Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Previous issues
19 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Funded articles
Volume 51(5); September 2018
Prev issue Next issue
Commentarys
What is the Best Sampling Method to Monitor the Effect of Endoscopy Reprocessing?
Kwang Hyun Chung, Byung Ik Jang
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):397-398.   Published online September 21, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.146
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 3,903 View
  • 94 Download
Close layer
Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer
Eun Hye Kim, Jun Chul Park
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):399-401.   Published online September 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.138
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 8,287 View
  • 110 Download
Close layer
The More, the Better: Is This True in Endoscopy for Gastric Cancer Screening?
Seong Woo Jeon
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):402-403.   Published online August 21, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.098
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 3,875 View
  • 131 Download
Close layer
Importance of the Size of Adenomatous Polyps in Determining Appropriate Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals
Hoon Sup Koo, Kyu Chan Huh
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):404-406.   Published online September 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.139
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 3,715 View
  • 101 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
Close layer
Focused Review Series: Updates on endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapieses
Various Intragastric Balloons Under Clinical Investigation
Seong Ji Choi, Hyuk Soon Choi
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):407-415.   Published online September 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.140
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Obesity is a chronic disease with an exponentially increasing incidence rate, and its negative effects are well documented in numerous studies. As a result, the importance of bariatric therapy cannot be overemphasized, and many bariatric treatment methods with varying mechanisms have been developed. Of the available treatment methods, intragastric balloons, introduced in the 1980s, have been shown to be a safe and effective treatment modality; various intragastric balloon products have been developed and are currently being widely used in clinical settings. However, the disadvantages of intragastric balloons, such as unclear long-term weight loss benefits and complications experienced during insertion and removal, preclude their wider use. In this review, we discuss different intragastric balloon products, focusing on those under clinical investigation, and suggest future research directions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review
    Maheeba Abdulla, Nafeesa Mohammed, Jehad AlQamish
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(40): 5526.     CrossRef
  • Mechanisms of Linggui Zhugan Decoction in the Treatment of Obesity Based on Network Pharmacology
    Chunmei Liu, Li Zhang, Yubin Yang
    Science of Advanced Materials.2023; 15(9): 1265.     CrossRef
  • A vibrating ingestible bioelectronic stimulator modulates gastric stretch receptors for illusory satiety
    Shriya S. Srinivasan, Amro Alshareef, Alexandria Hwang, Ceara Byrne, Johannes Kuosmanen, Keiko Ishida, Joshua Jenkins, Sabrina Liu, Wiam Abdalla Mohammed Madani, Alison M. Hayward, Niora Fabian, Giovanni Traverso
    Science Advances.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Intragastric Balloon Placement on the Stomach Wall: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Anna Rzepa, Michał Wysocki, Jerzy Hankus, Joanna Szpor, Jadwiga Dworak, Mateusz Wierdak, Piotr Małczak, Tomasz Stefura, Edyta Korbut, Marcin Surmiak, Marcin Magierowski, Michał Pędziwiatr, Piotr Major
    Obesity Surgery.2022; 32(7): 2426.     CrossRef
  • Adherence to Healthy Lifestyle Habits Is a Determinant of the Effectiveness of Weight Loss among Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies
    Gemma Miranda-Peñarroya, María Fernanda Zerón-Rugerio, Marta Vallejo-Gracia, Ricardo Sorio-Fuentes, Fernando Saenger-Ruiz, Maria Izquierdo-Pulido
    Nutrients.2022; 14(11): 2261.     CrossRef
  • Small Bowel Obstruction due to Migrated Intragastric Balloon: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Min Yien Tan, Kar Yin Fok, Huong Nguyen, Senarath Edirimanne, Michael Devadas, Muthukumaran Rangarajan
    Case Reports in Surgery.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic intragastric balloon therapy for 15 years in Japan: Results of nationwide surveys
    Masayuki Ohta, Satoshi Maekawa, Hiroki Imazu, Fumihiko Hatao, Yoshiaki Okumura, Hidetoshi Kiyonaga, Yukio Sawada, Masahiko Inamori, Yasuyuki Seto, Takayuki Masaki, Tetsuya Kakuma, Kazunori Kasama, Masafumi Inomata, Yuko Kitagawa, Michio Kaminishi, Seigo K
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2021; 14(3): 401.     CrossRef
  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment
    Luigi Schiavo, Giovanni De Stefano, Francesco Persico, Stefano Gargiulo, Federica Di Spirito, Giulia Griguolo, Niccolò Petrucciani, Eric Fontas, Antonio Iannelli, Vincenzo Pilone
    Obesity Surgery.2021; 31(4): 1514.     CrossRef
  • Endobariatric procedures for obesity: clinical indications and available options
    Hemant Goyal, Jonathan Kopel, Abhilash Perisetti, Rupinder Mann, Aman Ali, Benjamin Tharian, Shreyas Saligram, Sumant Inamdar
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 14: 263177452098462.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical and Metabolic Effects of Intragastric Balloon on Morbid Obesity and Its Related Comorbidities
    Joon Hyun Cho, Mohammad Bilal, Min Cheol Kim, Jonah Cohen
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Su-Young Kim
    Medicina.2021; 57(8): 737.     CrossRef
  • Effects of intragastric balloon on obesity in obese Korean women for 6 months post removal
    Hyeon-Ju Pak, Ha-Neul Choi, Hong-Chan Lee, Jung-Eun Yim
    Nutrition Research and Practice.2021; 15(4): 456.     CrossRef
  • Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?
    George Stavrou, Anne Shrewsbury, Katerina Kotzampassi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 13(8): 238.     CrossRef
  • Ingestible Sensors and Sensing Systems for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Monitoring: The Next Frontier in Minimally Invasive Screening
    Luke A. Beardslee, George E. Banis, Sangwook Chu, Sanwei Liu, Ashley A. Chapin, Justin M. Stine, Pankaj Jay Pasricha, Reza Ghodssi
    ACS Sensors.2020; 5(4): 891.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy and Safety of a Procedureless Gastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kornpong Vantanasiri, Reem Matar, Azizullah Beran, Veeravich Jaruvongvanich
    Obesity Surgery.2020; 30(9): 3341.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Bariatric Therapy: A Guide to the Intragastric Balloon
    Fateh Bazerbachi, Eric J. Vargas, Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 114(9): 1421.     CrossRef
  • 9,774 View
  • 259 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Currently Available Non-Balloon Devices
Hang Lak Lee
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):416-419.   Published online September 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.143
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Obesity and metabolic syndrome are known to have an impact on the economy. Obesity and metabolic syndrome affect about 40% population in the America alone, and with about 400 million obese adults in the world, obesity is a global concern. Moreover, the prevalence of overweight children is increasing. Bariatric surgery remains the gold standard for the treatment of obesity; however, endoscopic approaches may have a significant role in the management of metabolic syndrome and obesity. Until recently, many endoscopic methods have been introduced; however, few methods are used in practice, whereas others are under experimental research. Endoscopists have an important role in the treatment of obesity because endoscopic therapies have demonstrated their safety and efficacy over the past few years. Endoscopic bariatric therapies can be categorized as follows: space occupying, malabsorption, and gastric volume reduction. In this review, we summarize the currently available non-balloon type endoscopic procedure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endobariatric procedures for obesity: clinical indications and available options
    Hemant Goyal, Jonathan Kopel, Abhilash Perisetti, Rupinder Mann, Aman Ali, Benjamin Tharian, Shreyas Saligram, Sumant Inamdar
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 14: 263177452098462.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Su-Young Kim
    Medicina.2021; 57(8): 737.     CrossRef
  • Novel and emerging devices and operations in the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents
    Hae Sung Kang, Jonathan DeAntonio, Claudio Oiticica, David Lanning, Allen Browne
    Seminars in Pediatric Surgery.2020; 29(1): 150881.     CrossRef
  • 4,812 View
  • 139 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Experimental Gastric Non-Balloon Devices
Youn I Choi, Kyoung Oh Kim
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):420-424.   Published online September 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.150
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) are promising alternatives to the conventional surgeries used to treat obesity and related metabolic conditions, targeting gastrointestinal anatomical and physiological processes. Many EBTs are at various stages of development and are aimed at promoting an early sense of satiety via anatomical and physiological mechanisms. In the present study, we focused on relevant clinical issues and future perspectives with regard to gastric non-balloon methods treating obesity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Repeated photodynamic therapy using a chlorin e6‐embedded device to prolong the therapeutic effects on obesity
    Jung‐Hoon Park, Ji Won Kim, Dae Sung Ryu, Hyeonseung Lee, Hee Kyong Na, Jin Hee Noh, Do Hoon Kim, Sanghee Lee, Kun Na, Hwoon‐Yong Jung
    Obesity.2024; 32(5): 911.     CrossRef
  • Photoactive intragastric satiety-inducing device using polymeric photosensitizers for minimally invasive weight loss treatment
    Ji Won Kim, Sanghee Lee, Dae Sung Ryu, Jinhwan Park, Hyeonseung Lee, Hee Kyong Na, Jin Hee Noh, Do Hoon Kim, Jung-Hoon Park, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Kun Na
    Biomaterials.2023; 299: 122159.     CrossRef
  • Photodynamic Methylene Blue-Embedded Intragastric Satiety-Inducing Device to Treat Obesity
    Sanghee Lee, Ji Won Kim, Jinhwan Park, Hee Kyong Na, Do Hoon Kim, Jin Hee Noh, Dae Sung Ryu, Jae Myung Park, Jung-Hoon Park, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Kun Na
    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.2022; 14(15): 17621.     CrossRef
  • Biomaterials in Gastroenterology: A Critical Overview
    Adrian Goldis, Ramona Goldis, Traian V. Chirila
    Medicina.2019; 55(11): 734.     CrossRef
  • 4,995 View
  • 110 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Small Bowel Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies
Eun Jeong Gong, Do Hoon Kim
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):425-429.   Published online September 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.153
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic bariatric therapies that emulate some of the principles of bariatric surgery have been developed as a less invasive option for the treatment of obesity and related comorbidities. Small bowel endoscopic bariatric therapies include bypass sleeves, incisionless anastomosis systems, and duodenal mucosal resurfacing. Clinical experience with small bowel devices suggests that endoscopic bariatric procedures can be safely implemented and that these devices are effective for both weight loss and metabolic improvement. Although the mechanisms behind these effects should be further elucidated, endoscopic bariatric therapies may be more effective and safer adjunctive interventions than lifestyle modifications and pharmacological regimens for patients with obesity or obesity-related comorbidities.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review
    Maheeba Abdulla, Nafeesa Mohammed, Jehad AlQamish
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(40): 5526.     CrossRef
  • Overview of bariatric and metabolic endoscopy interventions
    Augustine Tawadros, Michael Makar, Michel Kahaleh, Avik Sarkar
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 13: 263177452093523.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic bariatric treatments: new toolkit in the armamentarium against obesity
    Laxmi N.R. Bondugulapati, Sandeep Ravi, Vamsi Kodumuri, Venkata C. Gourineni
    Current Opinion in Lipidology.2019; 30(2): 151.     CrossRef
  • 9,398 View
  • 146 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Training in Bariatric and Metabolic Endoscopic Therapies
Pichamol Jirapinyo, Christopher C. Thompson
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):430-438.   Published online September 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.148
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Bariatric endoscopy is an emerging subspecialty for gastroenterologists encompassing a broad array of procedures including primary endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies and the treatment of complications of bariatric surgery. In addition, comprehensive understanding of lifestyle intervention and pharmacotherapy are essential to successful outcomes. This review summarizes goals and steps of training for this emerging field.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • How to establish an endoscopic bariatric practice
    Daniel B Maselli, Lauren L Donnangelo, Brian Coan, Christopher E McGowan
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 16(4): 178.     CrossRef
  • Transoral Outlet Reduction: Expert Tips, Tricks, and Troubleshooting
    Daniel B. Maselli, Lauren L. Donnangelo, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Christopher C. Thompson, Christopher E. McGowan
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 119(6): 1047.     CrossRef
  • What We Talk About When We Talk About Training in Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
    Yousaf Hadi, Shailendra Singh
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2023; 68(6): 2211.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in class III obesity: Efficacy, safety, and durability outcomes in 404 consecutive patients
    Daniel Barry Maselli, Anna Carolina Hoff, Ashley Kucera, Emily Weaver, Laura Sebring, Lori Gooch, Kathleen Walton, Daniel Lee, Taylor Cratty, Selena Beal, Srikar Nanduri, Kendall Reese, Christina S Gainey, Laura Eaton, Brian Coan, Christopher E McGowan
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 15(6): 469.     CrossRef
  • Transoral outlet reduction: Outcomes of endoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass revision in 284 patients at a community practice
    Daniel B Maselli, Vibhu Chittajallu, Chase Wooley, Areebah Waseem, Daniel Lee, Michelle Secic, Lauren L Donnangelo, Brian Coan, Christopher E McGowan
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 15(10): 602.     CrossRef
  • Primary Bariatric Procedures
    Pichamol Jirapinyo, Christopher C. Thompson
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(5): 1674.     CrossRef
  • Endobariatric procedures for obesity: clinical indications and available options
    Hemant Goyal, Jonathan Kopel, Abhilash Perisetti, Rupinder Mann, Aman Ali, Benjamin Tharian, Shreyas Saligram, Sumant Inamdar
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 14: 263177452098462.     CrossRef
  • Common and Uncommon Problems During Endoscopic Suturing With Apollo Overstitch: Tips and Tricks for Troubleshooting
    Vincenzo Bove, Camilla Gallo, Valerio Pontecorvi, Tommaso Schepis, Guido Costamagna, Ivo Boškoski
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 23(3): 220.     CrossRef
  • How to Incorporate Bariatric Training Into Your Fellowship Program
    Pichamol Jirapinyo, Christopher C. Thompson
    Gastroenterology.2021; 161(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Advanced Endoscopy Training in the United States: An Advanced Fellow's Perspective
    Ramzi Mulki
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2021; 8(5): e00612.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Endoscopic Suturing Device (EndoZip TM) for Treatment of Obesity: First-in-Human Study
    Gontrand Lopez-Nava, Ravishankar Asokkumar, Angel Rull, Fernandez-Corbelle, Inmaculada Bautista, Barham Abu Dayyeh
    Obesity Surgery.2020; 30(5): 1696.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic gastric suturing for weight loss: Techniques and outcomes
    Daniel B. Maselli, Ramzi Hani Mulki, Reem Matar, Andrew C. Storm, Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 22(3): 136.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic management of weight regain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura, Christopher C. Thompson
    Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism.2019; 14(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy training in Korea
    Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2019; 34(2): 237.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic bariatric treatments: new toolkit in the armamentarium against obesity
    Laxmi N.R. Bondugulapati, Sandeep Ravi, Vamsi Kodumuri, Venkata C. Gourineni
    Current Opinion in Lipidology.2019; 30(2): 151.     CrossRef
  • How to Incorporate Bariatric Training Into Your Fellowship Program
    Pichamol Jirapinyo, Christopher C. Thompson
    Gastroenterology.2019; 157(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • An Approach to Obesity Management for Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists
    Jessica Briscoe, Monica Saumoy, Octavia Pickett-Blakely
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2019; 17(4): 587.     CrossRef
  • 10,255 View
  • 155 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Reviews
De-novo Gastrointestinal Anastomosis with Lumen Apposing Metal Stent
Deepanshu Jain, Ankit Chhoda, Abhinav Sharma, Shashideep Singhal
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):439-449.   Published online September 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.077
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Gastric outlet obstruction, afferent or efferent limb obstruction, and biliary obstruction among patients with altered anatomy often require surgical intervention which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic dilation for benign etiologies requires multiple sessions, whereas self-expandable metal stents used for malignant etiologies often fail due to tumor in-growth. Lumen apposing metal stents, placed endoscopically with the intent of creating a de-novo gastrointestinal anastomosis bypassing the site of obstruction, can potentially achieve similar efficacy, with a much lower complication rate. In our study cohort (n=79), the composite technical success rate and clinical success rate was 91.1% (72/79) and 97.2% (70/72), respectively. Five different techniques were used: 43% (34/79) underwent the balloon-assisted method, 27.9% (22/79) underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided balloon occluded gastro-jejunostomy bypass, 20.3% (16/79) underwent the direct technique, 6.3% (5/79) underwent the hybrid rendezvous technique, and 2.5% (2/79) underwent natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)-assisted procedure. All techniques required an echoendoscope except NOTES. In all, 53.2% (42/79) had non-cautery enhanced Axios stent, 44.3% (35/79) had hot Axios stent, and 2.5% (2/79) had Niti-S spaxus stent. Symptom-recurrence was seen in 2.8%, and 6.3% had a complication (bleeding, abdominal pain or peritonitis). All procedures were performed by experts at centers of excellence with adequate surgical back up.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Salvage endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy as a bridge to definitive surgical therapy for duodenal adenocarcinoma presenting with duodenal stent obstruction
    Tiffany Z. Yu, Abishek Agnihotri, Richard Zheng, Babar Bashir, Nayeem Nasher, Charles J. Yeo, Avinoam Nevler, Harish Lavu, Wilbur B. Bowne, Anand Kumar
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 16(3): 387.     CrossRef
  • The Use of Palliative Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Enterostomy to Treat Small Bowel Obstruction in Two Patients with Advanced Malignancies
    Ji Hong Oh, Seung Goun Hong
    The Korean Journal of Medicine.2022; 97(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Short benign ileocolonic anastomotic strictures - management with bi-flanged metal stents: Six case reports and review of literature
    Panagiotis Kasapidis, Georgios Mavrogenis, Dimitrios Mandrekas, Fateh Bazerbachi
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(28): 10162.     CrossRef
  • Long-term placement of lumen-apposing metal stent after endoscopic ultrasound-guided duodeno- and jejunojejunal anastomosis for direct access to excluded jejunal limb
    Gianfranco Donatelli, Fabrizio Cereatti, Andrea Spota, David Danan, Thierry Tuszynski, Jean-Loup Dumont, Serge Derhy
    Endoscopy.2021; 53(03): 293.     CrossRef
  • ERCP in patient with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and high grade duodenal stricture across dual lumen-apposing metal stents
    Kornpong Vantanasiri, Guru Trikudanathan
    Endoscopy.2021; 53(05): E189.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic sigmoidorectal reanastomosis using a dual endoscope technique: rendezvous single-balloon enteroscopy and endoscopic ultrasound
    Sławomir Kozieł, Katarzyna Kozłowska-Petriczko, Katarzyna M. Pawlak, Jan Petriczko, Anna Wiechowska-Kozłowska
    Endoscopy.2021; 53(07): E257.     CrossRef
  • Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Used to Treat Malignant Esophageal Stricture
    Ryan B. Mirchin, Syed Kashif Mahmood
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2020; 7(3): e00362.     CrossRef
  • Lumen-apposing metal stent use to maintain a surgical anastomosis
    Abdulla Nasser, Marc Cullen, Mohammed Barawi
    VideoGIE.2020; 5(10): 494.     CrossRef
  • Fluoroscopy-Guided Gastrojejunostomy Creation with Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent in a Porcine Model
    Jingui Li, Tao Gong, Jiaywei Tsauo, He Zhao, Xiaowu Zhang, Mingchen Sang, Xiao Li
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.2020; 43(11): 1687.     CrossRef
  • 5,089 View
  • 125 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Using a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review
Deepanshu Jain, Bharat Singh Bhandari, Nikhil Agrawal, Shashideep Singhal
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):450-462.   Published online June 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.024
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Surgery remains the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis except in high-risk candidates where percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD), endoscopic transpapillary cystic duct stenting (ET-CDS), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) are potential choices. PT-GBD is contraindicated in patients with coagulopathy or ascites and is not preferred by patients owing to aesthetic reasons. ET-CDS is successful only if the cystic duct can be visualized and cannulated. For 189 patients who underwent EUS-GBD via insertion of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), the composite technical success rate was 95.2%, which increased to 96.8% when LAMS was combined with co-axial self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). The composite clinical success rate was 96.7%. We observed a small risk of recurrent cholecystitis (5.1%), gastrointestinal bleeding (2.6%) and stent migration (1.1%). Cautery enhanced LAMS significantly decreases the stent deployment time compared to non-cautery enhanced LAMS. Prophylactic placement of a pigtail stent or SEMS through the LAMS avoids re-interventions, particularly in patients, where it is intended to remain in situ indefinitely. Limited evidence suggests that the efficacy of EUS-GBD via LAMS is comparable to that of PT-GBD with the former showing better results in postoperative pain, length of hospitalization, and need for antibiotics. EUS-GBD via LAMS is a safe and efficacious option when performed by experts.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • International Consensus Recommendations for Safe Use of LAMS for On- and Off-Label Indications Using a Modified Delphi Process
    Sebastian Stefanovic, Douglas G. Adler, Alexander Arlt, Todd H. Baron, Kenneth F. Binmoeller, Michiel Bronswijk, Marco J. Bruno, Jean-Baptiste Chevaux, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Helena Degroote, Pierre H. Deprez, Peter V. Draganov, Pierre Eisendrath, Marc
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 119(4): 671.     CrossRef
  • Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue approach in cases of unsuccessful biliary drainage
    Alessandro Fugazza, Kareem Khalaf, Katarzyna M Pawlak, Marco Spadaccini, Matteo Colombo, Marta Andreozzi, Marco Giacchetto, Silvia Carrara, Chiara Ferrari, Cecilia Binda, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Andrea Anderloni, Alessandro Repici
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(1): 70.     CrossRef
  • Role of advanced endoscopy in the management of inflammatory digestive diseases (pancreas and biliary tract)
    Toshiharu Ueki, Toru Maruo, Yoshinori Igarashi, Akira Yamamiya, Keiichi Tominaga, Atsushi Irisawa, Hitoshi Yoshida, Terumi Kamisawa, Mamoru Takenaka, Hiroyuki Isayama
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(5): 546.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage Conversion versus Conservative Treatment Following Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage in High-Risk Surgical Patients
    Hyung Ku Chon, Seong-Hun Kim, Tae Hyeon Kim
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(2): 348.     CrossRef
  • Acalculous Cholecystitis in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review
    Evanthia Thomaidou, Eleni Karlafti, Matthaios Didagelos, Kalliopi Megari, Eleni Argiriadou, Karolina Akinosoglou, Daniel Paramythiotis, Christos Savopoulos
    Viruses.2024; 16(3): 455.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with transmural use of LAMS in patients with liver cirrhosis: International multicenter study
    Faisal Nimri, Yervant Ichkhanian, Brianna Shinn, Thomas E. Kowalski, David E. Loren, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, Alina Tantau, Martha Arevalo, Ashraf Taha, Omar Shamaa, Maria Chavarria Viales, Mouen A. Khashab, Stephen Simmer, Sumit Singla, Cyru
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(06): E740.     CrossRef
  • Salvage endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy as a bridge to definitive surgical therapy for duodenal adenocarcinoma presenting with duodenal stent obstruction
    Tiffany Z. Yu, Abishek Agnihotri, Richard Zheng, Babar Bashir, Nayeem Nasher, Charles J. Yeo, Avinoam Nevler, Harish Lavu, Wilbur B. Bowne, Anand Kumar
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 16(3): 387.     CrossRef
  • Lumen-apposing-metal stent misdeployment in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainages: A systematic review focusing on issues and rescue management
    Elia Armellini, Flavio Metelli, Andrea Anderloni, Anna Cominardi, Giovanni Aragona, Michele Marini, Fabio Pace
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(21): 3341.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021
    Naotaka Fujita, Ichiro Yasuda, Itaru Endo, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takuji Iwashita, Toshiharu Ueki, Kenichiro Uemura, Akiko Umezawa, Akio Katanuma, Yu Katayose, Yutaka Suzuki, Junichi Shoda, Toshio Tsuyuguchi, Toshifumi Wakai, Kazuo Inui, Michiaki Unno, Yoshifu
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(9): 801.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, Indications, and Criteria of Arteriovenous Fistula Ligation Following Kidney Transplant: A Patient-Driven Approach
    Aimee H Dubin, Julia Martin-Velez, Nathan T Shenkute, Alexander H Toledo
    Experimental and Clinical Transplantation.2023; 21(6): 487.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the long-term outcomes of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage and endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for calculous cholecystitis in poor surgical candidates: a multicenter propensity score–matched analysis
    Tadahisa Inoue, Michihiro Yoshida, Yuta Suzuki, Rena Kitano, Kenji Urakabe, Kenichi Haneda, Fumihiro Okumura, Itaru Naitoh
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(3): 362.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transluminal Gallbladder Drainage in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis
    Shayan S. Irani, Neil R. Sharma, Andrew C. Storm, Raj J. Shah, Prabhleen Chahal, Field F. Willingham, Lee Swanstrom, Todd H. Baron, Eran Shlomovitz, Richard A. Kozarek, Joyce A. Peetermans, Edmund McMullen, Evelyne Ho, Schalk W. van der Merwe
    Annals of Surgery.2023; 278(3): e556.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Naso-gallbladder Drainage Using a Dedicated Catheter for Acute Cholecystitis After Transpapillary Metal Stent Placement for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
    Tadahisa Inoue, Rena Kitano, Mayu Ibusuki, Kazumasa Sakamoto, Satoshi Kimoto, Yuji Kobayashi, Yoshio Sumida, Yukiomi Nakade, Kiyoaki Ito, Masashi Yoneda
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2023; 68(12): 4449.     CrossRef
  • Current status of endoscopic management of cholecystitis
    Se Woo Park, Sang Soo Lee
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(3): 439.     CrossRef
  • Gallstone Disease in Cirrhosis—Pathogenesis and Management
    Bipadabhanjan Mallick, Anil C. Anand
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology.2022; 12(2): 551.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage in Pancreatobiliary Diseases
    Tae Hyeon Kim, Hyung Ku Chon
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 79(5): 203.     CrossRef
  • Determinants of outcomes of transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: systematic review with proportion meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Carlo Fabbri, Cecilia Binda, Monica Sbrancia, Elton Dajti, Chiara Coluccio, Giorgio Ercolani, Andrea Anderloni, Alessandro Cucchetti
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(11): 7974.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Study of Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis: A Comprehensive Review
    Yantao Fu, Liwei Pang, Wanlin Dai, Shuodong Wu, Jing Kong
    Digestive Diseases.2022; 40(4): 468.     CrossRef
  • Successful treatment of cholecystolithiasis by ERCP: A case report and literature review (with video)
    Ge Zhang, Jie Lin Li, Ming Ji, Shu Tian Zhang, Peng Li, Yong Jun Wang, Yong Dong Wu
    Journal of Digestive Diseases.2022; 23(5-6): 341.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic and Therapeutic Indications for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) in Patients with Pancreatic and Biliary Disease—Novel Interventional Procedures
    Manfred Prager, Elfi Prager, Christian Sebesta, Christian Sebesta
    Current Oncology.2022; 29(9): 6211.     CrossRef
  • Biliary Sepsis Due to Recurrent Acute Calculus Cholecystitis (ACC) in a High Surgical-Risk Elderly Patient: An Unexpected Complication
    Giacomo Sermonesi, Alessia Rampini, Girolamo Convertini, Raffaele Bova, Nicola Zanini, Riccardo Bertelli, Carlo Vallicelli, Francesco Favi, Giacomo Stacchini, Enrico Faccani, Nicola Fabbri, Fausto Catena
    Pathogens.2022; 11(12): 1423.     CrossRef
  • Use of Transmural Cholecystic Stents for Management of Acute Cholecystitis
    Mary Bokenkamp, Pedro Teixeira
    Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery.2022; 11(3): 176.     CrossRef
  • Identification of risk factors for obstructive cholecystitis following placement of biliary stent in unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: a 5-year retrospective analysis in single center
    Jang Han Jung, Se Woo Park, Bomi Hyun, Jin Lee, Dong Hee Koh, Doocheol Chung
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(6): 2679.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage
    Zain A. Sobani, Christina Ling, Tarun Rustagi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(7): 2154.     CrossRef
  • Managing Gallstone Disease in the Elderly
    Ankit Chhoda, Saurabh S. Mukewar, SriHari Mahadev
    Clinics in Geriatric Medicine.2021; 37(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • Percutaneous Cholecystolithotomy: An Alternative to Cholecystectomy after Cholecystostomy Tube Placement in the Truly High-Risk Surgical Patient
    Taylor S. Riall
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2021; 232(2): 201.     CrossRef
  • Gallbladder: Role of Interventional Radiology
    Matthew Antalek, Ahsun Riaz, Albert A. Nemcek
    Seminars in Interventional Radiology.2021; 38(03): 330.     CrossRef
  • Interventional endoscopic ultrasound
    Christoph F. Dietrich, Barbara Braden, Christian Jenssen
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2021; 37(5): 449.     CrossRef
  • New Stents for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Procedures
    Gunn Huh, Tae Jun Song
    The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract.2021; 26(4): 248.     CrossRef
  • Gallbladder Cryoablation: Other Endoscopic Options for High-Risk Patients with Cholecystitis
    Jason Jones, Harry R. Aslanian, Thiruvengadam Muniraj
    The American Journal of Medicine.2021; 134(11): e565.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage for Cholecystitis in Poor Surgical Candidates: An Updated Comprehensive Review
    Tadahisa Inoue, Michihiro Yoshida, Yuta Suzuki, Rena Kitano, Fumihiro Okumura, Itaru Naitoh
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(21): 4842.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy in surgery
    Ahmet Serdar Karaca, M. Mahir Özmen, Ahmet Çınar Yastı, Seher Demirer
    Turkish Journal of Surgery.2021; 37(2): 83.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage: Current Perspectives


    Alessandro Fugazza, Matteo Colombo, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni
    Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2020; Volume 13: 193.     CrossRef
  • An unusual complication of pyloric ring obstruction caused by flange of lumen apposing metal stent in endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage
    Seung Young Seo, Chang Hun Lee, In Hee Kim, Sang Wook Kim, Seung Ok Lee, Soo Teik Lee, Seong-Hun Kim
    Medicine.2020; 99(27): e21017.     CrossRef
  • Endoprosthetics for luminal obstruction
    Alessandro Fugazza, Antonio Capogreco, Alessandro Repici
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 22(4): 192.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Enteroenterostomy for Afferent Limb Syndrome
    Hicham El Bacha, Sarah Leblanc, Benoit Bordacahar, Bertrand Brieau, Maximillien Barret, Eric Savier, Olivier Soubrane, Bertand Dousset, Frederic Prat
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2020; 7(8): e00442.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for the management of acute calculus cholecystitis patients unfit for urgent cholecystectomy
    Tae Hyeon Kim, Dong Eun Park, Hyung Ku Chon, Ezio Lanza
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(10): e0240219.     CrossRef
  • When cholecystostomy tube and transpapillary stents for recurrent cholecystitis fail due to large gallstones: rescue with laser lithotripsy via cholecystoduodenal fistula
    Jennifer T. Higa, Shayan S. Irani
    VideoGIE.2020; 5(12): 660.     CrossRef
  • Which Are the Most Suitable Stents for Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound?
    Se Woo Park, Sang Soo Lee
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(11): 3595.     CrossRef
  • Conversion of percutaneous cholecystostomy to transmural endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage in malignant biliary obstruction
    Motoyasu Kan, Yusuke Hashimoto, Taro Shibuki, Gen Kimura, Kumiko Umemoto, Kazuo Watanabe, Mitsuhito Sasaki, Hideaki Takahashi, Hiroshi Imaoka, Izumi Ohno, Shuichi Mitsunaga, Masafumi Ikeda
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2019; 8(2): 87.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Methods for Gallbladder Drainage
    Jennifer T. Higa, Shayan S. Irani
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2019; 17(3): 357.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic EUS: New tools, new devices, new applications
    Barbara Braden, Vipin Gupta, ChristophFrank Dietrich
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2019; 8(6): 370.     CrossRef
  • Adverse events with lumen-apposing metal stents in endoscopic gallbladder drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    BabuP Mohan, Ravishankar Asokkumar, Mohammed Shakhatreh, Rajat Garg, Suresh Ponnada, Udayakumar Navaneethan, DouglasG Adler
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2019; 8(4): 241.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes and limitations in EUS-guided gallbladder drainage
    AnthonyYuen Bun Teoh
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2019; 8(7): 40.     CrossRef
  • Cholécystite aiguë de réanimation
    T. Degroote, V. Chhor, M. Tran, F. Philippart, C. Bruel
    Médecine Intensive Réanimation.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients
    Alejandro L. Suarez, Song Mingjun, Thiruvengadam Muniraj, Priya Jamidar, Harry Aslanian
    VideoGIE.2018; 3(11): 364.     CrossRef
  • De-novo Gastrointestinal Anastomosis with Lumen Apposing Metal Stent
    Deepanshu Jain, Ankit Chhoda, Abhinav Sharma, Shashideep Singhal
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(5): 439.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in management of acalculous cholecystitis
    Bryan Balmadrid
    F1000Research.2018; 7: 1660.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound guided gallbladder drainage - is it ready for prime time?
    Umesha Boregowda, Chandraprakash Umapathy, Arpitha Nanjappa, Helen Wong, Madhav Desai, Marina Roytman, Thimmaiah Theethira, Shreyas Saligram
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics.2018; 9(6): 47.     CrossRef
  • 7,135 View
  • 258 Download
  • 44 Web of Science
  • 49 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Experimental Study to Develop a Method for Improving Sample Collection to Monitor Laryngoscopes after Reprocessing
Savina Ditommaso, Monica Giacomuzzi, Elisa Ricciardi, Carla Zotti
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):463-469.   Published online August 21, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.012
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: The microbiological surveillance of endoscopes and automated flexible endoscope reprocessing have been proven to be two of the most difficult and controversial areas of infection control in endoscopy. The purpose of this study was to standardize a sampling method for assessing the effectiveness of standard reprocessing operating procedures for flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes (FFLs).
Methods
First, the sampling devices were directly inoculated with Bacillus atrophaeus spores; second, tissue non tissue (TNT) wipes were tested on artificially contaminated surfaces and on FFLs.
Results
Comparison of the sponges, cellulose, and TNT wipes indicated that the TNT wipes were more effective in releasing spores (93%) than the sponges (49%) and cellulose wipes (52%). The developed protocol provides a high efficiency for both collection and extraction from the stainless steel surface (87% of the spores were removed and released) and from the FFL (85% of the spores were removed and released), with relatively low standard deviations for recovery efficiency, particularly for the analysis of the FFL.
Conclusions
TNT wipes are more efficient for sampling surface areas, thereby aiding in the accuracy and reproducibility of environmental surveillance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A cost comparison between reusable flexible and disposable laryngoscopes
    James Ellis, Albert H Park, Aaron Prussin
    American Journal of Otolaryngology.2022; 43(2): 103321.     CrossRef
  • Using Microbiological Sampling to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nasofibroscope Disinfection: The Tristel Trio Wipes System in Ear–Nose–Throat (ENT) Endoscopy
    Ditommaso, Giacomuzzi, Cipriani, Zaccaria, Cavallo, Boggio, Albera, Zotti
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(22): 4583.     CrossRef
  • What is the Best Sampling Method to Monitor the Effect of Endoscopy Reprocessing?
    Kwang Hyun Chung, Byung Ik Jang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(5): 397.     CrossRef
  • 5,682 View
  • 106 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Long-Term Survival and Tumor Recurrence in Patients with Superficial Esophageal Cancer after Complete Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection: A Single-Center Case Series
Ji Wan Lee, Charles J. Cho, Do Hoon Kim, Ji Yong Ahn, Jeong Hoon Lee, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Sook Ryun Park, Hyun Joo Lee, Yong Hee Kim, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Sung-Bae Kim, Jong Hoon Kim, Seung-Il Park
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):470-477.   Published online June 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.025
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: To report the long-term survival and tumor recurrence outcomes in patients with superficial esophageal cancer (SEC) after complete non-curative endoscopic resection (ER).
Methods
We retrieved ER data for 24 patients with non-curatively resected SEC. Non-curative resection was defined as the presence of submucosal and/or lymphovascular invasion on ER pathology. Relevant clinical and tumor-specific parameters were reviewed.
Results
The mean age of the 24 study patients was 66.3±8.3 years. Ten patients were closely followed up without treatment, while 14 received additional treatment. During a mean follow-up of 59.0±33.2 months, the 3- and 5-year survival rates of all cases were 90.7% and 77.6%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were 72.9% in the close observation group and 82.1% in the additional treatment group (p=0.958). The 5-year cumulative incidences of all cases of recurrence (25.0% vs. 43.3%, p=0.388), primary EC recurrence (10.0% vs. 16.4%, p=0.558), and metachronous EC recurrence (16.7% vs. 26.7%, p=0.667) were similar between the two groups.
Conclusions
Patients with non-curatively resected SEC showed good long-term survival outcomes. Given the similar oncologic outcomes, close observation may be an option with appropriate caution taken for patients who are medically unfit to receive additional therapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Close Observation versus Additional Surgery after Noncurative Endoscopic Resection of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Byeong Geun Song, Ga Hee Kim, Charles J. Cho, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Yang Won Min, Hyuk Lee, Byung-Hoon Min, Ho June Song, Yong-Hee Kim, Jun Haeng Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Jae Ill Zo, Young Mog Shim
    Digestive Surgery.2021; 38(3): 247.     CrossRef
  • Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer
    Eun Hye Kim, Jun Chul Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(5): 399.     CrossRef
  • 5,727 View
  • 133 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Factors Affecting Endoscopic Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer in the Population-Based Screening Era
Yoon Gwon Mun, Myung-Gyu Choi, Chul-Hyun Lim, Han Hee Lee, Dong Hoon Kang, Jae Myung Park, Kyo Young Song
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):478-484.   Published online June 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.006
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Since population-based screening for gastric cancer in Korea was implemented, endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer has become increasingly popular. This study investigates factors affecting endoscopic curative resection of early gastric cancer in population-based screening for gastric cancer.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer who underwent treatment at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. All patients completed questionnaires about clinical information, including interval between surveillance tests for gastric cancer.
Results
Of 469 gastric cancer patients, 147 (31.3%) had undergone curative endoscopic resection, 260 (55.4%) had undergone curative surgical resection, and 62 (13.3%) underwent non-curative resection or were in an inoperable state. Patients with curative endoscopic resection had fewer alarm symptoms/signs than other groups. In multivariate analysis, regular surveillance endoscopy was the only factor predicting curative endoscopic resection (odds ratio [OR], 6.099; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.532–14.933). In addition, patients undergoing gastric cancer screening had a significantly higher rate of endoscopic curative resection compared with subjects who had never been screened. (1-year interval: OR, 49.969; 95% CI, 6.340–393.827, 2-year interval: OR, 15.283; 95% CI, 1.833–127.406, over 2-year interval: OR, 10.651; 95% CI, 1.248–90.871). Shorter screening test intervals were associated with higher rates of endoscopic curative resection.
Conclusions
Regular surveillance testing was the independent factor predicting curative endoscopic resection of gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A model established using marital status and other factors from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for early stage gastric cancer
    Lixiang Zhang, Baichuan Zhou, Panquan Luo, Aman Xu, Wenxiu Han, Zhijian Wei
    Journal of Investigative Medicine.2022; 70(6): 1373.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Non-Curative Resection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in Korea
    Si Hyung Lee, Min Cheol Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Kang Nyeong Lee, Jong Jae Park, Su Jin Hong
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(2): 196.     CrossRef
  • The More, the Better: Is This True in Endoscopy for Gastric Cancer Screening?
    Seong Woo Jeon
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(5): 402.     CrossRef
  • 5,453 View
  • 98 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Mis-sizing of Adenomatous Polyps is Common among Endoscopists and Impacts Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations
Thu Pham, Aung Bajaj, Lorela Berberi, Chengcheng Hu, Sasha Taleban
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):485-490.   Published online June 21, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.183
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: To determine the accuracy of identifying ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps during colonoscopy and define its impact on subsequent interval screening.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent colonoscopies at Banner University Medical Center, Tucson from 2011 to 2015. All patients with ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps based on their colonoscopy report were included. Adenomatous polyps were excluded if they did not meet the criteria. Discrepancies in the polyp size were determined by calculating the percentage of size variation (SV). Clinical mis-sizing was defined as SV >33%.
Results
The polyps analyzed were predominantly <10 mm in size. Approximately 13% of the examined polyps met the inclusion criteria, and 40.7% of the adenomas were ≥10 mm. A total of 189 ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps were collected from 10 different gastroenterologists and a colorectal surgeon. Adenomatous polyps were clinically mis-sized in 56.6% of cases and overestimated in 71.4%. Among the adenomas reviewed, 22% of mis-sized polyps and 11% of non-mis-sized polyps resulted in an inappropriate surveillance interval.
Conclusions
We found that more than half of ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps are mis-sized and that there is a tendency to overestimate adenoma size among endoscopists. This frequently leads to inappropriate intervals of surveillance colonoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Measuring Size of Colorectal Polyps Using a Virtual Scale Endoscope or Visual Assessment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Mahsa Taghiakbari, Roupen Djinbachian, Claire Haumesser, Sacha Sidani, Jeremy Liu Chen Kiow, Benoit Panzini, Daniel von Renteln
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adenoma-based Colonoscopy Quality Metrics for the 45-49 Years Old Military Screening Population
    Geoffrey A. Bader, Carl L. Kay, Zachary Eagle, Brandon W. Kuiper, Charles B. Miller, John G. Gancayco
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Measuring size of smaller colorectal polyps using a virtual scale function during endoscopies
    Daniel von Renteln, Roupen Djinbachian, Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi, Mahsa Taghiakbari
    Gut.2023; 72(3): 417.     CrossRef
  • Estimating colorectal polyp size with a virtual scale endoscope and visual estimation during colonoscopy: Prospective, preliminary comparison of accuracy
    Ryo Shimoda, Takashi Akutagawa, Michito Tomonaga, Tatsuro Murano, Kensuke Shinmura, Masato Yoshioka, Yuichi Teramura, Fumiaki Kiyomi, Hiroaki Ikematsu
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(7): 1471.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy of estimation of polyp size at colonoscopy
    Linda Tang, Angelina Di Re, Toufic El‐Khoury
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(6): 1125.     CrossRef
  • Polyp Characteristics of Nonsyndromic and Potentially Syndromic Juvenile Polyps
    Nadia Ibrahimi, Seth S. Septer, Brian R. Lee, Robert Garola, Raj Shah, Thomas M. Attard
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2019; 69(6): 668.     CrossRef
  • Importance of the Size of Adenomatous Polyps in Determining Appropriate Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals
    Hoon Sup Koo, Kyu Chan Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(5): 404.     CrossRef
  • 16,505 View
  • 120 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Case Reports
Removal of Esophageal Variceal Bands to Salvage Complete Esophageal Obstruction
Ala’ A Abdel Jalil, Ghassan Hammoud, Jamal A Ibdah, Sami Samiullah
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):491-494.   Published online August 21, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.011
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Esophageal varices develop in almost half of the patients with cirrhosis, and variceal hemorrhage constitutes an ominous sign with an increased risk of mortality. Variceal banding is considered an effective and mostly safe measure for primary and secondary prophylaxis. Although adverse events related to banding including dysphagia, stricture formation, bleeding, and ligation-induced ulcers have been described, complete esophageal obstruction is rare, with only 10 reported cases in the literature. Among those cases, 6 were managed conservatively; 1 patient had esophageal intraluminal dissection from an attempt to remove the bands using biopsy forceps but ultimately recovered with conservative management. Three patients developed strictures following removal of the bands, requiring repeated sessions of dilation therapy. We report on a patient who developed absolute dysphagia and complete esophageal obstruction after variceal banding. We successfully used the endoloop cutter hook to release the bands intact and restore luminal integrity.
  • 6,030 View
  • 98 Download
Close layer
Magnifying Endoscopy for Esophageal Ectopic Sebaceous Glands
Mu Song Jeon, Gwang Ha Kim, Dong Young Jeong, Byeong Kyu Park, Moon Won Lee, So-Jeong Lee, Do Youn Park
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):495-497.   Published online February 26, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.187
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Ectopic sebaceous glands are found very rarely in the esophagus; heretofore, several cases have been reported. The sebaceous gland is originally a source of an endodermal origin; however, there have been controversies regarding whether the origin of the esophageal ectopic sebaceous gland is ectodermal or endodermal. Ectopic sebaceous glands of the esophagus usually do not cause symptoms; thus, they are often found incidentally on endoscopy for routine health screening. Endoscopic findings are characterized by single or multiple yellow patches or nodular lesions of various sizes, sometimes with small central openings. We report two cases of esophageal ectopic sebaceous glands found incidentally during endoscopy with magnifying endoscopic findings. The lesions were in the mid-esophagus and lower esophagus, respectively, and both endoscopic findings were similar as multiple yellowish patches or plaques. Magnifying endoscopy revealed the openings of the excretory ducts surrounded by circular microvessels in both cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multiple heterotopic sebaceous glands in the oesophagus: A case report and literature review
    Yuan Fang, Zhi Wang, Yong Qiang Yang, Bei Wen Song, Wen Bin Gou
    Tropical Doctor.2024; 54(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Esophageal Ectopic Sebaceous Glands: Chronological Changes and Immunohistochemical Analysis
    Hirotsugu Hashimoto, Hajime Horiuchi, Sakiko Miura, Shunya Takayanagi, Toshiaki Gunji, Teppei Morikawa
    International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2021; 29(4): 378.     CrossRef
  • The clinical and endoscopic features of esophageal ectopic sebaceous glands
    Hui‐Fen Chen, Hsi‐Chang Lee, Min‐Kai Liao, Ting‐An Chang, Chih‐Lin Lin, Li‐Ying Liao, Kuan‐Yang Chen
    Advances in Digestive Medicine.2020; 7(4): 179.     CrossRef
  • Case Report of a Proposed, Novel, Endoscopic “Whitehead Pimple” Sign of Ectopic Esophageal Sebaceous Glands Based on Their Mimicking the Dermatologic and Histopathologic Characteristics of Cutaneous Whitehead Pimples/Closed Comedones
    Amy Le, Mitual Amin, Mitchell S. Cappell
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2019; 64(7): 2049.     CrossRef
  • Ectopic Sebaceous Gland in Esophagus Presenting as Subepithelial Tumor
    Dong Han Yeom, Han Seung Ryu
    Chonnam Medical Journal.2019; 55(3): 168.     CrossRef
  • 6,742 View
  • 129 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Brief Report
The “Bilio-Papillary Z Line”: Proposal for a Novel Quality Indicator of Direct Cholangioscopy
Vincent Zimmer
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):498-499.   Published online June 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.067
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Choledochoscopy: An update
    Tsinrong Lee, Thomas Zheng Jie Teng, Vishal G Shelat
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 13(12): 571.     CrossRef
  • 3,724 View
  • 67 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Letter to the Editor
Ocular Melanoma Recurrence Presenting as Cholestatic Jaundice due to Periampullary Area Metastases
Sotiris Anastasiadis, Andreas Xanthis, Jannis Kountouras, Panagiotis Katsinelos
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):500-501.   Published online August 22, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.061
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 3,135 View
  • 42 Download
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP