilemma for both clinicians and patients. In contrast to ductal adenocarcinoma, neoplastic pancreatic cysts may be cured by resection. In general, pancreatic cysts are classified as neoplastic or non-neoplastic cysts. The predominant types of neoplastic cysts include intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, serous cystic neoplasms, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. With the exception of serous type, neoplastic cysts, have malignant potential, and in most cases requires resection. Non-neoplastic cysts include pseudocyst, retention cyst, benign epithelial cysts, lymphoepithelial cysts, squamous lined cysts (dermoid cyst and epidermal cyst in intrapancreatic accessory spleen), mucinous nonneoplastic cysts, and lymphangiomas. The incidence of nonneoplastic, noninflammatory cysts is about 6.3% of all pancreatic cysts. Despite the use of high-resolution imaging technologies and cytologic tissue acquisition with endosonography, distinguishing nonneoplastic from neoplastic cysts remains difficult with most differentiations made postoperatively. Nonetheless, the definitive distinction between non-neoplastic and neoplastic cysts is crucial as unnecessary surgery could be avoided with proper diagnosis. Therefore, consideration of these rare disease entities should be entertained before deciding on surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A resected case of a simple mucinous cyst of the pancreas that was difficult to differentiate from a mucinous cystic neoplasm before surgery
    Tokio WAKABAYASHI, Yukihiro SHIROTA, Yuichi YOSHIE, Yoshiharu TOMITA, Yoshimichi UEDA
    Suizo.2024; 39(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • The Use of Integrated Molecular Testing in the Assessment and Management of Pancreatic Cysts
    Joshua D. Kirschenbaum, Tamas A. Gonda
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2023; 25(8): 182.     CrossRef
  • Mucinous non neoplastic cyst of the pancreas: a case report
    Ismail Elahabadi, Amir Rahnama, Gholamreza Bazmandegan, Zahra Kamiab
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The faith of non-surveilled pancreatic cysts: a bicentric retrospective study
    N. Surci, G. Marchegiani, S. Andrianello, T. Pollini, J. Mühlbacher, G. Jomrich, P. Richwien, D. Tamandl, M. Schindl, C. Bassi, R. Salvia, K. Sahora
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Intramural Pancreatic Pseudocysts in a Dog: A Case Report and Human Literature Review
    Tiffany A. Johnson, Arathi Vinayak, Jin Y. Heo, Todd A. Green
    Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.2022; 58(2): 96.     CrossRef
  • Large-duct pattern invasive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas–a variant mimicking pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A minireview
    Hiroki Sato, Andrew Scott Liss, Yusuke Mizukami
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(23): 3262.     CrossRef
  • Cystic pancreatic lesions: MR imaging findings and management
    Giovanni Morana, Pierluigi Ciet, Silvia Venturini
    Insights into Imaging.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MRI of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions: a new updated morphological approach for the differential diagnosis
    Giuseppe Mamone, Luca Barresi, Alessandro Tropea, Ambra Di Piazza, Roberto Miraglia
    Updates in Surgery.2020; 72(3): 617.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and differentiation of mature cystic teratoma of pancreas from its mimics
    Xin he Zhou, Ji Kong Ma, Bimbadhar Valluru, Kalyan Sharma, Ling Liu, Jin Bo Hu
    Medicine.2020; 99(47): e23267.     CrossRef
  • Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Epidermoid Cyst Without a Solid Component (Residual Splenic Tissue) vs. Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm
    Kousei Ishigami, Akihiro Nishie, Hiroyuki Irie, Yoshiki Asayama, Yasuhiro Ushijima, Yukihisa Takayama, Daisule Okamoto, Nobuhiro Fujita, Takao Ohtsuka, Tetsuhide Ito, Naoki Mochidome, Hiroshi Honda
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2019; 50(1): 91.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic ability of artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of cyst fluid in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic cystic lesions
    Yusuke Kurita, Takamichi Kuwahara, Kazuo Hara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Nozomi Okuno, Shimpei Matsumoto, Masahiro Obata, Hiroki Koda, Masahiro Tajika, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Atsushi Nakajima, Kensuke Kubota, Yasumasa Niwa
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between macroscopically visible tissue samples and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided through-the-needle microforceps biopsy sampling of pancreatic cystic lesions
    Stefano Francesco Crinò, Laura Bernardoni, Lorenzo Brozzi, Luca Barresi, Giuseppe Malleo, Roberto Salvia, Luca Frulloni, Sokol Sina, Alice Parisi, Andrea Remo, Alberto Larghi, Armando Gabbrielli, Erminia Manfrin
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2019; 90(6): 933.     CrossRef
  • Superparamagnetic iron-oxide-enhanced diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of intrapancreatic accessory spleen
    Kousei Ishigami, Akihiro Nishie, Tomohiro Nakayama, Yoshiki Asayama, Daisuke Kakihara, Nobuhiro Fujita, Yasuhiro Ushijima, Daisuke Okamoto, Takao Ohtsuka, Yasuhisa Mori, Tetsuhide Ito, Naoki Mochidome, Hiroshi Honda
    Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(10): 3325.     CrossRef
  • European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms

    Gut.2018; 67(5): 789.     CrossRef
  • Kyste mucineux simple du pancréas : description d’un cas et revue de la littérature
    Maxime Hamon, Pierre Balladur, Jean-François Fléjou
    Annales de Pathologie.2018; 38(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • An Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen That Was Difficult to Diagnose Due to Temporal Changes after Splenectomy
    Daisuke Uchida, Koichiro Tsutsumi, Hironari Kato, Hiroyuki Okada
    Internal Medicine.2018; 57(5): 681.     CrossRef
  • Mucinous nonneoplastic cyst of the pancreas: CT and MRI appearances
    Kousei Ishigami, Akihiro Nishie, Naoki Mochidome, Yoshiki Asayama, Yasuhiro Ushijima, Daisuke Kakihara, Daisuke Okamoto, Nobuhiro Fujita, Takao Ohtsuka, Yoshihiro Miyasaka, Tomoyuki Hida, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Hiroshi Honda
    Abdominal Radiology.2017; 42(12): 2827.     CrossRef
  • Natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and non‐neoplastic cyst: long‐term imaging follow‐up study
    Yuya Hisada, Naoyoshi Nagata, Koh Imbe, Yusuke Takasaki, Katsunori Sekine, Tsuyoshi Tajima, Mikio Yanase, Kazuma Fujimoto, Junichi Akiyama, Naomi Uemura
    Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2017; 24(7): 401.     CrossRef
  • Intramural gastric pseudocyst
    Jon Arne Søreide, Mohammed S.S. Al-Saiddi, Lars Normann Karlsen
    Medicine.2017; 96(50): e9157.     CrossRef
  • Neoplasia sólida pseudopapilar de páncreas
    Montiel Jiménez-Fuertes, José Ramón Ramírez-García, Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, Gustavo Díaz García, Manuel Durán-Poveda
    Cirugía Española.2016; 94(2): e31.     CrossRef
  • Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas
    Montiel Jiménez-Fuertes, José Ramón Ramírez-García, Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, Gustavo Díaz García, Manuel Durán-Poveda
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2016; 94(2): e31.     CrossRef
  • Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas Arising in the Setting of an Intermixed Acinar Cell Cystadenoma of the Pancreas: Report of a Rare Case
    Benjamin B. Scott, Thea P. Price, Zachary M. Callahan, Justin S. Poling, Harish Lavu
    Case Reports in Pancreatic Cancer.2016; 2(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • A Rare Case of Epidermoid Cyst in the Pancreatic Tail Invaginated from the Splenic Hilum: The Long-term Changes in the Imaging Findings
    Yoshiaki Sugiyama, Toru Kawamoto, Junpei Sasajima, Kazuya Koizumi, Hidenori Karasaki, Yusuke Mizukami
    Internal Medicine.2016; 55(24): 3591.     CrossRef
  • 11,806 View
  • 169 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Survey of Endoscope Reprocessing in Korea
Jeong Bae Park, Jae Nam Yang, Yun Jeong Lim, Ja Seol Koo, Jae Young Jang, Sang Hoon Park, Su Jin Hong, Sang-Woo Kim, Hoon Jai Chun, Disinfection Management Committee of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):39-47.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.39
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

There is a growing emphasis on quality management in endoscope reprocessing. Previous surveys conducted in 2002 and 2004 were not practitioner-oriented. Therefore, this survey is significant for being the first to target actual participants in endoscope reprocessing in Korea.

Methods

This survey comprised 33 self-filled questions, and was personally delivered to nurses and nursing auxiliaries in the endoscopy departments of eight hospitals belonging to the society. The anonymous responses were collected after 1 week either by post or in person by committee members.

Results

The survey included 100 participants. In the questionnaire addressing compliance rates with the reprocessing guideline, the majority (98.9%) had a high compliance rate compared to 27% of respondents in 2002 and 50% in 2004. The lowest rate of compliance with a reprocessing procedure was reported for transporting the contaminated endoscope in a sealed container. Automated endoscope reprocessors were available in all hospitals. Regarding reprocessing time, more than half of the subjects replied that reprocessing took more than 15 minutes (63.2%).

Conclusions

The quality management of endoscope reprocessing has improved as since the previous survey. A national survey expanded to include primary clinics is required to determine the true current status of endoscope reprocessing.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recommendations and guidelines for endoscope reprocessing: Current position statement of digestive endoscopic society of Taiwan
    Wei-Kuo Chang, Chen-Ling Peng, Yen-Wei Chen, Cheuk-Kay Sun, Chieh-Chang Chen, Tao-Chieh Liu, Yin-Yi Chu, I-Fang Tsai, Chen-Shuan Chung, Hsiao-Fen Lin, Fang-Yu Hsu, Wei-Chen Tai, Hsi-Chang Lee, Hsu-Heng Yen, E-Ming Wang, Shu-Hui Chen, Cheng-Hsin Chu, Ming-
    Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection.2024; 57(2): 211.     CrossRef
  • Monthly endoscopy surveillance culture facilitates detection of breaches in the scope reprocessing procedure: 5‐year experience in an endoscopy center
    Shu‐Hui Chen, Theophile Liu, Huei‐Wen Lai, Hui‐Lan Chang, Hsu‐Heng Yen
    Advances in Digestive Medicine.2022; 9(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • A nationwide survey on the effectiveness of training on endoscope reprocessing within the national cancer screening program in Korea
    Hye Young Shin, Da Hun Jang, Jae Kwan Jun
    American Journal of Infection Control.2021; 49(8): 1031.     CrossRef
  • Accreditation program for gastrointestinal endoscopes reprocessing in Italy: An on-site survey
    Giancarlo Spinzi, Angelo Milano, Piero Brosolo, Paola Da Massa Carrara, Maurizio Labardi, Alberto Merighi, Luisa Riccardi, Francesco Torresan, Maurizio Capelli
    Endoscopy International Open.2021; 09(11): E1627.     CrossRef
  • Education and Training Guidelines for the Board of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Hee Seok Moon, Eun Kwang Choi, Ji Hyun Seo, Jeong Seop Moon, Ho June Song, Kyoung Oh Kim, Jong Jin Hyun, Sung Kwan Shin, Beom Jae Lee, Sang Heon Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(4): 345.     CrossRef
  • Feedback Survey of the Effect, Burden, and Cost of the National Endoscopic Quality Assessment Program during the Past 5 Years in Korea
    Yu Kyung Cho, Jeong Seop Moon, Dong Su Han, Yong Chan Lee, Yeol Kim, Bo Young Park, Il-Kwun Chung, Jin-Oh Kim, Jong Pil Im, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun Gun Kim, Sang Kil Lee, Hang Lak Lee, Jae Young Jang, Eun Sun Kim, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon
    Clinical Endoscopy.2016; 49(6): 542.     CrossRef
  • Adequacy of Reprocessing Gastrointestinal Endoscopes in Korea Hospitals
    YoungOk Kim, Jae Sim Jeong
    Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science.2016; 18(4): 288.     CrossRef
  • Role of Clinical Endoscopy in Emphasizing Endoscope Disinfection
    Ji Kon Ryu, Eun Young Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Il Ju Choi, Ki Baik Hahm
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(5): 351.     CrossRef
  • Current Status of Endoscope Reprocessing in Korea
    Young-Seok Cho
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 8,488 View
  • 93 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison between the Effectiveness of Oral Phloroglucin and Cimetropium Bromide as Premedication for Diagnostic Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: An Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Study
Hye-Won Yun, Ki-Nam Shim, Sun-Kyung Na, Jae-In Ryu, Min-Jin Lee, Eun-Mi Song, Seong-Eun Kim, Hye-Kyoung Jung, Sung-Ae Jung
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):48-51.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.48
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

Suppression of gastrointestinal (GI) peristalsis during GI endoscopy commonly requires antispasmodic agents such as hyoscine butylbromide, atropine, glucagon, and cimetropium bromide. This study examined the efficacy of oral phloroglucin for the suppression of peristalsis, its impact on patient compliance, and any associated complications, and compared it with intravenous or intramuscular cimetropium bromide administration.

Methods

This was a randomized, investigator-blind, prospective comparative study. A total of 172 patients were randomized into two groups according to the following medications administered prior to upper endoscopy: oral phloroglucin (group A, n=86), and cimetropium bromide (group B, n=86). The numbers and the degrees of peristalsis events at the antrum and second duodenal portion were assessed for 30 seconds.

Results

A significantly higher number of gastric peristalsis events was observed in group A (0.49 vs. 0.08, p<0.001), but the difference was not clinically significant. No significant difference between both groups was found in the occurrence of duodenal peristalsis events (1.79 vs. 1.63, p=0.569). The incidence of dry mouth was significantly higher with cimetropium bromide than with phloroglucin (50% vs. 15.1%, p<0.001).

Conclusions

Oral phloroglucin can be used as an antispasmodic agent during upper endoscopy, and shows antispasmodic efficacy and adverse effects similar to those of cimetropium bromide.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effectiveness of oral phloroglucinol as a premedication for unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial
    HyeIn Jung, Hyun Jung Kim, Eun Sung Choi, Ju Yup Lee, Kyung Sik Park, Kwang Bum Cho, Yoo Jin Lee, Lise Lotte Gluud
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(8): e0255016.     CrossRef
  • Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal
    Peel Jung, Su B. Park, Hyung W. Kim, Dae H. Kang, Cheol W. Choi, Su J. Kim, Hyeong S. Nam, Dae G. Ryu, Joung B. Hong, Dong J. Kim
    Medicine.2018; 97(25): e11253.     CrossRef
  • 6,602 View
  • 75 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with Circumferential Incision for the Treatment of Large Sessile Polyps and Laterally Spreading Tumors of the Colorectum
Young Mi Hong, Hyung Wook Kim, Su Bum Park, Cheol Woong Choi, Dae Hwan Kang
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):52-58.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.52
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the standard treatment for colorectal polyps such as adenomas and early cancers with no risk of lymph node metastasis. However, endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps (≥20 mm diameter) is difficult to perform. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of EMR with circumferential incision (EMR-CI) for the resection of large sessile polyps (Is) and laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in the colorectum.

Methods

Between February 2009 and March 2011, we resected 80 large colorectal polyps by EMR-CI. We retrospectively investigated the en bloc resection rate, histologic complete resection rate, recurrence rate, and complications.

Results

The median polyp size was approximately 25 mm (range, 20 to 50), and the morphologic types included Is (13 cases), LST-granular (37 cases), and LST-nongranular (30 cases). The en bloc and complete histologic resection rates were 66.3% and 45.0%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 0% (median follow-up duration, 23 months), and perforation occurred in five cases (6.3%).

Conclusions

EMR-CI is an effective treatment modality for 20 to 30 mm-sized colorectal polyps, and may be considered as a second line therapeutic option if ESD is difficult.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection as a salvage option for difficult colorectal conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Shin Morimoto, Hidenori Tanaka, Yudai Takehara, Noriko Yamamoto, Fumiaki Tanino, Yuki Kamigaichi, Ken Yamashita, Hidehiko Takigawa, Ryo Yuge, Yuji Urabe, Shiro Oka
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(1): 222.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: current standards of treatment
    Mahsa Taghiakbari, Dong Hyun Danny Kim, Roupen Djinbachian, Daniel von Renteln
    eGastroenterology.2024; 2(2): e100025.     CrossRef
  • Hybrid Endoscopic Resection With Endo-knife and Snare for Colorectal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shinji Yoshii, Takefumi Kikuchi, Yuki Hayashi, Masahiro Nojima, Hiro-o Yamano, Hiroshi Nakase
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 25(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, and Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Management of Rectal and Anorectal Lesions: A Narrative Review
    Pedro Moreira, Pedro Cardoso, Guilherme Macedo, João Santos-Antunes
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(14): 4777.     CrossRef
  • Indications and outcomes of colorectal hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection: a large multicenter 10-year study
    Yuki Okamoto, Shiro Oka, Shinji Tanaka, Shinji Nagata, Masaki Kunihiro, Toshio Kuwai, Yuko Hiraga, Seiji Onogawa, Takeshi Mizumoto, Hideharu Okanobu, Morihisa Akagi, Kazuaki Chayama
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(3): 1894.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large (20–30 mm) flat colorectal lesions
    Chang Kyo Oh, Young Wook Cho, In Hyoung Choi, Han Hee Lee, Chul‐Hyun Lim, Jin Su Kim, Bo‐In Lee, Young‐Seok Cho
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(3): 568.     CrossRef
  • Cap-assisted EMR versus standard inject and cut EMR for treatment of large colonic laterally spreading tumors: a randomized multicenter study (with videos)
    Massimo Conio, Raffaele Manta, Rosa Angela Filiberti, Todd H. Baron, Luigi Pasquale, Mario Marini, Antonella De Ceglie
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 96(5): 829.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic techniques to reduce recurrence rates after colorectal EMR: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gijs Kemper, Ayla S. Turan, Erik J. Schoon, Ruud W. M. Schrauwen, Ludger S. M. Epping, Christian Gerges, Torsten Beyna, Horst Neuhaus, Ufuk Gündug, Peter D. Siersema, Erwin J. M. van Geenen
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(10): 5422.     CrossRef
  • Indications and outcomes of endoscopic resection for non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: A narrative review
    Endrit Shahini, Diogo Libânio, Giacomo Lo Secco, Antonio Pisani, Alberto Arezzo
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 13(8): 275.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a meta-analysis
    Hongjing Zhao, Jie Yin, Cuiying Ji, Xin Wang, Na Wang
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases
    Koichi Okamoto, Naoki Muguruma, Kaizo Kagemoto, Yasuhiro Mitsui, Daisaku Fujimoto, Shinji Kitamura, Tetsuo Kimura, Masahiro Sogabe, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Tetsuji Takayama
    Digestive Endoscopy.2017; 29(S2): 45.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with Circumferential Mucosal Incision for Colorectal Neoplasms: Comparison with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and between Two Endoscopists with Different Experiences
    Dong-Hoon Yang, Min-Seob Kwak, Sang Hyoung Park, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Hyun Gun Kim, Shai Friedland
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(4): 379.     CrossRef
  • Local recurrence and subsequent endoscopic treatment after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection with or without precutting in the colorectum
    Myeongsook Seo, Eun Mi Song, Gwang Un Kim, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Intestinal Research.2017; 15(4): 502.     CrossRef
  • How to deal with large colorectal polyps
    Selvi Thirumurthi, Gottumukkala S. Raju
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2016; 32(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review
    Antonella De Ceglie, Cesare Hassan, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Takahisa Matsuda, Yutaka Saito, Lorenzo Ridola, Pradeep Bhandari, Federica Boeri, Massimo Conio
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2016; 104: 138.     CrossRef
  • Should antibiotics be administered after endoscopic mucosalresection in patients with colon polyps?
    Zhimeng SHI, Hui QIU, Huangang LIU, Honggang YU
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.2016; 46: 1486.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Approach for Superficial Colorectal Neoplasms
    Jun-feng Xu, Lang Yang, Peng Jin, Jian-qiu Sheng
    Gastrointestinal Tumors.2016; 3(2): 69.     CrossRef
  • Many Options to Manage Laterally Spreading Tumors
    Dong Kyung Chang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • 9,885 View
  • 119 Download
  • 22 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref
Close layer
Twenty-Second versus Sixty-Second Dilation Duration in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Treatment of Small Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
Byoung Wook Bang, Tae Hoon Lee, Tae Jun Song, Joung-Ho Han, Hyun Jong Choi, Jong Ho Moon, Chang-Il Kwon, Seok Jeong
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):59-65.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.59
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has been advocated as an alternative therapy to endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, there is no established consensus on the optimal balloon dilation duration (BDD). We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications between the 20- and 60-second EPBD groups.

Methods

A total of 228 patients with small CBD stones (≤12 mm) were randomly assigned to undergo EPBD with a 20- or 60-second duration at six institutions. We evaluated baseline patient characteristics, endoscopic data, clinical outcomes, and procedure-related complications. In addition, we analyzed risk factors for postprocedural pancreatitis.

Results

CBD stones were removed successfully in 107 of 109 patients (98.1%) in the 20-second group and in 112 of 119 patients (94.1%) in the 60-second group (p=0.146). Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in seven patients (6.4%) in the 20-second group and nine patients (7.5%) in the 60-second group (p=0.408). In multivariate analysis, contrast dye injection into the pancreatic duct is a significant risk factor for post-EPBD pancreatitis.

Conclusions

Based on the data showing that there were no significant differences in safety and efficacy between the two BDD groups, 20 seconds of BDD may be adequate for treatment of small CBD stones with EPBD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The therapeutic effect of balloon dilatation with different duration for biliary duct calculi: A network meta-analysis
    ZhiYuan Yu, Chen Liang, ShiYu Yang, Xu Zhang, Yan Sun
    Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2022; 18(3): 327.     CrossRef
  • The ballooning time in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones
    Qiang Wang, Luyao Fu, Tao Wu, Xiong Ding
    Medicine.2021; 100(11): e24735.     CrossRef
  • Nouveautés dans la prise en charge des calculs biliaires à l’UEGW 2015
    E. Bories, C. Lefort
    Acta Endoscopica.2016; 46(1-2): 20.     CrossRef
  • Is endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation really a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis?
    Toshio Fujisawa, Koichi Kagawa, Kantaro Hisatomi, Kensuke Kubota, Atsushi Nakajima, Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(26): 5909.     CrossRef
  • Is the Balloon Dilation Duration in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation (EPBD) Related to the Occurrence of Post-EPBD Pancreatitis?
    Dong Uk Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • 7,542 View
  • 83 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Case Reports
Corrosive Esophagitis Caused by Ingestion of Picosulfate
Jae Yong Seo, Ki Joo Kang, Ho Suk Kang, Seong Eun Kim, Ji Won Park, Sung Hoon Moon, Jong Hyeok Kim, Choong Kee Park
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):66-69.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.66
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Corrosive esophagitis is characterized by caustic injury due to the ingestion of chemical agents, mainly alkaline substances such as detergents. Esophageal bleeding, perforation, or stricture can be worsened by high-degree corrosive esophagitis. Picosulfate is a commonly used laxative frequently administered for bowel preparation before colonoscopy or colon surgery. Picosulfate powder should be completely dissolved in water before ingestion because the powder itself may cause chemical burning of the esophagus and stomach. Here, we report a case of corrosive esophagitis due to the ingestion of picosulfate powder that was not completely dissolved in water.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • 3D printing of melatonin-loaded esophageal stents for treatment of corrosive esophagitis
    Tianyu Yuan, Dongdong Liu, Qian Li, Meng Wei, Yingbao Sun, Hua Xie, Lina Du, Bochuan Yuan, Pei Deng, Yanli Guo, Yiguang Jin
    Applied Materials Today.2024; 37: 102161.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Grading as a Predictor to Develop Strictures in Corrosive Esophagitis in Children
    Ioana Badiu Tisa, Lia Pepelea, Alexandru Pirvan, Iulia Lupan, Gabriel Samasca, Madalina Adriana Bordea
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(4): 1699.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of a patient with scar constitution combined with corrosive esophageal strictures after different endoscopic therapies
    Haixia Wang, Wei Tao
    Clinical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Esophageal Stricture Caused by the Ingestion of Undissolved Picosulfate Powder
    Daehyun Kim, Byungha Cho, Jong Wook Choi, Ki Bae Kim, Seon Mee Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(1): 122.     CrossRef
  • The effects of ω-3 fish oil emulsion-based parenteral nutrition plus combination treatment for acute paraquat poisoning
    Zhaohua Meng, Yanling Dong, Hengbo Gao, Dongqi Yao, Yu Gong, Qingbing Meng, Tuokang Zheng, Xiaolei Cui, Xiaoyun Su, Yingping Tian
    Journal of International Medical Research.2019; 47(2): 600.     CrossRef
  • Unexpected caustic esophageal injury associated with the use of a bowel preparation agent
    Yi-Ting Chou, Tien-Yu Huang, Chao-Feng Chang
    Journal of Medical Sciences.2019; 39(5): 251.     CrossRef
  • Acute Abdominal Pain after Ingestion of Bowel Cleansing Agent for Colonoscopy
    Hwon Kim, Jong Seol Park, Yong Sung Kim
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2018; 18(4): 275.     CrossRef
  • Acute Gastric Injury Caused by Undissolved Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate Powder
    Eun Young Ze, Chang Hwan Choi, Jeong Wook Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(1): 87.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Thermal Esophageal Injury Induced by Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate
    Dong-Hyuk Yang, Byoung Wook Bang, Kye Sook Kwon, Hyung Kil Kim, Yong Woon Shin
    Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • Esophagitis and its causes: Who is “guilty” when acid is found “not guilty”?
    Laurino Grossi, Antonio Francesco Ciccaglione, Leonardo Marzio
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 23(17): 3011.     CrossRef
  • 9,483 View
  • 111 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Esophageal Cancer in Esophageal Diverticula Associated with Achalasia
Ah Ran Choi, Nu Ri Chon, Young Hoon Youn, Hyo Chae Paik, Yon Hee Kim, Hyojin Park
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):70-73.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.70
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The simultaneous occurrence of achalasia and esophageal diverticula is rare. Here, we report the case of a 68-year-old man with multiple esophageal diverticula associated with achalasia who was later diagnosed with early esophageal cancer. He initially presented with dysphagia and dyspepsia, and injection of botulinum toxin to the lower esophageal sphincter relieved his symptoms. Five years later, however, the patient presented with worsening of symptoms, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed. The endoscopic findings showed multifocal lugol-voiding lesions identified as moderate dysplasia. We decided to use photodynamic therapy to treat the multifocal dysplastic lesions. At follow-up EGD 2 months after photodynamic therapy, more lugol-voiding lesions representing a squamous cell carcinoma in situ were found. The patient ultimately underwent surgery for the treatment of recurrent esophageal multifocal neoplasia. After a follow-up period of 3 years, the patient showed a good outcome without symptoms. To manage premalignant lesions such as achalasia with esophageal diverticula, clinicians should be cautious, but have an aggressive approach regarding endoscopic surveillance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Advanced squamous cell carcinoma in an asymptomatic, large, epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum
    Tomoaki Yoshida, Satoru Hashimoto, Ken-ichi Mizuno, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Junji Yokoyama, Hajime Umezu, Shuji Terai
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 13(4): 477.     CrossRef
  • Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Arising from an Epiphrenic Diverticulum Treated by Curative Esophagectomy Combined with Adjacent Organs Resection
    Aina KUNITOMO, Eiji HIGAKI, Tetsuya ABE, Takahiro HOSOI, Seiji ITO, Yasuhiro SHIMIZU
    Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2019; 80(11): 1999.     CrossRef
  • Imaging in the Evaluation of Endoscopic or Surgical Treatment for Achalasia
    Diego Palladino, Andrea Mardighian, Marilina D’Amora, Luca Roberto, Francesco Lassandro, Claudia Rossi, Gianluca Gatta, Mariano Scaglione, Guglielmi Giuseppe
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2016; 2016: 1.     CrossRef
  • 6,477 View
  • 59 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
An Extremely Rare Case of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Gastric Endometriosis
Jong Kun Ha, Cheol Woong Choi, Hyung Wook Kim, Dae Hwan Kang, Su Bum Park, Su Jin Kim, Jeong Beom Hong
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):74-77.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.74
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Endometriosis is a disease characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity. It is common in women of childbearing age, and is most frequently located in the pelvic cavity. Approximately 10% of endometriosis cases occur outside of the pelvic cavity in locations such as the intestines, genitourinary system, kidneys, lungs, and skin. However, there have been few reports of endometriosis in the stomach. Here, we report a rare case of endometriosis that presented as a subepithelial stomach tumor.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Gastric Endometriosis
    Bendeguz Metz, Yael Tovia, Dimitrios R. Kalaitzopoulos, Nicolas Samartzis
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024; 31(8): 633.     CrossRef
  • Müllerian‐type carcinosarcoma arising in gastric endometriosis: Case report and review of the literature
    Rayne Peerenboom, Sabrina Wang, Ryan Morgan, Seth Sankary, Lindsay Yassan, Katherine Kurnit, Mitchell C. Posner
    Clinical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcoelomic and Lympho-Hematogenous Dissemination of Endometrioid Heterotopias – the Mechanism of Extragenital Endometriosis Formation
    R. V. Ukrainets, Yu. S. Korneva
    Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology.2021; 10(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Molecular and Cellular Changes in the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis
    K. A. Toniyan, O. I. Orlov, V. V. Boyarintsev, I. V. Ogneva
    Human Physiology.2021; 47(6): 690.     CrossRef
  • Imaging of gastrointestinal endometriosis: what the radiologist should know
    Adrian Jaramillo-Cardoso, Anuradha S. Shenoy-Bhangle, Wendaline M. VanBuren, Giancarlo Schiappacasse, Christine O. Menias, Koenraad J. Mortele
    Abdominal Radiology.2020; 45(6): 1694.     CrossRef
  • 7,279 View
  • 58 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Through the Sinus Tract of a Surgical Gastrostomy
Katerina Kotzampassi, George Stavrou
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):78-80.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.78
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

We present the case of a woman on whom a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was performed through the sinus tract of a previous surgical gastrostomy for supraglottic obstructing malignancy. Five years after the induction of the surgical gastrostomy, she experienced a peristomal leakage, leading to severe necrotizing fasciitis, with skin irritation and inflammation. Despite extensive treatment to heal the abdominal wall close to the feeding tube, it recurred 3 months later, without any obvious cause. It was thus decided to perform a new gastrostomy in a nearby normal skin area, but, since it was totally impossible for the endoscope to be passed by mouth, due to obstruction, the sinus tract of the gastrostomy was used to facilitate endoscope insertion into the stomach for a new PEG.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy through a cervical esophageal fistula. An alternative, much improved technique for patient safety
    George Stavrou, Vassilios Grosomanidis, Anastasia Sarafidou, Gavriil Tsiropoulos, Stefanos Triaridis, Katerina Kotzampassi
    American Journal of Otolaryngology.2020; 41(3): 102408.     CrossRef
  • 6,004 View
  • 51 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Colonic Lymphangiomatosis Resolved after Excisional Biopsy
Young Soo Lee, Gyu Won Kim, Hye Jae Cho, Chan Sup Shim
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):81-84.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.81
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Lymphangioma is an uncommon malformation of the lymphatic system that involves a benign proliferation of the lymphatics, with no established treatment method. Multiple colonic lymphangioma, or colonic lymphangiomatosis, is an extremely rare condition. We report a case of colonic lymphangiomatosis that was detected during a colonoscopic examination conducted as part of a general health check-up. The lesion completely resolved after excisional biopsy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intermittent melena and refractory anemia due to jejunal cavernous lymphangioma: A case report
    Kai-Rui Liu, Sheng Zhang, Wei-Run Chen, You-Xing Huang, Xu-Guang Li
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(4): 1208.     CrossRef
  • Reverse Koebner's phenomenon in a case of Lymphohemangioma circumscriptum: A diagnostic clue representative of the Whimster hypothesis
    Manu Sehrawat, Kabir Sardana, Anusha Katare, Purnima Malhotra
    Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology.2020; 19(7): 1702.     CrossRef
  • Lymphangiomatosis of the ileum with perforation: A case report and review of the literature
    Antonio Giuliani, Lucia Romano, Gino Coletti, Mohammad Walid A Fatayer, Giuseppe Calvisi, Francesco Maffione, Chiara Muolo, Vincenzo Vicentini, Mario Schietroma, Francesco Carlei
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2019; 41: 6.     CrossRef
  • 7,609 View
  • 83 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Brief Report
The "Two-Sword Fencing" Technique in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Toshihiro Nishizawa, Toshio Uraoka, Yasutoshi Ochiai, Hidekazu Suzuki, Osamu Goto, Ai Fujimoto, Tadateru Maehata, Takanori Kanai, Naohisa Yahagi
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):85-86.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.85
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical benefit of the multibending endoscope for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial
    Koichi Hamada, Yoshinori Horikawa, Yoshiki Shiwa, Kae Techigawara, Takayuki Nagahashi, Daizo Fukushima, Shinya Nishida, Ryota Koyanagi, Koichiro Kawano, Noriyuki Nishino, Michitaka Honda
    Endoscopy.2021; 53(07): 683.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Toshihiro Nishizawa, Hidekazu Suzuki
    Cancers.2020; 12(10): 2849.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of a multibending endoscope in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Koichi Hamada, Yoshinori Horikawa, Ryota Koyanagi, Yoshiki Shiwa, Kae Techigawara, Shinya Nishida, Yujiro Nakayama, Michitaka Honda
    VideoGIE.2019; 4(12): 577.     CrossRef
  • Is the Double Channel Gastroscope Useful in Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Large Sessile Colon Polyps?
    Kwang An Kwon
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(2): 89.     CrossRef
  • 5,888 View
  • 53 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Notice of Retraction
Retraction Notice to "Endoscopic Resection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Comparision of Polypectomy and Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Band Ligation"
Sang Heon Lee, Seun Ja Park, Hyung Hun Kim, Kyung Sun Ok, Ji Hyun Kim, Sam Ryong Jee, Sang Young Seol, Bo Mi Kim
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):87-87.   Published online January 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.87
Retracts: Clin Endosc 2012;45(1):89
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 4,920 View
  • 71 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP