Review
-
How to improve the quality of upper gastrointestinal diagnostic endoscopy?
-
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Miguel Areia
-
Received December 23, 2024 Accepted January 24, 2025 Published online April 8, 2025
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.339
[Epub ahead of print]
-
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader
ePub
- Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is commonly performed worldwide and is the gold standard for most upper gastrointestinal tract diseases, particularly cancer. This review will use gastric cancer as an example to tackle how providers can improve the quality of endoscopy being delivered to reduce the missing rate, which may reach up to 10% of cases. In brief, endoscopists must consider pre-, intra-, and post-procedural attitudes to achieve this purpose. “Preparing or planning endoscopy,” cancer as a possible diagnosis in all procedures should be thought. Fasting of patients and the use of mucosal cleaning solutions help ensure mucosal cleansing, while planned sedation increases comfort. During endoscopy, taking time for complete inspection and photodocumentation to assure completeness. Importantly, training and knowledge of cancer (superficial) endoscopic features, particularly using advanced imaging technologies, are of paramount importance, as they are regular post-endoscopy audits of practice that positively impact quality. Finally, human-machine interaction through artificial intelligence has been shown to improve photodocumentation, detection, and auditing, and it may well assure a more homogenous service, particularly among low-performing deliverers.
Focused Review Series: Image-Enhanced Endoscopy: Update on Clinical Practice
-
Current Status of Image-Enhanced Endoscopy for Early Identification of Esophageal Neoplasms
-
Shin Hee Kim, Su Jin Hong
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(4):464-476. Published online July 26, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.186
-
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader
ePub
- Advanced esophageal cancer is known to have a poor prognosis. The early detection of esophageal neoplasms, including esophageal dysplasia and early esophageal cancer, is highly important for the accurate treatment of the disease. However, esophageal dysplasia and early esophageal cancer are usually subtle and can be easily missed. In addition to the early detection, proper pretreatment evaluation of the depth of invasion of esophageal cancer is very important for curative treatment. The progression of non-invasive diagnosis via image-enhanced endoscopy techniques has been shown to aid the early detection and estimate the depth of invasion of early esophageal cancer and, as a result, may provide additional opportunities for curative treatment. Here, we review the advancement of image-enhanced endoscopy-related technologies and their role in the early identification of esophageal neoplasms.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- Current status and perspectives of esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review
Wei Jiang, Bo Zhang, Jiaqi Xu, Liyan Xue, Luhua Wang
Cancer Communications.2025; 45(3): 281. CrossRef - Image-enhanced endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal disease: focusing on texture and color enhancement imaging and red dichromatic imaging
Jae Yong Park
Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(2): 163. CrossRef - An umbrella-inspired snap-on robotic 3D photoacoustic endoscopic probe for augmented intragastric sensing: Proof of concept study
Li Liu, Ang Li, Yisong Zhao, Luyao Zhu, Yongjian Zhao, Fei Gao
Photoacoustics.2024; 35: 100568. CrossRef - Curative criteria for endoscopic treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Annemijn D.I. Maan, Prateek Sharma, Arjun D. Koch
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 68: 101886. CrossRef - Advanced Endoscopic Techniques to Detect Prevalence of Synchronous Oesophageal Cancers in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
Cynthia Susan Mathew, Roshna Rose Paul, Suma Susan Mathews, Reuben Thomas Kurien, Rita Ruby A. Albert, Amit Kumar Dutta, Sudipta Dhar Chowdhury, A. J. Joseph, Ebby George Simon
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.2024; 76(6): 5133. CrossRef - Biomarkers for Early Detection, Prognosis, and Therapeutics of Esophageal Cancers
Vikrant Rai, Joe Abdo, Devendra K. Agrawal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(4): 3316. CrossRef - Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors
Gwang Ha Kim, Kiyoun Yi, Dong Chan Joo, Moon Won Lee, Hye Kyung Jeon, Bong Eun Lee
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(9): 3106. CrossRef - Role of linked color imaging for upper gastrointestinal disease: present and future
Sang Pyo Lee
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(5): 546. CrossRef - Analysis of Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Classification: A Mathematical Insight Utilizing Traditional Machine Learning Classifiers
Hari Mohan Rai, Joon Yoo
Mathematics.2023; 11(24): 4937. CrossRef - Application of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic detection of early esophageal cancer
Qing Li, Bing-Rong Liu
World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2021; 29(24): 1389. CrossRef
-
7,358
View
-
386
Download
-
9
Web of Science
-
10
Crossref
Focused Review Series: Application of Artificial Intelligence in GI Endoscopy
-
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
-
Alexander P. Abadir, Mohammed Fahad Ali, William Karnes, Jason B. Samarasena
-
Clin Endosc 2020;53(2):132-141. Published online March 30, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.038
-
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader
ePub
- Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly integrating into modern technology and clinical practice. Although in its nascency, AI has become a hot topic of investigation for applications in clinical practice. Multiple fields of medicine have embraced the possibility of a future with AI assisting in diagnosis and pathology applications.
In the field of gastroenterology, AI has been studied as a tool to assist in risk stratification, diagnosis, and pathologic identification. Specifically, AI has become of great interest in endoscopy as a technology with substantial potential to revolutionize the practice of a modern gastroenterologist. From cancer screening to automated report generation, AI has touched upon all aspects of modern endoscopy.
Here, we review landmark AI developments in endoscopy. Starting with broad definitions to develop understanding, we will summarize the current state of AI research and its potential applications. With innovation developing rapidly, this article touches upon the remarkable advances in AI-assisted endoscopy since its initial evaluation at the turn of the millennium, and the potential impact these AI models may have on the modern clinical practice. As with any discussion of new technology, its limitations must also be understood to apply clinical AI tools successfully.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology
Sravanthi Parasa, Tyler Berzin, Cadman Leggett, Seth Gross, Alessandro Repici, Omer F. Ahmad, Austin Chiang, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu, Jonathan Cohen, Evelien Dekker, Rajesh N. Keswani, Charles E. Kahn, Cesare Hassan, Nicholas Petrick, Peter Mountney, Jona
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025; 101(1): 2. CrossRef - Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence in cancer treatment
Yashdeep Mukheja, Kashish Pal, Akanksha Ahuja, Ankan Sarkar, Bhavneesh Kumar, Anurag Kuhad, Kanwaljit Chopra, Manish Jain
Next Research.2025; 2(1): 100179. CrossRef - Prompt-based polyp segmentation during endoscopy
Xinzhen Ren, Wenju Zhou, Naitong Yuan, Fang Li, Yetian Ruan, Huiyu Zhou
Medical Image Analysis.2025; 102: 103510. CrossRef - Deep Learning-Based Semantic Segmentation for Objective Colonoscopy Quality Assessment
Radu Alexandru Vulpoi, Adrian Ciobanu, Vasile Liviu Drug, Catalina Mihai, Oana Bogdana Barboi, Diana Elena Floria, Alexandru Ionut Coseru, Andrei Olteanu, Vadim Rosca, Mihaela Luca
Journal of Imaging.2025; 11(3): 84. CrossRef - Artificial Intelligence In Digital Marketing Influences Consumer Behaviour: A Review And Theoretical Foundation For Future Research
Fazla Rabby
SSRN Electronic Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Update zur Navigation im OP-Saal
Philipp Anthony Wise, Alexander Studier-Fischer, Thilo Hackert, Felix Nickel
Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.2024; 149(06): 522. CrossRef - Artificial intelligence‐aided diagnostic imaging: A state‐of‐the‐art technique in precancerous screening
Yang‐Bor Lu, Si‐Cun Lu, Fu‐Dong Li, Puo‐Hsien Le, Kai‐Hua Zhang, Zi‐Zheng Sun, Yung‐Ning Huang, Yu‐Chieh Weng, Wei‐Ting Chen, Yi‐Wei Fu, Jun‐Bo Qian, Bin Hu, Hong Xu, Cheng‐Tang Chiu, Qin‐Wei Xu, Wei Gong
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(3): 544. CrossRef - Development of convolutional neural network models that recognize normal anatomic structures during real-time radial-array and linear-array EUS (with videos)
Carlos Robles-Medranda, Jorge Baquerizo-Burgos, Miguel Puga-Tejada, Raquel Del Valle, Juan C. Mendez, Maria Egas-Izquierdo, Martha Arevalo-Mora, Domenica Cunto, Juan Alcívar-Vasquez, Hannah Pitanga-Lukashok, Daniela Tabacelia
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 99(2): 271. CrossRef - Repurposing of Drug Aspirin in Colon Cancer: Therapeutic Approach
Vrushali Neve, Abhijeet Kamble, Pawan Karwa
Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal.2024; 13(1): 23. CrossRef - Colorectal Polyp Detection Model by Using Super-Resolution Reconstruction and YOLO
Shaofang Wang, Jun Xie, Yanrong Cui, Zhongju Chen
Electronics.2024; 13(12): 2298. CrossRef - Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer: diagnosis, limitations, and the future prospects—a narrative review
Maanya Rajasree Katta, Pavan Kumar Reddy Kalluru, Divyaraj Amber Bavishi, Maha Hameed, Sai Sudha Valisekka
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 6743. CrossRef - Deep learning-based clinical decision support system for gastric neoplasms in real-time endoscopy: development and validation study
Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Gwang Ho Baik, Hyun Lim, Jae Hoon Jeong, Sung Won Choi, Joonhee Cho, Deok Yeol Kim, Kang Bin Lee, Seung-Il Shin, Dick Sigmund, Byeong In Moon, Sung Chul Park, Sang Hoon Lee, Ki Bae Bang, Dae-Soon Son
Endoscopy.2023; 55(08): 701. CrossRef - ДІАГНОСТИКА ДОБРОЯКІСНИХ ПУХЛИН ТОНКОГО КИШЕЧНИКА: СУЧАСНИЙ СТАН ПРОБЛЕМИ
В. Ю. ІЛЬЇНА-СТОГНІЄНКО, О. М. ЧАЙКА
Шпитальна хірургія. Журнал імені Л. Я. Ковальчука.2023; (1): 96. CrossRef - Future Directions in EndoHepatology
Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Lolwa Al-Obaid, Marvin Ryou
Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(1): 98. CrossRef - El papel emergente de la inteligencia artificial en la endoscopia gastrointestinal: una revisión de la literatura
María José Aguilera-Chuchuca, Sergio A. Sánchez-Luna, Begoña González Suárez, Kenneth Ernest-Suárez, Andres Gelrud, Tyler M. Berzin
Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2022; 45(6): 492. CrossRef - Artificial Intelligence-Based Colorectal Polyp Histology Prediction: High Accuracy in Larger Polyps
Naoki Muguruma, Tetsuji Takayama
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(1): 45. CrossRef - Assessment of the Risk of Severe Dengue Using Intrahost Viral Population in Dengue Virus Serotype 2 Patients via Machine Learning
Su-Jhen Hung, Huey-Pin Tsai, Ya-Fang Wang, Wen-Chien Ko, Jen-Ren Wang, Sheng-Wen Huang
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Kêmily Fuentes Marques, Alana Fuentes Marques, Marina Amorim Lopes, Rodrigo Fedatto Beraldo, Talles Bazeia Lima, Ligia Yukie Sassaki
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 3(1): 1. CrossRef - Weakly supervised end-to-end artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Lukas Buendgens, Didem Cifci, Narmin Ghaffari Laleh, Marko van Treeck, Maria T. Koenen, Henning W. Zimmermann, Till Herbold, Thomas Joachim Lux, Alexander Hann, Christian Trautwein, Jakob Nikolas Kather
Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Automated Detection of Bowel Preparation Scoring and Adequacy With Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Daniel J Low, Zhuoqiao Hong, Sechiv Jugnundan, Anjishnu Mukherjee, Samir C Grover
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2022; 5(6): 256. CrossRef - The emerging role of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a review
María José Aguilera-Chuchuca, Sergio A. Sánchez-Luna, Begoña González Suárez, Kenneth Ernest-Suárez, Andres Gelrud, Tyler M. Berzin
Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2022; 45(6): 492. CrossRef - Artificial Intelligence for Colonoscopy: Past, Present, and Future
Wallapak Tavanapong, JungHwan Oh, Michael A. Riegler, Mohammed Khaleel, Bhuvan Mittal, Piet C. de Groen
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.2022; 26(8): 3950. CrossRef - Künstliche Intelligenz in der Viszeralmedizin – „brave new world“ oder digitaler Horror?
R. Jakobs, M. Fried, J. Hampe
Der Gastroenterologe.2021; 16(1): 1. CrossRef - Challenges in Crohn’s Disease Management after Gastrointestinal Cancer Diagnosis
Claudio Fiorillo, Carlo Alberto Schena, Giuseppe Quero, Vito Laterza, Daniela Pugliese, Giuseppe Privitera, Fausto Rosa, Tommaso Schepis, Lisa Salvatore, Brunella Di Stefano, Luigi Larosa, Laura Maria Minordi, Luigi Natale, Giampaolo Tortora, Alessandro A
Cancers.2021; 13(3): 574. CrossRef - Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Updated Review of the Literature and State of the Art
Ivo Boškoski, Beatrice Orlandini, Luigi Giovanni Papparella, Maria Valeria Matteo, Martina De Siena, Valerio Pontecorvi, Guido Costamagna
Current Robotics Reports.2021; 2(1): 43. CrossRef - Use of Endoscopic Images in the Prediction of Submucosal Invasion of Gastric Neoplasms: Automated Deep Learning Model Development and Usability Study
Chang Seok Bang, Hyun Lim, Hae Min Jeong, Sung Hyeon Hwang
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(4): e25167. CrossRef - Artificial intelligence in brachytherapy: a summary of recent developments
Susovan Banerjee, Shikha Goyal, Saumyaranjan Mishra, Deepak Gupta, Shyam Singh Bisht, Venketesan K, Kushal Narang, Tejinder Kataria
The British Journal of Radiology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment. A New Era
Athanasia Mitsala, Christos Tsalikidis, Michail Pitiakoudis, Constantinos Simopoulos, Alexandra K. Tsaroucha
Current Oncology.2021; 28(3): 1581. CrossRef - Predicting Colorectal Cancer Occurrence in IBD
Mehmet Yalchin, Ann-Marie Baker, Trevor A. Graham, Ailsa Hart
Cancers.2021; 13(12): 2908. CrossRef - Usefulness of artificial intelligence in gastric neoplasms
Ji Hyun Kim, Seung-Joo Nam, Sung Chul Park
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(24): 3543. CrossRef - Deep neural network approaches for detecting gastric polyps in endoscopic images
Serdar Durak, Bülent Bayram, Tolga Bakırman, Murat Erkut, Metehan Doğan, Mert Gürtürk, Burak Akpınar
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.2021; 59(7-8): 1563. CrossRef - Use of artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of pancreatic pathologies
Ravinder Mankoo, Ahmad H Ali, Ghassan M Hammoud
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 2(3): 89. CrossRef - Role of Artificial Intelligence in Video Capsule Endoscopy
Ioannis Tziortziotis, Faidon-Marios Laskaratos, Sergio Coda
Diagnostics.2021; 11(7): 1192. CrossRef - Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve the Quality Control of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Ya-qi Song, Xin-li Mao, Xian-bin Zhou, Sai-qin He, Ya-hong Chen, Li-hui Zhang, Shi-wen Xu, Ling-ling Yan, Shen-ping Tang, Li-ping Ye, Shao-wei Li
Frontiers in Medicine.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Use of artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of pancreatic pathologies
Ravinder Mankoo, Ahmad H Ali, Ghassan M Hammoud
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 2(3): 88. CrossRef - Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastric dysplasia and early cancer: Current evidence and what the future may hold
Edward Young, Hamish Philpott, Rajvinder Singh
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(31): 5126. CrossRef - Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps in Endoscopic Images: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Gwang Ho Baik
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(8): e29682. CrossRef - Applications of Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Diseases
Silvia Pecere, Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo, Gianluca Esposito, Emanuele Dilaghi, Andrea Telese, Leonardo Henry Eusebi
Diagnostics.2021; 11(9): 1575. CrossRef - Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade
Gwang Ha Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Do Hyun Park, Jimin Han
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 633. CrossRef - Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy: A Practical Guide to Its Past and Future Challenges
Sang Hoon Kim, Yun Jeong Lim
Diagnostics.2021; 11(9): 1722. CrossRef - Digital surgery for gastroenterological diseases
Niall Philip Hardy, Ronan Ambrose Cahill
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(42): 7240. CrossRef - Choledochoscopy: An update
Tsinrong Lee, Thomas Zheng Jie Teng, Vishal G Shelat
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 13(12): 571. CrossRef - Prediction of Submucosal Invasion for Gastric Neoplasms in Endoscopic Images Using Deep-Learning
Bum-Joo Cho, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Chang Won Seo, Ju Han Kim
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(6): 1858. CrossRef - The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Assessment of Premalignant and Malignant Esophageal Lesions: Present and Future
Daniela Cornelia Lazăr, Mihaela Flavia Avram, Alexandra Corina Faur, Adrian Goldiş, Ioan Romoşan, Sorina Tăban, Mărioara Cornianu
Medicina.2020; 56(7): 364. CrossRef - Techniques to integrate artificial intelligence systems with medical information in gastroenterology
Hong-Yu Jin, Man Zhang, Bing Hu
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 1(1): 19. CrossRef - Assessing the risk of dengue severity using demographic information and laboratory test results with machine learning
Sheng-Wen Huang, Huey-Pin Tsai, Su-Jhen Hung, Wen-Chien Ko, Jen-Ren Wang, Michael R. Holbrook
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.2020; 14(12): e0008960. CrossRef - Emerging use of artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease
Arushi Kohli, Erik A Holzwanger, Alexander N Levy
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(44): 6923. CrossRef
-
9,879
View
-
314
Download
-
38
Web of Science
-
47
Crossref
Original Articles
-
Factors Affecting Endoscopic Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer in the Population-Based Screening Era
-
Yoon Gwon Mun, Myung-Gyu Choi, Chul-Hyun Lim, Han Hee Lee, Dong Hoon Kang, Jae Myung Park, Kyo Young Song
-
Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):478-484. Published online June 1, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.006
-
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader
ePub
- Background
/Aims: Since population-based screening for gastric cancer in Korea was implemented, endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer has become increasingly popular. This study investigates factors affecting endoscopic curative resection of early gastric cancer in population-based screening for gastric cancer.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer who underwent treatment at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. All patients completed questionnaires about clinical information, including interval between surveillance tests for gastric cancer.
Results
Of 469 gastric cancer patients, 147 (31.3%) had undergone curative endoscopic resection, 260 (55.4%) had undergone curative surgical resection, and 62 (13.3%) underwent non-curative resection or were in an inoperable state. Patients with curative endoscopic resection had fewer alarm symptoms/signs than other groups. In multivariate analysis, regular surveillance endoscopy was the only factor predicting curative endoscopic resection (odds ratio [OR], 6.099; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.532–14.933). In addition, patients undergoing gastric cancer screening had a significantly higher rate of endoscopic curative resection compared with subjects who had never been screened. (1-year interval: OR, 49.969; 95% CI, 6.340–393.827, 2-year interval: OR, 15.283; 95% CI, 1.833–127.406, over 2-year interval: OR, 10.651; 95% CI, 1.248–90.871). Shorter screening test intervals were associated with higher rates of endoscopic curative resection.
Conclusions
Regular surveillance testing was the independent factor predicting curative endoscopic resection of gastric cancer.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- A model established using marital status and other factors from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for early stage gastric cancer
Lixiang Zhang, Baichuan Zhou, Panquan Luo, Aman Xu, Wenxiu Han, Zhijian Wei
Journal of Investigative Medicine.2022; 70(6): 1373. CrossRef - Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Non-Curative Resection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in Korea
Si Hyung Lee, Min Cheol Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Kang Nyeong Lee, Jong Jae Park, Su Jin Hong
Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(2): 196. CrossRef - The More, the Better: Is This True in Endoscopy for Gastric Cancer Screening?
Seong Woo Jeon
Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(5): 402. CrossRef
-
6,218
View
-
113
Download
-
4
Web of Science
-
3
Crossref
-
An Ultrathin Endoscope with a 2.4-mm Working Channel Shortens the Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Time by Shortening the Suction Time
-
Satoshi Shinozaki, Yoshimasa Miura, Yuji Ino, Kenjiro Shinozaki, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Hironori Yamamoto
-
Clin Endosc 2015;48(6):516-521. Published online November 30, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.6.516
-
Correction in: Clin Endosc 2016;49(1):100
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader
ePub
- Background
/Aims: Poor suction ability through a narrow working channel prolongs esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to evaluate suction with a new ultrathin endoscope (EG-580NW2; Fujifilm Corp.) having a 2.4-mm working channel in clinical practice.
Methods
To evaluate in vitro suction, 200 mL water was suctioned and the suction time was measured. The clinical data of 117 patients who underwent EGD were retrospectively reviewed on the basis of recorded video, and the suction time was measured by using a stopwatch.
Results
In vitro, the suction time with the EG-580NW2 endoscope was significantly shorter than that with the use of an ultrathin endoscope with a 2.0-mm working channel (EG-580NW; mean ± standard deviation, 22.7±1.1 seconds vs. 34.7±2.2 seconds; p<0.001). We analyzed the total time and the suction time for routine EGD in 117 patients (50 in the EG-580NW2 group and 67 in the EG-580NW group). In the EG-580NW2 group, the total time for EGD was significantly shorter than that in the EG-580NW group (275.3±42.0 seconds vs. 300.6±46.5 seconds, p=0.003). In the EG-580NW2 group, the suction time was significantly shorter than that in the EG-580NW group (19.2±7.6 seconds vs. 38.0±15.9 seconds, p<0.001).
Conclusions
An ultrathin endoscope with a 2.4-mm working channel considerably shortens the routine EGD time by shortening the suction time, in comparison with an endoscope with a 2.0-mm working channel.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- Optical spectroscopy for in vivo medical diagnosis—a review of the state of the art and future perspectives
Jang Ah Kim, Dominic J Wales, Guang-Zhong Yang
Progress in Biomedical Engineering.2020; 2(4): 042001. CrossRef - Necessity of transnasal gastroscopy in routine diagnostics: a patient-centred requirement analysis
Anna-Livia Schuldt, Holger Kirsten, Jan Tuennemann, Mario Heindl, Florian van Bommel, Juergen Feisthammel, Marcus Hollenbach, Albrecht Hoffmeister
BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2019; 6(1): e000264. CrossRef
-
8,172
View
-
59
Download
-
3
Web of Science
-
2
Crossref
Review
-
Korean Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Polyp Detection
-
Bo-In Lee, Sung Pil Hong, Seong-Eun Kim, Se Hyung Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong-Hoon Yang, Sung Jae Shin, Suck-Ho Lee, Dong Il Park, Young-Ho Kim, Hyun Jung Kim, Suk-Kyun Yang, Hyo Jong Kim, Hae Jeong Jeon, Multi-Society Task Force for Development of Guidelines for Colorectal Polyp Screening, Surveillance and Management
-
Clin Endosc 2012;45(1):25-43. Published online March 31, 2012
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.25
-
-
Abstract
PDF
Supplementary Material
PubReader
ePub
Now colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in males and the fourth most common cancer in females in Korea. Since most of colorectal cancers occur after the prolonged transformation of adenomas into carcinomas, early detection and removal of colorectal adenomas are one of the most effective methods to prevent colorectal cancer. Considering the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer and polyps in Korea, it is very important to establish Korean guideline for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection. The guideline was developed by the Korean Multi-Society Take Force and we tried to establish the guideline by evidence-based methods. Parts of the statements were draw by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Herein we discussed epidemiology of colorectal cancers and adenomas in Korea and optimal methods for screening of colorectal cancer and detection of adenomas including fecal occult blood tests, radiologic tests, and endoscopic examinations.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- The Economic Burden of Colorectal Cancer in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Shanghai, China
Zhi‐xu Zhu, Yu‐xin Peng, Jing‐hong Ye, Yan Wei
Cancer Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Appropriate timing and interval for surveillance colonoscopy after liver transplantation based on a single-centre experience
Dae Gon Ryu, Hongqun Liu, Samuel S Lee, Ki Tae Yoon, Mayur Brahmania
Canadian Liver Journal.2025; 8(1): 39. CrossRef - Disability-adjusted life years for colorectal cancer in China, 2017–2030: A prevalence-based analysis focusing on the impact of screening coverage and the application of local weights
Yujie Wu, Yanjie Li, Xin Wang, Xinyi Zhou, Xinxin Yan, Hong Wang, Juan Zhu, Wanqing Chen, Jufang Shi
Chinese Medical Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk and high-risk individuals: A systematic review
Caroline Tanadi, Kevin Tandarto, Maureen Miracle Stella, Kenny Wijaya Sutanto, Mario Steffanus, Riki Tenggara, Muhammad Begawan Bestari
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 62(2): 101. CrossRef - Trends in colorectal cancer incidence according to an increase in the number of colonoscopy cases in Korea
Ga Hee Kim, Yeong Chan Lee, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Chang Mo Moon, Kyunga Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Eun-Ran Kim
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(1): 51. CrossRef - Evaluation of the “Burgenland PREvention trial of colorectal cancer Disease with ImmunologiCal Testing” (B-PREDICT)—a population-based colorectal cancer screening program
Stefanie BREZINA, Gernot LEEB, Andreas BAIERL, Evelyn GRÄF, Monika HACKL, Philipp HOFER, Harald LANG, Michaela KLEIN, Karl MACH, Remy SCHWARZER, Wilhelm WLASSITS, Andreas PÜSPÖK, Andrea GSUR
BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Colonic Polyp Study: Differences in Adenoma Characteristics Based on Colonoscopy History over 5-Year Follow-Up Period
Sang Hyun Park, Kwang Il Hong, Hyun Chul Park, Young Sun Kim, Gene Hyun Bok, Kyung Ho Kim, Dong Suk Shin, Jae Yong Han, Young Kwan Kim, Yeun Jong Choi, Soo Hoon Eun, Byung Hoon Lim, Kyeong Kun Kwack
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(1): 194. CrossRef - 2022 Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation
Young Sin Cho, Yoo Jin Lee, Jeong Eun Shin, Hye-Kyung Jung, Seon-Young Park, Seung Joo Kang, Kyung Ho Song, Jung-Wook Kim, Hyun Chul Lim, Hee Sun Park, Seong-Jung Kim, Ra Ri Cha, Ki Bae Bang, Chang Seok Bang, Sung Kyun Yim, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Bong Hyeon Kye,
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2023; 29(3): 271. CrossRef - Association of HLA-G 3′UTR polymorphisms and haplotypes with colorectal cancer susceptibility and prognosis
Sabrine Dhouioui, Ahmed-Baligh Laaribi, Nadia Boujelbene, Refka Jelassi, Hamza Ben Salah, Hedia Bellali, Hadda-Imene Ouzari, Amel Mezlini, Inès Zemni, Hanene Chelbi, Inès Zidi
Human Immunology.2022; 83(1): 39. CrossRef - An updated review of the methods, guidelines of, and controversies on screening for colorectal cancer
Sameh Hany Emile, Samer Hani Barsom, Steven D. Wexner
The American Journal of Surgery.2022; 224(1): 339. CrossRef - Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach
Sharifah Saffinas Syed Soffian, Azmawati Mohammed Nawi, Rozita Hod, Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf, Huan-Keat Chan, Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy.2022; Volume 15: 1025. CrossRef - Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 is associated with poor prognosis after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer
Ji Hyeong Song, Myung Sun Lee, Eun Young Cha, Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Jin Soo Kim
Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 18(1): 1. CrossRef - Systematic review of shared decision‐making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening
Marta Maes‐Carballo, Manuel García‐García, Yolanda Gómez‐Fandiño, Carlos Roberto Estrada‐López, Andrés Iglesias‐Álvarez, Aurora Bueno‐Cavanillas, Khalid Saeed Khan
European Journal of Cancer Care.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Real-World Use of Colonoscopy in an Older Population: A Nationwide Standard Cohort Study Using a Common Data Model
Ha Il Kim, Jin Young Yoon, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(7): 2227. CrossRef - Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy
Hyun Young Kim
Medicine.2021; 100(19): e25927. CrossRef - Gastrointestinal and Nongastrointestinal Complications of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in the Real World: A Nationwide Standard Cohort Using the Common Data Model Database
Ha Il Kim, Jin Young Yoon, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha
Gut and Liver.2021; 15(4): 569. CrossRef - Optimal postoperative surveillance strategies for stage III colorectal cancer
Min Young Park, In Ja Park, Hyo Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Minsung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021; 13(9): 1012. CrossRef - Tumor Size >5 cm and Harvested LNs <12 Are the Risk Factors for Recurrence in Stage I Colon and Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection
Hye-Sol Jung, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Han-Ki Lim, Min Jung Kim, Sang Hui Moon, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
Cancers.2021; 13(21): 5294. CrossRef - Colon Polyp Detection in Primary Health Care Institutions of Korea: Detection Rate and Issues with Following the Guidelines
Sang Hyun Park, Kwang Il Hong, Hyun Chul Park, Young Sun Kim, Gene Hyun Bok, Kyung Ho Kim, Dong Suk Shin, Jae Yong Han, Young Kwan Kim, Yeun Jong Choi, Soo Hoon Eun, Byung Hoon Lim, Kyeong Kun Kwack
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(6): 328. CrossRef - Evaluation of the Cut-Off Value of Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening during Health Checkups
Hye-Ran Park, Eun-Hee Nah, Jong-Seon Lee, Seon Cho
Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance.2021; 43(4): 190. CrossRef - Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after resection of low-risk diminutive versus small adenomas
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(3): 622. CrossRef - Factors Associated With Colonoscopy Compliance Based on Health Belief Model in a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Shanghai, China
Lihua He, Shuna Gao, Sha Tao, Weiyi Li, Juan Du, Yunfang Ji, Yejing Wang
International Quarterly of Community Health Education.2020; 41(1): 25. CrossRef - Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Young Adults (20–39 Years Old)
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Hyo-Joon Yang, Soo-Kyung Park, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 17(1): 115. CrossRef - Optimal colonoscopy surveillance interval period for the adenoma patients who had an adequate polypectomy at baseline colonoscopy
Jian Dong, Minman Wu, Jiarong Miao, Tao Zhi, Tianmei Zhang, Gang Yang, Yarong Chen, Lei Zhang, Qiong Nan
European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2019; 28(1): 10. CrossRef - Impact of family history of colorectal cancer on age‐specific prevalence of colorectal neoplasia
Chan Hyuk Park, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Yoon Suk Jung
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(3): 537. CrossRef - A Novel Blood‐Based Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Technology Using Electrical Detection of Colon Cancer Secreted Protein‐2
Minhong Jeun, Hyo Jeong Lee, Sungwook Park, Eun‐ju Do, Jaewon Choi, You‐Na Sung, Seung‐Mo Hong, Sang‐Yeob Kim, Dong‐Hee Kim, Ja Young Kang, Hye‐Nam Son, Jinmyoung Joo, Eun Mi Song, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong‐Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong‐Sik
Advanced Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - Increasing Trend in Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Asia: More Cancers in Men and More Rectal Cancers
Joseph J.Y. Sung, Han-Mo Chiu, Kyu-Won Jung, Jae Kwan Jun, Masau Sekiguchi, Takahisa Matsuda, Moe H. Kyaw
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 114(2): 322. CrossRef - Bowel preparation for colonoscopy may decrease the levels of testosterone in Korean men
Soo-Hyun Lee, Seung Geon Park, Moon-Jong Kim, Hyejin Chun, Doo-Yeoun Cho, Doohee Hong, Young-Sang Kim
Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - A Comparative Study Evaluating the Incidence of Colorectal Neoplasia(s) in Candidates for Bariatric Surgery by Screening Colonoscopy, 40–49 Versus 50–65 Years Old: a Preliminary Study
Toygar Toydemir, Görkem Özgen, İsmail Çalıkoğlu, Özdal Ersoy, Mehmet Ali Yerdel
Obesity Surgery.2019; 29(8): 2430. CrossRef - Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - The Rise of Colorectal Cancer in Asia: Epidemiology, Screening, and Management
Elias F. Onyoh, Wen-Feng Hsu, Li-Chun Chang, Yi-Chia Lee, Ming-Shiang Wu, Han-Mo Chiu
Current Gastroenterology Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - Colonic Intramucosal Cancer in the Interposed Colon Treated with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Case Report and Review of Literature
Seung-Ho Baek, Jang-Ho Lee, Dong Ryeol Yoo, Hye Yeong Kim, Meihua Jin, Ah-reum Jang, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(4): 377. CrossRef - IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC TEST FOR DETECTION OF FECAL OCCULT BLOOD
Anna Viktorovna Nikitina, Y. A. Akinshina, N. E. Nishchakova, E. A. Amelina, S. G. Mardanly
Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics.2019; 64(9): 536. CrossRef - Abdominal Obesity is More Predictive of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Risk Than Overall Obesity in Men
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2019; 53(7): e284. CrossRef - Stool-Based miR-92a and miR-144* as Noninvasive Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer Screening
Hyun Ho Choi, Young-Seok Cho, Ji Hye Choi, Hyung-Keun Kim, Sung Soo Kim, Hiun-Suk Chae
Oncology.2019; 97(3): 173. CrossRef - Association between family history of colorectal cancer and the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia following polypectomy in patients aged < 50 years
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(2): 383. CrossRef - Risk of metachronous neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy in young patients with colorectal neoplasia
Hyun Gun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Jae Myung Cha, Jeong Eun Shin, Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hoon Sup Koo, Young-Eun Joo, Sun-Jin Boo
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(3): 666. CrossRef - Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations
Florence Bénard, Alan N Barkun, Myriam Martel, Daniel von Renteln
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(1): 124. CrossRef - Stages of Adoption for Fecal Occult Blood Test and Colonoscopy Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Korea
Nhung Cam Bui, Ha Na Cho, Yoon Young Lee, Mina Suh, Boyoung Park, Jae Kwan Jun, Yeol Kim, Kui Son Choi
Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(2): 416. CrossRef - Anatomical distribution and detection rate of colorectal neoplasms according to age in the colonoscopic screening of a Korean population
Suk-young Lee, Wan Hee Song, Sang Cheul Oh, Byung-Wook Min, Sun Il Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2018; 94(1): 36. CrossRef - The prognostic implications of primary tumor location on recurrence in early-stage colorectal cancer with no associated risk factors
Sung Il Kang, Duck-Woo Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Hye-Seung Lee, Min Hyun Kim, Myung Jo Kim, Heung-Kwon Oh, Sung-Bum Kang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(6): 719. CrossRef - A combination of clinical risk stratification and fecal immunochemical test is useful for identifying persons with high priority of early colonoscopy
Yoon Suk Jung, Chan Hyuk Park, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Digestive and Liver Disease.2018; 50(3): 254. CrossRef - Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey
Seri Hong, Mina Suh, Kui Son Choi, Boyoung Park, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun-Soo Kim, Jae Kwan Jun, Dong Soo Han
Gut and Liver.2018; 12(4): 426. CrossRef - Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after colonoscopic polypectomy in patients aged 30 to 39 and 40 to 49 years
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 88(4): 715. CrossRef - A simple scoring model for advanced colorectal neoplasm in asymptomatic subjects aged 40–49 years
Yoo Mi Park, Hee Sun Kim, Jae Jun Park, Su Jung Baik, Young Hoon Youn, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyojin Park
BMC Gastroenterology.2017;[Epub] CrossRef - The fecal immunochemical test has high accuracy for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia before age 50
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Digestive and Liver Disease.2017; 49(5): 557. CrossRef - Colorectal cancer screening with the fecal immunochemical test in persons aged 30 to 49 years: focusing on the age for commencing screening
Yoon Suk Jung, Chan Hyuk Park, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2017; 86(5): 892. CrossRef - Biomedical optical spectroscopy for the early diagnosis of gastrointestinal neoplasms
Qin-Si Wan, Ting Wang, Kun-He Zhang
Tumor Biology.2017; 39(7): 101042831771798. CrossRef - Training in Endoscopy: Colonoscopy
Hyun Joo Jang
Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(4): 322. CrossRef - Impact of Age on the Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in a Young Population: An Analysis Using the Predicted Probability Model
Yoon Suk Jung, Chan Hyuk Park, Nam Hee Kim, Mi Yeon Lee, Dong Il Park
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2017; 62(9): 2518. CrossRef - Screening of colorectal cancer: present and future
Marcello Maida, Fabio Salvatore Macaluso, Gianluca Ianiro, Francesca Mangiola, Emanuele Sinagra, Georgina Hold, Carlo Maida, Giovanni Cammarota, Antonio Gasbarrini, Giuseppe Scarpulla
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2017; 17(12): 1131. CrossRef - Advanced Colonic Neoplasia at Follow-up Colonoscopy According to Risk Components and Adenoma Location at Index Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Study of 1,974 Asymptomatic Koreans
Su Jung Baik, Hyojin Park, Jae Jun Park, Hyun Ju Lee, So Young Jo, Yoo Mi Park, Hye Sun Lee
Gut and Liver.2017; 11(5): 667. CrossRef - Risk Factors Such as Male Sex, Smoking, Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity, and Fatty Liver Do Not Justify Screening Colonoscopies Before Age 45
Yoon Suk Jung, Kyung Eun Yun, Yoosoo Chang, Seungho Ryu, Dong Il Park
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2016; 61(4): 1021. CrossRef - Risk of developing advanced colorectal neoplasia after removing high‐risk adenoma detected at index colonoscopy in young patients: A KASID study
Soo‐Kyung Park, Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Won Hee Kim, Chang Soo Eun, Bong Min Ko, Geom Seog Seo, Jae Myung Cha, Jae Jun Park, Kyeong Ok Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Yoonho Jung, Eun Soo Kim, Seong Ran Jeon, Chang Kyun Lee, Dong Il Park
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(1): 138. CrossRef - Colorectal cancer screening of the general population in East Asia
Yasushi Sano, Jeong‐Sik Byeon, Xiao‐Bo Li, Martin C.S. Wong, Han‐Mo Chiu, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Takahiro Utsumi, Santa Hattori, Wataru Sano, Mineo Iwatate, Philip Chiu, Joseph Sung
Digestive Endoscopy.2016; 28(3): 243. CrossRef - Does Low Threshold Value Use Improve Proximal Neoplasia Detection by Fecal Immunochemical Test?
Nam Hee Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Soo-Kyung Park, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2016; 61(9): 2685. CrossRef - High levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and smoking might be markers of colorectal adenoma in Korean males aged 40-49 years
In Cheol Yoon, Jeong Hyeon Cho, Heejin Choi, Young Hoon Choi, Kyu Min Lim, Sung Hwa Choi, Jae Ho Han, Hyeon Ju Jeong, Hong Sub Lee
Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2016; 33(1): 13. CrossRef - Endoscopic Resection for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Band Ligation and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Byoung Wook Bang, Jin Seok Park, Hyung Kil Kim, Yong Woon Shin, Kye Sook Kwon, Joon Mee Kim
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2016; 2016: 1. CrossRef - Is a Preoperative Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Second Primary Cancer Detection in Head and Neck Cancer Necessary? Ten-year Registry Data
Gyeong Mi Heo, Mi Hee Kim, Jin Hwan Kim, Young Soo Rho, Woon Geon Shin
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 68(1): 23. CrossRef - Effect of Previous Gastrectomy on the Performance of Postoperative Colonoscopy
Sunghwan Kim, Jeongmin Choi, Tae Han Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Yun-Suhk Suh, Jong Pil Im, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Sang Gyun Kim, Seung-Yong Jeong, Joo Sung Kim, Han-Kwang Yang
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(3): 167. CrossRef - Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
Shirong Yan, Zijing Liu, Shuang Yu, Yixi Bao
Medical Science Monitor.2016; 22: 3409. CrossRef - Characteristics of and risk factors for colorectal neoplasms in young adults in a screening population
Seung Eun Lee, Hee Bum Jo, Won Gun Kwack, Yun Jin Jeong, Yeo-Jin Yoon, Hyoun Woo Kang
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(10): 2981. CrossRef - Background and significance of Korean national cancer screening guideline revision
Won-Chul Lee, Yeol Kim
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2015; 58(4): 274. CrossRef - Effect of different reconstruction algorithms on computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) performance in ultra-low dose CT colonography
Eun Sun Lee, Se Hyung Kim, Jong Pil Im, Sang Gyun Kim, Cheong-il Shin, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi
European Journal of Radiology.2015; 84(4): 547. CrossRef - Comparing the effectiveness of competing tests for reducing colorectal cancer mortality: a network meta-analysis
B. Joseph Elmunzer, Amit G. Singal, Jeremy B. Sussman, Amar R. Deshpande, Daniel A. Sussman, Marisa L. Conte, Ben A. Dwamena, Mary A.M. Rogers, Philip S. Schoenfeld, John M. Inadomi, Sameer D. Saini, Akbar K. Waljee
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2015; 81(3): 700. CrossRef - Risk factors for colorectal neoplasia in persons aged 30 to 39 years and 40 to 49 years
Yoon Suk Jung, Seungho Ryu, Yoosoo Chang, Kyung Eun Yun, Jung Ho Park, Hong Joo Kim, Yong Kyun Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Woo Kyu Jeon, Byung Ik Kim, Dong Il Park
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2015; 81(3): 637. CrossRef - Non-invasive screening for colorectal cancer in Asia
Han-Mo Chiu, Li-Chun Chang, Wen-Feng Hsu, Chu-Kuang Chou, Ming-Shiang Wu
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2015; 29(6): 953. CrossRef - Risk Factors for Delayed Post-Polypectomy Bleeding
Min Jung Kwon, You Sun Kim, Song I Bae, Young Il Park, Kyung Jin Lee, Jung Hwa Min, Soo Yeon Jo, Mi Young Kim, Hye Jin Jung, Seong Yeon Jeong, Won Jae Yoon, Jin Nam Kim, Jeong Seop Moon
Intestinal Research.2015; 13(2): 160. CrossRef - Distribution of the Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection Rate According to Age: Is Recommending Colonoscopy Screening for Koreans Over the Age of 50 Safe?
Taeseok Bae, Yunhyung Ha, Changkyun Kim, Jihyun Lee, Kwangil Ha, Sanghyun Shin, Youngcheol Lee, Yoonsik Kang
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(2): 46. CrossRef - The Korean guideline for colorectal cancer screening
Dae Kyung Sohn, Min Ju Kim, Younhee Park, Mina Suh, Aesun Shin, Hee Young Lee, Jong Pil Im, Hyoen-Min Cho, Sung Pil Hong, Baek-hui Kim, Yongsoo Kim, Jeong Wook Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Chung Mo Nam, Dong Il Park, Jun Won Um, Soon Nam Oh, Hwan Sub Lim, Hee Jin C
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2015; 58(5): 420. CrossRef - Age-specific prevalence of serrated lesions and their subtypes by screening colonoscopy: a retrospective study
Hyun Young Kim, Seon Mie Kim, Ji-Hyun Seo, Eun-Ha Park, Nayoung Kim, Dong Ho Lee
BMC Gastroenterology.2014;[Epub] CrossRef - Clinical features and course of ulcerative colitis diagnosed in asymptomatic subjects
Soo-Kyung Park, Byong Duk Ye, Suk-Kyun Yang, Seon-Ok Kim, Jihun Kim, Jong Wook Kim, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Kee Wook Jung, Kyung-Jo Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Jin-Ho Kim
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2014; 8(10): 1254. CrossRef - Do We Need Colonoscopy Following Acute Diverticulitis Detected on Computed Tomography to Exclude Colorectal Malignancy?
Young Hoon Choi, Seong-Joon Koh, Ji Won Kim, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Jong Pil Im, Joo Sung Kim, Hyun Chae Jung
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2014; 59(9): 2236. CrossRef - A Survey of Colonoscopic Surveillance After Polypectomy
Dae Kyung Sohn
Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(2): 88. CrossRef - The Prevalence of Colorectal Adenomas in Asymptomatic Korean Men and Women
Moon Hee Yang, Sanjay Rampal, Jidong Sung, Yoon-Ho Choi, Hee Jung Son, Jun Haeng Lee, Young-Ho Kim, Dong Kyung Chang, Poong-Lyul Rhee, Jong Chul Rhee, Eliseo Guallar, Juhee Cho
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2014; 23(3): 499. CrossRef - Circulating Methylated Septin 9 Nucleic Acid in the Plasma of Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer in the Stomach and Colon
Hye Seung Lee, Sang Mee Hwang, Taek Soo Kim, Duck-Woo Kim, Do Joong Park, Sung-Bum Kang, Hyung-Ho Kim, Kyoung Un Park
Translational Oncology.2013; 6(3): 290. CrossRef
-
14,567
View
-
171
Download
-
76
Crossref