Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Previous issues
19 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Funded articles
Volume 55(5); September 2022
Prev issue Next issue
Reviews
New sedatives and analgesic drugs for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures
Jae Min Lee, Yehyun Park, Jin Myung Park, Hong Jun Park, Jun Yong Bae, Seung Young Seo, Jee Hyun Lee, Hyung Ku Chon, Jun-Won Chung, Hyun Ho Choi, Jun Kyu Lee, Byung-Wook Kim, Endoscopic Sedation Committee of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):581-587.   Published online August 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.283
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Procedural sedation has become increasingly common in endoscopy. Sedatives and analgesics induce anxiolysis and amnesia. In addition, an appropriate level of sedation is necessary for safe procedures including therapeutic endoscopy. Midazolam and propofol are the most commonly used drugs in sedative endoscopy. In recent years, the need to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of sedation has increased in practice. Therefore, new sedatives and analgesic drugs for optimal sedative endoscopy, have recently emerged. This article reviews the characteristics of sedatives and analgesics, and describes their clinical use in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
    Chung Hyun Tae, Ju Yup Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Chan Hyuk Park, Eun Jeong Gong, Cheol Min Shin, Hyun Lim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Sang Hoon Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Moon Sung Lee, Jong-Jae Park, Oh Young Lee
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • Assessing wound complications in gastroscopy with Streptomyces protease enzyme combined with Shutai
    Qihui Chen, Hangfei Li, Lijuan Zhou, Zhanbo Yang
    International Wound Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characterization of Pediatric Rectal Absorption, Drug Disposition, and Sedation Level for Midazolam Gel Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling
    Jinying Zhu, Sufeng Zhou, Lu Wang, Yuqing Zhao, Jie Wang, Tangping Zhao, Tongtong Li, Feng Shao
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2024; 21(5): 2187.     CrossRef
  • Development of a predictive model for hypoxia due to sedatives in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective clinical study in Korea
    Jung Wan Choe, Jong Jin Hyun, Seong-Jin Son, Seung-Hak Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(4): 476.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer
    Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(5): 781.     CrossRef
  • Clinical practice guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
    Chung Hyun Tae, Ju Yup Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Chan Hyuk Park, Eun Jeong Gong, Cheol Min Shin, Hyun Lim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Sang Hoon Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Moon Sung Lee, Jong-Jae Park, Oh Young Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 391.     CrossRef
  • Quality of recovery and pre-existing impaired cognition in patients undergoing advanced GI endoscopic procedures with patient-controlled sedation: a prospective observational cohort study
    Sara Lyckner, Michelle S. Chew, Andreas Nilsson
    iGIE.2023; 2(3): 292.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
    Chung Hyun Tae, Ju Yup Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Chan Hyuk Park, Eun Jeong Gong, Cheol Min Shin, Hyun Lim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Sang Hoon Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Moon Sung Lee, Jong-Jae Park, Oh Young Lee
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(3): 107.     CrossRef
  • Drugs used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Jun Kyu Lee
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(11): 735.     CrossRef
  • 5,152 View
  • 328 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Management of aerosol generation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Chawisa Nampoolsuksan, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Asada Methasate, Jirawat Swangsri, Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Chainarong Phalanusitthepha, Thammawat Parakonthun, Voraboot Taweerutchana, Nicha Srisuworanan, Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Thikhamporn Tawantanakorn, Thawatchai Akaraviputh
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):588-593.   Published online August 24, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.062
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
In the highly contagious coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) are associated with high-risk of transmission. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is a procedure with the potential to cause dissemination of bodily fluids. At present, there is no consensus that endoscopy is defined as an AGP. This review discusses the current evidence on this topic with additional management. Prevailing publications on coronavirus related to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and aerosolization from the PubMed and Scopus databases were searched and reviewed. Comparative quantitative analyses showed a significant elevation of particle numbers, implying that aerosols were generated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The associated source events have also been reported. To reduce the dispersion, certain protective measures have been developed. Endoscopic unit protocols are recommended for the concerned personnel. Therefore, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy should be classified as an AGP. Proper practices should be adopted by healthcare workers and patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Aerosol protection using modified N95 respirator during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Chawisa Nampoolsuksan, Thawatchai Akaraviputh, Asada Methasate, Jirawat Swangsri, Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Chainarong Phalanusitthepha, Thammawat Parakonthun, Voraboot Taweerutchana, Nicha Srisuworanan, Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Thikhamporn Tawantanakorn,
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 335.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019
    Shahnaz Sultan
    Gastroenterology Clinics of North America.2023; 52(1): 157.     CrossRef
  • Does an Extraoral Suction Device Reduce Aerosol Generation and Prevent Droplet Exposure to the Examiner during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy?
    Shintaro Fujihara, Hideki Kobara, Noriko Nishiyama, Naoya Tada, Yasuhiro Goda, Kazuhiro Kozuka, Takanori Matsui, Taiga Chiyo, Nobuya Kobayashi, Tatsuo Yachida, Tsutomu Masaki
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(7): 2574.     CrossRef
  • 3,002 View
  • 197 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Preparation of image databases for artificial intelligence algorithm development in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Chang Bong Yang, Sang Hoon Kim, Yun Jeong Lim
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):594-604.   Published online May 31, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.229
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Over the past decade, technological advances in deep learning have led to the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging. The most commonly used structure in image recognition is the convolutional neural network, which mimics the action of the human visual cortex. The applications of AI in gastrointestinal endoscopy are diverse. Computer-aided diagnosis has achieved remarkable outcomes with recent improvements in machine-learning techniques and advances in computer performance. Despite some hurdles, the implementation of AI-assisted clinical practice is expected to aid endoscopists in real-time decision-making. In this summary, we reviewed state-of-the-art AI in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy and offered a practical guide for building a learning image dataset for algorithm development.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Use of artificial intelligence in the management of T1 colorectal cancer: a new tool in the arsenal or is deep learning out of its depth?
    James Weiquan Li, Lai Mun Wang, Katsuro Ichimasa, Kenneth Weicong Lin, James Chi-Yong Ngu, Tiing Leong Ang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Computer‐aided diagnosis in real‐time endoscopy for all stages of gastric carcinogenesis: Development and validation study
    Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2024; 12(4): 487.     CrossRef
  • Assessing Endoscopic Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: Development and Validation of a Highly Accurate Convolutional Neural Network
    Hannah Williams, Hannah M. Thompson, Christina Lee, Aneesh Rangnekar, Jorge T. Gomez, Maria Widmar, Iris H. Wei, Emmanouil P. Pappou, Garrett M. Nash, Martin R. Weiser, Philip B. Paty, J. Joshua Smith, Harini Veeraraghavan, Julio Garcia-Aguilar
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(10): 6443.     CrossRef
  • As how artificial intelligence is revolutionizing endoscopy
    Jean-Francois Rey
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 302.     CrossRef
  • Next-Generation Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Irene Zammarchi, Giovanni Santacroce, Marietta Iacucci
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(15): 2547.     CrossRef
  • Public Imaging Datasets of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Artificial Intelligence: a Review
    Shiqi Zhu, Jingwen Gao, Lu Liu, Minyue Yin, Jiaxi Lin, Chang Xu, Chunfang Xu, Jinzhou Zhu
    Journal of Digital Imaging.2023; 36(6): 2578.     CrossRef
  • AI-powered medical devices for practical clinicians including the diagnosis of colorectal polyps
    Donghwan Kim, Eunsun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 658.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the Volume and Distribution of Training Datasets in the Development of Deep-Learning Models for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps in Endoscopy Images
    Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Young Joo Yang, Gwang Ho Baik
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(9): 1361.     CrossRef
  • 3,919 View
  • 259 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Usefulness of the double-guidewire technique for endoscopic procedures in the field of biliary and pancreatic diseases
Mamoru Takenaka, Masatoshi Kudo
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):605-614.   Published online August 23, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.032
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The double-guidewire method has been increasingly used in endoscopic procedures for biliary and pancreatic diseases in recent years, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography-related procedures. In addition, double-lumen catheters with uneven distal and proximal lumen openings have been introduced, making it possible to easily create a double-guidewire situation, and the usefulness of the double-guidewire technique using uneven double-lumen cannulas has been widely reported. Although the advantages of using two guidewires depend on the particular situation and the appropriate use of the two guidewires, deepening the knowledge of the double-guidewire method will contribute greatly to troubleshooting in daily practice. In this review, the usefulness of the double-guidewire technique is discussed with respect to two main areas: selective insertion of guidewires and devices and biliary cannulation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Advancements in Research on Challenges in Selective Biliary Cannulation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
    天雨 张
    Journal of Clinical Personalized Medicine.2024; 03(01): 100.     CrossRef
  • Double-guidewire technique for selective biliary cannulation does not increase the rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in patients with naïve papilla
    Han Taek Jeong, June Hwa Bae, Ho Gak Kim, Jimin Han
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 226.     CrossRef
  • Dedicated Echoendoscope for Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound: Comparison with a Conventional Echoendoscope
    Toshio Fujisawa, Shigeto Ishii, Yousuke Nakai, Hirofumi Kogure, Ko Tomishima, Yusuke Takasaki, Koichi Ito, Sho Takahashi, Akinori Suzuki, Hiroyuki Isayama
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(10): 2840.     CrossRef
  • INTRAOPERATIVE SIGNS OF ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS
    S. M. Vasyliuk, O. V. Prudnikov, V. V. Ivanyna, O. S. Tkachuk, N. M. Pavliuk, B. V. Krysa, V. M. Atamaniuk
    Kharkiv Surgical School.2022; (4-5): 55.     CrossRef
  • 3,199 View
  • 213 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-assisted tissue acquisition for subepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Suprabhat Giri, Shivaraj Afzalpurkar, Sumaswi Angadi, Sridhar Sundaram
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):615-625.   Published online August 4, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.133
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) for tissue acquisition (TA) from subepithelial lesions (SELs) is emerging as an alternative to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided TA. Only a limited number of studies compared the diagnostic utility of MIAB and EUS for upper gastrointestinal (GI) SELs; therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search from January 2020 to January 2022 was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and safety of MIAB and EUS-guided TA for upper GI SELs.
Results
Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled technical success rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89–1.04) and procedural time (mean difference=–4.53 seconds; 95% CI, –22.38 to 13.31] were comparable between both the groups. The overall chance of obtaining a positive diagnostic yield was lower with EUS than with MIAB for all lesions (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.98) but comparable when using a fine-needle biopsy needle (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83–1.04). The positive diagnostic yield of MIAB was higher for lesions <20 mm (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.89). Six studies reported no adverse events.
Conclusions
MIAB can be considered an effective alternative to EUS-guided TA for upper GI SELs without an increased risk of adverse events.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Technical outcomes and postprocedural courses of mucosal incision‐assisted biopsy for possible gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A series of 48 cases (with video)
    Eriko Koizumi, Osamu Goto, Shun Nakagome, Tsugumi Habu, Yumiko Ishikawa, Kumiko Kirita, Hiroto Noda, Kazutoshi Higuchi, Takeshi Onda, Teppei Akimoto, Jun Omori, Naohiko Akimoto, Katsuhiko Iwakiri
    DEN Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Diagnostic Approach of Benign Esophageal Tumors: A Narrative Review
    Alex R. Jones, Preksha Vankawala, Tarek Sawas
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2024; 22(2): 44.     CrossRef
  • Unroofing of subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract using cold snare: an easy and efficient technique for diagnosis
    Bernhard Morell, Frans Olivier The, Christoph Gubler, Fritz Ruprecht Murray
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 274.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review
    Cynthia A. Verloop, Jacqueline A.C. Goos, Marco J. Bruno, Rutger Quispel, Lydi M.J.W. van Driel, Lieke Hol
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 99(6): 895.     CrossRef
  • Small gastric subepithelial lesions: A sand in the eye
    Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Nikhil Sonthalia, Rashid N. Lui
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(7): 1207.     CrossRef
  • EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided
    Suprabhat Giri, Sridhar Sundaram
    Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic ability and adverse events of mucosal incision‐assisted biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Eriko Koizumi, Osamu Goto, Akihisa Matsuda, Toshiaki Otsuka, Yumiko Ishikawa, Shun Nakagome, Masahiro Niikawa, Tsugumi Habu, Keiichiro Yoshikata, Kumiko Kirita, Hiroto Noda, Kazutoshi Higuchi, Takeshi Onda, Jun Omori, Naohiko Akimoto, Hiroshi Yoshida, Kat
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Approach to Small Gastric Subepithelial Lesions
    Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2023; 23(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • Is the canalization to obtain deep biopsy of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors miniprobe-guidded as an alternative to conventional known techniques?
    Modesto Varas Lorenzo, Ramón Abad Belando
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Comprehensive Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Harishankar Gopakumar, Vinay Jahagirdar, Jagadish Koyi, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Hemant Goyal, Neil R. Sharma, Abhilash Perisetti
    Cancers.2023; 15(16): 4175.     CrossRef
  • 2,951 View
  • 141 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Editorials
Combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, a practical solution for difficult cases
Dong-Hoon Yang
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):626-627.   Published online September 15, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.160
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Approaches and considerations in the endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer
    Yunho Jung
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 563.     CrossRef
  • 1,963 View
  • 142 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Tacrolimus for prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a potential new target of old drug?
Seok Jeong
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):628-629.   Published online August 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.188
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Preclinical safety evaluation of calcineurin inhibitors delivered through an intraductal route to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis demonstrates endocrine and systemic safety
    Jianbo Ni, Asna Khalid, Yu-Chu Lin, Monique T. Barakat, Jing Wang, Cheng-Yu Tsai, Pasha Reza Shams Azar, Ying Ding, Judy-April Murayi, Thottala Jayaraman, Ronald Poropatich, Rita Bottino, Li Wen, Georgios I. Papachristou, Gayathri Swaminathan, Mang Yu, So
    Pancreatology.2023; 23(4): 333.     CrossRef
  • 2,076 View
  • 152 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Safe implementation of transoral incisionless fundoplication as a new technique in a tertiary care center
Shivanand Bomman, Sofya Malashanka, Adil Ghafoor, David J. Sanders, Shayan Irani, Richard A. Kozarek, Andrew Ross, Michal Hubka, Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):630-636.   Published online August 17, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.003
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is an accepted anatomic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease in selected patients. In this report, we analyze our institution’s programmatic allocation of resources during the safe implementation of TIF as a new procedure.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent TIF from January 2020 to February 2021 at our institution was performed. The process of initially allocating the operating room (OR) with overnight admission and postoperative esophagram for added safety, and subsequently transitioning TIF to the endoscopy suite (ES) as an outpatient procedure was described. Patient safety and outcomes were evaluated during transition.
Results
Thirty patients who underwent TIF were identified. The mean age was 51.2±16.0 years. TIF was performed in an OR in nine patients (30%) and 21 (70%) in the ES. All the OR patients were admitted overnight and had routine EG. In contrast, four (19%) from the ES group required clinically-indicated admission and three (14.2%) required esophagram. The mean procedure duration was significantly lower in the ES group (65.7 min vs. 84 min, p=0.02).
Conclusions
A stepwise, resource-efficient process was described that allowed safe initiation of TIF as a new technique and its effective transition to a fully outpatient procedure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: What’s new right now?
    Palittiya Sintusek, Mohamed Mutalib, Nikhil Thapar
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 15(3): 84.     CrossRef
  • Assessing implementation strategy and learning curve for transoral incisionless fundoplication as a new technique
    Muhammad Haseeb, Christopher C. Thompson
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(6): 751.     CrossRef
  • 2,571 View
  • 117 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
Joon Seop Lee, Chang Min Cho, Yong Hwan Kwon, An Na Seo, Han Ik Bae, Man-Hoon Han
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):637-644.   Published online August 17, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.257
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is integral to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs). The impact of different EUS-FNB tissue sampling techniques on specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy in SETs has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic outcomes of slow-pull (SP) and standard suction (SS) in patients with GI SETs.
Methods
In this retrospective comparative study, 54 patients were enrolled. Medical records were reviewed for location and size of the target lesion, FNB needle type/size, technical order, specimen adequacy, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. The acquisition rate of adequate specimens and diagnostic accuracy were compared according to EUS-FNB techniques.
Results
The mean lesion size was 42.6±36.4 mm, and most patients were diagnosed with GI stromal tumor (75.9%). The overall diagnostic accuracies of the SP and SS techniques were 83.3% and 81.5%, respectively (p=0.800). The rates of obtaining adequate core tissue were 79.6% and 75.9%, respectively (p=0.799). No significant clinical factors affected the rate of obtaining adequate core tissue, including lesion location and size, FNB needle size, and final diagnosis.
Conclusions
SP and SS had comparable diagnostic accuracies and adequate core tissue acquisition for GI SETs via EUS-FNB.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions
    Takuto Hikichi, Minami Hashimoto, Takumi Yanagita, Tsunetaka Kato, Jun Nakamura
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2024; 51(2): 195.     CrossRef
  • What method can we choose if rapid on-site evaluation is not available for the endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions?
    Yu Kyung Cho
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • The Diagnostic Approach of Benign Esophageal Tumors: A Narrative Review
    Alex R. Jones, Preksha Vankawala, Tarek Sawas
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2024; 22(2): 44.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review
    Cynthia A. Verloop, Jacqueline A.C. Goos, Marco J. Bruno, Rutger Quispel, Lydi M.J.W. van Driel, Lieke Hol
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 99(6): 895.     CrossRef
  • EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided
    Suprabhat Giri, Sridhar Sundaram
    Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Esophageal Leiomyoma with Cystic Degeneration Mimicking a Malignant Neoplasm
    Gwang Ha Kim, Dong Chan Joo, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Kyungbin Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prevalence, natural progression, and clinical practices of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions in Korea: a multicenter study
    Younghee Choe, Yu Kyung Cho, Gwang Ha Kim, Jun-Ho Choi, Eun Soo Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Eun Kwang Choi, Tae Hyeon Kim, Seong-Hun Kim, Do Hoon Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(6): 744.     CrossRef
  • 2,900 View
  • 134 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Optical diagnosis by near-focus versus normal-focus narrow band imaging colonoscopy in colorectal polyps based on combined NICE and WASP classification: a randomized controlled trial
Nisa Netinatsunton, Natcha Cheewasereechon, Tanawat Pattarapuntakul, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Kanet Kanjanapradit, Bancha Ovartlarnporn
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):645-654.   Published online September 8, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.048
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) and Workgroup Serrated Polyps and Polyposis (WASP) classifications were developed for optical diagnosis of neoplastic and sessile serrated polyps, respectively. Near-focus NBI with NICE combined with WASP criteria for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps has not yet been evaluated. We aimed to compare the accuracy of near-focus NBI (group A) with normal-focus NBI (group B) in real-time optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using combined NICE and WASP criteria.
Methods
Among 362 patients, 118 with 227 polyps were recruited. Groups A and B included 62 patients with 130 polyps (three lost polyps) and 56 patients with 106 polyps (six lost polyps), respectively. Optical diagnoses were compared with pathological reports.
Results
The accuracy of optical diagnosis of neoplastic polyps in groups A and B was not significantly different (76% vs. 71%, p=0.52). WASP criteria provided all false positive diagnoses of sessile polyps as serrated polyps in 31 (16.2%) patients.
Conclusions
Near-focus NBI was not superior to normal-focus NBI in optical diagnostics of neoplastic polyps using NICE criteria. In our study, WASP classification yielded all false positives in the diagnosis of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Routine real-life optical diagnosis of polyps is still unadvisable.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Colonoscopy Quality, Innovation, and the Assessment of New Technology
    Sanjay R.V. Gadi, Sriya S. Muralidharan, Jeremy R. Glissen Brown
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 26(2): 177.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic characteristics and performance of WASP classification in the diagnosis of colorectal sessile‐serrated lesions in Vietnamese patients
    Nhu Thi Hanh Vu, Huy Minh Le, Diem Thi‐Ngoc Vo, Nhan Quang Le, Dung Dang Quy Ho, Duc Trong Quach
    JGH Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Classification and endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps
    Ji Hyun Kim, Sung Chul Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 633.     CrossRef
  • Understanding colorectal polyps to prevent colorectal cancer
    Dong-Hoon Yang
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 626.     CrossRef
  • AI-powered medical devices for practical clinicians including the diagnosis of colorectal polyps
    Donghwan Kim, Eunsun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 658.     CrossRef
  • Detecting colorectal lesions with image-enhanced endoscopy: an updated review from clinical trials
    Mizuki Nagai, Sho Suzuki, Yohei Minato, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Kentaro Mochida, Ken Ohata, Tetsuo Morishita
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(5): 553.     CrossRef
  • 2,758 View
  • 154 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
Daisuke Ide, Tomohiko Richard Ohya, Mitsuaki Ishioka, Yuri Enomoto, Eisuke Nakao, Yuki Mitsuyoshi, Junki Tokura, Keigo Suzuki, Seiichi Yakabi, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Masahiro Igarashi, Akio Nakashima, Masayuki Saruta, Shoichi Saito, Junko Fujisaki
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):655-664.   Published online May 31, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.009
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventional ESD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events.
Results
En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm2/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group.
Conclusions
PCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Novel adjustable traction “noose knot” method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Junki Tokura, Daisuke Ide, Keigo Suzuki, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Masahiro Igarashi, Shoichi Saito
    Endoscopy.2024; 56(S 01): E55.     CrossRef
  • Approaches and considerations in the endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer
    Yunho Jung
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 563.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of salvage endoscopy in the treatment of residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Juan Du, Ting Zhang, Lei Wang, Hao Zhang, Wenquan Yi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(6): 3027.     CrossRef
  • Is there a best choice of equipment for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection?
    Francesco Cocomazzi, Sonia Carparelli, Nunzia Labarile, Antonio Capogreco, Marco Gentile, Roberta Maselli, Jahnvi Dhar, Jayanta Samanta, Alessandro Repici, Cesare Hassan, Francesco Perri, Antonio Facciorusso
    Expert Review of Medical Devices.2024; 21(7): 561.     CrossRef
  • The Derivation and External Validation of a Fibrosis Risk Model for Colorectal Tumours Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Sandro Sferrazza, Marcello Maida, Giulio Calabrese, Antonio Facciorusso, Lorenzo Fuccio, Leonardo Frazzoni, Roberta Maselli, Alessandro Repici, Roberto Di Mitri, João Santos-Antunes
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4517.     CrossRef
  • Difficult colorectal polypectomy: Technical tips and recent advances
    Sukit Pattarajierapan, Hiroyuki Takamaru, Supakij Khomvilai
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(17): 2600.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial
    Gianluca Andrisani, Cesare Hassan, Margherita Pizzicannella, Francesco Pugliese, Massimiliano Mutignani, Chiara Campanale, Giorgio Valerii, Carmelo Barbera, Giulio Antonelli, Francesco Maria Di Matteo
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(6): 987.     CrossRef
  • Combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, a practical solution for difficult cases
    Dong-Hoon Yang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 626.     CrossRef
  • 5,040 View
  • 319 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Preventive effect of tacrolimus on patients with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
Harshavardhan Rao B., Paul K. Vincent, Priya Nair, Anoop K. Koshy, Rama P. Venu
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):665-673.   Published online August 2, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.265
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: In patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), calcineurin activates zymogen, which results in pancreatitis. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).
Methods
This was a prospective pilot study in which patients who underwent ERCP received tacrolimus (4 mg in two divided doses); this was the Tac group. A contemporaneous cohort of patients was included as a control group. All patients were followed-up for PEP. PEP was characterized by worsening abdominal pain with an acute onset, elevated pancreatic enzymes, and a duration of hospital stay of more than 48 hours. Serum tacrolimus levels were measured immediately before the procedure in the Tac group.
Results
There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the Tac group (n=48) and the control group (n=51). Only four out of 48 patients (8.3%) had PEP in the Tac group compared to eight out of 51 patients (15.7%) who had PEP in the control group. The mean trough tacrolimus level in patients who developed PEP was significantly lower (p<0.05).
Conclusions
Oral tacrolimus at a cumulative dose of 4 mg safely prevents PEP. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted to establish the role of tacrolimus in this context.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Acute pancreatitis: pathogenesis and emerging therapies
    Saif Zaman, Fred Gorelick
    Journal of Pancreatology.2024; 7(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • Preclinical safety evaluation of calcineurin inhibitors delivered through an intraductal route to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis demonstrates endocrine and systemic safety
    Jianbo Ni, Asna Khalid, Yu-Chu Lin, Monique T. Barakat, Jing Wang, Cheng-Yu Tsai, Pasha Reza Shams Azar, Ying Ding, Judy-April Murayi, Thottala Jayaraman, Ronald Poropatich, Rita Bottino, Li Wen, Georgios I. Papachristou, Gayathri Swaminathan, Mang Yu, So
    Pancreatology.2023; 23(4): 333.     CrossRef
  • Could assessment of genetic susceptibility be an effective solution to prevent pancreatitis from occurring after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?
    Jae Min Lee
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2023; 38(6): 783.     CrossRef
  • Rectal administration of tacrolimus protects against post-ERCP pancreatitis in mice
    Yu-Chu Lin, Jianbo Ni, Gayathri Swaminathan, Asna Khalid, Monique T. Barakat, Adam R. Frymoyer, Cheng-Yu Tsai, Ying Ding, Judy-April Murayi, Thottala Jayaraman, Ronald Poropatich, Rita Bottino, Li Wen, Georgios I. Papachristou, Sunil G. Sheth, Mang Yu, So
    Pancreatology.2023; 23(7): 777.     CrossRef
  • Tacrolimus for prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a potential new target of old drug?
    Seok Jeong
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 628.     CrossRef
  • 3,034 View
  • 146 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial
Kwang Hyun Chung, Jeong Don Chae, Wonho Choe, Hyo Young Lee, Il Hwan Oh, Byoung Kwan Son
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):674-682.   Published online August 2, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.210
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic channels are difficult to clean and can cause infection transmission. We examined the effectiveness of a newly developed channel-cleaning ball brush (BB), which is sucked into the endoscopic channel and scrapes and cleans the lumen as it passes through.
Methods
The upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopes used for patient examinations were randomly selected as the conventional brush (CB) or BB group. After manual cleaning, the presence or absence of carbohydrates, proteins, adenosine triphosphate, and hemoglobin was assessed.
Results
Fifty-six and 58 endoscopes were cleaned with the CB and BB, respectively. Carbohydrate and protein were detected in one (1.8%) and two endoscopes (3.4%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=1.000). Hemoglobin was observed in one (1.8%) and three endoscopes (5.2%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.636). The adenosine triphosphate levels were 10.6±15.9 and 12.5±14.3 relative light units in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.496). Twenty-seven (48.2%) and 19 (32.8%) endoscopes were positive for microbial cultures in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.136).
Conclusions
The efficacy of BB was not significantly different from that of CB in the endoscopic channel-cleaning process.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Simulated-use evaluation of rapid ChannelCheck™ cleaning test for optimal detection of organic residues in flexible endoscope channels
    K. Kulkarni, M. Gavette, M.J. Alfa
    Journal of Hospital Infection.2024; 152: 66.     CrossRef
  • 3,665 View
  • 177 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Less invasive transoral resection of esophageal fibrovascular polyps: case reports
Janusz Włodarczyk, Tomasz Smęder
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):683-687.   Published online December 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.144
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
We report five patients treated for esophageal fibrovascular polyps using a minimally invasive technique. Esophageal fibrovascular polyps are benign pedunculated submucosal tumors of considerable size. The treated polyps size ranged from 1.5 to 13 cm. The polyps were removed by relocation to the oral cavity under endoscopic control. No perioperative complications occurred after the treatment. The follow-up of patients after surgery was 9–89 months, with no evidence of polyp recurrence. Thus, the described treatment is safe but requires experience with endoscopy as well as esophageal surgery.
  • 3,288 View
  • 177 Download
Close layer
Brief Reports
General guideline in the endoscopy room to avoid air-borne infection during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):688-690.   Published online September 14, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.146
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Unlocking insights: Navigating COVID-19 challenges and Emulating future pandemic Resilience strategies with strengthening natural immunity
    Sunil J. Wimalawansa
    Heliyon.2024; 10(15): e34691.     CrossRef
  • 2,523 View
  • 123 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Infectious transmission from Savary dilators is uncommon: retrospective review from a large tertiary academic center
Zoe N. Memel, Duncan J. Flynn, Yasmin Hernandez-Barco, Kavel Harish Visrodia, Brenna Casey, Kumar Krishnan
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):691-694.   Published online June 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.050
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
  • 3,977 View
  • 126 Download
Close layer
Boost Your Learning with Quiz
A subepithelial lesion in a patient with long-standing ulcerative colitis
Suhyun Park, Jihun Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):695-698.   Published online September 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.215
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 2,487 View
  • 119 Download
Close layer
Letter to the Editor
Artificial intelligence-based colorectal polyp histology prediction using narrow-band image-magnifying colonoscopy: a stepping stone for clinical practice
Ji Young Chang
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):699-700.   Published online August 26, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.123
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Review on Artificial Intelligence in Internet of Things and Cyber Physical Systems
    Anandakumar Haldorai
    Journal of Computing and Natural Science.2023; : 12.     CrossRef
  • AI-powered medical devices for practical clinicians including the diagnosis of colorectal polyps
    Donghwan Kim, Eunsun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 658.     CrossRef
  • 1,821 View
  • 108 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Response
Response to Artificial intelligence-based colorectal polyp histology prediction using narrow-band image-magnifying colonoscopy: a stepping stone for clinical practice
Istvan Racz, Andras Horvath, Zoltán Horvath
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):701-702.   Published online September 27, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.123.1
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 1,609 View
  • 106 Download
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP