Background /Aims: Endoscopists occasionally encounter discrepancies between endoscopic and pathological diagnoses after colorectal polypectomies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of additional sections for diagnostic discrepancies.
Methods We examined polyps endoscopically diagnosed as adenomas or suspected adenomas that were resected and pathologically diagnosed as adenomas or normal mucosa. Adenomas pathologically diagnosed with initial sections were categorized as the “adenoma by initial section” group. Based on the re-diagnosis with additional sectioning, they were assigned to the “adenoma by additional section” or “normal mucosa by both sections” groups.
Results In the initial pathological diagnosis of 993 lesions, 850 were diagnosed as adenomas and 143 as normal mucosa. Additional sections corrected the pathological diagnoses in 23.8% (34/143) of cases. The rate of high confidence was significantly higher in the “adenoma by additional section” group than in the “normal mucosa by both sections” group (64.7% vs. 38.5%, p<0.01). Lesions in the “adenoma by additional section” group were significantly smaller than those in the “adenoma by initial section” group (2.7 vs. 3.8 mm, p<0.05).
Conclusions Diminutive adenomas can cause discrepancies between endoscopic and pathological diagnoses. Additional sections may help revise the pathological diagnoses, particularly for lesions with high confidence.
Background /Aims: The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early-stage gastric cancer is well established. However, its acquisition is challenging owing to its complexity. In Japan, G-Master is a novel ex vivo gastric ESD training model. The effectiveness of training using G-Master is unknown. This study evaluated the efficacy of gastric ESD training using the G-Master to evaluate trainees’ learning curves and performance.
Methods Four trainees completed 30 ESD training sessions using the G-Master, and procedure time, resection area, resection completion, en-bloc resection requirement, and perforation occurrence were measured. Resection speed was the primary endpoint, and learning curves were evaluated using the Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) method.
Results All trainees completed the resection and en-bloc resection of the lesion without any intraoperative perforations. The learning curves covered three phases: initial growth, plateau, and late growth. The transition from phase 1 to phase 2 required a median of 10 sessions. Each trainee completed 30 training sessions in approximately 4 months.
Conclusions Gastric ESD training using the G-Master is a simple, fast, and effective method for pre-ESD training in clinical practice. It is recommended that at least 10 training sessions be conducted.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Meaningful progress towards a high-fidelity endoscopic submucosal dissection training simulator model Gin Hyug Lee, So Young Byun Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(1): 77. CrossRef
Beyond the scope: unveiling the future of digestive endoscopy through experimental models Federico Soria Gálvez Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Toshihiro Nishizawa, Hidekazu Suzuki Cancers.2020; 12(10): 2849. CrossRef
Usefulness of a multibending endoscope in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection Koichi Hamada, Yoshinori Horikawa, Ryota Koyanagi, Yoshiki Shiwa, Kae Techigawara, Shinya Nishida, Yujiro Nakayama, Michitaka Honda VideoGIE.2019; 4(12): 577. CrossRef
Is the Double Channel Gastroscope Useful in Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Large Sessile Colon Polyps? Kwang An Kwon Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(2): 89. CrossRef