-
Volume 55(5); September 2022
-
Reviews
-
New sedatives and analgesic drugs for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures
-
Jae Min Lee, Yehyun Park, Jin Myung Park, Hong Jun Park, Jun Yong Bae, Seung Young Seo, Jee Hyun Lee, Hyung Ku Chon, Jun-Won Chung, Hyun Ho Choi, Jun Kyu Lee, Byung-Wook Kim, Endoscopic Sedation Committee of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):581-587. Published online August 29, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.283
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Procedural sedation has become increasingly common in endoscopy. Sedatives and analgesics induce anxiolysis and amnesia. In addition, an appropriate level of sedation is necessary for safe procedures including therapeutic endoscopy. Midazolam and propofol are the most commonly used drugs in sedative endoscopy. In recent years, the need to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of sedation has increased in practice. Therefore, new sedatives and analgesic drugs for optimal sedative endoscopy, have recently emerged. This article reviews the characteristics of sedatives and analgesics, and describes their clinical use in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
Chung Hyun Tae, Ju Yup Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Chan Hyuk Park, Eun Jeong Gong, Cheol Min Shin, Hyun Lim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Sang Hoon Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Moon Sung Lee, Jong-Jae Park, Oh Young Lee
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(1): 10. CrossRef - Assessing wound complications in gastroscopy with Streptomyces protease enzyme combined with Shutai
Qihui Chen, Hangfei Li, Lijuan Zhou, Zhanbo Yang
International Wound Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Characterization of Pediatric Rectal Absorption, Drug Disposition, and Sedation Level for Midazolam Gel Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling
Jinying Zhu, Sufeng Zhou, Lu Wang, Yuqing Zhao, Jie Wang, Tangping Zhao, Tongtong Li, Feng Shao
Molecular Pharmaceutics.2024; 21(5): 2187. CrossRef - Development of a predictive model for hypoxia due to sedatives in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective clinical study in Korea
Jung Wan Choe, Jong Jin Hyun, Seong-Jin Son, Seung-Hak Lee
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(4): 476. CrossRef - Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer
Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(5): 781. CrossRef - Clinical practice guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
Chung Hyun Tae, Ju Yup Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Chan Hyuk Park, Eun Jeong Gong, Cheol Min Shin, Hyun Lim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Sang Hoon Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Moon Sung Lee, Jong-Jae Park, Oh Young Lee
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 391. CrossRef - Quality of recovery and pre-existing impaired cognition in patients undergoing advanced GI endoscopic procedures with patient-controlled sedation: a prospective observational cohort study
Sara Lyckner, Michelle S. Chew, Andreas Nilsson
iGIE.2023; 2(3): 292. CrossRef - Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
Chung Hyun Tae, Ju Yup Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Chan Hyuk Park, Eun Jeong Gong, Cheol Min Shin, Hyun Lim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Sang Hoon Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Moon Sung Lee, Jong-Jae Park, Oh Young Lee
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(3): 107. CrossRef - Drugs used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Jun Kyu Lee
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(11): 735. CrossRef
-
5,152
View
-
328
Download
-
8
Web of Science
-
9
Crossref
-
Management of aerosol generation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
-
Chawisa Nampoolsuksan, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Asada Methasate, Jirawat Swangsri, Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Chainarong Phalanusitthepha, Thammawat Parakonthun, Voraboot Taweerutchana, Nicha Srisuworanan, Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Thikhamporn Tawantanakorn, Thawatchai Akaraviputh
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):588-593. Published online August 24, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.062
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- In the highly contagious coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) are associated with high-risk of transmission. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is a procedure with the potential to cause dissemination of bodily fluids. At present, there is no consensus that endoscopy is defined as an AGP. This review discusses the current evidence on this topic with additional management. Prevailing publications on coronavirus related to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and aerosolization from the PubMed and Scopus databases were searched and reviewed. Comparative quantitative analyses showed a significant elevation of particle numbers, implying that aerosols were generated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The associated source events have also been reported. To reduce the dispersion, certain protective measures have been developed. Endoscopic unit protocols are recommended for the concerned personnel. Therefore, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy should be classified as an AGP. Proper practices should be adopted by healthcare workers and patients.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Aerosol protection using modified N95 respirator during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
Chawisa Nampoolsuksan, Thawatchai Akaraviputh, Asada Methasate, Jirawat Swangsri, Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Chainarong Phalanusitthepha, Thammawat Parakonthun, Voraboot Taweerutchana, Nicha Srisuworanan, Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Thikhamporn Tawantanakorn,
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 335. CrossRef - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019
Shahnaz Sultan
Gastroenterology Clinics of North America.2023; 52(1): 157. CrossRef - Does an Extraoral Suction Device Reduce Aerosol Generation and Prevent Droplet Exposure to the Examiner during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy?
Shintaro Fujihara, Hideki Kobara, Noriko Nishiyama, Naoya Tada, Yasuhiro Goda, Kazuhiro Kozuka, Takanori Matsui, Taiga Chiyo, Nobuya Kobayashi, Tatsuo Yachida, Tsutomu Masaki
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(7): 2574. CrossRef
-
3,002
View
-
197
Download
-
3
Web of Science
-
3
Crossref
-
Preparation of image databases for artificial intelligence algorithm development in gastrointestinal endoscopy
-
Chang Bong Yang, Sang Hoon Kim, Yun Jeong Lim
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):594-604. Published online May 31, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.229
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Over the past decade, technological advances in deep learning have led to the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging. The most commonly used structure in image recognition is the convolutional neural network, which mimics the action of the human visual cortex. The applications of AI in gastrointestinal endoscopy are diverse. Computer-aided diagnosis has achieved remarkable outcomes with recent improvements in machine-learning techniques and advances in computer performance. Despite some hurdles, the implementation of AI-assisted clinical practice is expected to aid endoscopists in real-time decision-making. In this summary, we reviewed state-of-the-art AI in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy and offered a practical guide for building a learning image dataset for algorithm development.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Use of artificial intelligence in the management of T1 colorectal cancer: a new tool in the arsenal or is deep learning out of its depth?
James Weiquan Li, Lai Mun Wang, Katsuro Ichimasa, Kenneth Weicong Lin, James Chi-Yong Ngu, Tiing Leong Ang
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(1): 24. CrossRef - Computer‐aided diagnosis in real‐time endoscopy for all stages of gastric carcinogenesis: Development and validation study
Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee
United European Gastroenterology Journal.2024; 12(4): 487. CrossRef - Assessing Endoscopic Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: Development and Validation of a Highly Accurate Convolutional Neural Network
Hannah Williams, Hannah M. Thompson, Christina Lee, Aneesh Rangnekar, Jorge T. Gomez, Maria Widmar, Iris H. Wei, Emmanouil P. Pappou, Garrett M. Nash, Martin R. Weiser, Philip B. Paty, J. Joshua Smith, Harini Veeraraghavan, Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(10): 6443. CrossRef - As how artificial intelligence is revolutionizing endoscopy
Jean-Francois Rey
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 302. CrossRef - Next-Generation Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Irene Zammarchi, Giovanni Santacroce, Marietta Iacucci
Diagnostics.2023; 13(15): 2547. CrossRef - Public Imaging Datasets of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Artificial Intelligence: a Review
Shiqi Zhu, Jingwen Gao, Lu Liu, Minyue Yin, Jiaxi Lin, Chang Xu, Chunfang Xu, Jinzhou Zhu
Journal of Digital Imaging.2023; 36(6): 2578. CrossRef - AI-powered medical devices for practical clinicians including the diagnosis of colorectal polyps
Donghwan Kim, Eunsun Kim
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 658. CrossRef - Impact of the Volume and Distribution of Training Datasets in the Development of Deep-Learning Models for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps in Endoscopy Images
Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Young Joo Yang, Gwang Ho Baik
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(9): 1361. CrossRef
-
3,919
View
-
259
Download
-
8
Web of Science
-
8
Crossref
-
Usefulness of the double-guidewire technique for endoscopic procedures in the field of biliary and pancreatic diseases
-
Mamoru Takenaka, Masatoshi Kudo
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):605-614. Published online August 23, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.032
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- The double-guidewire method has been increasingly used in endoscopic procedures for biliary and pancreatic diseases in recent years, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography-related procedures. In addition, double-lumen catheters with uneven distal and proximal lumen openings have been introduced, making it possible to easily create a double-guidewire situation, and the usefulness of the double-guidewire technique using uneven double-lumen cannulas has been widely reported. Although the advantages of using two guidewires depend on the particular situation and the appropriate use of the two guidewires, deepening the knowledge of the double-guidewire method will contribute greatly to troubleshooting in daily practice. In this review, the usefulness of the double-guidewire technique is discussed with respect to two main areas: selective insertion of guidewires and devices and biliary cannulation.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Advancements in Research on Challenges in Selective Biliary Cannulation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
天雨 张
Journal of Clinical Personalized Medicine.2024; 03(01): 100. CrossRef - Double-guidewire technique for selective biliary cannulation does not increase the rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in patients with naïve papilla
Han Taek Jeong, June Hwa Bae, Ho Gak Kim, Jimin Han
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 226. CrossRef - Dedicated Echoendoscope for Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound: Comparison with a Conventional Echoendoscope
Toshio Fujisawa, Shigeto Ishii, Yousuke Nakai, Hirofumi Kogure, Ko Tomishima, Yusuke Takasaki, Koichi Ito, Sho Takahashi, Akinori Suzuki, Hiroyuki Isayama
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(10): 2840. CrossRef - INTRAOPERATIVE SIGNS OF ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS
S. M. Vasyliuk, O. V. Prudnikov, V. V. Ivanyna, O. S. Tkachuk, N. M. Pavliuk, B. V. Krysa, V. M. Atamaniuk
Kharkiv Surgical School.2022; (4-5): 55. CrossRef
-
3,199
View
-
213
Download
-
2
Web of Science
-
4
Crossref
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
-
Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-assisted tissue acquisition for subepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
-
Suprabhat Giri, Shivaraj Afzalpurkar, Sumaswi Angadi, Sridhar Sundaram
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):615-625. Published online August 4, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.133
-
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) for tissue acquisition (TA) from subepithelial lesions (SELs) is emerging as an alternative to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided TA. Only a limited number of studies compared the diagnostic utility of MIAB and EUS for upper gastrointestinal (GI) SELs; therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search from January 2020 to January 2022 was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and safety of MIAB and EUS-guided TA for upper GI SELs.
Results
Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled technical success rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89–1.04) and procedural time (mean difference=–4.53 seconds; 95% CI, –22.38 to 13.31] were comparable between both the groups. The overall chance of obtaining a positive diagnostic yield was lower with EUS than with MIAB for all lesions (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.98) but comparable when using a fine-needle biopsy needle (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83–1.04). The positive diagnostic yield of MIAB was higher for lesions <20 mm (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.89). Six studies reported no adverse events.
Conclusions
MIAB can be considered an effective alternative to EUS-guided TA for upper GI SELs without an increased risk of adverse events.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Technical outcomes and postprocedural courses of mucosal incision‐assisted biopsy for possible gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A series of 48 cases (with video)
Eriko Koizumi, Osamu Goto, Shun Nakagome, Tsugumi Habu, Yumiko Ishikawa, Kumiko Kirita, Hiroto Noda, Kazutoshi Higuchi, Takeshi Onda, Teppei Akimoto, Jun Omori, Naohiko Akimoto, Katsuhiko Iwakiri
DEN Open.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - The Diagnostic Approach of Benign Esophageal Tumors: A Narrative Review
Alex R. Jones, Preksha Vankawala, Tarek Sawas
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2024; 22(2): 44. CrossRef - Unroofing of subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract using cold snare: an easy and efficient technique for diagnosis
Bernhard Morell, Frans Olivier The, Christoph Gubler, Fritz Ruprecht Murray
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 274. CrossRef - Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review
Cynthia A. Verloop, Jacqueline A.C. Goos, Marco J. Bruno, Rutger Quispel, Lydi M.J.W. van Driel, Lieke Hol
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 99(6): 895. CrossRef - Small gastric subepithelial lesions: A sand in the eye
Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Nikhil Sonthalia, Rashid N. Lui
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(7): 1207. CrossRef - EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided
Suprabhat Giri, Sridhar Sundaram
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Diagnostic ability and adverse events of mucosal incision‐assisted biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Eriko Koizumi, Osamu Goto, Akihisa Matsuda, Toshiaki Otsuka, Yumiko Ishikawa, Shun Nakagome, Masahiro Niikawa, Tsugumi Habu, Keiichiro Yoshikata, Kumiko Kirita, Hiroto Noda, Kazutoshi Higuchi, Takeshi Onda, Jun Omori, Naohiko Akimoto, Hiroshi Yoshida, Kat
Digestive Endoscopy.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Approach to Small Gastric Subepithelial Lesions
Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2023; 23(1): 28. CrossRef - Is the canalization to obtain deep biopsy of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors miniprobe-guidded as an alternative to conventional known techniques?
Modesto Varas Lorenzo, Ramón Abad Belando
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Role of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Comprehensive Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Harishankar Gopakumar, Vinay Jahagirdar, Jagadish Koyi, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Hemant Goyal, Neil R. Sharma, Abhilash Perisetti
Cancers.2023; 15(16): 4175. CrossRef
-
2,951
View
-
141
Download
-
7
Web of Science
-
10
Crossref
Editorials
-
Tacrolimus for prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a potential new target of old drug?
-
Seok Jeong
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):628-629. Published online August 29, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.188
-
-
PDFPubReaderePub
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Preclinical safety evaluation of calcineurin inhibitors delivered through an intraductal route to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis demonstrates endocrine and systemic safety
Jianbo Ni, Asna Khalid, Yu-Chu Lin, Monique T. Barakat, Jing Wang, Cheng-Yu Tsai, Pasha Reza Shams Azar, Ying Ding, Judy-April Murayi, Thottala Jayaraman, Ronald Poropatich, Rita Bottino, Li Wen, Georgios I. Papachristou, Gayathri Swaminathan, Mang Yu, So
Pancreatology.2023; 23(4): 333. CrossRef
-
2,076
View
-
152
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
1
Crossref
Original Articles
-
Safe implementation of transoral incisionless fundoplication as a new technique in a tertiary care center
-
Shivanand Bomman, Sofya Malashanka, Adil Ghafoor, David J. Sanders, Shayan Irani, Richard A. Kozarek, Andrew Ross, Michal Hubka, Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):630-636. Published online August 17, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.003
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is an accepted anatomic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease in selected patients. In this report, we analyze our institution’s programmatic allocation of resources during the safe implementation of TIF as a new procedure.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent TIF from January 2020 to February 2021 at our institution was performed. The process of initially allocating the operating room (OR) with overnight admission and postoperative esophagram for added safety, and subsequently transitioning TIF to the endoscopy suite (ES) as an outpatient procedure was described. Patient safety and outcomes were evaluated during transition.
Results
Thirty patients who underwent TIF were identified. The mean age was 51.2±16.0 years. TIF was performed in an OR in nine patients (30%) and 21 (70%) in the ES. All the OR patients were admitted overnight and had routine EG. In contrast, four (19%) from the ES group required clinically-indicated admission and three (14.2%) required esophagram. The mean procedure duration was significantly lower in the ES group (65.7 min vs. 84 min, p=0.02).
Conclusions
A stepwise, resource-efficient process was described that allowed safe initiation of TIF as a new technique and its effective transition to a fully outpatient procedure.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: What’s new right now?
Palittiya Sintusek, Mohamed Mutalib, Nikhil Thapar
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 15(3): 84. CrossRef - Assessing implementation strategy and learning curve for transoral incisionless fundoplication as a new technique
Muhammad Haseeb, Christopher C. Thompson
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(6): 751. CrossRef
-
2,571
View
-
117
Download
-
2
Web of Science
-
2
Crossref
-
Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
-
Joon Seop Lee, Chang Min Cho, Yong Hwan Kwon, An Na Seo, Han Ik Bae, Man-Hoon Han
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):637-644. Published online August 17, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.257
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is integral to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs). The impact of different EUS-FNB tissue sampling techniques on specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy in SETs has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic outcomes of slow-pull (SP) and standard suction (SS) in patients with GI SETs.
Methods
In this retrospective comparative study, 54 patients were enrolled. Medical records were reviewed for location and size of the target lesion, FNB needle type/size, technical order, specimen adequacy, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. The acquisition rate of adequate specimens and diagnostic accuracy were compared according to EUS-FNB techniques.
Results
The mean lesion size was 42.6±36.4 mm, and most patients were diagnosed with GI stromal tumor (75.9%). The overall diagnostic accuracies of the SP and SS techniques were 83.3% and 81.5%, respectively (p=0.800). The rates of obtaining adequate core tissue were 79.6% and 75.9%, respectively (p=0.799). No significant clinical factors affected the rate of obtaining adequate core tissue, including lesion location and size, FNB needle size, and final diagnosis.
Conclusions
SP and SS had comparable diagnostic accuracies and adequate core tissue acquisition for GI SETs via EUS-FNB.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions
Takuto Hikichi, Minami Hashimoto, Takumi Yanagita, Tsunetaka Kato, Jun Nakamura
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2024; 51(2): 195. CrossRef - What method can we choose if rapid on-site evaluation is not available for the endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions?
Yu Kyung Cho
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(1): 53. CrossRef - The Diagnostic Approach of Benign Esophageal Tumors: A Narrative Review
Alex R. Jones, Preksha Vankawala, Tarek Sawas
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2024; 22(2): 44. CrossRef - Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review
Cynthia A. Verloop, Jacqueline A.C. Goos, Marco J. Bruno, Rutger Quispel, Lydi M.J.W. van Driel, Lieke Hol
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 99(6): 895. CrossRef - EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided
Suprabhat Giri, Sridhar Sundaram
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - An Esophageal Leiomyoma with Cystic Degeneration Mimicking a Malignant Neoplasm
Gwang Ha Kim, Dong Chan Joo, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Kyungbin Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Prevalence, natural progression, and clinical practices of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions in Korea: a multicenter study
Younghee Choe, Yu Kyung Cho, Gwang Ha Kim, Jun-Ho Choi, Eun Soo Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Eun Kwang Choi, Tae Hyeon Kim, Seong-Hun Kim, Do Hoon Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(6): 744. CrossRef
-
2,900
View
-
134
Download
-
5
Web of Science
-
7
Crossref
-
Optical diagnosis by near-focus versus normal-focus narrow band imaging colonoscopy in colorectal polyps based on combined NICE and WASP classification: a randomized controlled trial
-
Nisa Netinatsunton, Natcha Cheewasereechon, Tanawat Pattarapuntakul, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Kanet Kanjanapradit, Bancha Ovartlarnporn
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):645-654. Published online September 8, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.048
-
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) and Workgroup Serrated Polyps and Polyposis (WASP) classifications were developed for optical diagnosis of neoplastic and sessile serrated polyps, respectively. Near-focus NBI with NICE combined with WASP criteria for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps has not yet been evaluated. We aimed to compare the accuracy of near-focus NBI (group A) with normal-focus NBI (group B) in real-time optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using combined NICE and WASP criteria.
Methods
Among 362 patients, 118 with 227 polyps were recruited. Groups A and B included 62 patients with 130 polyps (three lost polyps) and 56 patients with 106 polyps (six lost polyps), respectively. Optical diagnoses were compared with pathological reports.
Results
The accuracy of optical diagnosis of neoplastic polyps in groups A and B was not significantly different (76% vs. 71%, p=0.52). WASP criteria provided all false positive diagnoses of sessile polyps as serrated polyps in 31 (16.2%) patients.
Conclusions
Near-focus NBI was not superior to normal-focus NBI in optical diagnostics of neoplastic polyps using NICE criteria. In our study, WASP classification yielded all false positives in the diagnosis of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Routine real-life optical diagnosis of polyps is still unadvisable.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Colonoscopy Quality, Innovation, and the Assessment of New Technology
Sanjay R.V. Gadi, Sriya S. Muralidharan, Jeremy R. Glissen Brown
Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 26(2): 177. CrossRef - Endoscopic characteristics and performance of WASP classification in the diagnosis of colorectal sessile‐serrated lesions in Vietnamese patients
Nhu Thi Hanh Vu, Huy Minh Le, Diem Thi‐Ngoc Vo, Nhan Quang Le, Dung Dang Quy Ho, Duc Trong Quach
JGH Open.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Classification and endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps
Ji Hyun Kim, Sung Chul Park
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 633. CrossRef - Understanding colorectal polyps to prevent colorectal cancer
Dong-Hoon Yang
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 626. CrossRef - AI-powered medical devices for practical clinicians including the diagnosis of colorectal polyps
Donghwan Kim, Eunsun Kim
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 658. CrossRef - Detecting colorectal lesions with image-enhanced endoscopy: an updated review from clinical trials
Mizuki Nagai, Sho Suzuki, Yohei Minato, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Kentaro Mochida, Ken Ohata, Tetsuo Morishita
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(5): 553. CrossRef
-
2,758
View
-
154
Download
-
6
Web of Science
-
6
Crossref
-
Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
-
Daisuke Ide, Tomohiko Richard Ohya, Mitsuaki Ishioka, Yuri Enomoto, Eisuke Nakao, Yuki Mitsuyoshi, Junki Tokura, Keigo Suzuki, Seiichi Yakabi, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Masahiro Igarashi, Akio Nakashima, Masayuki Saruta, Shoichi Saito, Junko Fujisaki
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):655-664. Published online May 31, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.009
-
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventional ESD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events.
Results
En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm2/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group.
Conclusions
PCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Novel adjustable traction “noose knot” method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
Junki Tokura, Daisuke Ide, Keigo Suzuki, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Masahiro Igarashi, Shoichi Saito
Endoscopy.2024; 56(S 01): E55. CrossRef - Approaches and considerations in the endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer
Yunho Jung
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 563. CrossRef - Efficacy and safety of salvage endoscopy in the treatment of residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Juan Du, Ting Zhang, Lei Wang, Hao Zhang, Wenquan Yi
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(6): 3027. CrossRef - Is there a best choice of equipment for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection?
Francesco Cocomazzi, Sonia Carparelli, Nunzia Labarile, Antonio Capogreco, Marco Gentile, Roberta Maselli, Jahnvi Dhar, Jayanta Samanta, Alessandro Repici, Cesare Hassan, Francesco Perri, Antonio Facciorusso
Expert Review of Medical Devices.2024; 21(7): 561. CrossRef - The Derivation and External Validation of a Fibrosis Risk Model for Colorectal Tumours Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Sandro Sferrazza, Marcello Maida, Giulio Calabrese, Antonio Facciorusso, Lorenzo Fuccio, Leonardo Frazzoni, Roberta Maselli, Alessandro Repici, Roberto Di Mitri, João Santos-Antunes
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4517. CrossRef - Difficult colorectal polypectomy: Technical tips and recent advances
Sukit Pattarajierapan, Hiroyuki Takamaru, Supakij Khomvilai
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(17): 2600. CrossRef - Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial
Gianluca Andrisani, Cesare Hassan, Margherita Pizzicannella, Francesco Pugliese, Massimiliano Mutignani, Chiara Campanale, Giorgio Valerii, Carmelo Barbera, Giulio Antonelli, Francesco Maria Di Matteo
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(6): 987. CrossRef - Combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, a practical solution for difficult cases
Dong-Hoon Yang
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 626. CrossRef
-
5,040
View
-
319
Download
-
8
Web of Science
-
8
Crossref
-
Preventive effect of tacrolimus on patients with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
-
Harshavardhan Rao B., Paul K. Vincent, Priya Nair, Anoop K. Koshy, Rama P. Venu
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):665-673. Published online August 2, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.265
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: In patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), calcineurin activates zymogen, which results in pancreatitis. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).
Methods
This was a prospective pilot study in which patients who underwent ERCP received tacrolimus (4 mg in two divided doses); this was the Tac group. A contemporaneous cohort of patients was included as a control group. All patients were followed-up for PEP. PEP was characterized by worsening abdominal pain with an acute onset, elevated pancreatic enzymes, and a duration of hospital stay of more than 48 hours. Serum tacrolimus levels were measured immediately before the procedure in the Tac group.
Results
There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the Tac group (n=48) and the control group (n=51). Only four out of 48 patients (8.3%) had PEP in the Tac group compared to eight out of 51 patients (15.7%) who had PEP in the control group. The mean trough tacrolimus level in patients who developed PEP was significantly lower (p<0.05).
Conclusions
Oral tacrolimus at a cumulative dose of 4 mg safely prevents PEP. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted to establish the role of tacrolimus in this context.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Acute pancreatitis: pathogenesis and emerging therapies
Saif Zaman, Fred Gorelick
Journal of Pancreatology.2024; 7(1): 10. CrossRef - Preclinical safety evaluation of calcineurin inhibitors delivered through an intraductal route to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis demonstrates endocrine and systemic safety
Jianbo Ni, Asna Khalid, Yu-Chu Lin, Monique T. Barakat, Jing Wang, Cheng-Yu Tsai, Pasha Reza Shams Azar, Ying Ding, Judy-April Murayi, Thottala Jayaraman, Ronald Poropatich, Rita Bottino, Li Wen, Georgios I. Papachristou, Gayathri Swaminathan, Mang Yu, So
Pancreatology.2023; 23(4): 333. CrossRef - Could assessment of genetic susceptibility be an effective solution to prevent pancreatitis from occurring after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?
Jae Min Lee
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2023; 38(6): 783. CrossRef - Rectal administration of tacrolimus protects against post-ERCP pancreatitis in mice
Yu-Chu Lin, Jianbo Ni, Gayathri Swaminathan, Asna Khalid, Monique T. Barakat, Adam R. Frymoyer, Cheng-Yu Tsai, Ying Ding, Judy-April Murayi, Thottala Jayaraman, Ronald Poropatich, Rita Bottino, Li Wen, Georgios I. Papachristou, Sunil G. Sheth, Mang Yu, So
Pancreatology.2023; 23(7): 777. CrossRef - Tacrolimus for prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a potential new target of old drug?
Seok Jeong
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 628. CrossRef
-
3,034
View
-
146
Download
-
5
Web of Science
-
5
Crossref
-
Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial
-
Kwang Hyun Chung, Jeong Don Chae, Wonho Choe, Hyo Young Lee, Il Hwan Oh, Byoung Kwan Son
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):674-682. Published online August 2, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.210
-
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic channels are difficult to clean and can cause infection transmission. We examined the effectiveness of a newly developed channel-cleaning ball brush (BB), which is sucked into the endoscopic channel and scrapes and cleans the lumen as it passes through.
Methods
The upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopes used for patient examinations were randomly selected as the conventional brush (CB) or BB group. After manual cleaning, the presence or absence of carbohydrates, proteins, adenosine triphosphate, and hemoglobin was assessed.
Results
Fifty-six and 58 endoscopes were cleaned with the CB and BB, respectively. Carbohydrate and protein were detected in one (1.8%) and two endoscopes (3.4%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=1.000). Hemoglobin was observed in one (1.8%) and three endoscopes (5.2%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.636). The adenosine triphosphate levels were 10.6±15.9 and 12.5±14.3 relative light units in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.496). Twenty-seven (48.2%) and 19 (32.8%) endoscopes were positive for microbial cultures in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.136).
Conclusions
The efficacy of BB was not significantly different from that of CB in the endoscopic channel-cleaning process.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Simulated-use evaluation of rapid ChannelCheck™ cleaning test for optimal detection of organic residues in flexible endoscope channels
K. Kulkarni, M. Gavette, M.J. Alfa
Journal of Hospital Infection.2024; 152: 66. CrossRef
-
3,665
View
-
177
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
1
Crossref
Case Report
-
Less invasive transoral resection of esophageal fibrovascular polyps: case reports
-
Janusz Włodarczyk, Tomasz Smęder
-
Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):683-687. Published online December 6, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.144
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- We report five patients treated for esophageal fibrovascular polyps using a minimally invasive technique. Esophageal fibrovascular polyps are benign pedunculated submucosal tumors of considerable size. The treated polyps size ranged from 1.5 to 13 cm. The polyps were removed by relocation to the oral cavity under endoscopic control. No perioperative complications occurred after the treatment. The follow-up of patients after surgery was 9–89 months, with no evidence of polyp recurrence. Thus, the described treatment is safe but requires experience with endoscopy as well as esophageal surgery.
Brief Reports
Boost Your Learning with Quiz
Letter to the Editor
Response