Clinical Endoscopy

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Efficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy in esophageal luminal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Ishaan Vohra, Harishankar Gopakumar, Neil R. Sharma, Srinivas R. Puli; Received November 6, 2023 Accepted March 3, 2024 Published online October 10, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.282 [Epub ahead of print]

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF PubReader ePub: Background
/Aim: Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) is a novel technique used to repair esophageal perforation and leaks. Varying data have been reported on the overall success rate of EVAC. We aimed to conduct a metanalysis of the available data on the clinical success rate of EVAC.
Methods
Electronic databases were searched for publications addressing the efficacy of EVAC in esophageal luminal defects. Pooling was conducted using both fixed and random-effects models. The overall clinical success of EVAC therapy was considered the primary outcome, whereas, overall complication rates, need for adjunct therapy, and mortality were considered secondary outcomes.
Results
In total, 366 patients were included in the study. On pooled analysis, the mean age was 66 years with 68.32% of patients being men. Overall pooled clinical success rate of EVAC therapy was 87.95%. Upon subgroup analysis, the pooled clinical success rate of postsurgical anastomotic leak and transmural esophageal perforation were found to be 86.57% and 88.89%, respectively. The all-cause hospital mortality was 14% and 4.2% in patients with esophageal perforation and EVAC, respectively.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that EVAC therapy has a high overall clinical success rate, with low mortality. EVAC therapy seems to be a promising procedure with excellent outcomes in patients with luminal esophageal defects.

826 View
117 Download

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Suprabhat Giri, Vaneet Jearth, Harish Darak, Sridhar Sundaram; Clin Endosc 2022;55(6):742-750. Published online November 9, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.141

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is commonly used for the resection of colorectal polyps ≤10 mm. Data regarding the influence of snare type on CSP effectiveness are conflicting. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of thin- and thick-wire snares for CSP.
Methods
A comprehensive search of the literature published between 2000 and 2021 was performed of various databases for comparative studies evaluating the outcomes of thin- versus thick-wire snares for CSP.
Results
Five studies with data on 1,425 polyps were included in the analysis. The thick-wire snare was comparable to the thin-wire snare with respect to complete histological resection (risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–1.09), overall bleeding (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.40–2.40), polyp retrieval (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97–1.04), and involvement of submucosa in the resection specimen (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.72–2.28). There was no publication bias and a small study effect, and the relative effects remained the same in the sensitivity analysis.
Conclusions
CSP using a thin-wire snare has no additional benefit over thick-wire snares in small colorectal polyps. Factors other than snare design may play a role in improving CSP outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Factors determining the resection ability of snares in cold snare polypectomy: Construction of an ex vivo model for accurately evaluating resection ability
Ryohei Hirose, Takuma Yoshida, Naohisa Yoshida, Katsuma Yamauchi, Hajime Miyazaki, Naoto Watanabe, Risa Bandou, Ken Inoue, Hiroshi Ikegaya, Takaaki Nakaya, Yoshito Itoh
Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(5): 573. CrossRef
Effectiveness and safety of thin vs. thick cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Rishad Khan, Sunil Samnani, Marcus Vaska, Samir C Grover, Catharine M Walsh, Jeffrey Mosko, Michael J Bourke, Steven J Heitman, Nauzer Forbes
Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(01): E99. CrossRef
International Digestive Endoscopy Network consensus on the management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy
Seung Joo Kang, Chung Hyun Tae, Chang Seok Bang, Cheol Min Shin, Young-Hoon Jeong, Miyoung Choi, Joo Ha Hwang, Yutaka Saito, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Christopher Khor, Vu Van Khien, Kee Don Choi, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Oh Young Lee
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(2): 141. CrossRef
IDEN Consensus on Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Seung Joo Kang, Chung Hyun Tae, Chang Seok Bang, Cheol Min Shin, Young-Hoon Jeong, Miyoung Choi, Joo Ha Hwang, Yutaka Saito, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Christopher Khor, Vu Van Khien, Kee Don Choi, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Oh Young Lee
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 83(6): 217. CrossRef
High‐Performance Dedicated Snares with Tip Attachments can Overcome Current Disadvantages in Cold Snare Polypectomy
Ryohei Hirose, Naohisa Yoshida, Takuma Yoshida, Hiroki Mukai, Katsuma Yamauchi, Hajime Miyazaki, Naoto Watanabe, Risa Bandou, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yoshikazu Inagaki, Yutaka Inada, Takaaki Murakami, Akio Yanagisawa, Hiroshi Ikegaya, Takaaki Nakaya, Yoshi
Advanced Materials Technologies.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
International Digestive Endoscopy Network Consensus on the Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Seung Joo Kang, Chung Hyun Tae, Chang Seok Bang, Cheol Min Shin, Young-Hoon Jeong, Miyoung Choi, Joo Ha Hwang, Yutaka Saito, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Christopher Khor, Vu Van Khien, Kee Don Choi, Ki-Nam Shim, Geun Am Song, Oh Young Lee
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(5): 764. CrossRef
Advances in Endoscopic Resection
Mitsuru Esaki, Sonmoon Mohapatra, Norio Fukami
Gastroenterology Clinics of North America.2024; 53(4): 709. CrossRef
Does the wire diameter really determine the outcomes in cold snare polypectomy?
S Giri, S Sundaram
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 38(4): 665. CrossRef
Cold resection for colorectal polyps: where we are and where we are going?
Antonio Capogreco, Ludovico Alfarone, Davide Massimi, Alessandro Repici
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 17(7): 719. CrossRef
Endoscopic treatment of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer
Yunho Jung
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 642. CrossRef

3,202 View
165 Download
10 Web of Science
10 Crossref

Original Articles

Insufflation of Carbon Dioxide versus Air During Colonoscopy Among Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: John Alexander Lata Guacho, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Bruna Furia Buzetti Hourneaux de Moura, Megui Marilia Mansilla Gallegos, Thomas McCarty, Ricardo Katsuya Toma, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura; Clin Endosc 2021;54(2):242-249. Published online March 25, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.275

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: Carbon dioxide is increasingly used in insufflation during colonoscopy in adult patients; however, air insufflation remains the primary practice among pediatric gastroenterologists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate insufflation using CO₂ versus air in colonoscopies in pediatric patients.
Methods
Individualized search strategies were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and LILACS databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane working methodology. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were selected for the present meta-analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated for outcomes including procedure time and abdominal pain immediately and 24 hours post-procedure.
Results
The initial search yielded 644 records, of which five RCTs with a total of 358 patients (CO₂: n=178 versus air: n=180) were included in the final analysis. The procedure time was not different between the CO₂ and air insufflation groups (mean difference, 10.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.55 to 24.22; p=0.11). Abdominal pain immediately post-procedure was significantly lower in the CO₂ group (risk difference, -0.15; 95% CI; -0.26 to -0.03; p=0.01) while abdominal pain at 24 hours post-procedure was similar (risk difference, -0.05; 95% CI; -0.11 to 0.01; p=0.11).
Conclusions
Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data, CO₂ insufflation reduced abdominal pain immediately following the procedure, while pain was similar at 24 hours post-procedure. These results suggest that CO₂ is a preferred insufflation technique when performing colonoscopy in pediatric patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Elevations in End-Tidal CO2 With CO2 Use During Pediatric Endoscopy With Airway Protection: Is This Physiologically Significant?
Chinenye R. Dike, Andrew Huang Pacheco, Elizabeth Lyden, David Freestone, Ojasvini Choudhry, Warren P. Bishop, Mohanad Shukry
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition.2023; 76(5): 660. CrossRef

6,020 View
165 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection versus Surgery for Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Cheal-Wung Huh, Dae Won Ma, Byung-Wook Kim, Joon Sung Kim, Seung Jae Lee; Clin Endosc 2021;54(2):202-210. Published online February 17, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.121

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: The use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer is controversial. The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.
Methods
The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were used to search for relevant studies comparing ESD and surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. The methodological quality of the included publications was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Nonrandomized Studies. The rates of overall survival, recurrence, adverse event, and complete resection were determined. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also evaluated.
Results
This meta-analysis enrolled five studies with 429 and 1,236 participants undergoing ESD and surgery, respectively. No significant difference was found in the overall survival rate between the ESD and surgery groups (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 0.98–5.36; p=0.06). However, ESD was associated with a higher recurrence rate and a lower complete resection rate. The adverse event rate was similar between the two groups.
Conclusions
ESD with meticulous surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy may be as effective and safe as surgery in patients with undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Further large-scale, randomized, controlled studies from additional regions are required to confirm these findings.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Curative criteria for endoscopic treatment of gastric cancer
João A. Cunha Neves, Pedro G. Delgado-Guillena, Patrícia Queirós, Diogo Libânio, Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 68: 101884. CrossRef
Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer
Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(5): 781. CrossRef
Chinese national clinical practice guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of early gastric cancer
Peng Li, Ziyu Li, Enqiang Linghu, Jiafu Ji
Chinese Medical Journal.2024; 137(8): 887. CrossRef
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer Exceeding Expanded Criteria—Long-Term Outcomes from the German ESD Registry
Kathrin Riedl, Andreas Probst, Alanna Ebigbo, Ingo Steinbrück, Hans-Peter Allgaier, David Albers, Matthias Mende, Michael Anzinger, Joerg Schirra, Viktor Rempel, Albrecht Lorenz, Siegbert Faiss, Ingo Wallstabe, Ulrike Denzer, Andreas Wannhoff, Franz Ludwi
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(18): 5538. CrossRef
Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach
Tae-Han Kim, In-Ho Kim, Seung Joo Kang, Miyoung Choi, Baek-Hui Kim, Bang Wool Eom, Bum Jun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Chang In Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Chung Hyun Tae, Chung sik Gong, Dong Jin Kim, Arthur Eung-Hyuck Cho, Eun Jeong Gong, Geum Jong Song, Hyeon-Su Im
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2023; 23(1): 3. CrossRef
Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer and Pre-Malignant Gastric Lesions
Ana Clara Vasconcelos, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Diogo Libânio
Cancers.2023; 15(12): 3084. CrossRef
Performance of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort
Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Michel Kahaleh, Arnaud Lemmers, Sandro Sferrazza, Maximilien Barret, Katsumi Yamamoto, Pierre Deprez, José C. Marín-Gabriel, George Tribonias, Hong Ouyang, Federico Barbaro, Oleksandr Kiosov, Stefan Seewald, Gaurav Patil, Shaimaa
Endoscopy International Open.2023; 11(07): E673. CrossRef
A meta-analysis of the impact on gastrectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stomach cancer
Rajesh K. Singh
International Journal of Clinical Medical Research.2023; 1(3): 88. CrossRef
A meta-analysis of the impact on gastrectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stomach cancer
Rajesh K. Singh
International Journal of Clinical Medical Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated intramucosal gastric cancer regardless of size
Gil Ho Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Bumhee Park, Jin Roh, Sun Gyo Lim, Sung Jae Shin, Kee Myung Lee, Choong-Kyun Noh
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(8): 840. CrossRef
Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer meeting the expanded criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hyo-Joon Yang, Jie-Hyun Kim, Na Won Kim, Il Ju Choi
Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(6): 3686. CrossRef
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for patients with undifferentiated early gastric cancer
Harold Benites-Goñi, Fernando Palacios-Salas, Andrea Carlin-Ronquillo, Carlos Díaz-Arocutipa, Alejandro Piscoya, Adrián Hernández
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The future of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer
Raquel Ortigão, Diogo Libânio, Mário Dinis‐Ribeiro
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 125(7): 1110. CrossRef
Endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer
Ji Yong Ahn
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(5): 276. CrossRef
Therapeutic approach to non-curative resection after endoscopic treatment in early gastric cancer
Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(5): 284. CrossRef
Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer
Chang Seok Bang
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(2): 143. CrossRef

5,481 View
219 Download
15 Web of Science
16 Crossref

Survival Benefit of Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Byung Hyo Cha, Myoung-Jin Jang, Sang Hyub Lee; Clin Endosc 2021;54(1):100-106. Published online January 15, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.254

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare but aggressive disease with a poor survival. Recent trials have shown improved survival with intraductal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the survival benefit of endoscopic RFA for unresectable extrahepatic CCA with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).
Methods
A systematic search from 1970 to 2020 was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials. gov. We selected eligible studies reporting relative risks, hazard ratios (HRs), or odds ratios, adjusted by controlling for confounding factors of survival rate and stent patency duration, among patients with extrahepatic CCA with MBO treated with RFA with stent insertion or stent insertion only.
Results
A total of eight trials (three randomized and five nonrandomized) with a total of 420 patients were included in the metaanalysis. Pooled overall survival analysis favored RFA treatment with stent insertion (HR, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34– 0.64; I²=47%; p=0.09); however, no significant difference was found in the duration of stent patency between the groups (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.57–1.09; I²=7%; p=0.36).
Conclusions
RFA therapy with stent insertion may confer a survival benefit compared with stent insertion only in patients with CCA and MBO.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Intraductal radiofrequency ablation plus biliary stent versus stent alone for malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Matheus de Oliveira Veras, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Thomas R. McCarty, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Oliveira, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo Gomes, Davi Lucena Landim, Felipe Giacobo Nunes, Tomazo Antônio Prince Franzini, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, W
Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(01): E23. CrossRef
Reply to Chandrasekhara and Aggarwal
Matheus de Oliveira Veras, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(05): E640. CrossRef
Consensus statements on endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary strictures

Journal of Digestive Diseases.2024; 25(1): 2. CrossRef
The Impact of Radiofrequency Ablation on Survival Outcomes and Stent Patency in Patients with Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Daniele Balducci, Michele Montori, Francesco Martini, Marco Valvano, Federico De Blasio, Maria Eva Argenziano, Giuseppe Tarantino, Antonio Benedetti, Emanuele Bendia, Marco Marzioni, Luca Maroni
Cancers.2024; 16(7): 1372. CrossRef
Impact of temperature-controlled endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score–matched analysis
Il Sang Shin, Jong Ho Moon, Yun Nah Lee, Jun Ho Myeong, Tae Hoon Lee, Jae Kook Yang, Young Deok Cho, Sang-Heum Park
Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(04): E535. CrossRef
Percutaneous endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and stent placement for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: a propensity score matching retrospective study
Wei Cui, Jing-Zhi Huang, Qi Wang, Feng Shi, Qing Gou, Xiao-Ming Chen, Jing Zhang, Jia-Ping Li, Rongde Xu
BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Biliary stents for active materials and surface modification: Recent advances and future perspectives
Yuechuan Li, Kunshan Yuan, Chengchen Deng, Hui Tang, Jinxuan Wang, Xiaozhen Dai, Bing Zhang, Ziru Sun, Guiying Ren, Haijun Zhang, Guixue Wang
Bioactive Materials.2024; 42: 587. CrossRef
Chinese national clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancers
Xu’an Wang, Yongrui Bai, Ningli Chai, Yexiong Li, Enqiang Linghu, Liwei Wang, Yingbin Liu
Chinese Medical Journal.2024; 137(19): 2272. CrossRef
Feasibility and safety of trans-biliary cryoablation: Preclinical evaluation of a novel flexible cryoprobe
Chao Zhang, Linzhong Zhu, Shousheng Tang, Jukun Wang, Yu Li, Xin Chen, Chunjing Bian, Dongbin Liu, Guokun Ao, Tao Luo
Cryobiology.2023; 111: 40. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Stent Versus Stent-alone Treatments for Malignant Biliary Strictures
Hayat Khizar, Yufei Hu, Yanhua Wu, Kamran Ali, Junaid Iqbal, Muhammad Zulqarnain, Jianfeng Yang
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2023; 57(4): 335. CrossRef
Development of novel biliary metal stent with coil-spring structure and its application in vivo swine biliary stricture model
In Rae Cho, Sang Hyub Lee, Jin Ho Choi, Namyoung Park, Min Woo Lee, Joo Seong Kim, Seok Jeong, Don Haeng Lee, Tae-Won Jeong, Byoung-Yun Ki, Woo Hyun Paik, Ji Kon Ryu, Yong-Tae Kim
Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
In-stent radiofrequency ablation with uncovered metal stent placement for tumor ingrowth/overgrowth causing self-expandable metal stent occlusion in distal malignant biliary obstruction: multicenter propensity score–matched study
Namyoung Park, Min Kyu Jung, Eui Joo Kim, Woo Hyun Paik, Jae Hee Cho
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(4): 694. CrossRef
ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures
B. Joseph Elmunzer, Jennifer L. Maranki, Victoria Gómez, Anna Tavakkoli, Bryan G. Sauer, Berkeley N. Limketkai, Emily A. Brennan, Elaine M. Attridge, Tara J. Brigham, Andrew Y. Wang
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(3): 405. CrossRef
Effect of radiofrequency ablation in addition to biliary stent on overall survival and stent patency in malignant biliary obstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Zahid Ijaz Tarar, Umer Farooq, Mustafa Gandhi, Ghulam Ghous, Saad Saleem, Faisal Kamal, Zaid Imam, Laith Jamil
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 35(6): 646. CrossRef
Impact of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation on survival of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a narrative review
Elena Di Girolamo, Andrea Belli, Alessandro Ottaiano, Vincenza Granata, Valentina Borzillo, Luca Tarotto, Fabiana Tatangelo, Raffaele Palaia, Corrado Civiletti, Mauro Piccirillo, Valentina D’Angelo, Francesco Fiore, Pietro Marone, Guglielmo Nasti, Frances
Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a randomised trial
Jana Jarosova, Lea Zarivnijova, Ivana Cibulkova, Jan Mares, Peter Macinga, Alzbeta Hujova, Premysl Falt, Ondrej Urban, Jan Hajer, Julius Spicak, Tomas Hucl
Gut.2023; 72(12): 2286. CrossRef
Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Chenming Liu, Jiaming Dong, Yuxing Liu, Siyuan Zhang, Ruanchang Chen, Haijun Tang
Journal of International Medical Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Intraductal Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma
Abhishek Agnihotri, David E. Loren
Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(2): 200. CrossRef
Silver Nanofunctionalized Stent after Radiofrequency Ablation Suppresses Tissue Hyperplasia and Bacterial Growth
Yubeen Park, Dong-Sung Won, Ga-Hyun Bae, Dae Sung Ryu, Jeon Min Kang, Ji Won Kim, Song Hee Kim, Chu Hui Zeng, Wooram Park, Sang Soo Lee, Jung-Hoon Park
Pharmaceutics.2022; 14(2): 412. CrossRef
Comparison of Intraductal RFA Plus Stent versus Stent-Only Treatment for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
David M. de Jong, Jeska A. Fritzsche, Amber S. Audhoe, Suzanne S. L. Yi, Marco J. Bruno, Rogier P. Voermans, Lydi M. J. W. van Driel
Cancers.2022; 14(9): 2079. CrossRef
Evaluation and Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Nadia V. Guardado, Kaysey Llorente, Benoit Blondeau
Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2021; 30(3): 491. CrossRef

4,960 View
169 Download
21 Web of Science
21 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search