Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Quality indicator"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Review
Quality indicators in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a brief review of established guidelines
Zubin Dev Sharma, Rajesh Puri
Clin Endosc 2023;56(3):290-297.   Published online April 11, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.210
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive endoscopic technique that has many diagnostic and therapeutic implications. It is a procedure with small but significant life-threatening complications. To ensure the best possible care, minimize complications, and improve the quality of health care, a constant review of the performance of the operator using ideal benchmark standards is needed. Hence, quality indicators are necessary. The American and European Societies of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have provided guidelines on quality measures for ERCP, which describe the skills to be developed and training to be implemented in performing quality ERCP. These guidelines have divided the indicators into pre-procedure, intraprocedural, and post-procedure measures. The focus of this article was to review the quality indicators of ERCP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training conditions, results from a pan‐European survey: Between vision and reality
    Karim Hamesch, Oscar Cahyadi, Stavros Dimitriadis, Marcus Hollenbach, Pilar Acedo, Myriam Ayari, Helena Dauvarte, Egle Dieninyte, Viktor Domislovic, Ana Dugic, Martin Ďuriček, Omar Elshaarawy, Anne Fennessy, Mark Enrik Geissler, Zornitsa Gorcheva, Amer Ha
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2025; 13(3): 474.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training using a silicone simulator fabricated using a 3D printing technique (with videos)
    Suk Pyo Shin, Kyong Joo Lee, Min Je Sung, Jong Chan Kim, Guk Bae Kim, Moo Yeop Kim, Sung Yong Han, Sung Ill Jang, Mamoru Takenaka, Chang-Il Kwon
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How to measure quality in ERCP?
    Franco Ana Rita, Arvanitakis Marianna, Teles de Campos Sara
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2025; 76: 101999.     CrossRef
  • Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage with intended primary metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a European prospective controlled multicentre trial (PUMa trial)
    D Schmitz, J B Gornals, J J Vila, A Schmidt, T Kleemann, J R Aparicio, A Amanzada, M Dollhopf, E Redondo-Cerezo, J Weigt, T Voigtländer, T von Hahn, J Rudi, C V Tortosa, A Küllmer, M Perez-Miranda
    Endoscopy.2025; 57(S 02): S6.     CrossRef
  • Development of a Checklist for Evaluating Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy Training Facilities and Educational Programs
    Hyung Ku Chon, Sung-Jo Bang, Eaum Seok Lee, Tae Ju Jeon, Chang Hwan Park
    The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract.2025; 30(2): 93.     CrossRef
  • Advancements in Research on Challenges in Selective Biliary Cannulation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
    天雨 张
    Journal of Clinical Personalized Medicine.2024; 03(01): 100.     CrossRef
  • Development of an Automated Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Quality Report Card Using an Integrated Analytics Suite
    Anmol Singh, Eric Swei, Celestina Tolosa, Matthew Alverson, Todd A. Brenner, Avleen Kaur, Aida Metri, Mohammed Rifat Shaik, Nikhil Bush, Branislav Bujnak, Alexandra T. Strauss, Mouen Khashab, Eun Ji Shin, Vikesh K. Singh, Venkata S. Akshintala
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 26(3): 230.     CrossRef
  • Validity of a virtual reality endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography simulator: can it distinguish experts from novices?
    Konstantinos Georgiou, Nikola Boyanov, Pantelis Antonakis, Dimitrios Thanasas, Gabriel Sandblom, Lars Enochsson
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,861 View
  • 289 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Exploring quality indicators for the detection of Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer: a cross-sectional nationwide survey
Fumiaki Ishibashi, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Hiroya Ueyama, Yohei Minato, Sho Suzuki
Clin Endosc 2023;56(4):460-469.   Published online April 4, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.167
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer (HPNGC) is becoming increasingly important. This study aimed to explore the quality indicators for HPNGC detection.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional, nationwide, web-based survey of gastrointestinal endoscopists in Japan. In addition to questions about the number of HPNGC cases detected in a year and basic information, the questionnaire also consisted of 28 questions: (1) 18 about HPNGC awareness, (2) six about diagnostic proactiveness, and (3) four about interest in HPNGC.
Results
Valid responses were obtained from 712 endoscopists. The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society-certified endoscopists had a significantly higher HPNGC detection rate than the nonspecialists (0.42% vs. 0.32%, respectively; p=0.008). The results of the multiple regression analysis showed that Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society certification and high awareness and interest scores were independent predictors of the HPNGC detection rate (p=0.012, p<0.001, p=0.024, respectively). Principal component analysis showed that the endoscopists who attended conferences for collecting information on HPNGC had a higher level of awareness.
Conclusions
To improve the detection of HPNGC, it is necessary to increase the awareness of the disease. It is hoped that relevant societies will play an important role in endoscopists’ education.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Visibility evaluation of gastric epithelial neoplasm of fundic gland mucosa lineage using texture and color enhancement imaging
    Hisanori Utsunomiya, Hiroya Ueyama, Tsutomu Takeda, Shunsuke Nakamura, Yasuko Uemura, Tomoyo Iwano, Momoko Yamamoto, Ryota Uchida, Daiki Abe, Shotaro Oki, Nobuyuki Suzuki, Atsushi Ikeda, Yoichi Akazawa, Kumiko Ueda, Mariko Hojo, Shuko Nojiri, Takashi Yao,
    DEN Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of Gastric Epithelial Tumors in Helicobacter pylori-uninfected Individuals Undergoing a Medical Checkup
    Eiko Okimoto, Kyoichi Adachi, Yuri Ebisutani, Norihisa Ishimura, Shunji Ishihara
    Internal Medicine.2024; 63(16): 2251.     CrossRef
  • A mathematical simulation model to determine the optimal endoscopic screening strategy for detection of H. pylori-naïve gastric neoplasms
    Fumiaki Ishibashi, Kosuke Okusa, Yoshitaka Tokai, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Tomohiro Kawakami, Kentaro Mochida, Yuka Yanai, Chizu Yokoi, Yuko Hayashi, Shun-ichiro Ozawa, Koji Uraushihara, Yohei Minato, Hiroyuki Nakanishi, Hiroya Ueyama, Mikinori Kataoka, Yuzo To
    Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(5): 1078.     CrossRef
  • Improving the quality of the esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer
    Jae Myung Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 453.     CrossRef
  • 3,799 View
  • 148 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
Clin Endosc 2022;55(3):319-331.   Published online May 16, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.094
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has been used to diagnose a wide variety of upper gastrointestinal diseases. In particular, EGD is used to screen high-risk subjects of gastric cancer. Quality control of EGD is important because the diagnostic rate is examiner-dependent. However, there is still no representative quality indicator that can be uniformly applied in EGD. There has been growing awareness of the importance of quality control in improving EGD performance. Therefore, we aimed to review the available and emerging quality indicators for diagnostic EGD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric High-Grade Foveolar Dysplasia With Normal Background Mucosa
    Gonzalo Latorre, Alberto Espino, Christine E. Orr, Robert Bechara
    Gastro Hep Advances.2025; 4(2): 100565.     CrossRef
  • GastroHUN an Endoscopy Dataset of Complete Systematic Screening Protocol for the Stomach
    Diego Bravo, Juan Frias, Felipe Vera, Juan Trejos, Carlos Martínez, Martín Gómez, Fabio González, Eduardo Romero
    Scientific Data.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Helicobacter pylori-related serum indicators: Cutting-edge advances to enhance the efficacy of gastric cancer screening
    Hao-Tian Sun
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Operation sequence of bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia affected colonoscopy performance: a randomized controlled trial
    Qing Wang, Yue Sui, Jingwen Gong, Xing Chen
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advancing Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Detection: A Single-Center Pilot Study Exploring the Potential of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Endoscopic Procedures
    Hadi Mokhtari Dowlatabad, Reihane Mahdavi, Seyed Rouhollah Miri, Mohammad Reza Fattahi, Hossein Ataee, Narges Yousefpour, Navid Manoochehri, Reza Taslimi, Mohammad Abdolahad
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopists and endoscopic assistants’ qualifications, but not their biopsy rates, improve gastric precancerous lesions detection rate
    Yao Shen, Xiao-Juan Gao, Xiao-Xue Zhang, Jia-Min Zhao, Fei-Fan Hu, Jing-Lue Han, Wen-Ying Tian, Mei Yang, Yun-Fei Wang, Jia-Le Lv, Qiang Zhan, Fang-Mei An
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prevalence and factors associated with organic dyspepsia in older adults with dyspepsia
    Natchanon Simngam, Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish, Theerach Kulkheereerattana, Kittat Chuaiad, Panuwat Arayakulsakol, Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current status of quality control in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the emerging role of artificial intelligence
    Lihui Zhang, Liwen Yao, Zihua Lu, Honggang Yu
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Simethicone and N-acetyl cysteine in improving mucosal visibility: Towards a “clearer view” during endoscopy
    Akash Roy, Mahesh K. Goenka
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 43(5): 863.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between observation time and detection rate of focal lesions in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a single-center, retrospective study
    Li Dong, Xiaodan Zhang, Yuting Xuan, Peiling Xiong, Yumei Ning, Bing Zhang, Fan Wang, Qiu Zhao, Jun Fang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy on Intraocular Pressure
    Maddalena De Bernardo, Antonella Santonicola, Marco Gioia, Livio Vitiello, Ferdinando Cione, Sergio Pagliarulo, Paola Iovino, Nicola Rosa
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(5): 1224.     CrossRef
  • The Diagnostic Performance of Linked Color Imaging Compared to White Light Imaging in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jae Gon Lee, In Kyung Yoo, Abdullah Ozgur Yeniova, Sang Pyo Lee
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(3): 444.     CrossRef
  • Optimal number of images and 2-year interval affect cancer detection in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy: An observational study
    Kazuhiro Ksahiwagi, Toshifumi Yoshida, Kayoko Fukuhara, Rieko Bessho, Hitoshi Ichikawa, Nagamu Inoue, Hiromasa Takaishi, Yasushi Iwao, Takanori Kanai
    Medicine.2024; 103(26): e38774.     CrossRef
  • Sistema de auditoría automática para la exploración endoscópica del estómago con Inteligencia Artificial – Gastro UNAL: Gastroendoscopy UNit for Automatic Labeling
    Martín Alonso Gómez Zuleta, Diego Fernando Bravo Higuera, Josué Andre Ruano Balseca, María Jaramillo González, Fabio Augusto González Osorio, Edgar Eduardo Romero Castro
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2024; 39(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer
    Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(5): 781.     CrossRef
  • Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia: A Latin American Perspective
    Arnoldo Riquelme, Felipe Silva, Diego Reyes, Gonzalo Latorre
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2024; 24(3): 218.     CrossRef
  • Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Quality Improvement and the Role of Topical Antiperistaltic Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Eoghan Burke, Patricia Harkins, Mayilone Arumugasamy
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Imaging for the Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Pre-Neoplastic Conditions of the Stomach
    Bruno Costa Martins, Renata Nobre Moura, Angelo So Taa Kum, Carolina Ogawa Matsubayashi, Sergio Barbosa Marques, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
    Cancers.2023; 15(9): 2445.     CrossRef
  • The effect of short-term training about depth predicting score on the diagnostic ability of invasion depth for differentiated early gastric Cancer among non-expert endoscopists
    Hui Li, Hui Hu, Ping Geng, Panhui Guo, Yuanrong Zhu, Lulu Zeng, Jun Liu, Xiangpeng Hu
    BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Variation in the rate of detection of minute and small early gastric cancers at diagnostic endoscopy may reflect the performance of individual endoscopists
    Daisuke Murakami, Masayuki Yamato, Yuji Amano, Takayoshi Nishino, Makoto Arai
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2023; 10(1): e001143.     CrossRef
  • Improving the quality of the esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer
    Jae Myung Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 453.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends
    Caesar Ferrari, Micheal Tadros
    Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Antispasmodic Agent Administration Improves Gastric Neoplasm Detection Rates during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
    Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2022; 22(3): 246.     CrossRef
  • Clinical features of gastric adenoma detected within 3 years after negative screening endoscopy in Korea
    Hyun Young Kim
    Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 16,627 View
  • 793 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 24 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Quality Indicators for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori-Negative Early Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study
Fumiaki Ishibashi, Konomi Kobayashi, Keita Fukushima, Ryu Tanaka, Tomohiro Kawakami, Junko Kato, Kazuaki Sugihara
Clin Endosc 2020;53(6):698-704.   Published online March 13, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.203
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: While Helicobacter pylori (HP)-negative gastric cancer is frequently reported, little is known about the predictors for detecting HP-negative early gastric cancer (EGC). We aimed to evaluate the predictors for the detection of HP-negative EGC.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 13,477 consecutive asymptomatic cases where upper endoscopy was performed by nine physicians from April 2017 to March 2019 and analyzed the detection rate of high-risk lesions (HRLs), including EGC, tubular adenoma, and lymphoma, according to the status of HP infection. The observation time was corrected for multiple regression analyses.
Results
For all physicians, the average observation time for screening HP-eradicated and -naïve patients was shorter than that for screening HP-positive patients (p<0.05). Multiple regression analyses revealed that the observation time in the three groups was an independent predictor for detecting HRLs in HP-eradicated patients (p=0.03106, 0.01263, and 0.02485, respectively), while experience of endoscopy was an independent predictor for detecting HRLs in HP-naïve patients (p=0.02638).
Conclusions
While observation time during screening endoscopy was a quality indicator for detecting HRLs in HP-eradicated patients, experience of endoscopy was a quality indicator for detecting HRLs in HP-naïve patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP) Guideli
    Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Diogo Libânio, Hugo Uchima, Manon C.W. Spaander, Jan Bornschein, Tamara Matysiak-Budnik, Georgios Tziatzios, João Santos-Antunes, Miguel Areia, Nicolas Chapelle, Gianluca Esposito, Gloria Fernandez-Esparrach, Lumir Kunovsky, Mónica Ga
    Endoscopy.2025; 57(05): 504.     CrossRef
  • The Increasing Trend of the Generational Helicobacter pylori‐Naïve Prevalence Among Japanese Individuals Born Between 1925 and 2015: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Regression Analysis
    Fumiaki Ishibashi, Chikamasa Ichita, Ayaka Takasu, Ran Li, Yasuhiro Hagiwara, Yutaka Matsuyama, Yuichiro Kemmoto, Chika Kusano, Manami Inoue, Nobutake Yamamichi, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda
    Helicobacter.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A mathematical simulation model to determine the optimal endoscopic screening strategy for detection of H. pylori-naïve gastric neoplasms
    Fumiaki Ishibashi, Kosuke Okusa, Yoshitaka Tokai, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Tomohiro Kawakami, Kentaro Mochida, Yuka Yanai, Chizu Yokoi, Yuko Hayashi, Shun-ichiro Ozawa, Koji Uraushihara, Yohei Minato, Hiroyuki Nakanishi, Hiroya Ueyama, Mikinori Kataoka, Yuzo To
    Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(5): 1078.     CrossRef
  • Exploring quality indicators for the detection of Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer: a cross-sectional nationwide survey
    Fumiaki Ishibashi, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Hiroya Ueyama, Yohei Minato, Sho Suzuki
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 460.     CrossRef
  • A Close Follow-Up Strategy in the Short Period of Time after Helicobacter pylori Eradication Contributes to Earlier Detection of Gastric Cancer
    Fumiaki Ishibashi, Sho Suzuki, Mizuki Nagai, Kentaro Mochida, Konomi Kobayashi, Tetsuo Morishita
    Digestion.2023; 104(3): 165.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer
    Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(5): 267.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for early gastric cancer: focus on Helicobacter pylori gastritis
    Hee Seok Moon
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(5): 259.     CrossRef
  • Tailored eradication strategy vs concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in Korean patients
    Youn I Choi, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Ja Young Seo, Dong Kyun Park
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(31): 5247.     CrossRef
  • Quality management system for screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy improves detection of Helicobacter pylori-negative interval gastric cancer
    Fumiaki Ishibashi, Konomi Kobayashi, Tomohiro Kawakami, Ryu Tanaka, Kazuaki Sugihara, Satoshi Baba
    Endoscopy International Open.2021; 09(12): E1900.     CrossRef
  • Quality Indicator for Gastric Cancer Detection Based on Helicobacter pylori Status
    Jae Myung Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(6): 629.     CrossRef
  • 6,369 View
  • 208 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Quality Indicators in Barrett’s Esophagus: Time to Change the Status Quo
Samuel Han, Sachin Wani
Clin Endosc 2018;51(4):344-351.   Published online July 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.099
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The push for high quality care in all fields of medicine highlights the importance of establishing and adhering to quality indicators.In response, several gastrointestinal societies have established quality indicators specific to Barrett’s esophagus, which serve to createthresholds for performance while standardizing practice and guiding value-based care. Recent studies, however, have consistentlydemonstrated the lack of adherence to these quality indicators, particularly in surveillance (appropriate utilization of endoscopy andobtaining biopsies using the Seattle protocol) and endoscopic eradication therapy practices. These findings suggest that innovativeinterventions are needed to address these shortcomings in order to deliver high quality care to patients with Barrett’s esophagus.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoskopische Diagnostik und Therapie des Ösophaguskarzinoms
    Alanna Ebigbo, Andreas Probst, Helmut Messmann
    Die Onkologie.2025; 31(2): 143.     CrossRef
  • Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders
    Alexander T Reddy, Joshua P Lee, David A Leiman
    Diseases of the Esophagus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Residing in Below Median Household Income Districts on Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Barrett’s Esophagus
    Suqing Li, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Sechiv Jugnundan, Gary May, Norman Marcon, Jeffrey Mosko, Christopher Teshima
    Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2023; 6(4): 137.     CrossRef
  • Clinical variation in surveillance and management of Barrett’s esophagus: A cross-sectional study of gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons
    Jamielyn DC Cruz, David Paculdo, Divya Ganesan, Meredith Baker, Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne, Nicholas J Shaheen, Sachin Wani, John W Peabody
    Medicine.2022; 101(51): e32187.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Self-Expandable Metal Stent Complications in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Scoping Review
    Connor K. Wilson, Sara R. Frankowski, Susan C. Steelman, Issam Makhoul
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2020; 2(8): 1163.     CrossRef
  • 6,865 View
  • 111 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP