Clinical Endoscopy

Review

Clinical meaning of sarcopenia in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment: Hiroyuki Hisada, Yosuke Tsuji, Hikaru Kuribara, Ryohei Miyata, Kaori Oshio, Satoru Mizutani, Hideki Nakagawa, Rina Cho, Nobuyuki Sakuma, Yuko Miura, Hiroya Mizutani, Daisuke Ohki, Seiichi Yakabi, Yu Takahashi, Yoshiki Sakaguchi, Naomi Kakushima, Nobutake Yamamichi, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Clin Endosc 2024;57(4):446-453. Published online March 22, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.193

With increasing global life expectancy, the significance of geriatric assessment parameters has increased. Sarcopenia is a crucial assessment parameter and is defined as the age-related loss of muscle mass and strength. Sarcopenia is widely acknowledged as a risk factor for postoperative complications in diverse advanced malignancies and has a detrimental effect on the long-term prognosis. While most studies have primarily concentrated on the correlation between sarcopenia and advanced cancer, more recent investigations have focused on the relationship between sarcopenia and early-stage cancer. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which is less invasive than surgical intervention, is extensively employed in the management of early-stage cancer, although it is associated with complications such as bleeding and perforation. In recent years, several reports have revealed the adverse consequences of sarcopenia in patients with early-stage cancer undergoing ESD. This literature review briefly summarizes the recent studies on the association between sarcopenia and ESD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical Significance of Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Yuanhao Su, Yongke Wu, Cheng Li, Yiyuan Zhao, Yunhao Li, Xing Jin, Zhidong Wang
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(8): 2970. CrossRef

4,355 View
243 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Original Article

Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions: Daisuke Ide, Tomohiko Richard Ohya, Mitsuaki Ishioka, Yuri Enomoto, Eisuke Nakao, Yuki Mitsuyoshi, Junki Tokura, Keigo Suzuki, Seiichi Yakabi, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Masahiro Igarashi, Akio Nakashima, Masayuki Saruta, Shoichi Saito, Junko Fujisaki; Clin Endosc 2022;55(5):655-664. Published online May 31, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.009

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventional ESD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events.
Results
En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm2/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group.
Conclusions
PCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Novel adjustable traction “noose knot” method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
Junki Tokura, Daisuke Ide, Keigo Suzuki, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Masahiro Igarashi, Shoichi Saito
Endoscopy.2024; 56(S 01): E55. CrossRef
Approaches and considerations in the endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer
Yunho Jung
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 563. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of salvage endoscopy in the treatment of residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Juan Du, Ting Zhang, Lei Wang, Hao Zhang, Wenquan Yi
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(6): 3027. CrossRef
Is there a best choice of equipment for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection?
Francesco Cocomazzi, Sonia Carparelli, Nunzia Labarile, Antonio Capogreco, Marco Gentile, Roberta Maselli, Jahnvi Dhar, Jayanta Samanta, Alessandro Repici, Cesare Hassan, Francesco Perri, Antonio Facciorusso
Expert Review of Medical Devices.2024; 21(7): 561. CrossRef
The Derivation and External Validation of a Fibrosis Risk Model for Colorectal Tumours Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Sandro Sferrazza, Marcello Maida, Giulio Calabrese, Antonio Facciorusso, Lorenzo Fuccio, Leonardo Frazzoni, Roberta Maselli, Alessandro Repici, Roberto Di Mitri, João Santos-Antunes
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4517. CrossRef
Traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection
Ji Hyun Kim, Sung Chul Park
Journal of Innovative Medical Technology.2024; 2(2): 47. CrossRef
Difficult colorectal polypectomy: Technical tips and recent advances
Sukit Pattarajierapan, Hiroyuki Takamaru, Supakij Khomvilai
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(17): 2600. CrossRef
Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial
Gianluca Andrisani, Cesare Hassan, Margherita Pizzicannella, Francesco Pugliese, Massimiliano Mutignani, Chiara Campanale, Giorgio Valerii, Carmelo Barbera, Giulio Antonelli, Francesco Maria Di Matteo
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(6): 987. CrossRef
Combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, a practical solution for difficult cases
Dong-Hoon Yang
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 626. CrossRef

5,740 View
333 Download
8 Web of Science
9 Crossref

Review

Recent Development of Techniques and Devices in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Hiroya Mizutani, Satoshi Ono, Daisuke Ohki, Chihiro Takeuchi, Seiichi Yakabi, Yosuke Kataoka, Itaru Saito, Yoshiki Sakaguchi, Chihiro Minatsuki, Yosuke Tsuji, Keiko Niimi, Shinya Kodashima, Nobutake Yamamichi, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Kazuhiko Koike; Clin Endosc 2017;50(6):562-568. Published online November 30, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.108

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now a well-established endoscopic treatment for early-stage colorectal neoplasms, especially in Asian countries, including Japan. Despite the spread of colorectal ESD, there are still situations in which achieving successful submucosal dissection is difficult. Various novel techniques and devices have been developed to overcome these difficulties, and past reports have shown that some of these strategies can be applied to colorectal ESD. We review several recent developments in the field. The techniques reviewed include the pocket creation method and traction methods and the devices reviewed include the overtube with balloon and electrosurgical knives with water-jet function. These improved techniques and devices can facilitate safer, more reliable ESDs and expand its applicability and acceptability all over the world.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The Current Landscape of Endoscopic Submucosal Training in the United States
Mike T. Wei, Shai Friedland, Joo Ha Hwang
Current Gastroenterology Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic mucosal resection with an over‐the‐scope clip for colorectal tumors (with video)
Takahiro Muramatsu, Tomoaki Tashima, Tomonori Kawasaki, Tsubasa Ishikawa, Kodai Esaki, Kei Sugimoto, Masami Sano, Shotaro Ishizaka, Yumi Mashimo, Takao Itoi, Shomei Ryozawa
DEN Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors
Sahib Singh, Babu P. Mohan, Saurabh Chandan, Neil Sharma, Rakesh Vinayek, Sudhir Dutta, Sergey V. Kantsevoy, Michelle Le, Douglas G. Adler
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 58(10): 1016. CrossRef
Conventional Versus Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal, Gastric, and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Felipe Giacobo Nunes, Igor Logetto Caetité Gomes, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura, Juan Eduardo G Dominguez, Fernando Fornari, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Oliveira, Sérgio Mazzola P de Figueiredo, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Eduardo
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic techniques for management of large colorectal polyps, strictures and leaks
Stuart R. Gordon, Lauren S. Eichenwald, Hannah K. Systrom
Surgery Open Science.2024; 20: 156. CrossRef
A new technique for ureteral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft in a beagle model
Xincheng Gao, Yuancheng Zhou, Ming Yang, Jiawei Chen, Zehao Yu, Xingyuan Xiao, Bing Li
Asian Journal of Urology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Colorectal Neoplasms at “Challenging Sites” Using a Double-Balloon Endoluminal Interventional Platform: A Single-Center Study
Gianluca Andrisani, Francesco Maria Di Matteo
Diagnostics.2023; 13(19): 3154. CrossRef
Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces procedure time and risk of serious adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chawin Lopimpisuth, Malorie Simons, Venkata S. Akshintala, Klaorat Prasongdee, Julie Nanavati, Saowanee Ngamruengphong
Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(3): 1775. CrossRef
Snare devices with thinner loop wire may provide higher performance for cold snare polypectomy in an experimental model
Satoshi Ono, Kyohei Maejima, Shun Ito, Shosuke Hosaka, Kiyotaka Umeki, Shin-ichiro Sato, Kota Akamine, Daichi Asai, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Endoscopy International Open.2022; 10(05): E664. CrossRef
The usefulness of a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by non-expert endoscopists in a porcine model (with video)
Hiroki Yamashita, Hiroaki Ikematsu, Tatsuro Murano, Naoki Aoyama, Yuki Kano, Tomohiro Mitsui, Hironori Sunakawa, Kensuke Shinmura, Kenji Takashima, Keiichiro Nakajo, Tomohiro Kadota, Yusuke Yoda, Tomonori Yano
Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(10): 7818. CrossRef
Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Systematic Review
Toshihiro Nishizawa, Takashi Ueda, Hirotoshi Ebinuma, Osamu Toyoshima, Hidekazu Suzuki
Cancers.2022; 15(1): 239. CrossRef
A Clip-with-Line Traction Suture Method for Closing Mucosal Defects after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Chong Wang, Yiting Wang, Yuanyuan Li, Sheng Zeng, Youxiang Chen, Guohua Li, Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Haruka Fujinami, Akira Teramoto, Saeko Takahashi, Takayuki Ando, Shinya Kajiura, Ichiro Yasuda
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 11(1): 141. CrossRef
Efficacy and suitable indication of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a balloon‐assisted endoscope
Yuichiro Kuroki, Kunio Asonuma, Natsumi Uehara, Toshiyuki Endo, Reika Suzuki, Yorimasa Yamamoto, Masatsugu Nagahama
JGH Open.2020; 4(2): 185. CrossRef
Task Deconstruction of Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (cESD): An Expert Consensus
Karen J. Dickinson, Brian J. Dunkin, John J. Nguyen‐Lee, Aman B. Ali, Stephanie Zajac
World Journal of Surgery.2020; 44(7): 2401. CrossRef
Review on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection focusing on the technical aspect
Tak Lit Derek Fung, Chi Woo Samuel Chow, Pak Tat Chan, Kam Hung Kwok
Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(9): 3766. CrossRef
A Novel Technique of Endoscopic Papillectomy with Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Ampullary Tumors: A Proof-of-Concept Study (with Video)
Naminatsu Takahara, Yosuke Tsuji, Yousuke Nakai, Yukari Suzuki, Akiyuki Inokuma, Sachiko Kanai, Kensaku Noguchi, Tatsuya Sato, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Kei Saito, Yoshiki Sakaguchi, Tomotaka Saito, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Suguru Mizuno, Hirofumi Kogu
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(8): 2671. CrossRef
Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Colorectal Lesions in China
Ning Cui, Yu Zhao, Honggang Yu
BioMed Research International.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a robotic system is coming
Dong-Hoon Yang, Dong-Wan Seo
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2019; 90(2): 299. CrossRef

8,959 View
313 Download
19 Web of Science
19 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search