Review
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for pancreatic cystic lesions: current status and future prospects
-
Clement Chun Ho Wu, Samuel Jun Ming Lim, Damien Meng Yew Tan
-
Clin Endosc 2024;57(4):434-445. Published online July 8, 2024
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.157
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased in prevalence due to the increased usage and advancements in cross-sectional abdominal imaging. Current diagnostic techniques cannot distinguish between PCLs requiring surgery, close surveillance, or expectant management. This has increased the morbidity and healthcare costs from inappropriately aggressive and conservative management strategies. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) allows for microscopic examination and delineation of the surface epithelium of PCLs. Landmark studies have identified characteristics distinguishing various types of PCLs, confirmed the high diagnostic yield of EUS-nCLE (especially for PCLs with an equivocal diagnosis), and shown that EUS-nCLE helps to change management and reduce healthcare costs. Refining procedure technique and reducing procedure length have improved the safety of EUS-nCLE. The utilization of artificial intelligence and its combination with other EUS-based advanced diagnostic techniques would further improve the results of EUS-based PCL diagnosis. A structured training program and device improvements to allow more complete mapping of the pancreas cyst epithelium will be crucial for the widespread adoption of this promising technology.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Pathognomonic Signs in Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: What Gastroenterologists and Involved Clinicians Need to Know
Alberto Martino, Luca Barresi, Francesco Paolo Zito, Michele Amata, Roberto Fiorentino, Severo Campione, Alessandro Iacobelli, Enrico Crolla, Roberto Di Mitri, Carlo Molino, Marco Di Serafino, Giovanni Lombardi
Gastroenterology Insights.2024; 15(3): 810. CrossRef
-
3,145
View
-
194
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
1
Crossref
Original Articles
-
Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling of patients with biliary tract cancer, especially with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
-
Takafumi Yanaidani, Kazuo Hara, Nozomi Okuno, Shin Haba, Takamichi Kuwahara, Yasuhiro Kuraishi, Nobumasa Mizuno, Sho Ishikawa, Masanori Yamada, Tsukasa Yasuda
-
Clin Endosc 2024;57(3):384-392. Published online February 15, 2024
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.139
-
-
Graphical Abstract
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is a standard diagnostic method for biliary tract cancer (BTC), and samples obtained in this manner may be used for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). This study evaluated the utility of EUS-TA for CGP in a clinical setting and determined the factors associated with the adequacy of CGP in patients with BTC.
Methods
CGP was attempted for 105 samples from 94 patients with BTC at the Aichi Cancer Center, Japan, from October 2019 to April 2022.
Results
Overall, 77.1% (81/105) of the samples were adequate for CGP. For 22-G or 19-G fine-needle biopsy (FNB), the sample adequacy was 85.7% (36/42), which was similar to that of surgical specimens (94%, p=0.45). Univariate analysis revealed that 22-G or larger FNB needle usage (86%, p=0.003), the target primary lesions (88%, p=0.015), a target size ≥30 mm (100%, p=0.0013), and number of punctures (90%, p=0.016) were significantly positively associated with CGP sample adequacy.
Conclusions
EUS-TA is useful for CGP tissue sampling in patients with BTC. In particular, the use of 22-G or larger FNB needles may allow for specimen adequacy comparable to that of surgical specimens.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Is genomic analysis possible in a tissue acquired via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in cholangiocarcinoma?
Jonghyun Lee, Sung Yong Han
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 332. CrossRef - Utility of Transpapillary Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Comprehensive Genome Profiling of Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer
Soma Fukuda, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Daiki Yamashige, Daiki Agarie, Yuya Hagiwara, Kohei Okamoto, Shin Yagi, Yasuhiro Komori, Masaru Kuwada, Yuta Maruki, Chigusa Morizane, Hideki Ueno, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka, Kiichiro Tsuchiya, Takuji Okusaka
Cancers.2024; 16(16): 2819. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound and Intraductal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Biliary Tract Diseases: A Narrative Review
Akiya Nakahata, Yasunobu Yamashita, Masayuki Kitano
Diagnostics.2024; 14(18): 2086. CrossRef
-
2,701
View
-
75
Download
-
3
Web of Science
-
3
Crossref
-
Anesthesia care provider sedation versus conscious sedation for endoscopic ultrasound–guided tissue acquisition: a retrospective cohort study
-
Sneha Shaha, Yinglin Gao, Jiahao Peng, Kendrick Che, John J. Kim, Wasseem Skef
-
Clin Endosc 2023;56(5):658-665. Published online July 3, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.006
-
-
Graphical Abstract
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: We aimed to study the effects of sedation on endoscopic ultrasound–guided tissue acquisition.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study evaluating the role of sedation in endoscopic ultrasound–guided tissue acquisition by comparing two groups: anesthesia care provider (ACP) sedation and endoscopist-directed conscious sedation (CS).
Results
Technical success was achieved in 219/233 (94.0%) in the ACP group and 114/136 (83.8%) in the CS group (p=0.0086). In multivariate analysis, the difference in technical success between the two groups was not significant (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.234–1.069; p=0.0738). A successful diagnostic yield was present in 146/196 (74.5%) in the ACP group and 66/106 (62.3%) in the CS group, respectively (p=0.0274). In multivariate analysis, the difference in diagnostic yield between the two groups was not significant (aOR, 0.643; 95% CI, 0.356–1.159; p=0.142). A total of 33 adverse events (AEs) were observed. The incidence of AEs was significantly lower in the CS group (5/33 CS vs. 28/33 ACP; OR, 0.281; 95% CI, 0.095–0.833; p=0.022).
Conclusions
CS provided equivalent technical success and diagnostic yield for malignancy in endoscopic ultrasound–guided tissue acquisition. Increased AEs were associated with anesthesia for the endoscopic ultrasound–guided tissue acquisition.
-
Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling of pancreatic cancer
-
Nozomi Okuno, Kazuo Hara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Shin Haba, Takamichi Kuwahara, Yasuhiro Kuraishi, Daiki Fumihara, Takafumi Yanaidani
-
Clin Endosc 2023;56(2):221-228. Published online March 7, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.086
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is essential for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The feasibility of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using samples obtained by EUS-TA has been under recent discussion. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of EUS-TA for CGP in a clinical setting.
Methods
CGP was attempted in 178 samples obtained from 151 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer at the Aichi Cancer Center between October 2019 and September 2021. We evaluated the adequacy of the samples for CGP and determined the factors associated with the adequacy of the samples obtained by EUS-TA retrospectively.
Results
The overall adequacy for CGP was 65.2% (116/178), which was significantly different among the four sampling methods (EUS-TA vs. surgical specimen vs. percutaneous biopsy vs. duodenal biopsy, 56.0% [61/109] vs. 80.4% [41/51] vs. 76.5% [13/17] vs. 100.0% [1/1], respectively; p=0.022). In a univariate analysis, needle gauge/type was associated with adequacy (22 G fine-needle aspiration vs. 22 G fine-needle biopsy [FNB] vs. 19 G-FNB, 33.3% (5/15) vs. 53.5% (23/43) vs. 72.5% (29/40); p=0.022). The sample adequacy of 19 G-FNB for CGP was 72.5% (29/40), and there was no significant difference between 19 G-FNB and surgical specimens (p=0.375).
Conclusions
To obtain adequate samples for CGP with EUS-TA, 19 G-FNB was shown to be the best in clinical practice. However, 19 G-FNB was not still sufficient, so further efforts are required to improve adequacy for CGP.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Updated techniques and evidence for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions
Masahiro Itonaga, Reiko Ashida, Masayuki Kitano
DEN Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling of gallbladder cancer using a forward-viewing echoendoscope in a patient who underwent Roux-en-Y reconstruction
Michihiro Ono, Shutaro Oiwa, Atsushi Uesugi, Seiya Saito, Ryota Yokoyama, Makoto Usami, Tomoyuki Abe, Miri Fujita, Kohichi Takada, Masahiro Maeda
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 17(1): 164. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling
Nozomi Okuno, Kazuo Hara
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2024; 51(2): 253. CrossRef - Oil blotting paper for formalin fixation increases endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition‐collected sample volumes on glass slides
Takuo Yamai, Kenji Ikezawa, Yusuke Seiki, Ko Watsuji, Yasuharu Kawamoto, Takeru Hirao, Kazuma Daiku, Shingo Maeda, Makiko Urabe, Yugo Kai, Ryoji Takada, Kaori Mukai, Tasuku Nakabori, Hiroyuki Uehara, Sayoko Tsuzaki, Ayumi Ryu, Satoshi Tanada, Shigenori Na
Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Utility of Transpapillary Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Comprehensive Genome Profiling of Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer
Soma Fukuda, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Daiki Yamashige, Daiki Agarie, Yuya Hagiwara, Kohei Okamoto, Shin Yagi, Yasuhiro Komori, Masaru Kuwada, Yuta Maruki, Chigusa Morizane, Hideki Ueno, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka, Kiichiro Tsuchiya, Takuji Okusaka
Cancers.2024; 16(16): 2819. CrossRef - Mcl-1 expression is a predictive marker of response to gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer
Makiko Urabe, Kenji Ikezawa, Yusuke Seiki, Ko Watsuji, Yasuharu Kawamoto, Takeru Hirao, Yugo Kai, Ryoji Takada, Takuo Yamai, Kaori Mukai, Tasuku Nakabori, Hiroyuki Uehara, Shigenori Nagata, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for personalized treatment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Sang Myung Woo
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(2): 183. CrossRef - Comparison of the novel Franseen needle versus the fine‐needle aspiration needle in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition for cancer gene panel testing: A propensity score‐matching analysis
Tomotaka Mori, Eisuke Ozawa, Akane Shimakura, Kosuke Takahashi, Satoshi Matsuo, Kazuaki Tajima, Yasuhiko Nakao, Masanori Fukushima, Ryu Sasaki, Satoshi Miuma, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Shinji Okano, Kazuhiko Nakao
JGH Open.2023; 7(9): 652. CrossRef - Editorial: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition in the era of precision medicine
Tiing Leong Ang, James Weiquan Li, Lai Mun Wang
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 38(10): 1677. CrossRef
-
2,584
View
-
178
Download
-
8
Web of Science
-
9
Crossref
-
Utility of forward-view endoscopic ultrasound in fine-needle aspiration in patients with a surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy
-
Asmaa Bakr, Kazuo Hara, Moaz Elshair, Shin Haba, Takamichi Kuwahara, Nozomi Okuno, Daiki Fumihara, Takafumi Yanaidani, Samy Zaky, Hanaa Omar
-
Clin Endosc 2023;56(3):367-374. Published online January 5, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.238
-
-
Graphical Abstract
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) using oblique-view EUS in patients with a surgically altered anatomy (SAA) of the upper gastrointestinal tract is limited because of difficult scope insertion due to the disturbed anatomy. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of forward-view (FV)-EUS in performing FNA in patients with a SAA.
Methods
We retrospectively investigated 32 patients with a SAA of the upper gastrointestinal tract who visited Aichi Cancer Center Hospital in Nagoya, Japan, between January 2014 and December 2020. We performed-upper gastrointestinal EUS-FNA using FV-EUS combined with fluoroscopic imaging to confirm tumor recurrence or to make a decision before chemotherapy or after a failure of diagnosis by radiology.
Results
We successfully performed EUS-FNA in all studied patients (100% technical success), with the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 100%, 87.5%, and 87.8%, respectively, with no complications.
Conclusions
EUS-FNA using FV-EUS combined with fluoroscopic imaging is an effective and safe technique for tissue acquisition in patients with a SAA.
-
Confirming Whether Fine Needle Biopsy Device Shortens the Learning Curve of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Without Rapid Onsite Evaluation
-
Meng-Ying Lin, Cheng-Lin Wu, Mitsuhiro Kida, Wei-Lun Chang, Bor-Shyang Sheu
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):420-427. Published online May 28, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.184
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition requires a long learning curve. We aimed to compare the skill maturation curves between fine needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) for tissue acquisition.
Methods
The initial 60 procedures performed by the trainee endosonographer (30 FNA vs. 30 FNB) were consecutively enrolled. The difference in procedure performance was compared between the two groups. Learning curves were assessed. Twenty additional cases were subsequently enrolled to assess the consistency of performance in the FNB group.
Results
The FNB group acquired larger tissue samples (2.35 vs. 0.70 mm2; p<0.001) with lower blood content (p=0.001) and higher tissue quality (p=0.017) compared with the FNA group. In addition, the FNB group required less needle pass to establish a diagnosis (2.43 vs. 2.97; p=0.006). A threshold diagnostic sensitivity of ≥80% was achieved after performing 10 FNB procedures. The number of needle passes significantly decreased after conducting 20 FNB procedures (1.80 vs. 2.70; p=0.041). The diagnostic sensitivity and number of needle passes remained the same in the subsequent FNB procedures. By contrast, this skill maturation phenomenon was not observed after performing 30 FNA procedures.
Conclusions
In EUS-guided tissue acquisition, the FNB needle was more efficient and thus shortened the learning curve of EUSguided tissue acquisition in trainee endosonographers.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Identification of Endosonographic Features that Compromise EUS-FNB Diagnostic Accuracy in Pancreatic Masses
Hsueh-Chien Chiang, Chien-Jui Huang, Yao-Shen Wang, Chun-Te Lee, Meng-Ying Lin, Wei-Lun Chang
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(11): 4302. CrossRef - Tissue Quality Comparison Between Heparinized Wet Suction and Dry Suction in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Masses: A Randomized Crossover Study
Meng-Ying Lin, Cheng-Lin Wu, Yung-Yeh Su, Chien-Jui Huang, Wei-Lun Chang, Bor-Shyang Sheu
Gut and Liver.2023; 17(2): 318. CrossRef - Factors Affecting the Learning Curve in the Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Prospective Study
Marcel Razpotnik, Simona Bota, Mathilde Kutilek, Gerolf Essler, Christian Urak, Julian Prosenz, Jutta Weber-Eibel, Andreas Maieron, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
Gut and Liver.2023; 17(2): 308. CrossRef - Investigation into the content of red material in EUS-guided pancreatic cancer biopsies
Meng-Ying Lin, Yung-Yeh Su, Yu-Ting Yu, Chien-Jui Huang, Bor-Shyang Sheu, Wei-Lun Chang
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(6): 1083. CrossRef
-
3,656
View
-
82
Download
-
4
Web of Science
-
4
Crossref
-
Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Portal Vein Thrombus in the Diagnosis and Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
-
Dina Eskandere, Hazem Hakim, Magdy Attwa, Wagdi Elkashef, Ahmed Youssef Altonbary
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(5):745-753. Published online March 15, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.240
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Malignant portal vein thrombus (PVT) is found in up to 44% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The nature of the thrombus influences treatment selection. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in determining the nature of PVT in liver cirrhosis and/or HCC.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted in 34 patients with liver cirrhosis and/or HCC with PVT. Under EUS guidance, PVT was punctured using a 22 G FNA needle (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) followed by monitoring of the puncture tract using color Doppler. Patients were followed for adverse events 2 hours after recovery.
Results
Throughout the 30-month study period, 34 patients, including 24 males with a mean age of 59±8 years, were enrolled. There were 8 patients with known HCC and 26 with no liver masses detected by computed tomography (CT). EUS-FNA from PVT was positive for malignancy in 3 patients (8.8%), of which only 1 patient was diagnosed with HCC by CT and 2 patients were newly diagnosed with HCC after EUS-FNA. No major complications were reported.
Conclusions
EUS-FNA is a safe and effective technique for determining the nature of PVT that does not fulfill the malignant criteria via imaging studies in patients with liver cirrhosis and/or HCC.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Endoscopic ultrasound–guided vascular interventions: A review (with videos)
Praveer Rai, Pankaj Kumar, Umair Shamsul Hoda, Kartik Balankhe
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 43(5): 927. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vascular interventions: An overview of current and emerging techniques
Ahmed Youssef Altonbary
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2023; 12(1): 16. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound in portal hypertension: navigating venous hemodynamics and treatment efficacy
Irina Dragomir, Cristina Pojoga, Claudia Hagiu, Radu Seicean, Bogdan Procopet, Andrada Seicean
Gastroenterology Report.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
-
4,242
View
-
110
Download
-
3
Web of Science
-
3
Crossref
-
High Sensitivity of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy in Lymphadenopathy Caused by Metastatic Disease: A Prospective Comparative Study
-
Per Hedenström, Vasilis Chatzikyriakos, Roozbeh Shams, Catarina Lewerin, Riadh Sadik
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(5):722-729. Published online March 4, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.283
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: The diagnostic work-up of lymphadenopathy is challenging but important to determine the correct therapy. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed the topic of endosonography (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition in lymphadenopathy. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB) in intrathoracic and intraabdominal lymphadenopathy.
Methods
In a tertiary care center, patients with lymphadenopathy referred for EUS-guided sampling were included prospectively from 2014 to 2019 (NCT02360839). In all cases, EUS-FNB (22 gauge) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) (25 gauge) were performed. The patients were randomized to the first needle pass with FNB or FNA. Study outcomes were the diagnostic accuracy and adverse event rate.
Results
Forty-eight patients were included (median age: 69 years [interquartile range, 59–76]; 24/48 females [50%]). The final diagnoses were metastasis (n=17), lymphoma (n=11), sarcoidosis (n=6), and inflammatory disease (n=14). The diagnostic performance of the two modalities was comparable, including a high sensitivity for metastatic nodes (EUS-FNB: 87% vs. EUSFNA: 100%, p=0.5). The sensitivity for lymphoma was borderline superior in favor of EUS-FNB (EUS-FNB: 55% vs. EUS-FNA: 9%, p=0.06). No adverse events were recorded.
Conclusions
In lymphadenopathy, both EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA are safe and highly sensitive for metastatic lymph node detection. Lymphoma diagnosis is challenging regardless of the needle used.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Transesophageal Bronchoscopic Ultrasound-guided Cryobiopsy (EUS-B-Cryo) for mediastinal lesions in critical airway obstruction: a case series with a systematic review
Sanchit Mohan, A. J. Mahendran, Rohit Kumar, Manu Madan, Pranav Ish, Rajnish Kaushik, Nitesh Gupta
Chest Disease Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Comparison of 19-gauge conventional and Franseen needles for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy and classification of malignant lymphoma using endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration
Mitsuru Okuno, Keisuke Iwata, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Yusuke Kito, Takuji Tanaka, Naoki Watanabe, Senji Kasahara, Yuhei Iwasa, Akihiko Sugiyama, Youichi Nishigaki, Yuhei Shibata, Junichi Kitagawa, Takuji Iwashita, Eiichi Tomita, Masahito Shimizu
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 364. CrossRef - Lymphadenopathy Tissue Sampling by EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Contributes to Meeting the Conditions for Genomic Profiling
Mitsuru Sugimoto, Tadayuki Takagi, Rei Suzuki, Naoki Konno, Hiroyuki Asama, Yuki Sato, Hiroki Irie, Jun Nakamura, Mika Takasumi, Minami Hashimoto, Tsunetaka Kato, Yuko Hashimoto, Takuto Hikichi, Hiromasa Ohira
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Diagnostic accuracy and safety of EUS-guided end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for tissue sampling of abdominal and mediastinal lymphadenopathies: a prospective multicenter series
Silvia Carrara, Daoud Rahal, Kareem Khalaf, Tommy Rizkala, Glenn Koleth, Cristiana Bonifacio, Marta Andreozzi, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Francesco Auriemma, Paola Bossi, Monica Balzarotti, Antonio Facciorusso, Teresa Staiano, Elena Maldi, Marco Spadaccini,
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(2): 191. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Deep-Seated Lymphadenopathies and Spleen Lesions: A Monocentric Experience
Flaminia Bellisario, Fabia Attili, Fabrizia Campana, Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Silvia Bellesi, Elena Maiolo, Eleonora Alma, Rosalia Malafronte, Giuseppe Macis, Luigi Maria Larocca, Salvatore Annunziata, Francesco D’Alò, Stefan Hohaus
Diagnostics.2023; 13(17): 2839. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration for lymph nodes tissue acquisition: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Antonio Facciorusso, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Daryl Ramai, Andrea Lisotti, Ioannis S Papanikolaou, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Ilaria Tarantino, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Pietro Fusaroli
Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - A Novel Approach to Classification and Reporting of Lymph Node Fine-Needle Cytology: Application of the Proposed Sydney System
Elena Vigliar, Gennaro Acanfora, Antonino Iaccarino, Massimo Mascolo, Daniela Russo, Giulia Scalia, Roberta Della Pepa, Claudio Bellevicine, Marco Picardi, Giancarlo Troncone
Diagnostics.2021; 11(8): 1314. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration for Tissue Sampling of Abdominal Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparative Study
Antonio Facciorusso, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Nicola Muscatiello, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Jayanta Samanta, Juliana Londoño Castillo, Christian Cotsoglou, Daryl Ramai
Cancers.2021; 13(17): 4298. CrossRef
-
4,363
View
-
108
Download
-
7
Web of Science
-
8
Crossref
-
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using a 20-Gauge Menghini Needle with a Lateral Forward Bevel and a 22-Gauge Franseen Needle: A Single-Center Large Cohort Study
-
Takafumi Mie, Takashi Sasaki, Ryo Kanata, Takaaki Furukawa, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(5):730-738. Published online March 4, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.251
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Several fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles are available for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition. However, there is disagreement on which type of needle has the best diagnostic yield. The aim of this study was to compare the performance and safety of two commonly used EUS-FNB needles.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNB between June 2016 and March 2020 in our hospital. Two types of needles were evaluated: a 20-gauge Menghini needle with a lateral forward bevel and a 22-gauge Franseen needle. Rapid on-site evaluation was performed in all the cases. A multivariate analysis was performed to clarify the negative predictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the diagnostic yields of these two needles.
Results
We analyzed 666 patients and 690 lesions. The overall diagnostic rate of histology alone was 88.8%, and the overall adverse event rate was 1.5%. Transduodenal access and small lesions (≤2 cm) were identified as negative predictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. After propensity score matching, 482 lesions were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy rates of histology in the M and F needle groups were 89.2% and 88.8%, respectively (p=1.00).
Conclusions
Both the needles showed high diagnostic yield, and no significant difference in performance was observed between the two.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Primary Pancreatic Lymphoma: Endosonography-Guided Tissue Acquisition Diagnosis
Anna Carolina Orsini-Arman , Rodrigo Cañada T Surjan, Filadélfio E Venco, José C Ardengh
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Diagnostic Yield of Serial Pancreatic Juice Aspiration Cytologic Examination With Brush Cytology for Pancreatic Ductal Stenosis
Takafumi Mie, Takashi Sasaki, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Takeshi Okamoto, Chinatsu Mori, Takaaki Furukawa, Yuto Yamada, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
Pancreas.2022; 51(8): 995. CrossRef - Pancreatic follicular lymphoma: a report of two cases and literature review
Takeshi Okamoto, Takashi Sasaki, Noriko Nishimura, Manabu Takamatsu, Chinatsu Mori, Takafumi Mie, Takaaki Furukawa, Yuto Yamada, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Dai Maruyama, Naoki Sasahira
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 14(6): 1756. CrossRef
-
4,625
View
-
101
Download
-
3
Web of Science
-
3
Crossref
Case Report
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound Through-the-Needle Biopsy for the Diagnosis of an Abdominal Bronchogenic Cyst
-
Jessica Cassiani, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Erminia Manfrin, Matteo Rivelli, Armando Gabbrielli, Alfredo Guglielmi, Corrado Pedrazzani
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(5):767-770. Published online February 17, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.195
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- A 57-year-old woman with epigastric pain was diagnosed with a 6-cm abdominal cystic lesion of unclear origin on cross-sectional imaging. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) demonstrated a unilocular cyst located between the pancreas, gastric wall, and left adrenal gland, with a regular wall filled with dense fluid with multiple hyperechoic floating spots. A 19-G needle was used to puncture the cyst, but no fluid could be aspirated. Therefore, EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy (EUS-TTNB) was performed. Histological analysis of the retrieved fragments revealed a fibrous wall lined by “respiratory-type” epithelium with ciliated columnar cells, consistent with the diagnosis of a bronchogenic cyst. Laparoscopic excision was performed, and the diagnosis was confirmed based on the findings of the surgical specimen. Abdominal bronchogenic cysts are extremely uncommon, and a definitive diagnosis is commonly obtained after the examination of surgical specimens due to the lack of pathognomonic findings on cross-sectional imaging and poor cellularity on EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. EUS-TTNB is useful for establishing a preoperative histological diagnosis, thus supporting the decision-making process.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Optimal resection of gastric bronchogenic cysts based on anatomical continuity with adherent gastric muscular layer: A case report
Masayoshi Terayama, Koshi Kumagai, Hiroshi Kawachi, Rie Makuuchi, Masaru Hayami, Satoshi Ida, Manabu Ohashi, Takeshi Sano, Souya Nunobe
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(6): 1216. CrossRef - Retroperitoneal tumor finally diagnosed as a bronchogenic cyst: A case report and review of literature
Yang-Yang Gong, Xin Qian, Bo Liang, Ming-Dong Jiang, Jun Liu, Xing Tao, Jing Luo, Hong-Jian Liu, You-Gang Feng
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(19): 6679. CrossRef - Endoscopic resection in the treatment of intramural esophageal bronchogenic cysts: A retrospective analysis of 17 cases
Jiao Jiao, Xiaofei Fan, Lili Luo, Zhongqing Zheng, Bangmao Wang, Wentian Liu
Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(12): 1691. CrossRef - Subdiaphragmatic bronchogenic cysts: Case series and literature review
Jianchun Xiao, Xueyang Zhang, Hongru Zhou, Tao Hong, Binglu Li, Xiaodong He, Wei Liu
Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
-
4,264
View
-
66
Download
-
5
Web of Science
-
4
Crossref
Original Articles
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Using a 22-G Needle for Hepatic Lesions: Single-Center Experience
-
Ebru Akay, Deniz Atasoy, Engin Altınkaya, Ali Koç, Tamer Ertan, Hatice Karaman, Erkan Caglar
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(3):404-412. Published online December 9, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.065
-
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been accepted as a reliable tool in diagnosing and staging intra-abdominal tumors. In this study, we aimed to investigate the performance of EUS-FNA in the evaluation of liver masses and its impact on patient management and procedure-related complications retrospectively.
Methods
Data of patients who underwent EUS-FNA biopsies due to liver masses between November 2017 and July 2018 were retrieved retrospectively. Biopsies were performed using 22-G needles. The demographics, EUS-FNA results, sensitivity and specificity of the procedure, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and specimen sufficiency rates were assessed.
Results
A total of 25 patients (10 females) were included in the study. The mean age was 62.73±15.2 years. The mean size of the masses was 34.50±16.04 mm. The technical success rate was 88%. During the EUS-FNA procedure, each patient had only one pass with 94.45% of aspirate sufficiency rate and 86.3% of biopsy sufficiency rate. The diagnostic accuracy rate was 86.3%. There were no complications.
Conclusions
For the evaluation of liver masses, EUS-FNA using a 22-G needle with even one pass had high aspiration and biopsy success rates accompanied with high diagnostic accuracy rates.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition for focal liver lesions in patients with a history of multiple primary malignant neoplasms
Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Naotaka Maruoka, Tatsuya Yamagami, Masatsugu Nagahama
DEN Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - The outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition for small focal liver lesions measuring ≤2 cm
Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Naotaka Maruoka, Tatsuya Yamagami, Masatsugu Nagahama
DEN Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Diagnostic and therapeutic role of endoscopic ultrasound in liver diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Eyad Gadour, Abeer Awad, Zeinab Hassan, Khalid Jebril Shrwani, Bogdan Miutescu, Hussein Hassan Okasha
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(7): 742. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of focal liver lesion
Alina Tantău, Cosmina Sutac, Anamaria Pop, Marcel Tantău
World Journal of Radiology.2024; 16(4): 72. CrossRef - Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures
Marcel Ioan Gheorghiu, Andrada Seicean, Cristina Pojoga, Claudia Hagiu, Radu Seicean, Zeno Sparchez
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(17): 2311. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnostic value of focal liver lesions: A systematic analysis of 88 cases (with video)
Xiaohong Kong, Zijun Fan, Ruiping Li, Duanmin Hu, Guilian Cheng
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology.2024; 48(7): 102382. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Focal Liver Lesions: An Effective Mini-Invasive Alternative to the Percutaneous Approach
Gabriele Rancatore, Dario Ligresti, Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Lucio Carrozza, Mario Traina, Ilaria Tarantino
Diagnostics.2024; 14(13): 1336. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for focal liver lesions can be safely performed in patients with ascites
Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Naotaka Maruoka, Tatsuya Yamagami, Masatsugu Nagahama
Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(11): E1309. CrossRef - A case in which ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was useful in the diagnosis of liver metastasis of gallbladder cancer
Ayako Inada, Masao Toki, Takahiro Yamada, Sho Kawamoto, Komei Kambayashi, Takeshi Nosaka, Kazushige Ochiai, Koichi Gondo, Shunsuke Watanabe, Akimasa Hayashi, Hiroaki Shimoyamada, Junji Shibahara, Tadakazu Hisamatsu
Progress of Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 102(1): 140. CrossRef - Endo-hepatology: Updates for the clinical hepatologist
Frances Lee, Tarun Rustagi, R. Todd Frederick
Clinical Liver Disease.2023; 22(2): 42. CrossRef - Distinct ways to perform a liver biopsy: The core technique setups and updated understanding of these modalities
Chao Sun, Xingliang Zhao, Lei Shi, Xiaofei Fan, Xiaolong Qi
Endoscopic Ultrasound.2023; 12(6): 437. CrossRef - Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a meta-analysis
Keyu Zeng, Zhenpeng Jiang, Jie Yang, Kefei Chen, Qiang Lu
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 57(5): 545. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions: Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison
Marcel Gheorghiu, Andrada Seicean, Sorana D. Bolboacă, Ioana Rusu, Radu Seicean, Cristina Pojoga, Ofelia Moșteanu, Zeno Sparchez
Diagnostics.2022; 12(9): 2214. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Focal Liver Lesions: The Expanding Light Over the Shadow
Takuji Iwashita, Masahito Shimizu
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(3): 299. CrossRef - Hepatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration
Koki Yamada, Susumu Shinoura, Kaoru Kikuchi, Chia-Tung Shun
Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef - Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Liver Disease: Where Do We Stand?
Tajana Pavic, Ivana Mikolasevic, Dominik Kralj, Nina Blazevic, Anita Skrtic, Ivan Budimir, Ivan Lerotic, Davor Hrabar
Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 2021. CrossRef
-
5,152
View
-
142
Download
-
15
Web of Science
-
16
Crossref
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Random Omental Fine Needle Aspiration: A Novel Technique for the Diagnosis of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
-
Pradeep Kumar Siddappa, Neha Jain, Naveen K. Agarwal, Monika Jain, Gurwant Singh Lamba
-
Clin Endosc 2020;53(5):594-599. Published online September 29, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.175
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Diagnostic abdominal paracentesis has been described in literature to have variable sensitivity of 50%–75% for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). We believe that random needle aspirates from the omentum, even in the absence of obvious deposits by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), could prove malignancy in patients with PC.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent EUS for diagnosis and staging of cancer and found to have ascites were included after obtaining informed consent. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) from random sites in the omentum was performed through the transgastric route using a linear echoendoscope.
Results
Fifty-four patients underwent EUS during October 2015 to April 2017 for detection, staging, or FNA of a suspected malignant lesion. Ascites was seen in 17 patients and 15 patients who fulfilled the criteria were included. The procedure was successful in all patients. Cytology was suggestive of malignancy in 12 (80%) but not suggestive of malignancy in 3 (20%) patients. Three patients who tested negative had hyperbilirubinemia with biliary obstruction. Their ascitic fluid analysis result was also negative.
Conclusions
Random FNA of the omentum in patients with malignancy-related ascites is highly effective in the diagnosis of PC and could be employed during EUS evaluation of malignancies.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Abhirup Chatterjee, Jimil Shah
Diagnostics.2023; 14(1): 78. CrossRef
-
4,426
View
-
80
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
1
Crossref
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Needles Provide Higher Diagnostic Yield Compared to Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Needles When Sampling Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
-
Benjamin D. Renelus, Daniel S. Jamorabo, Iman Boston, William M. Briggs, John M. Poneros
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(2):261-268. Published online August 31, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.101
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Studies comparing the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for solid pancreatic lesions have been inconclusive with no clear superiority. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and safety between the two sampling techniques.
Methods
We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials published between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was overall diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rates, cytopathologic and histopathologic accuracy, and the mean number of passes required to obtain adequate tissue between FNA and FNB needles. Fixed and random effect models with pooled estimates of target outcomes were developed.
Results
Eleven studies involving 1,365 participants were included for analysis. When compared to FNB, FNA had a significant reduction in diagnostic accuracy (81% and 87%, p=0.005). In addition, FNA provided reduced cytopathologic accuracy (82% and 89%, p=0.04) and an increased number of mean passes required compared to FNB (2.3 and 1.6, respectively, p<0.0001). There was no difference in adverse event rate between FNA and FNB needles (1.8% and 2.3% respectively, p=0.64).
Conclusions
FNB provides superior diagnostic accuracy without compromising safety when compared to FNA. FNB should be readily considered by endosonographers when evaluating solid pancreatic masses.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- The yield of cytology and histology obtained by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy needles in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Wisam Sbeit, Nidaa Abu Hanna, Livoff Alejandro, Tawfik Khoury
Cytopathology.2024; 35(1): 92. CrossRef - Diagnosis of lung squamous cell carcinoma using EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of a lung lesion
Jenson Phung, Mohamed Abdallah, Mohammad Bilal
iGIE.2024; 3(1): 32. CrossRef - EUS-guided tissue acquisition in patients with solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas
José M. Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José G. de la Mora-Levy, Juan O. Alonso-Lárraga, Angélica I. Hernández-Guerrero, Betsabé A. Soriano-Herrera, Lidia F. Villegas-González, Luis F. Uscanga-Domínguez, Stephanie López-Romero, Félix I. Téllez-Ávila
Postgraduate Medicine.2024; 136(1): 78. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Tissue Sampling Adequacy for Molecular Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Wael T. Mohamed, Vinay Jahagirdar, Fouad Jaber, Mohamed K. Ahmed, Ifrah Fatima, Thomas Bierman, Zhuxuan Fu, Philip G. Jones, Amira F. Hassan, Erin Faber, Wendell K. Clarkston, Hassan Ghoz, Ossama W. Tawfik, Sreeni Jonnalagadda
Cancers.2024; 16(4): 761. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided biopsy using a three‐prong asymmetry tip needle for pancreatic tumors and peridigestive tract lesions: Retrospective single‐center study
Kento Shionoya, Ryosuke Tonozuka, Shuntaro Mukai, Takayoshi Tsuchiya, Reina Tanaka, Kenjiro Yamamoto, Kazumasa Nagai, Yukitoshi Mastunami, Hiroyuki Kojima, Takao Itoi
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2024; 31(4): 294. CrossRef - The factors that influence the diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
Liqi Sun, Yuqiong Li, Qiuyue Song, Lisi Peng, Ying Xing, Haojie Huang, Zhendong Jin
Endoscopic Ultrasound.2024; 13(3): 183. CrossRef - Experience of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Fine Needle Biopsy: Data from Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan
Hafiz Irfan Mushtaq, Fariha Shams, Shafqat Rasool, Ghias Ul Hassan, Sadia Jabbar, Farwa Javed, Sidra Rasheed, Akif Dlishad, Ghias Un Nabi Tayyab
Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2024; : 31. CrossRef - Impact of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) on accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy of solid lesions
Hussein Okasha, Ahmed Ebrahim, Ihab Samih, Mohammed Sayed
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2024; 13(3): 98. CrossRef - The Role of CT-guided Core Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Tumors: An Initial Evaluation in Modern Oncology
Eduardo P. Eyheremendy, Cristian A. Angeramo, Patricio Méndez
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic Tissues Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions for Molecular Analysis
Divya M. Chalikonda, Uzma D. Siddiqui
Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 26(4): 347. CrossRef - Minimally Invasive Sampling of Mediastinal Lesions
Alberto Fantin, Nadia Castaldo, Ernesto Crisafulli, Giulia Sartori, Alice Villa, Elide Felici, Stefano Kette, Filippo Patrucco, Erik H. F. M. van der Heijden, Paolo Vailati, Giuseppe Morana, Vincenzo Patruno
Life.2024; 14(10): 1291. CrossRef - EUS-FNA techniques in the pathological diagnosis of pancreatic disease
Atsushi KANNO, Akitsugu TANAKA, Yusuke SAKURAI, Eriko IKEDA, Kozue ANDO, Kensuke YOKOYAMA, Hironori YAMAMOTO
Suizo.2024; 39(5): 305. CrossRef - ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures
B. Joseph Elmunzer, Jennifer L. Maranki, Victoria Gómez, Anna Tavakkoli, Bryan G. Sauer, Berkeley N. Limketkai, Emily A. Brennan, Elaine M. Attridge, Tara J. Brigham, Andrew Y. Wang
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(3): 405. CrossRef - Comprehensive review on endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition techniques for solid pancreatic tumor
Sakue Masuda, Kazuya Koizumi, Kento Shionoya, Ryuhei Jinushi, Makomo Makazu, Takashi Nishino, Karen Kimura, Chihiro Sumida, Jun Kubota, Chikamasa Ichita, Akiko Sasaki, Masahiro Kobayashi, Makoto Kako, Uojima Haruki
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(12): 1863. CrossRef - Pancreatic duct lavage cytology combined with a cell-block method for patients with possible pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, including pancreatic carcinoma in situ
Hiroaki Kusunose, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Hideyuki Anan, Kazuki Endo, Haruka Okano, Masaya Oikawa, Takashi Tsuchiya, Takashi Sawai, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(3): 353. CrossRef - Current status and issues in genomic analysis using EUS-FNA/FNB specimens in hepatobiliary–pancreatic cancers
Yoshinori Ozono, Hiroshi Kawakami, Naomi Uchiyama, Hiroshi Hatada, Souichiro Ogawa
Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(11): 1081. CrossRef - Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Abhirup Chatterjee, Jimil Shah
Diagnostics.2023; 14(1): 78. CrossRef - Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in groove pancreatitis
Yu Mo She, Nan Ge
Annals of Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer
Ali Zakaria, Bayan Al-Share, Jason B. Klapman, Aamir Dam
Cancers.2022; 14(6): 1373. CrossRef - A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy
Zhiwang Li, Wei Liu, Xiaoda Xu, Peiyu Li
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 56(8): 668. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of precision medicine
Reiko Ashida, Masayuki Kitano
Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(7): 1329. CrossRef - Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study
Thanawin Wong, Tanawat Pattarapuntakul, Nisa Netinatsunton, Bancha Ovartlarnporn, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Naichaya Chamroonkul, Pimsiri Sripongpun, Sawangpong Jandee, Apichat Kaewdech, Siriboon Attasaranya, Teerha Piratvisuth
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: Needle types, technical issues, and sample handling
Woo Hyun Paik
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2022; 11(3): 96. CrossRef - Comparison of Adverse Events of Different Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Methods: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
Yen-Chih Lin, Hsu-Heng Yen, Siou-Ping Huang, Kai-Lun Shih, Yang-Yuan Chen
Diagnostics.2022; 12(9): 2123. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Galab M. Hassan, Louise Laporte, Sarto C. Paquin, Charles Menard, Anand V. Sahai, Benoît Mâsse, Helen Trottier
Diagnostics.2022; 12(12): 2951. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound Quality Metrics in Clinical Practice
Lawrence Ku, Linda A. Hou, Viktor E. Eysselein, Sofiya Reicher
Diagnostics.2021; 11(2): 242. CrossRef - Personalized Approach to the Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Management of Pancreaticobiliary Malignancies
Michael Makar, Eric Zhao, Amy Tyberg
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(3): 180. CrossRef - Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy in Comparison to Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: A Two-Center Experience
Antonio Facciorusso, Daryl Ramai, Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi, Laura Bernardoni, Erminia Manfrin, Nicola Muscatiello, Stefano Francesco Crinò
Cancers.2021; 13(12): 3062. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy histology with a 22‐gauge Franseen needle and fine‐needle aspiration liquid‐based cytology with a conventional 25‐gauge needle provide comparable diagnostic accuracy in solid pancreatic lesions
Yoichi Tomita, Yuichi Torisu, Masafumi Chiba, Yuji Kinoshita, Takafumi Akasu, Nana Shimamoto, Takahiro Abe, Keisuke Kanazawa, Kazuki Takakura, Shintaro Tsukinaga, Masanori Nakano, Hirobumi Toyoizumi, Masayuki Kato, Masayuki Saruta
JGH Open.2021; 5(9): 1092. CrossRef - Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using a 20-Gauge Menghini Needle with a Lateral Forward Bevel and a 22-Gauge Franseen Needle: A Single-Center Large Cohort Study
Takafumi Mie, Takashi Sasaki, Ryo Kanata, Takaaki Furukawa, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 730. CrossRef
-
5,497
View
-
200
Download
-
26
Web of Science
-
30
Crossref
Review
-
The Role of Needle-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review
-
Yung Ka Chin, Clement Chun Ho Wu, Damien Meng Yew Tan
-
Clin Endosc 2021;54(1):38-47. Published online March 31, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.200-IDEN
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- The prevalence of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) has increased recently due to the increased use of cross-sectional abdominal imaging and the ageing global population. Current diagnostic techniques are inadequate to distinguish between PCLs that require surgery, close surveillance, or expectant management. This has resulted in increased morbidity from both inappropriately aggressive and conservative management strategies. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) has allowed microscopic examination and visual delineation of the surface epithelium of PCLs. Landmark studies in this decade have correlated nCLE and histological findings and identified characteristics differentiating various types of PCLs. Subsequent studies have confirmed the high diagnostic yield of nCLE and its diagnostic utility in PCLs with an equivocal diagnosis. Moreover, nCLE has been shown to improve the diagnostic yield of PCLs. This will help avoid unnecessary pancreatic surgery, which carries significant morbidity and mortality risks. The early detection of high-grade dysplasia in PCLs will provide early surgical treatment and improve outcomes for pancreatic cancer. Despite the high upfront cost of nCLE, the improved diagnostic accuracy and resultant appropriate management have resulted in improved cost effectiveness. Refining the procedure technique and limiting the procedure length have significantly improved the safety of nCLE. A structured training program and device improvements to allow more complete mapping of the pancreatic cyst epithelium will be crucial for the widespread adoption of this promising technology.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Molecular Pathology of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions with a Focus on Malignant Progression
Yan Hu, Dan Jones, Ashwini K. Esnakula, Somashekar G. Krishna, Wei Chen
Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1183. CrossRef - Applications and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound in Digestive System Diseases
Jia Huang, Xiaofei Fan, Wentian Liu
Diagnostics.2023; 13(17): 2815. CrossRef - EUS-guided fine needle aspiration-based clues to mistaken or uncertain identity: serous pancreatic cysts
Michele T. Yip-Schneider, Rodica Muraru, Rachel C. Kim, Howard H. Wu, Stuart Sherman, Aditya Gutta, Mohammad A. Al-Haddad, John M. Dewitt, C. Max Schmidt
HPB.2023; 25(12): 1587. CrossRef - Current trends in the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms in Korea: a national survey
Hyung Ku Chon, Sung Hoon Moon, Sang Wook Park, Woo Hyun Paik, Chang Nyol Paik, Byoung Kwan Son, Tae Jun Song, Dong Won Ahn, Eaum Seok Lee, Yun Nah Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Jae Min Lee, Tae Joo Jeon, Chang-Hwan Park, Kwang Bum Cho, Dong Wook Lee
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2022; 37(1): 63. CrossRef - Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Diagnosis of Biliary and Pancreatic Disorders: A Systematic Analysis
Do Han Kim, Somashekar G. Krishna, Emmanuel Coronel, Paul T. Kröner, Herbert C. Wolfsen, Michael B. Wallace, Juan E. Corral
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(2): 197. CrossRef - Accuracy and agreement of a large panel of endosonographers for endomicroscopy-guided virtual biopsy of pancreatic cystic lesions
Jorge D. Machicado, Bertrand Napoleon, Anne Marie Lennon, Samer El-Dika, Stephen P. Pereira, Damien Tan, Rahul Pannala, Mohit Girotra, Pradermchai Kongkam, Helga Bertani, Yunlu Feng, Hao Sijie, Ning Zhong, Vincent Valantin, Sarah Leblanc, Alice Hinton, So
Pancreatology.2022; 22(7): 994. CrossRef - Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Focused Review on Cyst Clinicopathological Features and Advanced Diagnostics
Wei Chen, Nehaal Ahmed, Somashekar G. Krishna
Diagnostics.2022; 13(1): 65. CrossRef - Diagnostic Value of Endomicroscopy for Gastrointestinal Diseases: New Possibilities and Concepts
Ralf Kiesslich
Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 23(1): 57. CrossRef
-
5,961
View
-
231
Download
-
9
Web of Science
-
8
Crossref
Focused review series
-
Current Status of Endoscopic Ultrasound Techniques for Pancreatic Neoplasms
-
Yousuke Nakai, Naminatsu Takahara, Suguru Mizuno, Hirofumi Kogure, Kazuhiko Koike
-
Clin Endosc 2019;52(6):527-532. Published online July 24, 2019
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.025
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) now plays an important role in the management of pancreatic neoplasms. There are various types of pancreatic neoplasms, from benign to malignant lesions, and the role of EUS ranges from the imaging diagnosis to treatment. EUS is useful for the detection, characterization, and tissue acquisition of pancreatic lesions. Recent advancement of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS and elastography enables better characterization of pancreatic lesions. In addition to these enhanced EUS imaging techniques, EUS-guided tissue acquisition is now the standard procedure to establish the pathological diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms. While these diagnostic roles of EUS have been established, EUS-guided interventions such as ablation and drainage are also increasingly utilized in the management of pancreatic neoplasms. However, most of these EUS-guided interventions are not yet standardized in terms of techniques and devices and thus need further investigations.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in managing pancreatic malignancy
Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(2): 163. CrossRef - Artificial intelligence assisted endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic space occupying lesion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Arkadeep Dhali, Vincent Kipkorir, Bahadar S. Srichawla, Harendra Kumar, Roger B. Rathna, Ibsen Ongidi, Talha Chaudhry, Gisore Morara, Khulud Nurani, Doreen Cheruto, Jyotirmoy Biswas, Leonard R. Chieng, Gopal Krishna Dhali
International Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Endotherapy in Pancreatic Diseases
Vaneet Jearth, Surinder S. Rana
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 13(01): 019. CrossRef - Endoscopic Management of Pancreatobiliary Malignancies
Dong Wook Lee, Eun Young Kim
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(5): 1635. CrossRef - Bazo accesorio intrapancreático: reporte de caso resuelto con pancreatectomía distal robótica
Armando Pereyra-Talamantes, Juan Eduardo Flores-Martín, Marco Antonio Gallaga-Rojas, Jesús Emmanuel Rodríguez-Silverio, Erikc González-Azua, Mario Eduardo Alonso-Calamaco, Enrique Jiménez-Chavarría, Héctor F Noyola-Villalobos
Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica.2022; 23(1-2): 41. CrossRef - Dynamic Doppler Ultrasound Assessment of Tissue Perfusion Is a Better Tool than a Single Vessel Doppler Examination in Differentiating Malignant and Inflammatory Pancreatic Lesions
Przemysław Dyrla, Arkadiusz Lubas, Jerzy Gil, Marek Saracyn, Maciej Gonciarz
Diagnostics.2021; 11(12): 2289. CrossRef - Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses
Julio Iglesias-Garcia, Daniel de la Iglesia-Garcia, José M. Olmos-Martinez, José Lariño-Noia, J. Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
-
5,920
View
-
243
Download
-
6
Web of Science
-
7
Crossref
Case Report
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pancreatoduodenal Groove Pathology: Report of Three Cases and Brief Review of the Literature
-
Inés C. Oría, Juan E. Pizzala, Augusto M. Villaverde, Juan C. Spina, Analía V. Pasqua, Julio C. Lazarte, Oscar M. Mazza, Mariano M. Marcolongo
-
Clin Endosc 2019;52(2):196-200. Published online November 9, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.097
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- The pancreatoduodenal groove is a small area where pathologic processes involving the distal bile duct, duodenum, pancreatic head, ampulla of Vater, and retroperitoneum converge. Despite great advances in imaging techniques, a definitive preoperative diagnosis is challenging because of the complex anatomy of this area. Therefore, surgical intervention is frequently required because of the inability to completely exclude malignancy.
We report 3 cases of patients with different groove pathologies but similar clinical and imaging presentation, and show the essential role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in making a specific preoperative diagnosis, excluding malignancy in the first case, changing diagnosis in the second case, and confirming malignancy in the third case. EUS was a fundamental tool in this cohort of patients, not only because of its ability to provide superior visualization of a difficult anatomical region, but because of the ability to guide precise, realtime procedures, such as fine-needle aspiration.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Groove pancreatitis presenting with upper gastrointestinal obstruction and abnormal renal function: A case report and literature review
Xiaoyuan Fan, Chihong Shi, Dewen Lu
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Groove Pancreatitis: Clinical Cases and Review of the Literature
Catarina Neto do Nascimento, Carolina Palmela, António Sampaio Soares, Maria Lobo Antunes, Catarina Andrade Fidalgo, Luísa Glória
GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 30(6): 437. CrossRef - Cytopathology of Inflammatory Lesions of the Pancreatobiliary Tree
Barbara A Centeno
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2023; 147(3): 267. CrossRef - Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in groove pancreatitis
Yu Mo She, Nan Ge
Annals of Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Complete duodenal obstruction induced by groove pancreatitis: A case report
Ya-Li Wang, Chen-Hao Tong, Jian-Hua Yu, Zhi-Liang Chen, Hong Fu, Jian-Hui Yang, Xin Zhu, Bao-Chun Lu
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2019; 7(23): 4106. CrossRef
-
5,896
View
-
147
Download
-
5
Web of Science
-
5
Crossref
Original Articles
-
Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
-
Ihab I. El Hajj, Howard Wu, Sarah Reuss, Melissa Randolph, Akeem Harris, Mark A. Gromski, Mohammad Al-Haddad
-
Clin Endosc 2018;51(6):576-583. Published online July 13, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.053
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remains the most common EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new Franseen tip fine needle biopsy (FNB) device for EUSguided sampling of solid lesions and compare it with the historical FNA technique.
Methods
Acquire® 22 G FNB needle (Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, USA) was used for solid tumor sampling (Study group). Tissue was collected for rapid on-site evaluation, and touch and crush preparations were made. Historical EUS-FNA samples obtained using Expect® 22 G FNA needle (Boston Scientific Co.) were used as controls (Control group). All specimens were independently evaluated by two cytopathologists blinded to the formal cytopathological diagnosis.
Results
Mean cell block histology scores were significantly higher (p=0.046) in the FNB group (51 samples) despite a significantly lower (p<0.001) mean number of passes compared to the FNA group (50 specimens). The overall diagnostic yields for the FNB vs. FNA groups were 96% vs. 88%. The degree of tumor differentiation was adequately assessed in all cell block qualifying lesions in the FNB group. Two patients developed post-FNB abdominal pain.
Conclusions
The new Franseen tip FNB device provides histologically superior and cytologically comparable specimens to those obtained by FNA, but with fewer passes.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Consensus statements on endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition. Guidelines from the Asian Endoscopic Ultrasound Group
Charing Ching‐Ning Chong, Rapat Pittayanon, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Vikram Bhatia, Nozomi Okuno, Raymond Shing‐Yan Tang, Tsu‐Yao Cheng, Yu‐Ting Kuo, Dongwook Oh, Tae Jun Song, Tae Hyeon Kim, Kazuo Hara, Anthony Wing‐Hung Chan, Howard Ho Wai Leung, Aiming Ya
Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(8): 871. CrossRef - The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Overview and Summary
Barbara A. Centeno, Mauro Saieg, Momin T. Siddiqui, Miguel Perez‐Machado, Lester J. Layfield, Birgit Weynand, Michelle D. Reid, Edward B. Stelow, Maria D. Lozano, Noriyoshi Fukushima, Ian A. Cree, Ravi Mehrotra, Fernando C. Schmitt, Andrew S. Field, Marth
Cancer Cytopathology.2024; 132(7): 396. CrossRef - Comparative diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions without ROSE: a prospec
Hussein Hassan Okasha, Mohammed Yousri Ahmed, Marwa A. Ahmed, Sameh Abou Elenin, Abeer Abdel-latif, Mahmoud Farouk, Mahmoud Gamal Ameen, Ahmed Hussein El-Habashi, Mahasen Akram Elshaer, Ahmed Elsayed Alzamzamy
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Franseen needle in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a phase II prospective study
Kohei Shikano, Jun Ikari, Takahiro Nakajima, Masayuki Ota, Yuki Shiko, Akira Naito, Mitsuhiro Abe, Takeshi Kawasaki, Jun-Ichiro Ikeda, Yoshihito Ozawa, Takuji Suzuki
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 54(9): 1037. CrossRef - Evaluation of Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreatic Cancer for Genetic Yield and Quality
Jonanthan Tiong, Phi Nguyen, Mithra Sritharan, Joanne Lundy, Henry Shen, Beena Kumar, Michael Swan, Brenda Jenkins, Daniel Croagh
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Pulmonary endoscopy – central to an interventional pulmonology program
Sally Griffiths, Lucy Power, David Breen
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine.2024; 18(11): 843. CrossRef - Endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy Franseen fine needle biopsy tool versus standard fine needle aspiration needle: Impact on diagnosis and tissue adequacy
Matthew C. Aboudara, Timothy Saettele, Ossama Tawfik
Respiratory Medicine.2023; 208: 107131. CrossRef - Clinical Applications of Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) Scope: Challenges and Opportunities
Davide Biondini, Mariaenrica Tinè, Umberto Semenzato, Matteo Daverio, Francesca Scalvenzi, Erica Bazzan, Graziella Turato, Marco Damin, Paolo Spagnolo
Diagnostics.2023; 13(15): 2565. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Deep-Seated Lymphadenopathies and Spleen Lesions: A Monocentric Experience
Flaminia Bellisario, Fabia Attili, Fabrizia Campana, Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Silvia Bellesi, Elena Maiolo, Eleonora Alma, Rosalia Malafronte, Giuseppe Macis, Luigi Maria Larocca, Salvatore Annunziata, Francesco D’Alò, Stefan Hohaus
Diagnostics.2023; 13(17): 2839. CrossRef - Fine needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of immunohistochemistry-required lesions: A multicenter study with prospective evaluation
Yuchong Zhao, Dingkun Xiong, Aruna, Qian Chen, Dong Kuang, Si Xiong, Yun Wang, Yilei Yang, Qiaozhen Guo, Lan Chen, Jiqiao Zhang, Xiaoli Wu, Yunlu Feng, Bin Cheng
Endoscopic Ultrasound.2023; 12(6): 456. CrossRef - A Systematic Review of Real-time Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy Methods for Soft Tissues
Rahul Nadda, Ashish Kumar Sahani, Ramjee Repaka
IETE Technical Review.2022; 39(5): 1011. CrossRef - Concordance of the histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and its distinction from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy specimens: an interobserver agreement study
Kenji Notohara, Terumi Kamisawa, Toru Furukawa, Noriyoshi Fukushima, Takeshi Uehara, Satomi Kasashima, Eisuke Iwasaki, Atsushi Kanno, Atsuhiro Kawashima, Kensuke Kubota, Yasuhiro Kuraishi, Masayo Motoya, Itaru Naitoh, Takayoshi Nishino, Junichi Sakagami,
Virchows Archiv.2022; 480(3): 565. CrossRef - Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis
Priscilla A. van Riet, Nicole S. Erler, Marco J. Bruno, Djuna L. Cahen
Endoscopy.2021; 53(04): 411. CrossRef - A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial of Wet Suction and Conventional Techniques of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
Mika Takasumi, Takuto Hikichi, Minami Hashimoto, Jun Nakamura, Tsunetaka Kato, Hitomi Kikuchi, Yuichi Waragai, Ko Watanabe, Tadayuki Takagi, Rei Suzuki, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Manabu Hayashi, Yuki Sato, Hiroki Irie, Ryoichiro Kobashi, Yoshinori Okubo, Masao Ko
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef - Comparison of contrast-enhanced versus conventional EUS-guided FNA/fine-needle biopsy in diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a randomized controlled trial
In Rae Cho, Seok-Hoo Jeong, Huapyong Kang, Eui Joo Kim, Yeon Suk Kim, Jae Hee Cho
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 94(2): 303. CrossRef - A prospective multicenter study of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle biopsy using a 22‐gauge Franseen needle for pancreatic solid lesions
Kazunaga Ishigaki, Yousuke Nakai, Naoki Sasahira, Kazuya Sugimori, Katsuya Kitamura, Tomohisa Iwai, Saburo Matsubara, Kenji Shimura, Takao Itoi, Shomei Ryozawa, Jun Ushio, Shinpei Doi, Hiroo Imazu, Iruru Maetani, Hiroyuki Isayama
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 36(10): 2754. CrossRef - Optimal number of needle punctures in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial lesions without rapid on-site evaluation
Masato Suzuki, Yusuke Sekino, Kunihiro Hosono, Kenichi Kawana, Hajime Nagase, Kensuke Kubota, Atsushi Nakajima
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2021; 48(4): 623. CrossRef - Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using a 20-Gauge Menghini Needle with a Lateral Forward Bevel and a 22-Gauge Franseen Needle: A Single-Center Large Cohort Study
Takafumi Mie, Takashi Sasaki, Ryo Kanata, Takaaki Furukawa, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 730. CrossRef - Usefulness of a Fork-Tip Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy for Gastric Subepithelial Lesions
Mika Takasumi, Takuto Hikichi, Minami Hashimoto, Jun Nakamura, Tsunetaka Kato, Ryoichiro Kobashi, Takumi Yanagita, Rei Suzuki, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Yuki Sato, Hiroki Irie, Tadayuki Takagi, Masao Kobayakawa, Yuko Hashimoto, Hiromasa Ohira
Diagnostics.2021; 11(10): 1883. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy in solid lesions: A multi-center analysis
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Moura, Thomas R McCarty, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Galileu Ferreira Ayala Farias, Antonio Coutinho Madruga-Neto, Marvin Ryou, Christopher C Thompson
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(34): 10507. CrossRef - Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): Technical Updates and Pathological Yield
Huzaifa A. Jaliawala, Samid M. Farooqui, Kassem Harris, Tony Abdo, Jean I. Keddissi, Houssein A. Youness
Diagnostics.2021; 11(12): 2331. CrossRef - Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)‐guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses
Khaled Alkhateeb, Beatrice B. Lee, Houda Alatassi, Mary A. Sanders, Endashaw M. Omer, Stephen A. McClave, Mostafa Fraig
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2020; 48(3): 197. CrossRef - Factors associated with diagnostic accuracy, technical success and adverse events of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
De‐Feng Li, Jian‐yao Wang, Mei‐feng Yang, Feng Xiong, Ding‐guo Zhang, Zheng‐lei Xu, Min‐Han Luo, Zhen‐dong Jing, Kai‐Xuan Wang, Li‐sheng Wang, Jun Yao
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2020; 35(8): 1264. CrossRef - An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study
Lindsey M Temnykh, Mahmoud A Rahal, Zahra Zia, Mohammad A Al-Haddad
Gastroenterology Report.2020; 8(5): 349. CrossRef - Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial
Shi-yu Li, Wei Zhou, Lei Shi, Zhen Ding, Jun Yao, Yue-ping Jiang, Li Gao, Hui Jiang, Zhen-dong Jin, Kai-xuan Wang
Digestive and Liver Disease.2020; 52(7): 734. CrossRef - Core needle biopsy with endobronchial ultrasonography: single center experience with 100 cases
Akshu Balwan, Billie Bixby, Cassi Grotepas, Benjamin L. Witt, Aidin Iravani, Sikandar Ansari, Chakravarthy B. Reddy
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.2020; 9(4): 249. CrossRef - Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions
Amin K. Soltani, Kumar Krishnan
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.2020; 9(5): 389. CrossRef - Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for small solid pancreatic lesions
Takafumi Mie, Takashi Sasaki, Ryo Kanata, Takaaki Furukawa, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
Endoscopy International Open.2020; 08(10): E1359. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Thomas R. McCarty, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Galileu Ferreira Ayala Farias, Marvin Ryou, Linda S. Lee, Christopher C. Thompson
Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(5): 600. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle biopsies of pancreatic lesions: Prospective study of histology quality using Franseen needle
Petros Stathopoulos, Anika Pehl, Lutz Philipp Breitling, Christian Bauer, Tobias Grote, Thomas Mathias Gress, Carsten Denkert, Ulrike Walburga Denzer
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(37): 5693. CrossRef - Comparison of the reverse bevel versus Franseen type endoscopic ultrasound needle
Chi Wing Chow, Syeda Asma Haider, Krish Ragunath, Guruprasad P Aithal, Martin W James, Jacobo Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Aloysious Dominic Aravinthan, Suresh Vasan Venkatachalapathy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 12(9): 266. CrossRef - Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using a 22-gauge Franseen needle: a prospective multicenter study
Takuya Ishikawa, Hiroki Kawashima, Eizaburo Ohno, Hiroki Suhara, Daijuro Hayashi, Takeshi Hiramatsu, Hiroshi Matsubara, Takahisa Suzuki, Takamichi Kuwahara, Eri Ishikawa, Yoshie Shimoyama, Fumie Kinoshita, Yoshiki Hirooka, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Endoscopy.2020; 52(11): 978. CrossRef - Overlooked risk for needle tract seeding following endoscopic ultrasound-guided minimally invasive tissue acquisition
Ruo-Yu Gao, Ben-Hua Wu, Xin-Ying Shen, Tie-Li Peng, De-Feng Li, Cheng Wei, Zhi-Chao Yu, Ming-Han Luo, Feng Xiong, Li-Sheng Wang, Jun Yao
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(40): 6182. CrossRef - Efficacy of EUS-guided FNB using a Franseen needle for tissue acquisition and microsatellite instability evaluation in unresectable pancreatic lesions
Mitsuru Sugimoto, Hiroki Irie, Tadayuki Takagi, Rei Suzuki, Naoki Konno, Hiroyuki Asama, Yuki Sato, Jun Nakamura, Mika Takasumi, Minami Hashimoto, Tsunetaka Kato, Ryoichiro Kobashi, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Yuko Hashimoto, Takuto Hikichi, Hiromasa Ohira
BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition by 22-Gauge Franseen and Standard Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions
Kazunaga Ishigaki, Yousuke Nakai, Hiroki Oyama, Sachiko Kanai, Tatsunori Suzuki, Tomoka Nakamura, Tatsuya Sato, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kei Saito, Tomotaka Saito, Naminatsu Takahara, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Suguru Mizuno, Hirofumi Kogure, Minoru Tada, Hiroyuki Isayama
Gut and Liver.2020; 14(6): 817. CrossRef - Clinical Impact of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Using a Novel Franseen Needle for Histological Assessment of Pancreatic Diseases
Takuya Ishikawa, Hiroki Kawashima, Eizaburo Ohno, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Daisuke Sakai, Tadashi Iida, Ryo Nishio, Takeshi Yamamura, Kazuhiro Furukawa, Masanao Nakamura, Ryoji Miyahara, Senju Hashimoto, Masatoshi Ishigami, Yoshiki Hirooka
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef - Recent advancement in EUS-guided fine needle sampling
Pujan Kandel, Michael B. Wallace
Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 54(5): 377. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies: Is the Future Here Yet?
Ihab I. El Hajj, Mohammad Al-Haddad
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(4): 297. CrossRef - Present and Future of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition in Solid Pancreatic Tumors
Jae Keun Park, Kwang Hyuck Lee
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(6): 541. CrossRef - Will New Instruments for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Make Us Happy?
Chang-Il Kwon
Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(6): 510. CrossRef
-
6,968
View
-
200
Download
-
50
Web of Science
-
40
Crossref
-
Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographers during Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
-
Takashi Tamura, Yasunobu Yamashita, Kazuki Ueda, Yuki Kawaji, Masahiro Itonaga, Shin-ichi Murata, Kaori Yamamoto, Takeichi Yoshida, Hiroki Maeda, Takao Maekita, Mikitaka Iguchi, Hideyuki Tamai, Masao Ichinose, Jun Kato
-
Clin Endosc 2017;50(4):372-378. Published online January 20, 2017
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.083
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been used to diagnose gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs). Although rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has been reported to improve the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions, on-site cytopathologists are not routinely available. Given this background, the usefulness of ROSE by endosonographers themselves for pancreatic tumors has also been reported. However, ROSE by endosonographers for diagnosis of SMT has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA with ROSE by endosonographers for SMT, focusing on diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), compared with that of EUS-FNA alone.
Methods
Twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA with ROSE by endosonographers for SMT followed by surgical resection were identified. Ten historical control subjects who underwent EUS-FNA without ROSE were used for comparison.
Results
The overall diagnostic accuracy for SMT was significantly higher in cases with than without ROSE (100% vs. 80%, p=0.03). The number of needle passes by FNA with ROSE by endosonographers tended to be fewer, although accuracy was increased (3.3±1.3 vs. 5.9±3.8, p=0.06).
Conclusions
ROSE by endosonographers during EUS-FNA for SMT is useful for definitive diagnosis, particularly for GIST.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review
Cynthia A. Verloop, Jacqueline A.C. Goos, Marco J. Bruno, Rutger Quispel, Lydi M.J.W. van Driel, Lieke Hol
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 99(6): 895. CrossRef - Gastric glomus tumor on EUS-FNA-based cytology: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 4 cases, including 1 case with associated MIR143HG-NOTCH2 fusion gene
Sameer Chhetri Aryal, Sanam Husain, Ziying Zhang, Lisi Yuan
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.2023; 12(4): 296. CrossRef - EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New?
Thomas Vasilakis, Dimitrios Ziogas, Georgios Tziatzios, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Eleni Koukoulioti, Christina Kapizioni, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Antonio Facciorusso, Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
Diagnostics.2023; 13(13): 2176. CrossRef - A prospective randomized noninferiority trial comparing conventional smears and SurePathTM liquid-based cytology in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of esophageal, gastric, and duodenal lesions
Jae Chang Jun, Sang Hyub Lee, Han Myung Lee, Sang Gyun Kim, Hyunsoo Chung, Joo Seong Kim, Namyoung Park, Jin Ho Choi, Yoonjin Kwak, Soo-Jeong Cho
Medicine.2023; 102(29): e34321. CrossRef - The Diagnosis of Small Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy
Masanari Sekine, Takeharu Asano, Hirosato Mashima
Diagnostics.2022; 12(4): 810. CrossRef - A Pilot Study of Image-associative Teaching Versus Traditional Didactic Teaching for Novice Endosonographers Learning Cytopathology Effectively
Yi Chu, Wenyu LI, Min Luo, HongYi Zhu, Yi Sun, Xiaolin She, Jirong Huo, Yuqian Zhou
Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(4): 324. CrossRef - Diagnostic yield of EUS-TA for gastric submucosal epithelial lesions using rapid specimen evaluation under stereomicroscopy
Tetsuhiko Hirai, Junro Ishizaki, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Myontyori Kim, Yoichi Saegusa, Akinori Tamaki, Masafumi Watanabe, Hironori Masutani, Kosuke Okuwaki, Mitsuhiro Kida, Chika Kusano
Progress of Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 100(1): 63. CrossRef - Ki‐67 index assessment on FNA specimens of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Correlation with mitotic rate and potential predictive value for risk stratification
Xi Wang, Rita Abi‐Raad, Haiming Tang, Guoping Cai
Cancer Cytopathology.2022; 130(12): 974. CrossRef - Recent Progress and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Toshirou Nishida, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yoichi Naito
Cancers.2021; 13(13): 3158. CrossRef - Optimal number of needle punctures in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial lesions without rapid on-site evaluation
Masato Suzuki, Yusuke Sekino, Kunihiro Hosono, Kenichi Kawana, Hajime Nagase, Kensuke Kubota, Atsushi Nakajima
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2021; 48(4): 623. CrossRef - Methodological and Technical Aspects of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of the Upper Digestive Tract Lesions
E. A. Godzhello, N. A. Bulganina, M. V. Khrustaleva
Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology.2020; 174(4): 107. CrossRef - Challenging biliary strictures: pathophysiological features, differential diagnosis, diagnostic algorithms, and new clinically relevant biomarkers - part 1
Jean-Marc Dumonceau, Myriam Delhaye, Nicolas Charette, Annarita Farina
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Mucosal incision‐assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration with a rapid on‐site evaluation for gastric subepithelial lesions: A randomized cross‐over study
Takashi Osoegawa, Yosuke Minoda, Eikichi Ihara, Keishi Komori, Akira Aso, Ayako Goto, Soichi Itaba, Haruei Ogino, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Naohiko Harada, Kosuke Makihara, Shinichi Tsuruta, Hidetaka Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Ogawa
Digestive Endoscopy.2019; 31(4): 413. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors
Gyu Young Pih, Do Hoon Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(4): 314. CrossRef - Rapid On-Site Evaluation of Fine-Needle Aspiration by Non-Cytopathologists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Adequacy Assessment
Lauren Pearson, Rachel E. Factor, Sandra K. White, Brandon S. Walker, Lester J. Layfield, Robert L. Schmidt
Acta Cytologica.2018; 62(4): 244. CrossRef - Is a Cytopathologist Always Needed during Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Tissue Acquisition?
Moon Won Lee, Gwang Ha Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(4): 311. CrossRef - Endoscopic Evaluation and Management of Gastric Stromal Tumors
Kambiz Kadkhodayan, Ehsan Rafiq, Robert H. Hawes
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2017; 15(4): 691. CrossRef
-
8,379
View
-
234
Download
-
15
Web of Science
-
17
Crossref
Case Report
Original Articles
-
Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
-
Hee Kyong Na, Jeong Hoon Lee, Young Soo Park, Ji Yong Ahn, Kwi-Sook Choi, Do Hoon Kim, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Jin-Ho Kim
-
Clin Endosc 2015;48(2):152-157. Published online March 27, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.2.152
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background/Aims
To evaluate the yields and utility of 19-gauge (G) Trucut biopsy (TCB) versus 22 G fine needle aspiration (FNA) for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs).
MethodsWe retrieved data for 152 patients with a gastric SET larger than 2 cm who had undergone endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided 19 G TCB (n=90) or 22 G FNA (n=62). Relevant clinical, tumor-specific, and EUS procedural information was reviewed retrospectively.
ResultsA specific diagnosis was made for 76 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and 51 non-GIST SETs. The diagnostic yield of TCB was greater than that of FNA (77.8% vs. 38.7%, p<0.001). The percentage of non-diagnostic specimens (suspicious and insufficient) was significantly lower in the TCB group (6.7% and 15.5%, respectively) than in the FNA group (22.6% and 38.7%, respectively; both p<0.001). TCB accurately diagnosed 90.9% of GISTs and 81.1% of non-GIST SETs, whereas FNA accurately diagnosed 68.8% of GISTs and 14.3% of non-GIST SETs. There were nine technical failures with TCB, and the rate of adverse events did not differ between the groups (TCB vs. FNA, 3.3% vs. 8.1%; p=0.27).
ConclusionsNineteen-gauge TCB is safe and highly valuable for diagnosing gastric SETs larger than 2 cm if technical failure can be avoided.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
-
9,677
View
-
135
Download
-
37
Web of Science
-
33
Crossref
-
Performance and Clinical Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Intramural Lesions
-
Hea Jung Sung, Yu Kyung Cho, Eun Young Park, Sung Jin Moon, Chul Hyun Lim, Jin Su Kim, Jae Myung Park, In Seok Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Myung-Gyu Choi, Kyu Yong Choi
-
Clin Endosc 2013;46(6):627-632. Published online November 19, 2013
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.6.627
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background/Aims
We evaluated the performance, clinical role, and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in gastrointestinal intramural lesions.
MethodsProcedural and pathologic data were reviewed from consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA for intramural lesions. Final diagnoses were determined by surgical histopathologic conformation and the diagnosis of malignancy, including clinical follow-up with repeat imaging.
ResultsForty-six patients (mean age, 47 years; 24 males) underwent EUS-FNA. Lesions were located in the stomach (n=31), esophagus (n=5), and duodenum (n=10). The median lesion size was 2 cm (range, 1 to 20.6). Final diagnoses were obtained in 22 patients (48%). EUS-FNA was diagnostic in 40 patients (87%). The diagnostic accuracy of cytology for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions was 82%; diagnostic error occurred in three patients (6%). The cytologic results influenced clinical judgment in 78% cases. The primary reasons for negative or no clinical impact were false-negative results, misdirected patient management, and inconclusive cytology.
ConclusionsEUS-FNA exhibited an 87% diagnostic yield for gastrointestinal intramural lesions; the accuracy of cytology for differentiating malignancy was 82%. The limitations of EUS-FNA were primarily because of nondiagnostic sampling (9%) and probable diagnostic error (6%); these factors may influence the clinical role of EUS-FNA.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Feasibility and clinical value of linear endoscopic ultrasonography imaging in the lower gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions
Li Tao, Yajun Chen, Qianqian Fang, Fan Xu, Qianwei Yu, Lijiu Zhang, Xiangpeng Hu
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumors: Impact of rapid onsite evaluation and correlation with histopathologic follow‐up
Syed M. Gilani, Thiruvengadam Muniraj, Harry R. Aslanian, Guoping Cai
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2021; 49(2): 203. CrossRef - Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Focusing on Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Eun Young Kim
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2015; 15(1): 9. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy without Rapid On-Site Cytologic Examination: A Time to Change the Paradigm?
Yeon Suk Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(3): 207. CrossRef
-
6,223
View
-
58
Download
-
4
Crossref
Special Issue Articles of IDEN 2013
-
Role of Repeated Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Inconclusive Initial Cytology Result
-
Eun Young Kim
-
Clin Endosc 2013;46(5):540-542. Published online September 30, 2013
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.540
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
For tissue diagnosis of suspected pancreatic cancer, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the procedure of choice with high safety and accuracy profiles. However, about 10% of cytologic findings of EUS-FNA are inconclusive. In that situation, careful observation, surgical exploration, or alternative diagnostic tools such as bile duct brushing with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or computed tomography-guided biopsy can be considered. However, some concerns and/or risks of these options render repeat EUS-FNA a reasonable choice. Repeated EUS-FNA may impose substantial clinical impact with low risk.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- An Unusual Presentation of a Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas Mimicking Adenocarcinoma
Hyung Ku Chon, Keum Ha Choi, Tae Hyeon Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(5): 615. CrossRef - Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Patients with Suspected Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Yield and Associated Change in Access to Appropriate Care
Robert A. Mitchell, Dylan Stanger, Constantin Shuster, Jennifer Telford, Eric Lam, Robert Enns
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 2016: 1. CrossRef - Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and multidisciplinary approach in the management of abdominal or mediastinal mass
Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco, Manuela Coppola, Elena Mannisi, Gerolamo Bevivino, Vincenzo Formica, Ilaria Portarena, Samanta Romeo, Pierpaolo Sileri, Mario Roselli, Francesco Pallone, Omero Alessandro Paoluzi
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2015; 27(9): 1045. CrossRef - Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses
Bo Sun, Xiujiang Yang, Bo Ping, Yiping He, Zhaozhen Zhang
Digestive Endoscopy.2015; 27(1): 130. CrossRef
-
6,234
View
-
62
Download
-
4
Crossref
-
Procore and Flexible 19 Gauge Needle Can Replace Trucut Biopsy Needle?
-
Ji Young Bang, Shyam Varadarajulu
-
Clin Endosc 2013;46(5):503-505. Published online September 30, 2013
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.503
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is routinely performed for establishing tissue diagnosis in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. The concept of delivering chemotherapy based on molecular markers and the ability to establish a reliable diagnosis in lieu of an onsite cytopathologist has fuelled the recent trend in procuring core tissue by means of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy. To overcome the technical limitations induced by the rigidity of the Trucut biopsy needle, a new ProCore needle with reverse bevel technology has been developed. Recent data suggests that the newly developed flexible 19 gauge needle can also procure core tissue and has easy maneuverability when navigating the transduodenal route. Irrespective of the needles being used, the best clinical outcomes can be attained only by practicing evidence-based techniques, procuring adequate quantity of sample for ancillary studies, and processing the specimens appropriately.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy
Zhiwang Li, Wei Liu, Xiaoda Xu, Peiyu Li
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 56(8): 668. CrossRef - Examination of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration using a puncture needle with a side trap
Kazuhito Miyazaki, Yuya Hirasawa, Masaharu Aga, Naoto Aiko, Yusuke Hamakawa, Yuri Taniguchi, Yuki Misumi, Yoko Agemi, Tsuneo Shimokawa, Hiroyuki Hayashi, Katsuhiko Naoki, Hiroaki Okamoto
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Feasibility and Accuracy of Transduodenal Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Lesions Using a 19-Gauge Flexible Needle: A Multicenter Study
Germana de Nucci, Maria Chiara Petrone, Nicola Imperatore, Edoardo Forti, Roberto Grassia, Silvia Giovanelli, Laura Ottaviani, Vincenzo Mirante, Giuseppe Sabatino, Carlo Fabbri, Mauro Manno, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Gianpiero Manes
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(2): 229. CrossRef - Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions
Amin K. Soltani, Kumar Krishnan
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.2020; 9(5): 389. CrossRef - Present status and perspectives of endosonography 2017 in gastroenterology
Michael Hocke, Barbara Braden, Christian Jenssen, Christoph F. Dietrich
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2018; 33(1): 36. CrossRef - Slow-Pull Using a Fanning Technique Is More Useful Than the Standard Suction Technique in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses
Jae Min Lee, Hong Sik Lee, Jong Jin Hyun, Jung Min Lee, In Kyung Yoo, Seung Han Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Bora Keum, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim
Gut and Liver.2018; 12(3): 360. CrossRef - Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
Ihab I. El Hajj, Howard Wu, Sarah Reuss, Melissa Randolph, Akeem Harris, Mark A. Gromski, Mohammad Al-Haddad
Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(6): 576. CrossRef - EUS-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal disease: a comparison of diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles
Michael Sai Lai Sey, Mohammad Al-Haddad, Thomas F. Imperiale, Kathleen McGreevy, Jingmei Lin, John M. DeWitt
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016; 83(2): 347. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided techniques for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Can we do better?
Andrew C Storm, Linda S Lee
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(39): 8658. CrossRef - Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Hee Kyong Na, Jeong Hoon Lee, Young Soo Park, Ji Yong Ahn, Kwi-Sook Choi, Do Hoon Kim, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Jin-Ho Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(2): 152. CrossRef - Tumor sólido pseudopapilar de páncreas con diagnóstico preoperatorio por ecoendoscopia
María del Carmen García Gavilán, Isabel María Méndez Sánchez, Andrés Sánchez Yagüe, Luis Robles Cabeza, Ana M Betancourt Zambrano, Martha González Bárcenas, María Ángeles Romero Ordoñez, María del Carmen López Vega, Andrés Sánchez Cantos
Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2015; 38(1): 42. CrossRef - Fine-Needle Biopsy: Should This Be the First Choice in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition?
Eun Young Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(5): 425. CrossRef - What is the best method for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration? Needle types and aspiration techniques
Kazuo Hara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Susumu Hijioka, Hiroshi Imaoka, Masahiro Tajika, Tsutomu Tanaka, Makoto Ishihara, Yasumasa Niwa, Kenji Yamao
Gastrointestinal Intervention.2014; 3(2): 104. CrossRef
-
6,069
View
-
57
Download
-
13
Crossref
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration versus Core Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Subepithelial Tumors
-
Kevin Webb, Joo Ha Hwang
-
Clin Endosc 2013;46(5):441-444. Published online September 30, 2013
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.441
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Subepithelial lesions are frequently encountered and remain a diagnostic challenge. Imaging of subepithelial lesions using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can be helpful in narrowing the differential diagnosis of the lesion; however, definitive diagnosis typically requires tissue. Many methods for acquiring tissue exist including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration, Trucut biopsy, and fine needle biopsy. Obtaining adequate tissue is important for cytologic and histologic exams including immunohistochemical stains, thus a great deal of effort has been made to increase tissue acquisition in order to improve diagnostic yield in subepithelial lesions.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Endoscopic Management of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor
Hyunchul Lim
Journal of Digestive Cancer Research.2022; 10(1): 16. CrossRef - Magnetically Actuated Soft Capsule Endoscope for Fine-Needle Biopsy
Donghoon Son, Hunter Gilbert, Metin Sitti
Soft Robotics.2020; 7(1): 10. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine‐needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency
Aslam Syed, Olivia Babich, Bharat Rao, Shailendra Singh, Neil Carleton, Abhishek Gulati, Archana Kulkarni, Mrinal Garg, Katie Farah, Gursimran Kochhar, Suzanne Morrissey, Marcia Mitre, Abhijit Kulkarni, Manish Dhawan, Jan F. Silverman, Majed Pharaon, Shya
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2019; 47(11): 1138. CrossRef - Cytology and histology: Complementary diagnostic modalities during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
Norge Vergara, Roseann I. Wu, Stuti Shroff, Cindy M. McGrath
Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 20(1): 10. CrossRef - Echoendoscopic ablative therapy for solid pancreatic tumors
Woo Hyun Paik, Dong Wan Seo
Journal of Digestive Diseases.2017; 18(3): 135. CrossRef - Via mucosa incision EUS-guided sampling for the diagnosis of conventional endoscopic biopsy-negative gastric wall thickening
Hongbo Shan, Xiaoyan Gao, Guangyu Luo, Jieqing Xiang, Bilv Zhong, Xiaofang Qiu, Shiyong Lin, Shuhong Li, Yin Li, Guoliang Xu, Rong Zhang
Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef - Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Focusing on Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Eun Young Kim
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2015; 15(1): 9. CrossRef - Which Needle Is Better for Diagnosing Subepithelial Lesions?
Eun Young Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(2): 91. CrossRef
-
6,637
View
-
59
Download
-
8
Crossref
Case Report
-
Hepatic and Splenic Infarction and Bowel Ischemia Following Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis
-
Hee Yoon Jang, Sang-Woo Cha, Byung Hoo Lee, Ho Eun Jung, Jin Woo Choo, Yun-Ju Cho, Hye Young Ju, Young Deok Cho
-
Clin Endosc 2013;46(3):306-309. Published online May 31, 2013
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.306
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) is a well-established intervention to palliate malignant pain. We report a patient who developed hepatic and splenic infarction and bowel ischemia following EUS-CPN. A 69-year-old man with known lung cancer and pancreatic metastasis was transferred for debilitating, significant epigastric pain for several months. The patient underwent EUS-CPN to palliate the pain. After the procedure, the patient complained continuously of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting; hematemesis and hematochezia were newly developed. Abdominal computed tomography revealed infarction of the liver and spleen and ischemia of the stomach and proximal small bowel. On esophagogastroduodenoscopy, hemorrhagic gastroduodenitis, and multiple gastric ulcers were noted without active bleeding. The patient expired on postoperative day 27 despite the best supportive care.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Endoscopic Management of Pain due to Chronic Pancreatitis
Arjun Kundra, Daniel S. Strand, Vanessa M. Shami
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2024; 34(3): 433. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Block Can Be a Useful Procedure for Pain Relief in Chronic Pancreatitis When Used Selectively
Nikhil Sonthalia, Vikram Patil, Awanish Tewari, Akash Roy, Mahesh Kumar Goenka
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 14(04): 203. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for managing abdominal pain related with advanced cancer
Ryota Nakano, Hideyuki Shiomi, Shogo Ota, Hiroko Iijima
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2022; 11(3): 126. CrossRef - Computed Tomography-Guided Celiac Plexus Block in the Setting of Pancreatic Cancer: Case Study and Review
David Weinstein, Sophie Gonzalez, David Sacks
Journal of Radiology Nursing.2022; 41(3): 159. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Interventions
Pedro Moutinho-Ribeiro, Pedro Costa-Moreira, Ana Caldeira, Sílvia Leite, Susana Marques, Teresa Moreira, Nuno Nunes, Miguel Bispo
GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 28(1): 32. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: An update
Guillermo Pérez-Aguado, Diego Martinez-Acitores de la Mata, Carlos Marra-López Valenciano, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien Sainz
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 13(10): 460. CrossRef - Efficacy of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis compared with medication alone for unresectable pancreatic cancer in the oxycodone/fentanyl era: a prospective randomized control study
Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Kaori Masu, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toji Murabayashi, Toshitaka Sakai, Fumisato Kozakai, Kei Ito
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(1): 120. CrossRef - Alleviating Pancreatic Cancer-Associated Pain Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Neurolysis
Kosuke Minaga, Mamoru Takenaka, Ken Kamata, Tomoe Yoshikawa, Atsushi Nakai, Shunsuke Omoto, Takeshi Miyata, Kentaro Yamao, Hajime Imai, Hiroki Sakamoto, Masayuki Kitano, Masatoshi Kudo
Cancers.2018; 10(2): 50. CrossRef - Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
Anthony Y B Teoh, Vinay Dhir, Mitsuhiro Kida, Ichiro Yasuda, Zhen Dong Jin, Dong Wan Seo, Majid Almadi, Tiing Leong Ang, Kazuo Hara, Ida Hilmi, Takao Itoi, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Koji Matsuda, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Rajesh Puri, Raymond S Tang, Hsiu-Po Wang, A
Gut.2018; 67(7): 1209. CrossRef - Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis
Amit H. Sachdev, Frank G. Gress
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2018; 28(4): 579. CrossRef - Eus-guided therapy for pancreatic pain: easy, effective and safe. why isn´t the first therapeutic approach?
Pilar Castro Carbajo, Lydia Elena Pradera Andrés, Carolina Navarro, Luis Ramón Rábago Torres
Gastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access.2018;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided celiac plexus block and neurolysis
Ichiro Yasuda, Hsiu‐Po Wang
Digestive Endoscopy.2017; 29(4): 455. CrossRef - Endoscopic Palliation of Pancreatic Cancer
Vishal B. Gohil, Jason B. Klapman
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2017; 15(3): 333. CrossRef - EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis
Ichiro YASUDA, Shinpei DOI, Masatoshi MABUCHI
Suizo.2015; 30(2): 191. CrossRef - Therapeutic role of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreaticobiliary disease: A comprehensive review
Fan-Sheng Meng
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(46): 12996. CrossRef
-
7,224
View
-
67
Download
-
15
Crossref
Focused Review Series: What Should We Know about EUS-FNA?
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Submucosal Lesion
-
Jeong Seop Moon
-
Clin Endosc 2012;45(2):117-123. Published online June 30, 2012
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.2.117
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
A submucosal lesion, more appropriately a subepithelial lesion, is hard to diagnose. Endoscopic ultrasonography is good to differentiate the nature of submucosal lesion. For definite diagnosis, tissue acquisition from submucosal lesion is necessary, and many methods have been introduced for this purpose mainly by endoscopic ultrasonography, such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), EUS-guided Trucut Biopsy (TCB), and EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB). For EUS-FNA, adequate processing of specimen is important, and for proper diagnosis of EUS-FNA specimen, both cytologic and histologic examinations, including immunohistochemical stains, are important. All gastrointestinal stromal tumors have some degree of malignant potential, so there have been a lot of efforts and methods to increase diagnostic yields of submucosal lesion. We herein review the current hot topics on EUS-FNA for submucosal tumor, such as needles, on-site cytopathologists, immunohistochemical stains, EUS-TCB, EUS-FNB, Ki-67 labelling index, DOG1, and combining EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Enhancing gastrointestinal submucosal tumor recognition in endoscopic ultrasonography: A novel multi-attribute guided contextual attention network
Hangbin Zheng, Zhixia Dong, Tianyuan Liu, Hanyao Zheng, Xinjian Wan, Jinsong Bao
Expert Systems with Applications.2024; 242: 122725. CrossRef - Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided biopsy using a three‐prong asymmetry tip needle for pancreatic tumors and peridigestive tract lesions: Retrospective single‐center study
Kento Shionoya, Ryosuke Tonozuka, Shuntaro Mukai, Takayoshi Tsuchiya, Reina Tanaka, Kenjiro Yamamoto, Kazumasa Nagai, Yukitoshi Mastunami, Hiroyuki Kojima, Takao Itoi
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2024; 31(4): 294. CrossRef - Gastric schwannoma: The gastrointestinal tumor simulator - case report and review of the literature
Amine Majdoubi, Anass El Achchi, Mohamed El Hammouti, Tareq Bouhout, Badr Serji
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 116: 109389. CrossRef - Emerging Technologies in Endoscopy for Gastrointestinal Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Overview
Gurkamal Singh Nijjar, Smriti Kaur Aulakh, Rajinderpal Singh, Sohbat Kaur Chandi
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Dysphagia Caused by Submucosal Tumor-Like Esophageal Cancer: Two Case Reports
Chunxiao Hu, Xiaohua Ye
International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasonography in a Tertiary Level Hospital: A Single-Centre Experience
Güner KILIÇ, Yusuf KAYAR
Sağlık Akademisi Kastamonu.2023; 8(2): 198. CrossRef - Successful Resection of Gastric Subepithelial Lipoma Using the Bite-on-Bite Approach: Reviving Old Techniques in a Peripheral Hospital
Serbulent Aydin, Mohamed Elgamal , Yucel Aydin
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Current advances in management, treatment, and surveillance
Camilla Gallo, Roberta Elisa Rossi, Federica Cavalcoli, Federico Barbaro, Ivo Boškoski, Pietro Invernizzi, Sara Massironi
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(11): 1123. CrossRef - Efficacy, Feasibility, and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
Yandi Tan, Xinyi Tang, Ju Huang, Rui Li
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 56(6): e283. CrossRef - AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Subepithelial Lesions Encountered During Routine Endoscopy: Expert Review
Kaveh Sharzehi, Amrita Sethi, Thomas Savides
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 20(11): 2435. CrossRef - Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
Yasunobu Yamashita, Reiko Ashida, Hirofumi Yamazaki, Yuki Kawaji, Toshio Shimokawa, Takashi Tamura, Keiichi Hatamaru, Masahiro Itonaga, Masayuki Kitano
Diagnostics.2022; 12(12): 3122. CrossRef - What About Gastric Schwannoma? A Review Article
Sara Lauricella, Sergio Valeri, Gianluca Mascianà, Ida Francesca Gallo, Erica Mazzotta, Chiara Pagnoni, Saponaro Costanza, Lorenza Falcone, Domenico Benvenuto, Marco Caricato, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2021; 52(1): 57. CrossRef - Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs)
Francesco Maione, Alessia Chini, Marco Milone, Nicola Gennarelli, Michele Manigrasso, Rosa Maione, Gianluca Cassese, Gianluca Pagano, Francesca Paola Tropeano, Gaetano Luglio, Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Diagnostics.2021; 11(5): 771. CrossRef - Controversies in EUS: Do we need miniprobes?
Hans Seifert, Pietro Fusaroli, PaoloGiorgio Arcidiacono, Barbara Braden, Felix Herth, Michael Hocke, Alberto Larghi, Bertrand Napoleon, Mihai Rimbas, BogdanSilvio Ungureanu, Adrian Sãftoiu, AnandV Sahai, ChristophF Dietrich
Endoscopic Ultrasound.2021; 10(4): 246. CrossRef - Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy in Gastric Subepithelial Tumors Located in the Cardia
Ga Hee Kim, Ji Yong Ahn, Chung Sik Gong, Mimi Kim, Hee Kyong Na, Jeong Hoon Lee, Kee Wook Jung, Do Hoon Kim, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(2): 583. CrossRef - Traction method for endoscopic subserosal dissection
Bianca Maria Quarta Colosso, Mary Raina Angeli Abad, Haruhiro Inoue
VideoGIE.2020; 5(4): 148. CrossRef - EUS and EUS-guided FNA/core biopsies in the evaluation of subepithelial lesions of the lower gastrointestinal tract: 10-year experience
IrinaM Cazacu, BenS Singh, AdrianaA Luzuriaga Chavez, Pramoda Koduru, Shamim Ejaz, BrianR Weston, WilliamA Ross, JeffreyH Lee, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, ManoopS Bhutani
Endoscopic Ultrasound.2020; 9(5): 329. CrossRef - Large leiomyoma of lower esophagus diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography–fine needle aspiration: A case report
Min Rao, Qing-Qing Meng, Pu-Jun Gao
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(22): 5809. CrossRef - Predicting Malignancy Risk in Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors with Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography Using Perfusion Analysis Software
Hyun Seok Lee, Chang Min Cho, Yong Hwan Kwon, Su Youn Nam
Gut and Liver.2019; 13(2): 161. CrossRef - Gastric Schwannoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature for Gastric Submucosal Masses Distinction
Behnam Sanei, Amirhosein Kefayat, Melika Samadi, Parvin Goli, Mohammad Hossein Sanei, Mahsa Khodadustan
Case Reports in Medicine.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef - Subepithelial rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor – the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration to establish a definitive cytological diagnosis: a case report
Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi, Martin Coronel, Danielle Azevedo Chacon, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura, Sérgio E. Matuguma, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura
Journal of Medical Case Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef - Is a Cytopathologist Always Needed during Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Tissue Acquisition?
Moon Won Lee, Gwang Ha Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(4): 311. CrossRef - Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Guiding Treatment Plans for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors
Jeong Seop Moon
Clinical Endoscopy.2016; 49(3): 220. CrossRef - Primary Esophageal Intramural Squamous Cell Carcinoma Masquerading as a Submucosal Tumor: A Rare Presentation of a Common Disease
Nikhil Sonthalia, Samit S. Jain, Ravindra G. Surude, Vinay B. Pawar, Suhas Udgirkar, Pravin M. Rathi
Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology.2016; 9: CGast.S40605. CrossRef - Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Hee Kyong Na, Jeong Hoon Lee, Young Soo Park, Ji Yong Ahn, Kwi-Sook Choi, Do Hoon Kim, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Jin-Ho Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(2): 152. CrossRef - Which Needle Is Better for Diagnosing Subepithelial Lesions?
Eun Young Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(2): 91. CrossRef - Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Focusing on Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Eun Young Kim
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2015; 15(1): 9. CrossRef - Utility of DOG1 Immunomarker in Fine Needle Aspirates of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
Aanchal Kakkar, Sandeep R. Mathur, Deepali Jain, Venkateswaran K. Iyer, Aasma Nalwa, Mehar C. Sharma
Acta Cytologica.2015; 59(1): 61. CrossRef - Prognostic Significance of Ki-67 Expression in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
Seong Yeon Jeong, Won Wo Park, You Sun Kim, Young Il Park, Seung Hyup Kim, Won Jae Yoon, Jeong Seop Moon, Byung Mo Lee, Seong Woo Hong, Yun Kyung Kang
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 64(2): 87. CrossRef - A case of anastomotic recurrence after surgery for gastric cancer diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration
Kouta Murohashi, Haruo Miwa, Kazuya Sugimori, Yuichiro Tozuka, Yuniba Ishii, Eri Kameta, Tomohiro Ishii, Takashi Kaneko, Takashi Oshima, Atsushi Kokawa, Kazushi Numata, Chikara Kunisaki, Katsuaki Tanaka, Shin Maeda
Progress of Digestive Endoscopy.2014; 85(1): 88. CrossRef - Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagus and stomach
Zhankun He, Chao Sun, Zhongqing Zheng, Qingxiang Yu, Tao Wang, Xin Chen, Hailong Cao, Wentian Liu, Bangmao Wang
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2013; 28(2): 262. CrossRef - Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Malignant Potential in Resected Gastric Subepithelial Tumors
Seung Kak Shin, Jun-Won Chung, Jung Hyun Lee, Yoon Jae Kim, Kwang Ahn Kwon, Dong Kyun Park, Woon Kee Lee
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2013; 13(2): 104. CrossRef - Diagnosis of Subepithelial Lesion: Still "Tissue Is the Issue"
Eun Young Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2013; 46(4): 313. CrossRef - Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Mesenchymal Tumors Adjacent to the Esophagogastric Junction: We Need to Do More
Chao Sun, Zhankun He, Zhongqing Zheng, Qingxiang Yu, Tao Wang, Wentian Liu, Bangmao Wang
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2013; 23(7): 570. CrossRef - Endoscopic Ultrasound, Where Are We Now in 2012?
Eun Young Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2012; 45(3): 321. CrossRef - Metastatic Breast Cancer to the Gastrointestinal Tract: Report of Five Cases and Review of the Literature
Massimo Ambroggi, Elisa Maria Stroppa, Patrizia Mordenti, Claudia Biasini, Adriano Zangrandi, Emanuele Michieletti, Elena Belloni, Luigi Cavanna
International Journal of Breast Cancer.2012; 2012: 1. CrossRef
-
8,164
View
-
89
Download
-
36
Crossref
-
Two Cases of Adrenal Cysts Assessed by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Purposes
-
Hyung Hun Kim, M.D., Jung Hwan Lee, M.D., Sang Ryul Lee, M.D., Su-Yeon Lee, M.D., Young Il Park, M.D., Soo Hyung Ryu, M.D., You Sun Kim, M.D. and Jeong Seop Moon, M.D.
-
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;40(2):97-101. Published online February 27, 2010
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Adrenal cyst is a rare disease and its incidence rate is about 0.06∼0.18%. Many cases of adrenal cysts are diagnosed incidentally. Surgical excision is generally performed to rule out malignancy when an adrenal cyst is detected. However, a reviewing the overall cases revealed that only 7% of adrenal cysts were malignant or potentially malignant. Thus, it has been suggested to observe an asymptomatic simple benign cyst after aspiration. From this point of view, it is necessary to perform a functional hormonal test and fine needle aspiration cytology for investigating the nature of adrenal cysts. Adrenal cyst drainage can be performed when surgical resection is not indicated. Computed tomography or ultrasonography guided percutaneous aspiration and drainage has been performed, but linear endoscopic ultrasound has not yet been used for this purpose. We have performed endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of adrenal cysts for cytologic and hormonal examination and endoscopic ultrasound guided adrenal cyst drainage, and we report here on our experiences with this technique. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;40:97-101)
-
The Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Mass
-
Jae Myung Cha, M.D.*, Dong Wan Seo, M.D., Sang Soo Lee, M.D., Do Hyun Park, M.D., Jung Sik Choi, M.D., Young Min Ju, M.D., Sung Koo Lee, M.D., Myung Hwan Kim, M.D. and Young Il Min, M.D.*
-
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2005;31(3):147-154. Published online September 30, 2005
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a technique used to distinguish benign and malignant pancreatic mass histologically. The aim of this study was to determine the value and safety of EUS-FNA for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid mass. Methods: The records of forty patients (M:F=24:16, median age: 56 yr) who underwent EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses between October 2003 and July 2004 were analyzed. Histological findings obtained by EUS-FNA were compared with the final diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy, and the rate of complication of EUS-FNA were analyzed. Results: The sites of the lesions were as follows: pancreatic head, n=20 (50%); body, n=10 (25%); tail, n=7 (18%); multifocal, n=3 (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive values were 71%, 78%, 73%, and 64%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 90% in body lesions, however 65% in head lesions. Transient abdominal pain occurred in one patient (3%) after the procedure; however, there was no case of severe complication. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is shown to be an effective and safe procedure for establishing a tissue diagnosis in patients with solid pancreatic masses. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2005;31:147154)
-
The Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Mass
-
Jae Myung Cha, M.D.*, Dong Wan Seo, M.D., Sang Soo Lee, M.D., Do Hyun Park, M.D., Jung Sik Choi, M.D., Young Min Ju, M.D., Sung Koo Lee, M.D., Myung Hwan Kim, M.D. and Young Il Min, M.D.*
-
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2005;31(3):147-154. Published online September 30, 2005
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a technique used to distinguish benign and malignant pancreatic mass histologically. The aim of this study was to determine the value and safety of EUS-FNA for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid mass. Methods: The records of forty patients (M:F=24:16, median age: 56 yr) who underwent EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses between October 2003 and July 2004 were analyzed. Histological findings obtained by EUS-FNA were compared with the final diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy, and the rate of complication of EUS-FNA were analyzed. Results: The sites of the lesions were as follows: pancreatic head, n=20 (50%); body, n=10 (25%); tail, n=7 (18%); multifocal, n=3 (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive values were 71%, 78%, 73%, and 64%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 90% in body lesions, however 65% in head lesions. Transient abdominal pain occurred in one patient (3%) after the procedure; however, there was no case of severe complication. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is shown to be an effective and safe procedure for establishing a tissue diagnosis in patients with solid pancreatic masses. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2005;31:147154)
-
내시경직시하 세침흡인세포진검사로 진단된 상부위장관종양 ( Endoscopic Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies )
-
-
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 1993;13(2):341-345. Published online November 30, 1992
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- The endoscopic fine needle aspiration cytology may add to the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic biopsy and brush cytology. It is also of particular value in submucosal, infiltrative and ulceronecrotic tumors. Endoscopic fine needle aspiration cytology was done with sclerotherapy needle(23 gauge) in. the 17 patients with submucosal tumor(18 cases), extrinsic compression(2 cases), infiltrative gastric cancer(one case) and cancer of the ampulla of Vater(one case) on the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic fine needle aspiration cytology established the diagnosis in 6 cases(submucosal tumor of the stomach; 2 cases, submucosal tumor of the duodenum; one case, extrinsic mass of the duodenum; one case, infiltrative cancer of the stomach; one case, and the cancer of ampulla of Vater; one case) of 17 cases. There were negative results for malignancy in 7 cases and material insufficiency in 4 cases. Five cases of the positive results with endoscopic fine needle aspiration cytology were not diagnosed with endoscopic forceps biopsies. There was no complication. We conclude that endoscopic fine needle aspiration cytology is a simple and safe technique and is of particular value in submucosal tumor, extrinsic compression of the upper gastrointestinal tract by tumor, and infiltrative gastric cancer.