Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Haruka Okano"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Predictive factors for the necessity of peroral cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of cystic duct confluence stones: a retrospective study in Japan
Kazuaki Miyamoto, Takahisa Ogawa, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Fumisato Kozakai, Haruka Okano, Yuto Matsuoka, Kento Hosokawa, Hidehito Sumiya, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2026;59(2):280-287.   Published online January 9, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.195
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: The treatment of cystic duct confluence stones often requires peroral cholangioscopy (POCS)-guided lithotripsy. This study evaluated the efficacy of endoscopic treatment for cystic duct confluence stones and identified predictive factors for the need for POCS-guided lithotripsy.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included 38 patients with cystic duct confluence stones treated endoscopically between September 2007 and December 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of complete stone removal. Secondary outcomes included the number of sessions, total procedure time, adverse events, and predictive factors for POCS-guided lithotripsy.
Results
The complete stone removal rate was 100%. POCS-guided lithotripsy was required in 50% of the cases. The mean number of sessions needed for stone removal was 2.05. The mean procedure time was 93.9 minutes. The incidence of adverse events was 13%. Multivariate analysis showed that a minor axis length of the stone relative to the distal bile duct diameter greater than 1.2 was an independent predictive factor for requiring POCS-guided lithotripsy.
Conclusions
Endoscopic treatment is highly effective for cystic duct confluence stones. However, POCS-guided lithotripsy was necessary when the minor axis of the stone relative to the distal bile duct diameter exceeded 1.2.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cholangioscopy-guided ERCP: expanding diagnostic and therapeutic applications
    Shengjie Yang, Hongyu Li
    Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 1,760 View
  • 113 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Efficacy of double half-pigtail plastic stents for endoscopic biliary drainage of acute calculous cholangitis
Toshitaka Sakai, Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Haruka Okano, Kento Hosokawa, Hidehito Sumiya, Jun Horaguchi, Masaya Oikawa, Takashi Tsuchiya, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2025;58(6):898-908.   Published online November 11, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.134
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: Plastic stent placement is required when biliary stones cannot be completely removed during the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Although double half-pigtail plastic stents (DHPs) help prevent stent migration, their clinical utility has not yet been evaluated.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data from 221 patients who underwent DHP placement for acute calculous cholangitis (ACC) between January 2015 and March 2024. Patient without complete stone removal during initial ERCP were included. Clinical success, adverse events, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and time to RBO (TRBO) were compared in 21 patients treated with straight plastic stents (STs) under similar conditions.
Results
Clinical success was achieved in 99% of patients in the DHP group and 95% of the ST group (p=0.13). Adverse event rates were comparable between groups. During follow-up, the DHP group had significantly lower stent occlusion (2% vs. 20%, p<0.01) and migration rates (4% vs. 15%, p=0.02), leading to a lower RBO rate (5% vs. 35%, p<0.01). The median TRBO was significantly longer in the DHP group (585 vs. 247 days, p<0.01).
Conclusions
DHPs had comparable efficacy to STs, with significantly fewer stent-related adverse events. This may be a potential option for biliary drainage in ACC.
  • 3,112 View
  • 78 Download
Close layer
Incidence and risk factors for recurrence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing endoscopic extraction without prophylactic biliary stenting and subsequent cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in Japan
Hidehito Sumiya, Takahisa Ogawa, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Haruka Okano, Yuto Matsuoka, Kento Hosokawa, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2026;59(1):124-131.   Published online October 24, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.081
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: In patients undergoing endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones (CBDs) and subsequent cholecystectomy, CBDs sometimes recur during the preoperative and perioperative periods. In this study, the incidence and risk factors for CBDs recurrence were investigated.
Methods
A total of 245 patients (mean age: 66 years; 138 men) who underwent cholecystectomy within 180 days of CBDs extraction between October 2017 and June 2023 were included. Recurrence was defined as the detection of the CBDs during the preoperative or perioperative period using imaging modalities such as computed tomography or re-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, regardless of the presence of cholangitis.
Results
CBDs recurrence occurred in 4.1% of the patients (10/245). The median time to recurrence was 40 days. Preoperative recurrence was observed in nine patients, and only one patient had postoperative recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified cystic duct stones as the only significant risk factor for CBDs recurrence (hazard ratio, 15.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.7–66; p<0.001).
Conclusions
The risk of CBDs recurrence after endoscopic extraction during the pre and perioperative periods is high in patients with cystic duct stones. Prophylactic biliary stenting may be considered in high-risk patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Balancing surgical timing and risk stratification to prevent recurrent common bile duct stones after bile duct clearance
    Sung Bum Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2026; 59(1): 76.     CrossRef
  • Biliary Fistula at the Margin of Liver Caused by New Common Bile Duct Stones after Hepatectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review of Bile Leakage after Liver Surgery
    勇 李
    Asian Case Reports in Emergency Medicine.2026; 14(01): 113.     CrossRef
  • 3,825 View
  • 190 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Predictive factors for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: a retrospective study in Japan
Keisuke Yonamine, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Haruka Okano, Yuto Matsuoka, Kento Hosokawa, Hidehito Sumiya, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2025;58(3):457-464.   Published online March 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.238
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: The factors affecting the detection rate of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) in patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) have not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to identify the predictive factors for histologically detecting level 1 or 2 LPSP using EUS-TA.
Methods
Fifty patients with AIP were included in this study, and the primary outcome measures were the predictive factors for histologically detecting level 1 or 2 LPSP using EUS-TA.
Results
Multivariate analysis identified the use of fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles as a significant predictive factor for LPSP detection (odds ratio, 15.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.62–141; ¬¬p=0.017). The rate of good-quality specimens (specimen adequacy score ≥4) was significantly higher for the FNB needle group than for the fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle group (97% vs. 56%; p<0.01), and the FNB needle group required significantly fewer needle passes than the FNA needle group (median, 2 vs. 3; p<0.01).
Conclusions
The use of FNB needles was the most important factor for the histological confirmation of LPSP using EUS-TA in patients with type 1 AIP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis presenting with exophytic pancreatic mass formation and ascites: a case report
    Yusuke Kitera, Junichi Kaneko, Shioto Suzuki, Daijiro Suzuki, Kohei Nishizawa, Yuichi Hirano, Shinya Ikeda, Takuya Otsu, Masaki Takinami, Yurimi Takahashi, Yuzo Sasada, Kazuhito Kawata, Satoshi Tamura
    Gastroenterology Report.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in autoimmune pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huiling Yu, Jingwei Kou, Qijin He, Dongxuan Zhang, Yalan Chen, Jie Liang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A new era for autoimmune pancreatitis diagnosis: fine-needle biopsy outperforms fine-needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
    Gunn Huh, Tae Jun Song
    Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(3): 406.     CrossRef
  • 4,007 View
  • 177 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Prophylactic endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting to prevent acute cholecystitis induced after metallic stent placement for malignant biliary strictures: a retrospective study in Japan
Fumisato Kozakai, Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Haruka Okano, Yuto Matsuoka, Kento Hosokawa, Hidehito Sumiya, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2024;57(5):647-655.   Published online May 17, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.284
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic biliary drainage using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) for malignant biliary strictures occasionally induces acute cholecystitis (AC). This study evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic gallbladder stents (GBS) during SEMS placement.
Methods
Among 158 patients who underwent SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures between January 2018 and March 2023, 30 patients who attempted to undergo prophylactic GBS placement before SEMS placement were included.
Results
Technical success was achieved in 21 cases (70.0%). The mean diameter of the cystic duct was more significant in the successful cases (6.5 mm vs. 3.7 mm, p<0.05). Adverse events occurred for 7 patients (23.3%: acute pancreatitis in 7; non-obstructive cholangitis in 1; perforation of the cystic duct in 1 with an overlap), all of which improved with conservative treatment. No patients developed AC when the GBS placement was successful, whereas 25 of the 128 patients (19.5%) without a prophylactic GBS developed AC during the median follow-up period of 357 days (p=0.043). In the multivariable analysis, GBS placement was a significant factor in preventing AC (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–0.99; p=0.045).
Conclusions
GBS may contribute to the prevention of AC after SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Role of Prophylactic Endoscopic Gallbladder Stent Placement for Prevention of Acute Cholecystitis in Patients Receiving Stenting for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
    Zahid Ijaz Tarar, Mustafa Gandhi, Umer Farooq, AhtshamUllah Chaudhry, Gopala K. Konduri, Ahmad Zain, Zohaib Ahmed, Baltej Singh, Nirav Thosani
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2026; 71(4): 1547.     CrossRef
  • Large-diameter Plastic Stents as An Option for Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Hidehito Sumiya, Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Haruka Okano, Kento Hosokawa, Shun Nozaki, Kei Ito
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2026; 86(3): 227.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Cholecystitis After Self-expandable Metallic Stent Placement for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
    Hashem Albunni, Azizullah Beran, Nwal Hadaki, Mark A. Gromski, Mohammad Al-Haddad
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for infection following particle stent placement in obstructive jaundice patients: A retrospective analysis
    Gang Wang, Rui Qi
    Current Problems in Surgery.2025; 67: 101775.     CrossRef
  • Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholecystitis: A review of incidence, risk factors, prevention, and management
    Suprabhat Giri, Shivaraj Afzalpurkar, Prasanna Gore, Gaurav Khatana, Saroj Kanta Sahu, Dibya Lochan Praharaj, Bipadabhanjan Mallick, Preetam Nath, Sridhar Sundaram, Manoj Kumar Sahu
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Technical challenges and safety of prophylactic gallbladder stenting with metallic biliary stenting
    Masood Muhammad Karim, Om Parkash
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(6): 841.     CrossRef
  • 6,567 View
  • 328 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Diagnostic value of homogenous delayed enhancement in contrast-enhanced computed tomography images and endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for patients with focal autoimmune pancreatitis
Keisuke Yonamine, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Hideyuki Anan, Haruka Okano, Masaya Oikawa, Takashi Tsuchiya, Takashi Sawai, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2023;56(4):510-520.   Published online April 5, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.142
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: We aimed to investigate (1) promising clinical findings for the recognition of focal type autoimmune pancreatitis (FAIP) and (2) the impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) on the diagnosis of FAIP.
Methods
Twenty-three patients with FAIP were involved in this study, and 44 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were included in the control group.
Results
(1) Multivariate analysis revealed that homogeneous delayed enhancement on contrast-enhanced computed tomography was a significant factor indicative of FAIP compared to PDAC (90% vs. 7%, p=0.015). (2) For 13 of 17 FAIP patients (76.5%) who underwent EUS-TA, EUS-TA aided the diagnostic confirmation of AIPs, and only one patient (5.9%) was found to have AIP after surgery. On the other hand, of the six patients who did not undergo EUS-TA, three (50.0%) underwent surgery for pancreatic lesions.
Conclusions
Homogeneous delayed enhancement on contrast-enhanced computed tomography was the most useful clinical factor for discriminating FAIPs from PDACs. EUS-TA is mandatory for diagnostic confirmation of FAIP lesions and can contribute to a reduction in the rate of unnecessary surgery for patients with FAIP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Updates in IgG4-Related Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Disease
    Hoyun Lee, Rodrigo Vieira Motta, Emma L Culver
    British Journal of Hospital Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: a retrospective study in Japan
    Keisuke Yonamine, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Haruka Okano, Yuto Matsuoka, Kento Hosokawa, Hidehito Sumiya, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito
    Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(3): 457.     CrossRef
  • A new era for autoimmune pancreatitis diagnosis: fine-needle biopsy outperforms fine-needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
    Gunn Huh, Tae Jun Song
    Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(3): 406.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis and management of autoimmune pancreatitis
    Gauri Kumbhar, Akhil Mahajan, Rahul Puri, Sridhar Sundaram
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 44(6): 824.     CrossRef
  • A multidisciplinary approach is essential for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Sung-Hoon Moon
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 457.     CrossRef
  • 6,054 View
  • 103 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Pancreatic duct lavage cytology combined with a cell-block method for patients with possible pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, including pancreatic carcinoma in situ
Hiroaki Kusunose, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Hideyuki Anan, Kazuki Endo, Haruka Okano, Masaya Oikawa, Takashi Tsuchiya, Takashi Sawai, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2023;56(3):353-366.   Published online November 16, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.021
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of pancreatic duct lavage cytology combined with a cell-block method (PLC-CB) for possible pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs).
Methods
This study included 41 patients with suspected PDACs who underwent PLC-CB mainly because they were unfit for undergoing endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration. A 6-Fr double lumen catheter was mainly used to perform PLC-CB. Final diagnoses were obtained from the findings of resected specimens or clinical outcomes during surveillance after PLC-CB.
Results
Histocytological evaluations using PLC-CB were performed in 87.8% (36/41) of the patients. For 31 of the 36 patients, final diagnoses (invasive PDAC, 12; pancreatic carcinoma in situ, 5; benignancy, 14) were made, and the remaining five patients were excluded due to lack of surveillance periods after PLC-CB. For 31 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PLC-CB for detecting malignancy were 94.1%, 100%, and 96.8%, respectively. In addition, they were 87.5%, 100%, and 94.1%, respectively, in 17 patients without pancreatic masses detectable using endoscopic ultrasonography. Four patients developed postprocedural pancreatitis, which improved with conservative therapy.
Conclusions
PLC-CB has an excellent ability to detect malignancies in patients with possible PDACs, including pancreatic carcinoma in situ.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer via pancreatic juice cytology with a cell-block method in a patient with altered anatomy
    Yasuo Otsuka, Kosuke Minaga, Akane Hara, Kentaro Yamao, Mamoru Takenaka, Takaaki Chikugo, Masatoshi Kudo
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(06): E764.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
    Yasutaka ISHII, Masahiro SERIKAWA, Shinya NAKAMURA, Juri IKEMOTO, Shiro OKA
    Suizo.2024; 39(4): 247.     CrossRef
  • Cell block created from pancreatic duct lavage is another jigsaw puzzle to diagnose early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Rungsun Rerknimitr
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(3): 313.     CrossRef
  • 6,370 View
  • 243 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey
Yoshihide Kanno, Tetsuya Ohira, Yoshihiro Harada, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Yoshiki Koike, Taku Yamagata, Toshitaka Sakai, Kaori Masu, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Megumi Tanaka, Tomohiro Shimada, Fumisato Kozakai, Kazuki Endo, Haruka Okano, Daichi Komabayashi, Takeshi Shimizu, Shohei Suzuki, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):340-347.   Published online December 11, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.138
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation with propofol as an alternative to benzodiazepine drugs in outpatient endoscopy.
Methods
In this prospective study, examinees who underwent outpatient endoscopy under propofol sedation and submitted a nextday questionnaire with providing informed consent were evaluated. Periprocedural acute responses, late adverse events within 24 hours, and examinee satisfaction were evaluated.
Results
Among the 4,122 patients who received propofol in the 17,978 outpatient-based endoscopic examinations performed between November 2016 and March 2018, 2,305 eligible examinees (esophagogastroduodenoscopy for 1,340, endoscopic ultrasonography for 945, and total colonoscopy for 20) were enrolled, and their responses to a questionnaire were analyzed. The mean propofol dose was 69.6±24.4 mg (range, 20–200 mg). Diazepam, midazolam, and/or pentazocine in combination with propofol was administered to 146 examinees. Mild oxygen desaturation was observed in 59 examinees (2.6%); and mild bradycardia, in 2 (0.09%). Other severe reactions or late events did not occur. After eliminating 181 invalid responses, 97.7% (2,065/2,124) of the patients desired propofol sedation in future examinations.
Conclusions
Propofol sedation was found to be safe—without severe adverse events or accidents—for outpatient endoscopy on the basis of the patients’ next-day self-evaluation. Given the high satisfaction level, propofol sedation might be an ideal tool for painless endoscopic screening.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of sedation with pentazocine or pethidine hydrochloride for endoscopic ultrasonography in outpatients: A single‐center retrospective study
    Makiko Urabe, Kenji Ikezawa, Yusuke Seiki, Ko Watsuji, Yasuharu Kawamoto, Takeru Hirao, Yugo Kai, Ryoji Takada, Takuo Yamai, Kaori Mukai, Tasuku Nakabori, Hiroyuki Uehara, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
    DEN Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for adverse reactions to nurse-administered propofol during outpatient endoscopy: a cross-sectional study
    Renzo Inca Villanueva, Cynthia Bazán Montero, María Estela Bulnes-Montánchez, Lary Salazar Alva, José Salvador Carrillo, Alejandra Zevallos, Fernando Salazar
    BMC Anesthesiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Remimazolam, a novel drug, for safe and effective endoscopic sedation
    Jae Min Lee, Yehyun Park, Dong Won Ahn, Jun Kyu Lee, Kwang Hyuck Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(3): 370.     CrossRef
  • Balancing safety and effectiveness in colonoscopy for older adults: a narrative review
    Min-Jae Kim, Yuna Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Youn, Jaeyoung Chun
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(4): 443.     CrossRef
  • Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia
    Matthew Brohan, Janette Brohan, Basavana Goudra
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4362.     CrossRef
  • How to implement adverse events as a quality indicator in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Tom G. Moreels
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Propofol Alone versus Propofol in Combination with Midazolam for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients with Paradoxical Reactions to Midazolam
    Ji Hyung Nam, Dong Kee Jang, Jun Kyu Lee, Hyoun Woo Kang, Byung-Wook Kim, Byung Ik Jang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(2): 234.     CrossRef
  • Drugs used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Jun Kyu Lee
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(11): 735.     CrossRef
  • 8,410 View
  • 175 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP