Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
91 "Endoscopic ultrasonography"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Short-term outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clutch cutter for subepithelial lesions within the esophagogastric submucosa: a Japanese prospective observational study
Kazuya Akahoshi, Kazuki Inamura, Kazuaki Akahoshi, Shigeki Osada, Shinichi Tamura, Yoshihiro Oishi, Masafumi Oya, Hidenobu Koga
Received April 21, 2024  Accepted June 10, 2024  Published online October 10, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.094    [Epub ahead of print]
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clutch cutter (ESD-CC) for subepithelial lesions within the esophagogastric submucosa (SELEGSM) has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ESD-CC for the treatment of SELEGSM.
Methods
This prospective study included 15 consecutive patients with 18 SELEGSMs diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography. The primary outcomes were short-term outcomes including en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, procedure time, and complication rate. The secondary outcome was final histological diagnosis.
Results
Among the participants, 18 lesions were identified: 12 in the stomach (nine patients) and six in the esophagus (six patients). The en bloc resection rate was 94.4% (17/18). The R0 resection rate was 88.9% (16/18). The median operating time was 39 min, and no instances of perforation or bleeding were observed. The final diagnoses of SELEGSM included six neuroendocrine tumors (33.3%), six granular cell tumors (33.3%), two ectopic pancreases (11.1%), one inflammatory fibroid polyp (5.6%), one leiomyoma (5.6%), one lipoma (5.6%), and one leiomyosarcoma (5.6%).
Conclusions
ESD-CC appears to be a technically efficient and safe approach for SELEGSM resection, suggesting its potential as a valuable treatment option.
  • 852 View
  • 123 Download
Close layer
Comparison of bispectral index-guided endoscopic ultrasonography with continuous vs. intermittent infusion of propofol: a retrospective study in Japan
Ayana Okamoto, Ken Kamata, Tomohiro Yamazaki, Shunsuke Omoto, Kosuke Minaga, Mamoru Takenaka, Masatoshi Kudo
Clin Endosc 2024;57(6):814-820.   Published online July 24, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.019
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous propofol infusion for anesthesia during endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).
Methods
A total of 427 consecutive patients who underwent EUS between May 2018 and February 2019 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two propofol infusion groups: continuous (n=207) and intermittent (n=220). The following parameters were compared: (1) propofol dose, (2) respiratory and circulatory depression, (3) body movement requiring discontinuation of the examination, (4) awakening score, and (5) patient satisfaction.
Results
The median total maintenance dose of propofol was significantly higher in the continuous group than in the intermittent group (160.0 mg vs. 130.0 mg, respectively); however, the reduction in SpO2 was significantly lower in the continuous group (2.9% vs. 13.2%). Body movements occurred less frequently in the continuous group than in the intermittent group (40.1% vs. 49.5%, respectively). The rate of complete awakening was significantly higher in the continuous group than in the intermittent group. Finally, there was a significant difference in the percentage of patients who answered “absolutely yes” when asked about receiving EUS again: 52.7% in the continuous group vs. 34.3% in the intermittent group.
Conclusions
Continuous infusion resulted in stable sedation and reduced propofol-associated risks.
  • 2,427 View
  • 151 Download
Close layer
Review
Role of endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis
Eun-Jin Yang, Kee Wook Jung
Received January 26, 2024  Accepted April 4, 2024  Published online July 5, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.023    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease involving inflammation of the esophagus. Endoscopy is essential in the diagnosis and treatment of EoE and shows typical findings, including esophageal edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stenosis. However, studies involving pediatric and adult patients with EoE suggest that even a normally appearing esophagus can be diagnosed as EoE by endoscopic biopsy. Therefore, in patients with suspected EoE, biopsy samples should be obtained from the esophagus regardless of endoscopic appearance. Moreover, follow-up endoscopies with biopsy after therapy initiation are usually recommended to assess response. Although previous reports of endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with EoE have shown diffuse thickening of the esophageal wall, including lamina propria, submucosa, and muscularis propria, its role in EoE remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Endoscopic dilation or bougienage is a safe and effective procedure that can be used in combination with medical and/or dietary elimination therapy in patients with esophageal stricture for the management of dysphagia and to prevent its recurrence.
  • 4,569 View
  • 382 Download
Close layer
Original Article
Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage using a drill dilator: a retrospective study in Japan
Ahmed Sadek, Kazuo Hara, Nozomi Okuno, Shin Haba, Takamichi Kuwahara, Toshitaka Fukui, Minako Urata, Takashi Kondo, Yoshitaro Yamamoto, Kenneth Tachi
Clin Endosc 2024;57(5):666-674.   Published online June 5, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.272
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Dilation of the tract before stent deployment is a challenging step in endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD). In this study, we examined the effectiveness and safety of a novel spiral dilator, Tornus ES (Asahi Intec), for EUS-PDD.
Methods
This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. The punctured tract was dilated using a Tornus ES dilator in all EUS-PDD cases. Our primary endpoint was the technical success rate of initial tract dilation. Technical success was defined as successful fistula dilation using a Tornus ES followed by successful stent insertion. Secondary endpoints were procedure times and early adverse events.
Results
A total of 12 patients were included between December 2021 and March 2023. EUS-PDD was performed in 11 patients for post-pancreaticoduodenectomy anastomotic strictures and one patient with pancreatitis with duodenal perforation. The technical success rates of stent insertion and fistula dilation using a Tornus ES dilator was 100%. The median procedure time was 24 minutes. No remarkable adverse events related to the procedure were observed, apart from fever, which occurred in 2 patients.
Conclusions
Tract dilation in EUS-PDD using a Tornus ES is effective and safe.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A novel spiral dilator for pancreatic duct drainage: catching two birds with one stone
    Han Taek Jeong, Jimin Han
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(5): 608.     CrossRef
  • Technical outcomes between a drill dilator and ultra-tapered mechanical dilator during EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy: Comparative study
    Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Jun Matsuno, Yuki Uba, Mitsuki Tomita, Nobuhiro Hattori, Junichi Nakamura, Kimi Bessho, Hiroki Nishikawa
    Endoscopy International Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3,303 View
  • 303 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Reviews
Forward viewing liner echoendoscopy for therapeutic interventions
Kazuo Hara, Nozomi Okuno, Shin Haba, Takamichi Kuwahara
Clin Endosc 2024;57(2):175-180.   Published online February 29, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.271
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures using the forward-viewing convex EUS (FV-EUS) have been reviewed based on the articles reported to date. The earliest reported procedure is the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using FV-EUS. However, the study on drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts focused on showing that drainage is possible with FV-EUS rather than leveraging its features. Subsequently, studies describing the characteristics of FV-EUS have been reported. By using FV-EUS in EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, double punctures in the gastrointestinal tract can be avoided. In postoperative modified anatomical cases, using the endoscopic function of FV-EUS, procedures such as bile duct drainage from anastomosis, pancreatic duct drainage from the afferent limb, and abscess drainage from the digestive tract have been reported. When a perpendicular puncture to the gastrointestinal tract is required or when there is a need to insert the endoscope deep into the gastrointestinal tract, FV-EUS is considered among the options.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Failed endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage across the duodenal covered metallic stent salvaged by using a forward‐viewing linear echoendoscope
    Tesshin Ban, Yoshimasa Kubota, Takashi Joh
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(12): 1389.     CrossRef
  • Stent misdeployment and factors associated with failure in endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy: analysis of the combined datasets from two randomized trials
    Yen-I Chen, Clara Long, Anand V. Sahai, Bertrand Napoleon, Gianfranco Donatelli, Rastislav Kunda, Myriam Martel, Shannon M. Chan, Paolo G. Arcidiacono, Eric Lam, Pradermchai Kongkam, Nauzer Forbes, Alberto Larghi, Jeffrey D. Mosko, Schalk Van der Merwe, S
    Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3,906 View
  • 210 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: focusing on comparison of endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy
Sun Gyo Lim, Chan Gyoo Kim
Clin Endosc 2024;57(5):571-580.   Published online February 23, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.160
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a condition characterized by blockage or narrowing where the stomach empties its contents into the small intestine due to primary malignant tumors or metastatic diseases. This condition leads to various symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and weight loss. To manage malignant GOO, different treatment options have been employed, including surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ), gastroduodenal stenting (GDS) using self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ). This review focuses on comparing the clinical outcomes of endoscopic stenting (GDS and EUS-GJ) with SGJ for malignant GOO. Studies have shown that GDS with SEMS provides comparable clinical outcomes and safety for the palliation of obstructive symptoms. The choice between covered and uncovered SEMS remains controversial, as different studies have reported varying results. EUS-GJ, performed via endoscopic ultrasound guidance, has shown promising efficacy and safety in managing malignant GOO, but further studies are needed to establish it as the primary treatment option. Comparative analyses suggest that GDS has higher recurrence and reintervention rates compared to EUS-GJ and SGJ, with similar overall procedural complications. However, bleeding rates were lower with GDS than with SGJ. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine the optimal treatment approach for malignant GOO.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Palliative management for malignant biliary obstruction and gastric outlet obstruction from pancreatic cancer
    Pengfei Wu, Kai Chen, Jin He
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3,673 View
  • 366 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Role of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS elastography in pancreatic lesions
Yasunobu Yamashita, Masayuki Kitano
Clin Endosc 2024;57(2):164-174.   Published online January 17, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.074
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Pancreatic cancers have a poor prognosis, and their incident rates have risen. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an efficient and reliable diagnostic modality for pancreatic lesions, providing high spatial resolution. However, while EUS helps to detect minor pancreatic lesions, nearly all solid pancreatic lesions are hypoechoic, which creates difficulty in making differential diagnoses of pancreatic lesions. When diagnosing pancreatic lesions, the performance of image-enhanced EUS techniques is essential, such as EUS elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS). CH-EUS diagnosis is based on assessing the vascularity of lesions, whereas tissue elasticity is measured via EUS elastography. Elastography is either strain or shear-wave, depending on the different mechanical properties being evaluated. The usefulness of enhanced EUS techniques is demonstrated in this review for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions, including solid and cystic lesions, and pancreatic cancer staging.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration or Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Giorgio Esposto, Giuseppe Massimiani, Linda Galasso, Paolo Santini, Raffaele Borriello, Irene Mignini, Maria Elena Ainora, Alberto Nicoletti, Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme, Antonio Gasbarrini, Sergio Alfieri, Giuseppe Quero, Maria Assunta Zocco
    Cancers.2024; 16(9): 1658.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound and Gastric Sub-Epithelial Lesions: Ultrasonographic Features, Tissue Acquisition Strategies, and Therapeutic Management
    Marzia Varanese, Marco Spadaccini, Antonio Facciorusso, Gianluca Franchellucci, Matteo Colombo, Marta Andreozzi, Daryl Ramai, Davide Massimi, Roberto De Sire, Ludovico Alfarone, Antonio Capogreco, Roberta Maselli, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Fugazza, Alessa
    Medicina.2024; 60(10): 1695.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Tissue Sampling: Lesion Assessment, Needles, and Techniques
    Jahnvi Dhar, Jayanta Samanta, Zaheer Nabi, Manik Aggarwal, Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi, Antonio Facciorusso, Luca Frulloni, Stefano Francesco Crinò
    Medicina.2024; 60(12): 2021.     CrossRef
  • 4,341 View
  • 262 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Prevalence, natural progression, and clinical practices of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions in Korea: a multicenter study
Younghee Choe, Yu Kyung Cho, Gwang Ha Kim, Jun-Ho Choi, Eun Soo Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Eun Kwang Choi, Tae Hyeon Kim, Seong-Hun Kim, Do Hoon Kim, The Research Group for Endoscopic Ultrasound in Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Clin Endosc 2023;56(6):744-753.   Published online August 25, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.005
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and natural progression of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract.
Methods
The medical records of patients with UGI SELs who underwent endoscopic screening at eight university hospitals between January and December 2010 were retrospectively investigated. The follow-up evaluations were performed until December 2016.
Results
UGI SELs were found in 1,044 of the 65,233 participants screened (endoscopic prevalence, 1.60%; the total number of lesions, 1,062; mean age, 55.1±11.2 years; men, 53.6%). The median follow-up period was 48 (range, 8–74) months. SELs were most frequently found in the stomach (63.8%) and had a mean size of 9.9±6.1 mm. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was performed in 293 patients (28.1%). The most common lesions were leiomyomas, followed by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and ectopic pancreas. The proportions of SELs with malignant potential according to size were 3% (<1 cm), 22% (1–2 cm), 27% (2–3 cm), and 38% (≥3 cm). In gastric SELs larger than 1 cm, resections were performed in 20 patients because of an increase in size, of which 12 were found to be GISTs.
Conclusions
The prevalence of UGI SELs was 1.60%. Further, 23% of gastric SELs ≥1 cm were precancerous lesions, most followed by EUS and clinical decisions without initial pathological confirmation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Case of Esophageal MALT Lymphoma Mimicking a Subepithelial Tumor
    Ha Eun Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Min Ji Kim, Kyung Bin Kim, Dong Chan Joo, Hye Kyung Jeon, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 83(4): 157.     CrossRef
  • Small gastric subepithelial lesions: A sand in the eye
    Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Nikhil Sonthalia, Rashid N. Lui
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(7): 1207.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic treatment of a large Brunner’s gland hamartoma in the duodenum
    Ha Eun Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Kyungbin Kim
    Endoscopy.2024; 56(S 01): E546.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis of Gastric Mesenchymal Tumors Using Digital Endosonography Image Analysis
    Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Ji Woo Kim, Kwang Baek Kim
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(13): 3725.     CrossRef
  • An Esophageal Leiomyoma with Cystic Degeneration Mimicking a Malignant Neoplasm
    Gwang Ha Kim, Dong Chan Joo, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Kyungbin Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3,621 View
  • 195 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with a direct technique without previous intestinal filling using a tubular fully covered self-expandable metallic stent
Hakan Şentürk, İbrahim Hakkı Köker, Koray Koçhan, Sercan Kiremitçi, Gülseren Seven, Ali Tüzün İnce
Clin Endosc 2024;57(2):209-216.   Published online July 3, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.022
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastrojejunostomy is a minimally invasive method for the management of gastric outlet obstruction. Conventionally, a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is used to create an anastomosis. However, LAMS is expensive and not widely available. In this report, we described a tubular fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (T-FCSEMS) for this purpose.
Methods
Twenty-one patients (15 men [71.4%]; median age, 66 years; range, 40–87 years) were included in this study. A total of 19 malignant (12 pancreatic, 6 gastric, and 1 metastatic rectal cancer) and 2 benign cases were observed. The proximal jejunum was punctured with a 19 G needle. The stomach and jejunum walls were dilated with a 6 F cystotome, and a 20×80 mm polytetrafluoroethylene T-FCSEMS (Hilzo) was deployed. Oral feeding was initiated after 12 to 18 hours and solid foods after 48 hours.
Results
The median procedure time was 33 minutes (range, 23–55 minutes). After two weeks, 19 patients tolerated oral feeding. In patients with malignancy, the median survival time was 118 days (range, 41–194 days). No serious complications or deaths occurred. All patients with malignancy tolerated oral food intake until they expired.
Conclusions
T-FCSEMS is safe and effective. This stent should be considered as an alternative to LAMS for gastric outlet obstruction.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tubular fully covered self-expandable metallic stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy: moving forward or taking a step back?
    Rami G. El Abiad, Mouen A. Khashab
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 193.     CrossRef
  • Advances in self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions
    Dong Kee Jang, Dong Wook Lee, Seong-Hun Kim, Kwang Bum Cho, Sundeep Lakhtakia
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(5): 588.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: focusing on comparison of endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy
    Sun Gyo Lim, Chan Gyoo Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(5): 571.     CrossRef
  • 5,173 View
  • 200 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Focused Review Series: Recent Updates on the Role of EUSs in Pancreatobiliary Disease
What You Need to Know Before Performing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Hepaticogastrostomy
Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Thawee Ratanachu-Ek, Nonthalee Pausawasdi
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):301-308.   Published online May 28, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.103
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary treatment modality for bile duct obstruction. When ERCP is unsuccessful, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage can be an alternative method. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as a treatment option for biliary obstruction, especially after ERCP failure. EUS-BD offers transluminal intrahepatic and extrahepatic drainage through a transgastric and transduodenal approach. EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is an excellent choice for patients with hilar strictures or those with a surgically altered anatomy. The optimal steps in EUS-HGS are case selection, bile duct visualization, puncture-site selection, wire insertion and manipulation, tract dilation, and stent placement. Caution should be taken at each step to prevent complications. Dedicated devices for EUS-HGS have been developed to improve the technical success rate and reduce complications. This technical review focuses on the essential practical points at each step of EUS-HGS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Use of a novel screw-type dilator for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy via 22-gauge needle and 0.018-inch guidewire.
    Shin Kato, Mariko Tsukamoto, Taichi Murai, Yuta Koike
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transbulbäre und transgastrale Gallengangsdrainage
    Philipp Thies, Markus Dollhopf
    Gastroenterologie up2date.2024; 20(01): 69.     CrossRef
  • Safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction and ascites
    Tsukasa Yasuda, Kazuo Hara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Shin Haba, Takamichi Kuwahara, Nozomi Okuno, Yasuhiro Kuraishi, Takafumi Yanaidani, Sho Ishikawa, Masanori Yamada, Toshitaka Fukui
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 246.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for recurrent stenosis after balloon dilation for benign hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture
    Takafumi Mie, Takashi Sasaki, Takeshi Okamoto, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Chinatsu Mori, Yuto Yamada, Takaaki Furukawa, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 253.     CrossRef
  • Is Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Safe and Effective after Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Saqr Alsakarneh, Mahmoud Y. Madi, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Fouad Jaber, Yassine Kilani, Mohamed Ahmed, Azizullah Beran, Mohamed Abdallah, Omar Al Ta’ani, Anika Mittal, Laith Numan, Hemant Goyal, Mohammad Bilal, Wissam Kiwan
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(13): 3883.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: practical tips and tricks
    Kambiz Kadkhodayan, Shayan Irani
    VideoGIE.2024; 9(9): 417.     CrossRef
  • A Possible Contraindication for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy: A Giant Hiatal Hernia
    Koichiro Mandai, Shiho Nakamura
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided intervention for inaccessible papilla in advanced malignant hilar biliary obstruction
    Partha Pal, Sundeep Lakhtakia
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(2): 143.     CrossRef
  • Liver impaction technique improves technical success rate of guidewire insertion during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video)
    Junichi Nakamura, Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Yuki Uba, Mitsuki Tomita, Kimi Bessho, Nobuhiro Hattori, Hiroki Nishikawa
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review
    Roy L. J. van Wanrooij, Michiel Bronswijk, Rastislav Kunda, Simon M. Everett, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Mihai Rimbas, Tomas Hucl, Abdenor Badaoui, Ryan Law, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Alberto Larghi, Marc Giovannini, Mouen A. Khashab, Kenneth F. Binmoeller, Marc
    Endoscopy.2022; 54(03): 310.     CrossRef
  • Practical Tips for Safe and Successful Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy: A State-of-the-Art Technical Review
    Saburo Matsubara, Keito Nakagawa, Kentaro Suda, Takeshi Otsuka, Masashi Oka, Sumiko Nagoshi
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(6): 1591.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of Serious Complications during Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: A Case-Based Technical Review
    Surinder Singh Rana, Jimil Shah, Harish Bhujade, Ujjwal Gorsi, Mandeep Kang, Rajesh Gupta
    Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 13(02): 082.     CrossRef
  • 5,915 View
  • 250 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Fiducial Placement for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Pancreatic Malignancy
Seong-Hun Kim, Eun Ji Shin
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):314-323.   Published online May 28, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.102
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an important treatment option for pancreatic cancer, which is known to be one of the malignancies with the worst prognosis. However, the high radiation doses delivered during SBRT may cause damage to adjacent radiosensitive organs. To minimize such damage, fiducial markers are used for localization during SBRT for pancreatic cancer. The development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has enabled fiducial markers to be inserted into the pancreas using an EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle, unlike in the past when percutaneous placement was generally performed. For successful EUS-guided fiducial marker placement, it is necessary for the fiducial markers to be loaded within the EUS-FNA needles to have a low probability of complications and a low migration risk, and to be stably observed in SBRT imaging. A systematic review has shown that the technical success rate of EUS-guided fiducial marker placement is 96.27%, whereas the fiducial marker migration and adverse event rates are 4.33% and 4.85%, respectively. Nonetheless, standardized techniques for fiducial marker placement and the characteristics of optimal fiducial markers have not yet been established. This review will introduce the characteristics (e.g., materials and shapes) of fiducial markers used in fiducial marker placement for pancreatic cancer and will discuss conventional techniques along with their success rates, difficulties, and adverse events.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Preliminary Controlled Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fiducial Markers to Guide Pancreas Surgery
    Patrick W. Chang, Jonathan Sadik, Ara B. Sahakian, Ravi Kankotia, Christopher Ko, Jessica Serna, Alex Rodriguez, Helen Lee, Sujit Kulkarni, Yuri Genyk, Mohd Sheikh, James L. Buxbaum
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 58(9): 931.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided interventional therapies for pancreatic diseases
    Rongmin Xu, Kai Zhang, Nan Ge, Siyu Sun
    Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cardiac migration of an implanted hepatic fiducial marker used for stereotactic body radiation therapy - A case report
    Youstina Soliman, Febin Antony, Mark Vivian, Sankar Venkatraman, Maged Nashed
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2024; 20(5): 1628.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Treatments for Pancreatic Cancer: Understanding How Endoscopic Ultrasound Has Revolutionized Management of Pancreatic Cancer
    Sahib Singh, Antonio Facciorusso, Rakesh Vinayek, Sudhir Dutta, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Ganesh Aswath, Neil Sharma, Sumant Inamdar
    Cancers.2024; 17(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Development of devices for interventional endoscopic ultrasound for the management of pancreatobiliary diseases
    Masahiro Itonaga, Masayuki Kitano, Reiko Ashida
    Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 35(3): 302.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Placement for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
    Irina M. Cazacu, Ben S. Singh, Rachael M. Martin-Paulpeter, Sam Beddar, Stephen Chun, Emma B. Holliday, Albert C. Koong, Prajnan Das, Eugene J. Koay, Cullen Taniguchi, Joseph M. Herman, Manoop S. Bhutani
    Cancers.2023; 15(22): 5355.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Management of Pancreatobiliary Malignancies
    Dong Wook Lee, Eun Young Kim
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(5): 1635.     CrossRef
  • Hot topics in therapeutic EUS
    Daniela Tabacelia, Alexandru Martiniuc, Daniela Elena Burtea, Adrian Saftoiu, Cezar Stroescu
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2022; 11(3): 153.     CrossRef
  • 5,154 View
  • 209 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Confirming Whether Fine Needle Biopsy Device Shortens the Learning Curve of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Without Rapid Onsite Evaluation
Meng-Ying Lin, Cheng-Lin Wu, Mitsuhiro Kida, Wei-Lun Chang, Bor-Shyang Sheu
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):420-427.   Published online May 28, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.184
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition requires a long learning curve. We aimed to compare the skill maturation curves between fine needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) for tissue acquisition.
Methods
The initial 60 procedures performed by the trainee endosonographer (30 FNA vs. 30 FNB) were consecutively enrolled. The difference in procedure performance was compared between the two groups. Learning curves were assessed. Twenty additional cases were subsequently enrolled to assess the consistency of performance in the FNB group.
Results
The FNB group acquired larger tissue samples (2.35 vs. 0.70 mm2; p<0.001) with lower blood content (p=0.001) and higher tissue quality (p=0.017) compared with the FNA group. In addition, the FNB group required less needle pass to establish a diagnosis (2.43 vs. 2.97; p=0.006). A threshold diagnostic sensitivity of ≥80% was achieved after performing 10 FNB procedures. The number of needle passes significantly decreased after conducting 20 FNB procedures (1.80 vs. 2.70; p=0.041). The diagnostic sensitivity and number of needle passes remained the same in the subsequent FNB procedures. By contrast, this skill maturation phenomenon was not observed after performing 30 FNA procedures.
Conclusions
In EUS-guided tissue acquisition, the FNB needle was more efficient and thus shortened the learning curve of EUSguided tissue acquisition in trainee endosonographers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identification of Endosonographic Features that Compromise EUS-FNB Diagnostic Accuracy in Pancreatic Masses
    Hsueh-Chien Chiang, Chien-Jui Huang, Yao-Shen Wang, Chun-Te Lee, Meng-Ying Lin, Wei-Lun Chang
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(11): 4302.     CrossRef
  • Tissue Quality Comparison Between Heparinized Wet Suction and Dry Suction in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Masses: A Randomized Crossover Study
    Meng-Ying Lin, Cheng-Lin Wu, Yung-Yeh Su, Chien-Jui Huang, Wei-Lun Chang, Bor-Shyang Sheu
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(2): 318.     CrossRef
  • Factors Affecting the Learning Curve in the Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Prospective Study
    Marcel Razpotnik, Simona Bota, Mathilde Kutilek, Gerolf Essler, Christian Urak, Julian Prosenz, Jutta Weber-Eibel, Andreas Maieron, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(2): 308.     CrossRef
  • Investigation into the content of red material in EUS-guided pancreatic cancer biopsies
    Meng-Ying Lin, Yung-Yeh Su, Yu-Ting Yu, Chien-Jui Huang, Bor-Shyang Sheu, Wei-Lun Chang
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(6): 1083.     CrossRef
  • 3,748 View
  • 82 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Interventions for the Early and Remission Phases of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: What are the More Concrete and Practical Situations for Performing Them?
Sho Hasegawa, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Toshitaka Sakai, Hiroaki Kusunose, Kensuke Kubota, Atsushi Nakajima, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2021;54(6):888-898.   Published online May 27, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.271
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: The use of endoscopic intervention (EI) for acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) remains controversial because the severity of biliary obstruction/cholangitis/pancreatitis is not reflected in the indications for early EI (EEI).
Methods
A total of 148 patients with ABP were included to investigate 1) the differences in the rate of worsening cholangitis/pancreatitis between the EEI group and the early conservative management (ECM) group, especially for each severity of cholangitis/pancreatitis, and 2) the diagnostic ability of imaging studies, including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), to detect common bile duct stones (CBDSs) in the ECM group.
Results
No differences were observed in the rate of worsening cholangitis between the EEI and ECM groups, regardless of the severity of cholangitis and/or the existence of impacted CBDSs. Among patients without impacted CBDSs and moderate/severe cholangitis, worsening pancreatitis was significantly more frequent in the EEI group (18% vs. 4%, p=0.048). In patients in the ECM group, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting CBDSs were 73% and 98%, respectively, for EUS, whereas the values were 13% and 92%, respectively, for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Conclusions
EEI should be avoided in the absence of moderate/severe cholangitis and/or impacted CBDSs because of the high rate of worsening pancreatitis. EUS can contribute to the accurate detection of residual CBDSs, for the determination of the need for elective EI.
  • 3,568 View
  • 119 Download
Close layer
Case Report
Micro-Biopsy Forceps in the Assessment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Possible New Indication?
Cecilia Binda, Emanuele Dabizzi, Emanuele Sinagra, Adele Fornelli, Luca Saragoni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri
Clin Endosc 2021;54(4):613-617.   Published online March 25, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.241
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is defined as a metastatic involvement of the peritoneum by several other primary sites and it is characterized by a marked worsening of prognosis, with limited treatment opportunities. Subsequently, PC should be ruled out before any invasive treatment is administered. A new through-the-needle micro-biopsy forceps (MF) was recently introduced that permits micro-histology cores. In this case series, we evaluated the feasibility of MF in the assessment of PC to complete patient diagnostic work-ups. Five consecutive patients referred for endoscopic ultrasound staging were sampled using MF. Sampling was feasible in all patients with a technical success of 100%. No adverse events were reported in any cases. This technique was feasible and safe with a technical success rate of 100%. It permitted sampling of peritoneal irregularity, obtained high-quality tissue fragments in all cases, and enabled an additional assessment, i.e., immunohistochemical staining.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Current perspectives on the diversification of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy
    Shinpei Doi, Takako Adachi, Ayako Watanabe, Nobuhiro Katsukura, Takayuki Tsujikawa
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2024; 51(2): 235.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) from peritoneal lesions: a prospective cohort pilot study
    Pradermchai Kongkam, Theerapat Orprayoon, Sirilak Yooprasert, Nakarin Sirisub, Naruemon Klaikaew, Anapat Sanpawat, Shahram Safa, Wiriyaporn Ridtitid, Pinit Kullavanijaya, Rungsun Rerknimitr
    BMC Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3,759 View
  • 71 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using a 20-Gauge Menghini Needle with a Lateral Forward Bevel and a 22-Gauge Franseen Needle: A Single-Center Large Cohort Study
Takafumi Mie, Takashi Sasaki, Ryo Kanata, Takaaki Furukawa, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
Clin Endosc 2021;54(5):730-738.   Published online March 4, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.251
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Several fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles are available for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition. However, there is disagreement on which type of needle has the best diagnostic yield. The aim of this study was to compare the performance and safety of two commonly used EUS-FNB needles.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNB between June 2016 and March 2020 in our hospital. Two types of needles were evaluated: a 20-gauge Menghini needle with a lateral forward bevel and a 22-gauge Franseen needle. Rapid on-site evaluation was performed in all the cases. A multivariate analysis was performed to clarify the negative predictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the diagnostic yields of these two needles.
Results
We analyzed 666 patients and 690 lesions. The overall diagnostic rate of histology alone was 88.8%, and the overall adverse event rate was 1.5%. Transduodenal access and small lesions (≤2 cm) were identified as negative predictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. After propensity score matching, 482 lesions were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy rates of histology in the M and F needle groups were 89.2% and 88.8%, respectively (p=1.00).
Conclusions
Both the needles showed high diagnostic yield, and no significant difference in performance was observed between the two.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Primary Pancreatic Lymphoma: Endosonography-Guided Tissue Acquisition Diagnosis
    Anna Carolina Orsini-Arman , Rodrigo Cañada T Surjan, Filadélfio E Venco, José C Ardengh
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Yield of Serial Pancreatic Juice Aspiration Cytologic Examination With Brush Cytology for Pancreatic Ductal Stenosis
    Takafumi Mie, Takashi Sasaki, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Takeshi Okamoto, Chinatsu Mori, Takaaki Furukawa, Yuto Yamada, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
    Pancreas.2022; 51(8): 995.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic follicular lymphoma: a report of two cases and literature review
    Takeshi Okamoto, Takashi Sasaki, Noriko Nishimura, Manabu Takamatsu, Chinatsu Mori, Takafumi Mie, Takaaki Furukawa, Yuto Yamada, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Dai Maruyama, Naoki Sasahira
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 14(6): 1756.     CrossRef
  • 4,733 View
  • 102 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey
Yoshihide Kanno, Tetsuya Ohira, Yoshihiro Harada, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Yoshiki Koike, Taku Yamagata, Toshitaka Sakai, Kaori Masu, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Megumi Tanaka, Tomohiro Shimada, Fumisato Kozakai, Kazuki Endo, Haruka Okano, Daichi Komabayashi, Takeshi Shimizu, Shohei Suzuki, Kei Ito
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):340-347.   Published online December 11, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.138
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation with propofol as an alternative to benzodiazepine drugs in outpatient endoscopy.
Methods
In this prospective study, examinees who underwent outpatient endoscopy under propofol sedation and submitted a nextday questionnaire with providing informed consent were evaluated. Periprocedural acute responses, late adverse events within 24 hours, and examinee satisfaction were evaluated.
Results
Among the 4,122 patients who received propofol in the 17,978 outpatient-based endoscopic examinations performed between November 2016 and March 2018, 2,305 eligible examinees (esophagogastroduodenoscopy for 1,340, endoscopic ultrasonography for 945, and total colonoscopy for 20) were enrolled, and their responses to a questionnaire were analyzed. The mean propofol dose was 69.6±24.4 mg (range, 20–200 mg). Diazepam, midazolam, and/or pentazocine in combination with propofol was administered to 146 examinees. Mild oxygen desaturation was observed in 59 examinees (2.6%); and mild bradycardia, in 2 (0.09%). Other severe reactions or late events did not occur. After eliminating 181 invalid responses, 97.7% (2,065/2,124) of the patients desired propofol sedation in future examinations.
Conclusions
Propofol sedation was found to be safe—without severe adverse events or accidents—for outpatient endoscopy on the basis of the patients’ next-day self-evaluation. Given the high satisfaction level, propofol sedation might be an ideal tool for painless endoscopic screening.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of sedation with pentazocine or pethidine hydrochloride for endoscopic ultrasonography in outpatients: A single‐center retrospective study
    Makiko Urabe, Kenji Ikezawa, Yusuke Seiki, Ko Watsuji, Yasuharu Kawamoto, Takeru Hirao, Yugo Kai, Ryoji Takada, Takuo Yamai, Kaori Mukai, Tasuku Nakabori, Hiroyuki Uehara, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
    DEN Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia
    Matthew Brohan, Janette Brohan, Basavana Goudra
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4362.     CrossRef
  • How to implement adverse events as a quality indicator in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Tom G. Moreels
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Propofol Alone versus Propofol in Combination with Midazolam for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients with Paradoxical Reactions to Midazolam
    Ji Hyung Nam, Dong Kee Jang, Jun Kyu Lee, Hyoun Woo Kang, Byung-Wook Kim, Byung Ik Jang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(2): 234.     CrossRef
  • Drugs used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Jun Kyu Lee
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(11): 735.     CrossRef
  • 4,700 View
  • 161 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Therapy for Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Definitive Management Using a Dedicated Algorithm
Ming Ming Xu, Iman Andalib, Aleksey Novikov, Enad Dawod, Moamen Gabr, Monica Gaidhane, Amy Tyberg, Michel Kahaleh
Clin Endosc 2020;53(3):355-360.   Published online December 3, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.113
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage is the preferred approach for infected or symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). Here, we developed an algorithm for the management of pancreatitis complicated by PFCs and report on its effcacy and safety.
Methods
Between September 2011 and October 2017, patients were prospectively managed according to the algorithm. PFCs were classified as poorly organized fluid collections (POFCs), pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs), or walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Clinical success was defined as a decrease in PFC size by ≥50% of the maximal diameter or to ≤2 cm.
Results
 A total of 108 patients (62% male; mean age, 53 years) were included: 13 had POFCs, 43 had PPs, and 52 had WOPN. Seventytwo patients (66%) required a pancreatic duct (PD) stent, whereas 65 (60%) received enteral feeding. A total of 103 (95%) patients achieved clinical success. Eight patients experienced complications including bleeding (n=6) and surgical intervention (n=2). Patients with enteral feeding were 3.4 times more likely to achieve resolution within 60 days (p=0.0421), whereas those with PD stenting was five times more likely to achieve resolution within 90 days (p=0.0069).
Conclusions
 A high PFC resolution rate can be achieved when a dedicated algorithm encompassing EUS-guided drainage, PD stenting, and early enteral feeding is adopted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Novel classification system for walled-off necrosis: a step toward standardized nomenclature and risk-stratification framework
    Serge Baroud, Vinay Chandrasekhara, Andrew C. Storm, Ryan J. Law, Eric J. Vargas, Michael J. Levy, Tala Mahmoud, Fateh Bazerbachi, Aliana Bofill-Garcia, Rabih Ghazi, Daniel B. Maselli, John A. Martin, Santhi Swaroop Vege, Naoki Takahashi, Bret T. Petersen
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(2): 300.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage for pancreatic fluid collection after pancreatic surgery: An up-to-date meta-analysis and systematic review
    Liang Chen, Ting Li, Bin Wang, Yunxiao Cheng, Sicong Zhao, Yunxiao Lyu
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2022; 45(8): 1519.     CrossRef
  • Transluminal and retroperitoneal minimally invasive necrosectomy in acute pancreatitis
    A. V. Fedorov, V. N. Ektov, M. A. Khodorkovskiy
    Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery.2022; 27(3): 81.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic transluminal interventions in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis
    A.V. Fedorov, V.N. Ektov, M.A. Khodorkovsky
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2021; (9): 85.     CrossRef
  • Hydrogen peroxide assisted endoscopic necrosectomy for walled-off pancreatic necrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rajat Garg, Shradha Gupta, Amandeep Singh, Marian T. Simonson, Tarun Rustagi, Prabhleen Chahal
    Pancreatology.2021; 21(8): 1540.     CrossRef
  • The Diagnostic Dilemma of Malignant Biliary Strictures
    Robert Dorrell, Swati Pawa, Yi Zhou, Neeraj Lalwani, Rishi Pawa
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(5): 337.     CrossRef
  • Importance of Pancreatic Duct Stenting and Enteral Feeding in Treatment Algorithm of Pancreatic Fluid Collections
    Seong-Hun Kim, Eun Ji Shin
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(3): 253.     CrossRef
  • Role of pancreatography in the endoscopic management of encapsulated pancreatic collections – review and new proposed classification
    Igor Mendonça Proença, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Sergio Eiji Matuguma, Spencer Cheng, Thomas R McCarty, Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior, Paulo Sakai, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(45): 7104.     CrossRef
  • 5,689 View
  • 249 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of the Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Sang Yoon Kim, Ki-Nam Shim, Joo-Ho Lee, Ji Young Lim, Tae Oh Kim, A. Reum Choe, Chung Hyun Tae, Hye-Kyung Jung, Chang Mo Moon, Seong-Eun Kim, Sung-Ae Jung
Clin Endosc 2019;52(6):565-573.   Published online July 17, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.019
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most efficient imaging modality for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). However, abdominopelvic computed tomography (APCT) has other advantages in evaluating the characteristics, local extension, or invasion of SETs to adjacent organs. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of EUS and APCT based on surgical histopathology results.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data from 53 patients who underwent both EUS and APCT before laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric SETs from January 2010 to December 2017 at a single institution. On the basis of histopathology results, we assessed the diagnostic ability of the 2 tests.
Results
The overall accuracy of EUS and APCT was 64.2% and 50.9%, respectively. In particular, the accuracy of EUS vs. APCT for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), leiomyomas, and ectopic pancreas was 83.9% vs. 74.2%, 37.5% vs. 0.0%, and 57.1% vs. 14.3%, respectively. Most of the incorrect diagnoses with EUS involved hypoechoic lesions originating in the fourth echolayer, with the most common misdiagnosed lesions being GISTs mistaken for leiomyomas and vice versa.
Conclusions
APCT showed a lower overall accuracy than EUS; however, APCT remains a useful modality for malignant/potentially malignant gastric SETs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Correlation of preoperative CT features with intra- and postoperative parameters of endoscopic resection in patients with gastric submucosal tumor (1~3 cm)
    Yuxiang Chen, Mo Chen, Zhu Wang, Junchao Wu, Jinlin Yang, Li Yang, Kai Deng
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 259.     CrossRef
  • Guidelines in Practice: The Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
    Brian C. Jacobson, Vanessa M. Shami
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 119(3): 397.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Xinrui Guo, Xiaohan Zhao, Gang Huang, Yanbo Yu
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) of the Luminal Gastrointestinal Tract
    Giovanna Impellizzeri, Giulio Donato, Claudio De Angelis, Nico Pagano
    Diagnostics.2024; 14(10): 996.     CrossRef
  • Current Practice in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Localized Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    Zachary Lee, Divya Mohanraj, Abraham Sachs, Madhavi Kambam, Sandra DiBrito
    International Journal of Translational Medicine.2024; 4(3): 387.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of EUS-guided keyhole biopsies in diagnosing subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
    Sen Verhoeve, Cynthia Verloop, Marco Bruno, Valeska Terpstra, Lydi Van Driel, Lars Perk, Lieke Hol
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(10): E1183.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound and Gastric Sub-Epithelial Lesions: Ultrasonographic Features, Tissue Acquisition Strategies, and Therapeutic Management
    Marzia Varanese, Marco Spadaccini, Antonio Facciorusso, Gianluca Franchellucci, Matteo Colombo, Marta Andreozzi, Daryl Ramai, Davide Massimi, Roberto De Sire, Ludovico Alfarone, Antonio Capogreco, Roberta Maselli, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Fugazza, Alessa
    Medicina.2024; 60(10): 1695.     CrossRef
  • III BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS STATEMENT ON ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
    Ricardo Rangel de Paula PESSOA, Alexandre Moraes BESTETTI, Victor Lira de OLIVEIRA, Wladimir Campos de ARAUJO, Simone GUARALDI, Rodrigo Roda RODRIGUES SILVA, Francisco Antonio Araujo OLIVEIRA, Maria Sylvia Ierardi RIBEIRO, Fred Olavo Aragão Andrade CARNEI
    Arquivos de Gastroenterologia.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enhanced dual-mode imaging: Superior photoacoustic and ultrasound endoscopy in live pigs using a transparent ultrasound transducer
    Jaewoo Kim, Dasom Heo, Seonghee Cho, Mingyu Ha, Jeongwoo Park, Joongho Ahn, Minsu Kim, Donggyu Kim, Da Hyun Jung, Hyung Ham Kim, Hee Man Kim, Chulhong Kim
    Science Advances.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in differential diagnosis and evaluation of malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (<50mm)
    Jiali Wu, Mengqi Zhuang, Yubao Zhou, Xiang Zhan, Weiwei Xie
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(5): 542.     CrossRef
  • ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
    Brian C. Jacobson, Amit Bhatt, Katarina B. Greer, Linda S. Lee, Walter G. Park, Bryan G. Sauer, Vanessa M. Shami
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Approach to Small Gastric Subepithelial Lesions
    Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2023; 23(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • Computed tomography features of gastric leiomyoma versus gastric stromal tumor: a case–control study with propensity score matching
    Qi Wang, Lijia Wang, Xiaohui Qi, Xiang Liu, Qiao Xie, Yifeng Wang, Gaofeng Shi
    Journal of International Medical Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New?
    Thomas Vasilakis, Dimitrios Ziogas, Georgios Tziatzios, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Eleni Koukoulioti, Christina Kapizioni, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Antonio Facciorusso, Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(13): 2176.     CrossRef
  • The effect of endoscopic ultrasound on the precise selection of endoscopic treatment for submucosal tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract
    Jian-Hua Li, Shu-Min Qin, Tian-Wen Liu, Jun-Qian Chen, Ying-Ting Li
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systematic Endoscopic Approach for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
    Gwang Ha Kim
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
    Pierre H. Deprez, Leon M.G. Moons, Dermot OʼToole, Rodica Gincul, Andrada Seicean, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes, Gloria Fernández-Esparrach, Marcin Polkowski, Michael Vieth, Ivan Borbath, Tom G. Moreels, Els Nieveen van Dijkum, Jean-Yves Blay, Jeanin E. van Hooft
    Endoscopy.2022; 54(04): 412.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors before Operation: A Retrospective Analysis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
    Yu-Ning Lin, Ming-Yan Chen, Chun-Yi Tsai, Wen-Chi Chou, Jun-Te Hsu, Chun-Nan Yeh, Ta-Sen Yeh, Keng-Hao Liu
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(2): 297.     CrossRef
  • Advancements in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
    Osamu Goto, Mitsuru Kaise, Katsuhiko Iwakiri
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(3): 321.     CrossRef
  • DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT FOR LEIOMYOMA OF THE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
    V. O. Shaprynskyi, Yu. V. Babii
    Kharkiv Surgical School.2022; (4-5): 46.     CrossRef
  • A scoring model for radiologic diagnosis of gastric leiomyomas (GLMs) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT): Differential diagnosis from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)
    Jian-Xia Xu, Qiao-Ling Ding, Yuan-Fei Lu, Shu-Feng Fan, Qin-Pan Rao, Ri-Sheng Yu
    European Journal of Radiology.2021; 134: 109395.     CrossRef
  • A Nomogram for Predicting Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery during the Endoscopic Resection of Subepithelial Tumors of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
    Shun-Wen Hsiao, Mei-Wen Chen, Chia-Wei Yang, Kuo-Hua Lin, Yang-Yuan Chen, Chew-Teng Kor, Siou-Ping Huang, Hsu-Heng Yen
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 2160.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasonido endoscópico, aplicaciones actuales en tumores sólidos gastrointestinales
    Gabriel Alonso Mosquera-Klinger, Jhon Jaime Carvajal Gutiérrez, Alavaro Andrés Gómez Venegas, Sebastián Niño Ramírez, Raúl Cañadas Garrido
    Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología.2020; 35(4): 506.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography or Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography: Which is Better?
    Eun Young Park, Gwang Ha Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(6): 519.     CrossRef
  • 7,247 View
  • 200 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 24 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
Armen Eskandari, Patrick Koo, Heejung Bang, Dorina Gui, Shiro Urayama
Clin Endosc 2019;52(4):347-352.   Published online July 10, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.005
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: To compare the performance of latest commercially available endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles.
Methods
Six latest commercially available needles were tested on a freshly harvested bovine liver; the tested needles included three 19 G, one 20 G, and two 22 G needles. Five biopsies were performed per needle with 10 mL of wet suction. The primary outcome was the number of complete portal tracts (CPTs) per needle aspirate. The secondary outcomes were the mean specimen length and mean fragment length. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test were applied.
Results
All 19 G needles and the 20 G needle yielded similar mean CPTs and were superior to the SharkCore 22 G needle (p<0.001 adjusted for multiplicity). There was no statistically significant difference in total specimen length among the three 19 G needles and the 20 G needle tested. The two 22 G needles performed similarly with respect to the number of CPTs, mean fragment length, and mean specimen length (adjusted p=0.07, p=0.59, and p=0.10, respectively).
Conclusions
The specimen adequacy was similar among the 3 latest commercially available 19 G needles. The endoscopist may choose a larger-bore needle based on availability without concerns of specimen adequacy. Further studies are needed to assess the ease of needle use in various anatomical locations and to confirm the optimal needle design.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of Franseen and novel tricore needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in a porcine liver model
    Yubeen Park, Jeon Min Kang, Ji Won Kim, Dong-Sung Won, Dae Sung Ryu, Song Hee Kim, Chae Eun Yun, Seung Jin Eo, Jung-Hoon Park, Sang Soo Lee
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of outcomes
    Saurabh Chandan, Smit Deliwala, Shahab R. Khan, Babu P. Mohan, Banreet S. Dhindsa, Jay Bapaye, Hemant Goyal, Lena L. Kassab, Faisal Kamal, Harlan R. Sayles, Gursimran S. Kochhar, Douglas G. Adler
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2023; 12(2): 171.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Hepatology
    Saleh A. Alqahtani, Floriane Ausloos, Ji Seok Park, Sunguk Jang
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(2): 204.     CrossRef
  • EUS Guided Liver Biopsy
    Itegbemie Obaitan, Romil Saxena, Mohammad A Al-Haddad
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
    Ishaan K. Madhok, Nasim Parsa, Jose M. Nieto
    Clinics in Liver Disease.2022; 26(1): 127.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a meta-analysis
    Keyu Zeng, Zhenpeng Jiang, Jie Yang, Kefei Chen, Qiang Lu
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 57(5): 545.     CrossRef
  • Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
    Shiva Rangwani, Devarshi R Ardeshna, Khalid Mumtaz, Sean G Kelly, Samuel Y Han, Somashekar G Krishna
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(28): 3586.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic and interventional EUS in hepatology: An updated review
    Vaneet Jearth, Sridhar Sundaram, Surinder Singh Rana
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2022; 11(5): 355.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound guided hepatic interventions
    Rintaro Hashimoto, Kenneth J. Chang
    Digestive Endoscopy.2021; 33(1): 54.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Two Specialized Histology Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Pilot Study
    Rintaro Hashimoto, David P. Lee, Jason B. Samarasena, Vishal S. Chandan, Wenchang Guo, John G. Lee, Kenneth J. Chang
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(5): 1700.     CrossRef
  • Emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
    John David Chetwood, Sanjivan Mudaliar, Dominic Staudenmann, Joo-Shik Shin, Ken Liu, Avik Majumdar, Arthur Kaffes, Simone Strasser, Geoffrey W McCaughan, Payal Saxena
    Gut.2021; 70(8): 1600.     CrossRef
  • A prospective, head-to-head comparison of 2 EUS-guided liver biopsy needles in vivo
    Soorya N. Aggarwal, Travis Magdaleno, Farina Klocksieben, Jennifer E. MacFarlan, Shanth Goonewardene, Zachary Zator, Shashin Shah, Hiral N. Shah
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 93(5): 1133.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Using a 22-G Needle for Hepatic Lesions: Single-Center Experience
    Ebru Akay, Deniz Atasoy, Engin Altınkaya, Ali Koç, Tamer Ertan, Hatice Karaman, Erkan Caglar
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(3): 404.     CrossRef
  • How Can We Optimize Tools and Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Liver Biopsy?
    Itegbemie Obaitan, Mohammad A. Al-Haddad
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2020; 18(5): 1025.     CrossRef
  • Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology
    James Neuberger, Jai Patel, Helen Caldwell, Susan Davies, Vanessa Hebditch, Coral Hollywood, Stefan Hubscher, Salil Karkhanis, Will Lester, Nicholas Roslund, Rebecca West, Judith I Wyatt, Mathis Heydtmann
    Gut.2020; 69(8): 1382.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic liver disease
    Brian M Fung, Alexander P Abadir, Armen Eskandari, Michael J Levy, James H Tabibian
    World Journal of Hepatology.2020; 12(6): 262.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies: Is the Future Here Yet?
    Ihab I. El Hajj, Mohammad Al-Haddad
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(4): 297.     CrossRef
  • 7,278 View
  • 133 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Focused Review Series: Recent Update of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors
Current Status of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors
Sang Gyun Kim, Ji Hyun Song, Joo Ha Hwang
Clin Endosc 2019;52(4):301-305.   Published online July 9, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.024
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (GSTs) are usually detected incidentally on endoscopic or radiologic examinations. In conventional endoscopy, a GST usually presents as a protuberant lesion with an intact mucosal surface. As the lesion is located beneath the mucosal layer of the gastrointestinal tract, conventional biopsy typically does not reveal the pathologic diagnosis. First, a GST should be differentiated from an extrinsic compression through the positional change of the patient during conventional endoscopic examination. In cases of GSTs originating from the gastrointestinal wall, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can be beneficial for narrowing the differential diagnosis through delineation of echo findings and by determining the layer of origin. EUS findings can also help determine the management strategies for GSTs by making a differential diagnosis according to malignant potential.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic Resection of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumours: Our Clinical Experience and Results
    Mehmet Zeki Buldanlı, Oktay Yener
    Prague Medical Report.2022; 123(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Gastric subepithelial tumor: long-term natural history and risk factors for progression
    Bokyung Kim, Seungkyung Kang, Eunwoo Lee, Jinju Choi, Hyunsoo Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho, Sang Gyun Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(7): 5232.     CrossRef
  • Traumatic neuroma of remnant cystic duct mimicking duodenal subepithelial tumor: A case report
    Dong-Hwan Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Jin-Kyu Cho, Jung-Wook Yang, Tae-Han Kim, Sang-Ho Jeong, Young-Hye Kim, Young- Joon Lee, Soon-Chan Hong, Eun-Jung Jung, Young-Tae Ju, Chi-Young Jeong, Ju-Yeon Kim
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(17): 3821.     CrossRef
  • 6,118 View
  • 236 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Diagnostic Ability of Convex-Arrayed Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Major Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer
Yuki Fujii, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Hironari Kato, Yosuke Saragai, Saimon Takada, Sho Mizukawa, Shinichiro Muro, Daisuke Uchida, Takeshi Tomoda, Shigeru Horiguchi, Noriyuki Tanaka, Hiroyuki Okada
Clin Endosc 2019;52(5):479-485.   Published online May 16, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.163
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for major vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer and to evaluate the relationship between EUS findings and pathological distance.
Methods
In total, 57 consecutive patients who underwent EUS for pancreatic cancer before surgery were retrospectively reviewed. EUS image findings were divided into four types according to the relationship between the tumor and major vessel (types 1 and 2: invasion, types 3 and 4: non-invasion). We also compared the EUS findings and pathologically measured distances between the tumors and evaluated vessels.
Results
The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS diagnosis for vascular invasion were 89%, 92%, and 91%, respectively, in the veins and 83%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, in the arteries. The pathologically evaluated distances of cases with type 2 EUS findings were significantly shorter than those of cases with type 3 EUS findings in both the major veins (median [interquartile range], 96 [0–742] µm vs. 2,833 [1,076–5,694] µm, p=0.012) and arteries (623 [0–854] µm vs. 3,097 [1,396–6,000] µm, p=0.0061). All cases with a distance of ≥1,000 µm between the tumors and main vessels were correctly diagnosed.
Conclusions
Tumors at a distance ≥1,000 µm from the main vessels were correctly diagnosed by EUS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Staging and Vascular Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer
    Mohammed A El-Nady, Khalid A Ead, Mustafa A Haridy, Nour Shaheen, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Saad R Abdelwahid, Mohammed F Mohammed, Omran Mohamed, Safwat S Sawy, Emad Abdelrazzak, Amro M Hassan
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound vs. contrast-enhanced computed tomography in local staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a bi-national multicenter study
    Wisam Sbeit, Mahmoud Salman, Abed Khalaileh, Ahmad Zoabi, Zakhar Bramnik, David Hovel, Mahmud Mahamid, Eran Israeli, Lior Katz, Reem Khoury, Nama Mubariki, Andrea Lisotti, Halim Awadie, Tawfik Khoury
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 35(9): 974.     CrossRef
  • Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Abhirup Chatterjee, Jimil Shah
    Diagnostics.2023; 14(1): 78.     CrossRef
  • The expanding role of endoscopic ultrasound elastography
    Jahnvi Dhar, Jayanta Samanta
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 15(5): 841.     CrossRef
  • Experience of introduction of endoscopic ultrasonography into daily clinical practice in a surgical hospital
    A.V. Zhdanov, E.G. Solonitsyn, E.A. Korymasov
    Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya.2020; 26(5): 24.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer
    Seong-Hun Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(5): 397.     CrossRef
  • 5,535 View
  • 123 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Focused Review Series: Endoscopic approaches to Neuroendocrine Tumors
Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Dong Wook Lee, Michelle Kang Kim, Ho Gak Kim
Clin Endosc 2017;50(6):537-545.   Published online November 30, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.131
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are relatively rare; however, the incidence has increased over the last few decades. They are classified as functional or non-functional tumors according to the presence of associated clinical symptoms. The majority are non-functional tumors. For classification and staging, the World Health Organization 2010 classification system is the most commonly accepted. Chromogranin A is the most sensitive marker but has insufficient specificity. In general, PNETs are hypervascular tumors, and multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography is considered the first choice for imaging study. Multiphasic magnetic resonance imaging can detect PNETs smaller than 2 cm and small liver metastasis compared with other modalities. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is often used in cases where functional PNETs are suspected. Positron emission tomography (PET) scan with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose cannot visualize PNETs, but PET with 68-Ga DOTATATE can. Endoscopic ultrasonography can characterize smaller PNETs using contrast and confirm histology through fine needle aspiration or biopsy. In this article, we review the characteristics of grading systems and diagnostic modalities commonly used for PNETs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Differentiation between renal cell carcinoma metastases to the pancreas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with renal cell carcinoma on CT or MRI
    Marie-Joy Nduwimana, Ceylan Colak, Cem Bilgin, Blake A. Kassmeyer, Candice M. Bolan, Christine O. Menias, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
    Abdominal Radiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Anatomic Imaging for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Maximizing Strengths and Mitigating Weaknesses
    Mina Hesami, Michael Blake, Mark A. Anderson, Luigi Asmundo, Aoife Kilcoyne, Zahra Najmi, Peter D. Caravan, Ciprian Catana, Cynthia Czawlytko, Shadi Abdar Esfahani, Avinash R. Kambadakone, Anthony Samir, Shaunagh McDermott, Liran Domachevsky, Stephan Ursp
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2024; 48(4): 521.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Tawfik Khoury, Wisam Sbeit, Pietro Fusaroli, Davide Campana, Nicole Brighi, Bertrand Napoleon, Andrea Lisotti
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(4): 395.     CrossRef
  • Imaging Update for Hereditary Abdominopelvic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Hanna R. Ferreira Dalla Pria, Kedar G. Sharbidre, Mayur Virarkar, Sanaz Javadi, Hrishabh Bhosale, Jessica Maxwell, Chandana Lall, Ajaykumar C. Morani
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2024; 48(4): 533.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasonography-based intratumoral and peritumoral machine learning radiomics analyses for distinguishing insulinomas from non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Shuangyang Mo, Cheng Huang, Yingwei Wang, Huaying Zhao, Wenhong Wu, Haixing Jiang, Shanyu Qin
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Technique Optimization and Tips and Tricks for Radiologists
    Fabio Pellegrino, Vincenza Granata, Roberta Fusco, Francesca Grassi, Salvatore Tafuto, Luca Perrucci, Giulia Tralli, Mariano Scaglione
    Tomography.2023; 9(1): 217.     CrossRef
  • All you need to know about gastrinoma today | Gastrinoma and Zollinger‐Ellison syndrome: A thorough update
    Odysseas Chatzipanagiotou, Dimitrios Schizas, Michail Vailas, Marina Tsoli, Panagiotis Sakarellos, Maria Sotiropoulou, Alexandros Papalambros, Evangellos Felekouras
    Journal of Neuroendocrinology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Piero Alberti, David Martin, Georgios Gemenetzis, Rowan Parks
    Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2023; 6(3): 83.     CrossRef
  • An integrative view on glucagon function and putative role in the progression of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) and hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC)
    Bárbara Ferreira, Adrián Heredia, Jacinta Serpa
    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.2023; 578: 112063.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (Pan-NET) Presented by Abdominal Pain: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Matteo Regolo, Nicolas Cardaci, Clara Salmeri, Alfredo Laudani, Michele Colaci, Massimo Ippolito, Fabio Motta, Salvatore Magrì, Stefanie Parisi, Alfredo Gaetano Torcitto, Lorenzo Malatino
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(20): 6617.     CrossRef
  • A review of functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Exploring the molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment
    Yasir Alshareefy, Sinead Cummins, Adele Mazzoleni, Vidushi Sharma, Saibaba Guggilapu, Amanda Weng Yee Leong, Andrew Awuah Wireko
    Medicine.2023; 102(46): e36094.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation under the control of ultrasonography as a new method of treatment of neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors and analgesia option for locally advanced forms of pancreatic cancer. First experience in Russia
    V. V. Lozovaya, O. A. Malikhova, A. S. Vodoleev, O. A. Gusarova, A. O. Tumanyan, A. G. Malikhov
    Surgery and Oncology.2023; 13(3): 11.     CrossRef
  • C1QA and COMP: plasma-based biomarkers for early diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Priya Kumari Gorai, Prahalad Singh Bharti, Shashi Kumar, Girish H. Rajacharya, Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay, Sujoy Pal, Renu Dhingra, Rakesh Kumar, Fredrik Nikolajeff, Saroj Kumar, Neerja Rani
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Racial disparities in operative management of localized, non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in surgically fit patients
    Katherine E. Bingmer, Jonathan J. Hue, Kavin Sugumar, John B. Ammori, Luke D. Rothermel, Jordan M. Winter, Jeffrey M. Hardacre, Lee M. Ocuin
    HPB.2022; 24(2): 217.     CrossRef
  • Facility type and size-stratified analysis of management patterns and outcomes of patients with localized non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Jonathan J. Hue, Kavin Sugumar, John B. Ammori, Luke D. Rothermel, Jeffrey M. Hardacre, Jordan M. Winter, Lee M. Ocuin
    HPB.2022; 24(4): 498.     CrossRef
  • Current and New Challenges in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Role of miRNA-Based Approaches as New Reliable Biomarkers
    Andrei Havasi, Daniel Sur, Simona Sorana Cainap, Cristian-Virgil Lungulescu, Laura-Ioana Gavrilas, Calin Cainap, Catalin Vlad, Ovidiu Balacescu
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(3): 1109.     CrossRef
  • Unilateral pseudouveitis revealing a pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report
    Faten Cherchir, Ines Naceur, Ahmed Anas Haouari, Tayssir Ben Achour, Hajer Ben Mansour, Khadija Bellil, Fatma Said, Mohamed Habib Houman
    Clinical Case Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours misdiagnosed as autoimmune pancreatitis: A case report and review of literature
    Zi-Qi Lin, Xin Li, Yan Yang, Yi Wang, Xiao-Ying Zhang, Xiao-Xin Zhang, Jia Guo
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(15): 4886.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the Role of Operative Intervention in Elderly Patients With Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Jonathan J. Hue, Kavin Sugumar, Amr Mohamed, J. Eva Selfridge, David Bajor, Jeffrey M. Hardacre, John B. Ammori, Luke D. Rothermel, Jordan M. Winter, Lee M. Ocuin
    Pancreas.2022; 51(4): 380.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic insulinoma in elderly patients: Three case reports
    Gemma Rossi, Maria Chiara Petrone, Gabriele Capurso, Stefano Partelli, Massimo Falconi, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(19): 6514.     CrossRef
  • A Curious Peripancreatic Mass: A Case of an Exophytic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
    Bohyun Kim, Younghoon Kim
    Korean Journal of Abdominal Radiology.2022; 6(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Wenzel M. Hackeng, Hussein A. Assi, Florine H.M. Westerbeke, Lodewijk A.A. Brosens, Christopher M. Heaphy
    Surgical Pathology Clinics.2022; 15(3): 541.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: two sides of the moon
    Anna La Salvia, Irene Persano, Elena Parlagreco, Alessandro Audisio, Massimiliano Cani, Maria Pia Brizzi
    Medical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of spectral CT combined with perfusion scan in diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Yamin Wan, Hui Hao, Yunjin Chen, Yifan Zhang, Qingmei Yue, Zhizhen Li
    Insights into Imaging.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of premalignant pancreatic-cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors: prospective study
    Fadi Younis, Dana Ben-Ami Shor, Nir Lubezky, Ravit Geva, Esther Osher, Oren Shibolet, Adam Phillips, Erez Scapa
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 34(11): 1111.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic/peripancreatic tumors and oligometastatic disease: an observational prospective multicenter study
    Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira, Rodrigo Garces-Duran, Pierre Eisendrath, Jacques Devière, Pierre Deprez, Laurent Monino, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Ivan Borbath
    Endoscopy International Open.2022; 10(10): E1380.     CrossRef
  • Integrating Molecular Analysis into the Pathologic Evaluation of Pancreatic Cysts
    Phoenix D. Bell, Aatur D. Singhi
    Surgical Pathology Clinics.2022; 15(3): 455.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided intra-tumoral therapies
    Barthet Marc, Laurent Monino, Mihai Rimbas
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 60-61: 101817.     CrossRef
  • Synchronous or metachronous presentation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor versus secondary lesion to pancreas in patients affected by renal cell carcinoma. Systematic review
    Irene Persano, Elena Parlagreco, Anna La Salvia, Marco Audisio, Marco Volante, Consuelo Buttigliero, Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti, Maria Pia Brizzi
    Seminars in Oncology.2022; 49(6): 476.     CrossRef
  • Application of low dose pancreas perfusion CT combined with enhancement scanning in diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Yamin Wan, Hui Hao, Saisai Meng, Zhizhen Li, Fulong Yu, Meng chi, Qi Chao, Jianbo Gao
    Pancreatology.2021; 21(1): 240.     CrossRef
  • Utility of contrast‐enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for predicting the prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Rei Ishikawa, Ken Kamata, Akane Hara, Hidekazu Tanaka, Ayana Okamoto, Tomohiro Yamazaki, Atsushi Nakai, Shunsuke Omoto, Kosuke Minaga, Kentaro Yamao, Mamoru Takenaka, Yasunori Minami, Tomohiro Watanabe, Yasutaka Chiba, Takaaki Chikugo, Ippei Matsumoto, Yo
    Digestive Endoscopy.2021; 33(5): 829.     CrossRef
  • Pediatric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Hanna Garnier, Caitlyn Loo, Piotr Czauderna, Sanjeev A. Vasudevan
    Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2021; 30(2): 219.     CrossRef
  • Multimodality Imaging Review of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia
    Arafat Ali, Jonathan Revels, David T. Wang, Lily L. Wang, Sherry S. Wang
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2021; 217(1): 245.     CrossRef
  • Significant pathway and biomarker identification of pancreatic cancer associated lung cancer
    Tamanna Khan, Bikash Kumar Paul, Md Tanvir Hasan, Md Rakib Islam, M.A. Arefin, K. Ahmed, Md K. Islam, Mohammad Ali Moni
    Informatics in Medicine Unlocked.2021; 25: 100637.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of treatments for VIPoma: A GTE multicentric series
    Mathias Brugel, Thomas Walter, Bernard Goichot, Denis Smith, Côme Lepage, Christine Do Cao, Vincent Hautefeuille, Vinciane Rebours, Guillaume Cadiot, Louis de Mestier
    Pancreatology.2021; 21(8): 1531.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcome after EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation: Prospective results in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic cystic neoplasms
    Marc Barthet, Marc Giovannini, Mohamed Gasmi, Nathalie Lesavre, Christian Boustière, Bertrand Napoleon, Arthur LaQuiere, Stephane Koch, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet, Jean-Michel Gonzalez
    Endoscopy International Open.2021; 09(08): E1178.     CrossRef
  • Current update on imaging for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Nicole Segaran, Catherine Devine, Mindy Wang, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 12(10): 897.     CrossRef
  • Malignant Insulinoma with Multiple Liver Metastases and Hypercalcitoninemia in a Patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Presenting as Recurrent Episodes of Diaphoresis due to Severe Hypoglycemia
    Marco Ciacciarelli, Gianluca Caruso, Marco Rengo, Piero Maceroni, Carmen Misurale, Eleonora D’Armiento, Alessandro Polidoro, Cristina Napoli, Alberto Lombardini, Umberto Ceratti, Ruben Manuel Luciano Colunga Biancatelli, Leonardo Calvosa, Romina Milanese,
    Case Reports in Endocrinology.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Therapeutic challenges and research limitations
    Gabriel Benyomo Mpilla, Philip Agop Philip, Bassel El-Rayes, Asfar Sohail Azmi
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(28): 4036.     CrossRef
  • Multivisceral robotic resection: a glimpse into the future of minimally invasive abdominal surgery
    Anantha Shreepad Bhat, Alexia Farrugia, Gabriele Marangoni, Jawad Ahmad
    BMJ Case Reports.2020; 13(8): e234887.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review of the literature
    Nicola Imperatore, Germana de Nucci, Enzo Domenico Mandelli, Annalisa de Leone, Francesco Paolo Zito, Giovanni Lombardi, Gianpiero Manes
    Endoscopy International Open.2020; 08(12): E1759.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a case series
    Germana de Nucci, Nicola Imperatore, Enzo Domenico Mandelli, Franca di Nuovo, Corrado d’Urbano, Gianpiero Manes
    Endoscopy International Open.2020; 08(12): E1754.     CrossRef
  • A rare case of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor
    RajaRao Nudurupati, RaviKamal Kumar Akunuri, TarunKumar Suvvari, LakshmiVenkata Simhachalam Kutikuppala
    Apollo Medicine.2020; 17(4): 277.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Ablation of Focal Pancreatic Lesions: The GRUPUGE Perspective
    Miguel Bispo, Ana Caldeira, Sílvia Leite, Susana Marques, Teresa Moreira, Pedro Moutinho-Ribeiro, Nuno Nunes
    GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 27(6): 410.     CrossRef
  • Neoplasms of the Neuroendocrine Pancreas: An Update in the Classification, Definition, and Molecular Genetic Advances
    Julie M. Guilmette, Vania Nosé
    Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2019; 26(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • A Patient With an Elevated α-Fetoprotein Level and Liver Masses
    Adam E. Mikolajczyk, Lindsay J. Yassan, Anjana A. Pillai
    JAMA.2019; 321(1): 97.     CrossRef
  • Hemobilia following Percutaneous Liver Biopsy in the Setting of Malignancy (with Video): Diagnosis and Management of a Rare Cause of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    B. Pabla, M. Porayko
    Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Paraneoplastic syndromes and other systemic disorders associated with neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Julie Guilmette, Vânia Nosé
    Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology.2019; 36(4): 229.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor
    Marc Barthet
    Annales d'Endocrinologie.2019; 80(3): 182.     CrossRef
  • Rare breast and subcutaneous metastases from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case report
    Dorotea Bosco, Salvatore Perrotti, Corrado Spatola, Giada Maria Vecchio, Rosalia Latino, Antonio Di Cataldo
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors in Pediatrics
    Zainab Azam Farooqui, Aman Chauhan
    Global Pediatric Health.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Update of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms With a Focus on the New World Health Organization Classification
    Jiayun M. Fang, Jiaqi Shi
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2019; 143(11): 1317.     CrossRef
  • Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies
    Lingaku Lee, Tetsuhide Ito, Robert T. Jensen
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2018; 18(9): 837.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic Cytology
    Raza S. Hoda, Martha B. Pitman
    Surgical Pathology Clinics.2018; 11(3): 563.     CrossRef
  • Imaging presentation of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Valentina Ciaravino, Riccardo De Robertis, Paolo Tinazzi Martini, Nicolò Cardobi, Sara Cingarlini, Antonio Amodio, Luca Landoni, Paola Capelli, Mirko D’Onofrio
    Insights into Imaging.2018; 9(6): 943.     CrossRef
  • Natural History of Small Pancreatic Lesions Suspected to Be Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Jin Ho Choi, Young Hoon Choi, Jinwoo Kang, Woo Hyun Paik, Sang Hyub Lee, Ji Kon Ryu, Yong-Tae Kim
    Pancreas.2018; 47(10): 1357.     CrossRef
  • 11,833 View
  • 365 Download
  • 53 Web of Science
  • 56 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Current Status of Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage
Joey Ho Yi Chan, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
Clin Endosc 2018;51(2):150-155.   Published online November 17, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.125
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The gold standard for treatment of acute cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, cholecystectomy is often not suitable for surgically unfit patients who are too frail due to various co-morbidities. As such, several less invasive endoscopic treatment modalities have been developed to control sepsis, either as a definitive treatment or as a temporizing modality until the patient is stable enough to undergo cholecystectomy at a later stage. Recent developments in endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-specific stents having lumen-apposing properties have demonstrated potential as a definitive treatment modality. Furthermore, advanced gallbladder procedures can be performed using the stents as a portal. With similar effectiveness as percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy and lower rates of adverse events reported in some studies, EUS-GBD has opened exciting possibilities in becoming the next best alternative in treating acute cholecystitis in surgically unfit patients. The aim of this review article is to provide a summary of the various methods of gallbladder drainage (GBD) with particular focus on EUS-GBD and the many new prospects it allows.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients: the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) guidelines
    Federico Coccolini, Eugenio Cucinotta, Andrea Mingoli, Mauro Zago, Gaia Altieri, Alan Biloslavo, Roberto Caronna, Ismail Cengeli, Enrico Cicuttin, Roberto Cirocchi, Luigi Cobuccio, Gianluca Costa, Valerio Cozza, Camilla Cremonini, Giovanni Del Vecchio, Gi
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(2): 331.     CrossRef
  • Post-operative complications of cholecystectomy: what the radiologist needs to know
    Irfan Amir Kazi, M. Azfar Siddiqui, Nanda Deepa Thimmappa, Amr Abdelaziz, Ayman H. Gaballah, Ryan Davis, Eric Kimchi, Ghassan Hammoud, Kazi A. Syed, Ayesha Nasrullah
    Abdominal Radiology.2024; 50(1): 109.     CrossRef
  • Lumen-apposing-metal stent misdeployment in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainages: A systematic review focusing on issues and rescue management
    Elia Armellini, Flavio Metelli, Andrea Anderloni, Anna Cominardi, Giovanni Aragona, Michele Marini, Fabio Pace
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(21): 3341.     CrossRef
  • Nonsurgical Gallbladder Drainage: Percutaneous and Endoscopic Approaches
    Gregory Toy, Douglas G. Adler
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(1): 90.     CrossRef
  • Current status of endoscopic management of cholecystitis
    Se Woo Park, Sang Soo Lee
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(3): 439.     CrossRef
  • Lumen Apposition: A Changing Landscape in Therapeutic Endoscopy
    Thomas R. McCarty, Christopher C. Thompson
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(5): 1660.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided drainage of the gallbladder using a novel 0.018-inch guidewire for preventing bile leakage (with video)
    Mamoru Takenaka, Shunsuke Omoto, Masatoshi Kudo
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2022; 11(6): 520.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage
    Zain A. Sobani, Christina Ling, Tarun Rustagi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(7): 2154.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for symptomatic gallbladder disease: a cumulative systematic review meta-analysis
    Thomas R. McCarty, Kelly E. Hathorn, Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Kunal Jajoo, Marvin Ryou, Christopher C. Thompson
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(9): 4964.     CrossRef
  • Acute biliary interventions
    T.C. See
    Clinical Radiology.2020; 75(5): 398.e9.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the same session
    Raul Torres Yuste, Francisco Javier Garcia‐Alonso, Ramón Sanchez‐Ocana, Marta Cimavilla Roman, Irene Peñas Herrero, Ana Yaiza Carbajo, Marina De Benito Sanz, Natalia Mora Cuadrado, Carlos De la Serna Higuera, Manuel Perez‐Miranda
    Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 32(4): 608.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents
    Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, Shayan Irani
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 22(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • A Rare Fatal Bile Peritonitis after Malposition of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided 5-Fr Naso-Gallbladder Drainage
    Tae Hyung Kim, Hyun Jin Bae, Seung Goun Hong
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(1): 97.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, Mahendran Jayaraj, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Dhruv Singh, Joanna Law, Michael Larsen, Andrew Ross, Richard Kozarek, Shayan Irani
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 1904.     CrossRef
  • Recent development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage
    Brian Kin Hang Lam, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2020; 9(4): 148.     CrossRef
  • 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis
    Michele Pisano, Niccolò Allievi, Kurinchi Gurusamy, Giuseppe Borzellino, Stefania Cimbanassi, Djamila Boerna, Federico Coccolini, Andrea Tufo, Marcello Di Martino, Jeffrey Leung, Massimo Sartelli, Marco Ceresoli, Ronald V. Maier, Elia Poiasina, Nicola De
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Guidewire May Save the Day
    Rajat Garg, Mohammed Barawi
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 72(2): 83.     CrossRef
  • 9,006 View
  • 345 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Clinical Value of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Gallbladder Masses
Galam Leem, Moon Jae Chung, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Si Young Song, Jae Bock Chung, Seung Woo Park
Clin Endosc 2018;51(1):80-88.   Published online September 20, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.044
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Recent studies have revealed that contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) is beneficial in the differential diagnosis of malignant neoplasms of the pancreas and gallbladder from benign masses, in terms of the evaluation of microvasculature and real-time perfusion. In this study, we aimed to prove the clinical value of CEH-EUS in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic and gallbladder masses by direct comparison with that of conventional EUS.
Methods
We reviewed the sonographic images and medical information of 471 patients who underwent conventional EUS and CEH-EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic and gallbladder masses at a single medical center (Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea) between March 2010 and March 2016.
Results
The enhancement pattern of CEH-EUS of the pancreatic solid masses showed higher sensitivity and specificity in differentiating pancreatic adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors (82.0% and 87.9% for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 81.1% and 90.9% for neuroendocrine tumors, respectively), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was higher than that of conventional EUS. The enhancement texture of CEH-EUS of the gallbladder masses showed a higher sensitivity in differentiating malignant masses than that of conventional EUS; however, the difference between the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves was not statistically significant.
Conclusions
CEH-EUS can complement conventional EUS in the diagnosis of pancreatic and gallbladder masses, in terms of the limitations of the latter.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Gallbladder Disease Diagnosis
    Kosuke Takahashi, Eisuke Ozawa, Akane Shimakura, Tomotaka Mori, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Kazuhiko Nakao
    Diagnostics.2024; 14(4): 374.     CrossRef
  • Clinical value of endoscopic ultrasound sound speed in differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesion and prognosis of pancreatic cancer
    Jianing Qiu, Kangrong Li, Xiuyan Long, Xiaoyu Yu, Pan Gong, Yu Long, Xiaoyan Wang, Li Tian
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis system based on deep learning in images capture and segmentation training of solid pancreatic masses
    Anliu Tang, Pan Gong, Ning Fang, Mingmei Ye, Shan Hu, Jinzhu Liu, Wujun Wang, Kui Gao, Xiaoyan Wang, Li Tian
    Medical Physics.2023; 50(7): 4197.     CrossRef
  • Novel Technique of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Lesions and Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: A Single-Center Prospective Study
    Yasunobu Yamashita, Reiko Ashida, Takaaki Tamura, Toshio Shimokawa, Hirofumi Yamazaki, Yuki Kawaji, Takashi Tamura, Keiichi Hatamaru, Masahiro Itonaga, Masayuki Kitano
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(13): 2132.     CrossRef
  • The Latest Advancements in Diagnostic Role of Endosonography of Pancreatic Lesions
    Jagoda Oliwia Rogowska, Łukasz Durko, Ewa Malecka-Wojciesko
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(14): 4630.     CrossRef
  • The role of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for biliary diseases
    Senju Hashimoto, Eizaburo Ohno, Satoshi Yamamoto, Kazunori Nakaoka, Yoshiki Hirooka
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for predicting the efficacy of first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
    Tomoya Emori, Reiko Ashida, Takashi Tamura, Yuki Kawaji, Keiichi Hatamaru, Masahiro Itonaga, Yasunobu Yamashita, Toshio Shimokawa, Nobuyuki Higashino, Akira Ikoma, Tetsuo Sonomura, Manabu Kawai, Masayuki Kitano
    Pancreatology.2022; 22(4): 525.     CrossRef
  • Differential diagnoses of gallbladder tumors using CT‐based deep learning
    Hiroaki Fujita, Taiichi Wakiya, Keinosuke Ishido, Norihisa Kimura, Hayato Nagase, Taishu Kanda, Masashi Matsuzaka, Yoshihiro Sasaki, Kenichi Hakamada
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2022; 6(6): 823.     CrossRef
  • Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer
    Yasutaka Ishii, Masahiro Serikawa, Tomofumi Tsuboi, Ryota Kawamura, Ken Tsushima, Shinya Nakamura, Tetsuro Hirano, Ayami Fukiage, Takeshi Mori, Juri Ikemoto, Yusuke Kiyoshita, Sho Saeki, Yosuke Tamura, Sayaka Miyamoto, Kazuaki Chayama
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(2): 238.     CrossRef
  • The Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (AFSUMB) Guidelines for Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound
    Masayuki Kitano, Yasunobu Yamashita, Ken Kamata, Tiing Leong Ang, Hiroo Imazu, Eizaburo Ohno, Yoshiki Hirooka, Pietro Fusaroli, Dong-Wan Seo, Bertrand Napoléon, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh, Tae Hyeon Kim, Christoph F. Dietrich, Hsiu-Po Wang, Masatoshi Kudo
    Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.2021; 47(6): 1433.     CrossRef
  • A simple method for diagnosing gallbladder malignant tumors with subserosa invasion by endoscopic ultrasonography
    Mitsuru Sugimoto, Hiroki Irie, Mika Takasumi, Minami Hashimoto, Yuka Oka, Tadayuki Takagi, Rei Suzuki, Naoki Konno, Hiroyuki Asama, Yuki Sato, Jun Nakamura, Tsunetaka Kato, Ryoichiro Kobashi, Yuko Hashimoto, Shigeru Marubashi, Takuto Hikichi, Hiromasa Ohi
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlation Between Enhancement Patterns on Transabdominal Ultrasound and Survival for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Tongtong Zhou, Li Tan, Yang Gui, Jing Zhang, Xueqi Chen, Menghua Dai, Mengsu Xiao, Qing Zhang, Xiaoyan Chang, Qun Xu, Chunmei Bai, Yuejuan Cheng, Qiang Xu, Xue Wang, Hua Meng, Wanying Jia, Ke Lv, Yuxin Jiang
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 6823.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Lesions
    Senju Hashimoto, Kazunori Nakaoka, Naoto Kawabe, Teiji Kuzuya, Kohei Funasaka, Mitsuo Nagasaka, Yoshihito Nakagawa, Ryoji Miyahara, Tomoyuki Shibata, Yoshiki Hirooka
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(10): 1789.     CrossRef
  • Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Early Diagnosis of Small Pancreatic Cancer
    Yasunobu Yamashita, Kensuke Tanioka, Yuki Kawaji, Takashi Tamura, Junya Nuta, Keiichi Hatamaru, Masahiro Itonaga, Takeichi Yoshida, Yoshiyuki Ida, Takao Maekita, Mikitaka Iguchi, Masaki Terada, Tetsuo Sonomura, Seiko Hirono, Ken-Ichi Okada, Manabu Kawai,
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid
    Jae Young Lee, Yasunori Minami, Byung Ihn Choi, Won Jae Lee, Yi-Hong Chou, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Mi-Suk Park, Nobuki Kudo, Min Woo Lee, Ken Kamata, Hiroko Iijima, So Yeon Kim, Kazushi Numata, Katsutoshi Sugimoto, Hitoshi Maruyama, Yasukiyo Sumino, Chikara Oga
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Les nouvelles techniques diagnostiques des tumeurs neuroendocrines pancréatiques
    R. Coriat
    Oncologie.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy
    Xue Liang, Xiang Jing
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
    Masayuki Kitano, Takeichi Yoshida, Masahiro Itonaga, Takashi Tamura, Keiichi Hatamaru, Yasunobu Yamashita
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 54(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • Value of contrast‐enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography with enhancement pattern for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A meta‐analysis
    Yasunobu Yamashita, Toshio Shimokawa, Bertrand Napoléon, Pietro Fusaroli, Rodica Gincul, Masatoshi Kudo, Masayuki Kitano
    Digestive Endoscopy.2019; 31(2): 125.     CrossRef
  • Cavernous Hemangioma of the Gallbladder Masquerading as a Carcinoma
    Naotake Funamizu, Yukio Nakabayashi
    Case Reports in Gastroenterology.2019; 13(1): 219.     CrossRef
  • Can Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography Differentiate Malignancy from Benign Disease?
    Tae Hoon Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Indication and Usefulness of Bile Juice Cytology for Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cancer
    Hiroshi Itsuki, Masahiro Serikawa, Tamito Sasaki, Yasutaka Ishii, Ken Tsushima, Yoshinari Furukawa, Yoshiaki Murakami, Koji Arihiro, Kazuaki Chayama
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies
    Lingaku Lee, Tetsuhide Ito, Robert T. Jensen
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2018; 18(9): 837.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy of EUS and CEH EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumours
    B. Bunganič, M. Laclav, T. Dvořáková, O. Bradáč, E. Traboulsi, Š. Suchánek, P. Frič, M. Zavoral
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 53(10-11): 1411.     CrossRef
  • Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of gallbladder with concomitant hepatitis C infection
    Sarthak Soin, Bibek Singh Pannu, Phyo Thazin Myint, Amandeep Singh Dhillon
    BMJ Case Reports.2018; : bcr-2018-225141.     CrossRef
  • 7,593 View
  • 221 Download
  • 30 Web of Science
  • 25 Crossref
Close layer
Case Reports
Gastric Schwannoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Trucut Biopsy
Sung Wook Hong, Won Young Cho, Jin-Oh Kim, Chang Gyun Chun, Kwang Yeun Shim, Gene Hyun Bok, Wook Hyun Um, Ji Eun Lee
Clin Endosc 2013;46(3):284-287.   Published online May 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.284
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Schwannomas of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are rare subepithelial tumors comprising approximately 3.3% to 12.8% of all mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. On endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) they are seen as hypoechoic tumors arising most commonly from the 4th proper muscle layer. Although EUS helps to distinguish tumor characteristics, tissue sampling is required for differentiation with other more common tumors such as GI stromal tumors. Both EUS-guided fine needle aspiration and EUS-guided trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB) can be used for tissue sampling. However, only EUS-TCB allows core biopsy and a high yield of immunohistochemical staining. We report a case of a gastric schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-TCB.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Differential diagnosis of submucosal gastric tumors: gastric schwannomas misdiagnosed as GISTs
    Mutlu Unver, Suleyman Cağlar Ertekin, Eyüp Kebapcı, Mustafa Olmez, Erhan Ergin, Safak Ozturk, Erkan Sahin, Ragıp Ortac
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What About Gastric Schwannoma? A Review Article
    Sara Lauricella, Sergio Valeri, Gianluca Mascianà, Ida Francesca Gallo, Erica Mazzotta, Chiara Pagnoni, Saponaro Costanza, Lorenza Falcone, Domenico Benvenuto, Marco Caricato, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2021; 52(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • Intramuscular ancient schwannoma of the axillary nerve
    Vishali Moond, Preeti Diwaker, Reshma Golamari, Rohit Jain
    BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(5): e239445.     CrossRef
  • Gastric schwannoma: a case report and literature review
    Changsheng Pu, Keming Zhang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gastric Schwannomas Misdiagnosed as GIST: A Comparative Study of Clinic Strategies Based on Membrane Marker Detection
    Quanyong Cheng, Kun Zhao, Jing Wang, Yu Guo, Hui Pang
    Journal of Cancer Research Updates.2020; 9(1): 82.     CrossRef
  • Clinical characteristics and surgical treatment of schwannomas of the esophagus and stomach: A case series and systematic review
    Jesús Morales-Maza, Francisco Ulises Pastor-Sifuentes, Germán E Sánchez-Morales, Emilio Sanchez-Garcia Ramos, Oscar Santes, Uriel Clemente-Gutiérrez, Adriana Simoneta Pimienta-Ibarra, Heriberto Medina-Franco
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2019; 11(9): 750.     CrossRef
  • Axillary schwannoma, preoperative diagnosis on a tru-cut biopsy: Case report and literature review
    Hager Aref, Georges A. Abizeid
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2018; 52: 49.     CrossRef
  • Spectral Computed Tomography Imaging of Gastric Schwannoma and Gastric Stromal Tumor
    Jianli Liu, Yanjun Chai, Junlin Zhou, Chi Dong, Wenjuan Zhang, Bin Liu
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2017; 41(3): 417.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric schwannoma
    Jinlong Hu, Xiang Liu, Nan Ge, Sheng Wang, Jintao Guo, Guoxin Wang, Siyu Sun
    Medicine.2017; 96(25): e7175.     CrossRef
  • Two Synchronous Colonic Adenocarcinomas, a Gastric Schwannoma and a Mucinous Neoplasm of the Appendix: a Case Report
    Diogo Sousa, Miguel Allen, Alda Pinto, Andreia Ferreira, Ana Cruz, Diogo Marinho, Pierpaolo Cusati, José Augusto Martins
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2015; 46(3): 304.     CrossRef
  • Benign Gastric Schwannoma: How Long Should We Follow Up to Monitor the Recurrence? A Case Report and Comprehensive Review of Literature of 137 Cases
    Xiafei Hong, Wenming Wu, Mengyi Wang, Quan Liao, Yupei Zhao
    International Surgery.2015; 100(4): 744.     CrossRef
  • 6,653 View
  • 52 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
A Case of Gossypiboma Masquerading as a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
Jong Woon Cheon, Eun Young Kim, Ki Yong Kim, Jae Bum Park, Young Kook Shin, Ka Young Kim, Hyun Dong Chae
Clin Endosc 2011;44(1):51-54.   Published online September 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2011.44.1.51
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Gossypiboma refers to a mass resulting from a retained gauze pad accidentally left within the body after surgery. Although the clinical features are diverse, it is often found incidentally as a mass having an internal cystic change and adhesion to adjacent organs. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is helpful, yet the initial diagnosis can be misleading in cases with atypical findings. We report a case of gossypiboma in a 78-year-old woman that we suspected was a gastrointestinal stromal tumor according to abdominal CT and endoscopic ultrasound, yet was diagnosed as a gossypiboma postoperatively.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Jejunal Gossypiboma Mimicking a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case of a Rare Iatrogenic Complication and Review of the Literature
    Michail Angelos Papaoikonomou, Europi Michailidou, Christos Pogiatzis, Maria Eleni Michailidi, Gregorios Panselinas
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Case Report: Laparoscopy-assisted resection for intra-abdominal gossypiboma masquerading as a jejunal tumor (with video)
    Yihui Han, Wenming Yang, Wenshu Dai, Qin Ma, Tao Yuan, Yun Yang, Yanrong Lu, Bo Zhang, Mingming Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intracranial Iatrogenic Foreign Bodies: Features of Neuroimaging
    O. A. Staroseltseva, N. V. Nudnov, M. L. Radutnaya, Е. L. Bondar’, А. N. Vorobyev, D. V. Levin, А. А. Yakovlev, Е. V. Pron’kina
    Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine.2022; 102(6): 390.     CrossRef
  • Medical imaging of textile iatrogenic foreign bodies in abdomen and pelvis
    A. A. Ryazantsev, A. L. Yudin, E. A. Yumatova
    Medical Visualization.2019; (4): 100.     CrossRef
  • Clinical case for diagnosis of textiloma in gastrointestinal tract
    A. V. Sergeev, A. N. Katrich
    Innovative medicine of Kuban.2019; (4): 62.     CrossRef
  • IMAGING DIAGNOSIS—ULTRASOUND UNCOMMON FEATURES OF AN ABDOMINAL GOSSYPIBOMA IN A DOG
    Arnaud Louvet, Anne‐Carole Duconseille
    Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fluorouracil implants caused a diaphragmatic tumor to be misdiagnosed as liver metastasis: a case report
    Yang-Yang Shen, Hong-Wei Qin, Jian-Bo Zhang, Zhen-Dan Wang, Pang Li, Kai Pang, Bo Zhang, Sheng Li, Kai Cui
    BMC Cancer.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 6,392 View
  • 45 Download
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
A Case of Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis in Which Endoscopic Ultrasonography Was Useful for the Diagnosis
Eun Jung Kang, M.D., Jin Oh Kim, M.D., Hyun Gun Kim, M.D., Tae Hee Lee, M.D., Wan Jung Kim, M.D., Sung Gon Jun, M.D., Gang Il Cheon, M.D. and Joon Seong Lee, M.D.
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2011;42(2):124-126.   Published online February 28, 2011
AbstractAbstract PDF
Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis (PCI) is an uncommon condition in which submucosal or subserosal gas cysts are present within the bowel wall. We report a case of a 37-year-old man with no medical history. He underwent a colonoscopy for screening purposes, which revealed multiple and variably sized submucosal tumors in the ascending colon. Endoscopic ultrasonographic (EUS) finding showed multiple hyperechogenic regions with distal acoustic shadowing within the submucosa of the ascending colon. A computed tomography scan showed multiple air-filled cystic masses in the ascending colon. EUS appears to be effective for the diagnosis of PCI. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2011;42:124-126)
  • 2,453 View
  • 14 Download
Close layer
Rectal Endometriosis That Is Difficult to Differentiate from Endoscopically Resectable Subepitherial Lesion
Seung Kyu Chung, M.D., Suck-Ho Lee, M.D., Bum Suk Son, M.D., Chang Kyun Lee, M.D., Tae Hoon Lee, M.D., Il-Kwun Chung, M.D., Sun-Joo Kim, M.D. and Ji-Hye Lee, M.D.*
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;41(5):319-323.   Published online November 30, 2010
AbstractAbstract PDF
Endometriosis occurs most frequently in the intestine. In the pelvic organs intestinal endometriosis presents with various symptoms and endoscopic findings. If an asymptomatic submucosal lesion is found in the sigmoid colon or rectum of reproductive women, a differential diagnosis should be done. Owing to advancements in endoscopic therapy, endoscopic excision has been attempted for various subepithelial lesions. To successfully do an endoscopic excision, accurate diagnosis should be obtained through diagnostic tests such as endoscopic ultrasonography prior to excision. Here the authors report a case of rectal endometriosis in an asymptomatic woman of reproductive age. They attempted endoscopic resection based on the endoscopic finding that the subepithelial lesion was limited to the submucosal layer in endoscopic ultrasonography. This conclusion turned out to be a mistaken one. Because of tumor adhesion to the proper muscular layer, we failed to successfully conduct an endoscopic excision. Ultimately, we did surgery and diagnosed rectal endometriosis. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;41:319-323)
  • 1,763 View
  • 16 Download
Close layer
Malignant Transformation of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in 44 Months Observational Period: A Case Report
Choong Heon Ryu, M.D., Ji Hyun Kim, M.D., Kwan Sik Park, M.D., Hyo Rim Seo, M.D., Yun Jung Choi, M.D., Seoung In Ha, M.D., Yoon Jung Kim, M.D. and Sang Young Seol, M.D.
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;41(1):21-25.   Published online July 31, 2010
AbstractAbstract PDF
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor is a common type of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor. Depending on the patient's age, compliance and health status, and the level of suspicion of malignancy, tumors ≤3 cm in size are typically monitored annually by endoscopic ultrasonography. The examination interval can be extended if no size change is noted on consecutive examinations. We report here on a 44-year-old female who presented with abdominal discomfort and displayed no size change of her gastrointestinal stromal tumor on three consecutive endoscopies over a 44- month interval. The patient was diagnosed with malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor on the basis of the evident ulceration seen on esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the inhomogenous echo noted on the endoscopic ultrasonography and the pathologic findings by gastric wedge resection. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;41:21-25)
  • 2,343 View
  • 11 Download
Close layer
A Case of Rectal Implantation Cysts at an Anastomosis Site after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for a Rectal Cancer
Hee Sun Lee, M.D., Geun Am Song, M.D., In Hye Hwang, M.D., Yang Seon Yi, M.D., Kyung Hwa Shin, M.D., Bo Kyung Choi, M.D., Gwang Ha Kim, M.D. and Do Youn Park, M.D.*
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;40(6):382-386.   Published online June 30, 2010
AbstractAbstract PDF
Rectal implantation cysts can be caused by continued growth in the submucosa of traumatically misplaced columnar epithelium during previous surgery. Cases of implantation cyst occurring at the site of anastomosis have rarely been reported. Rectal implantation cysts occurring at an anastomosis site after a low anterior resection for rectal cancer need to be distinguished from locally recurrent rectal cancer. Here we present a case of rectal implantation cysts in a patient with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection 9 months previously. The diagnosis was made according to the characteristic image findings of endoscopic ultrasonography and enodsocopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration. This is the first case report of rectal implantation cyst in Korea. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;40:382-386)
  • 2,142 View
  • 41 Download
Close layer

Close layer
TOP