Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Quality indicators"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Reviews
Quality indicators in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a brief review of established guidelines
Zubin Dev Sharma, Rajesh Puri
Clin Endosc 2023;56(3):290-297.   Published online April 11, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.210
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive endoscopic technique that has many diagnostic and therapeutic implications. It is a procedure with small but significant life-threatening complications. To ensure the best possible care, minimize complications, and improve the quality of health care, a constant review of the performance of the operator using ideal benchmark standards is needed. Hence, quality indicators are necessary. The American and European Societies of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have provided guidelines on quality measures for ERCP, which describe the skills to be developed and training to be implemented in performing quality ERCP. These guidelines have divided the indicators into pre-procedure, intraprocedural, and post-procedure measures. The focus of this article was to review the quality indicators of ERCP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training using a silicone simulator fabricated using a 3D printing technique (with videos)
    Suk Pyo Shin, Kyong Joo Lee, Min Je Sung, Jong Chan Kim, Guk Bae Kim, Moo Yeop Kim, Sung Yong Han, Sung Ill Jang, Mamoru Takenaka, Chang-Il Kwon
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advancements in Research on Challenges in Selective Biliary Cannulation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
    天雨 张
    Journal of Clinical Personalized Medicine.2024; 03(01): 100.     CrossRef
  • Development of an Automated Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Quality Report Card Using an Integrated Analytics Suite
    Anmol Singh, Eric Swei, Celestina Tolosa, Matthew Alverson, Todd A. Brenner, Avleen Kaur, Aida Metri, Mohammed Rifat Shaik, Nikhil Bush, Branislav Bujnak, Alexandra T. Strauss, Mouen Khashab, Eun Ji Shin, Vikesh K. Singh, Venkata S. Akshintala
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 26(3): 230.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training conditions, results from a pan‐European survey: Between vision and reality
    Karim Hamesch, Oscar Cahyadi, Stavros Dimitriadis, Marcus Hollenbach, Pilar Acedo, Myriam Ayari, Helena Dauvarte, Egle Dieninyte, Viktor Domislovic, Ana Dugic, Martin Ďuriček, Omar Elshaarawy, Anne Fennessy, Mark Enrik Geissler, Zornitsa Gorcheva, Amer Ha
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validity of a virtual reality endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography simulator: can it distinguish experts from novices?
    Konstantinos Georgiou, Nikola Boyanov, Pantelis Antonakis, Dimitrios Thanasas, Gabriel Sandblom, Lars Enochsson
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3,318 View
  • 247 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
Clin Endosc 2022;55(3):319-331.   Published online May 16, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.094
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has been used to diagnose a wide variety of upper gastrointestinal diseases. In particular, EGD is used to screen high-risk subjects of gastric cancer. Quality control of EGD is important because the diagnostic rate is examiner-dependent. However, there is still no representative quality indicator that can be uniformly applied in EGD. There has been growing awareness of the importance of quality control in improving EGD performance. Therefore, we aimed to review the available and emerging quality indicators for diagnostic EGD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric High-Grade Foveolar Dysplasia With Normal Background Mucosa
    Gonzalo Latorre, Alberto Espino, Christine E. Orr, Robert Bechara
    Gastro Hep Advances.2025; 4(2): 100565.     CrossRef
  • GastroHUN an Endoscopy Dataset of Complete Systematic Screening Protocol for the Stomach
    Diego Bravo, Juan Frias, Felipe Vera, Juan Trejos, Carlos Martínez, Martín Gómez, Fabio González, Eduardo Romero
    Scientific Data.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current status of quality control in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the emerging role of artificial intelligence
    Lihui Zhang, Liwen Yao, Zihua Lu, Honggang Yu
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Simethicone and N-acetyl cysteine in improving mucosal visibility: Towards a “clearer view” during endoscopy
    Akash Roy, Mahesh K. Goenka
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 43(5): 863.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between observation time and detection rate of focal lesions in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a single-center, retrospective study
    Li Dong, Xiaodan Zhang, Yuting Xuan, Peiling Xiong, Yumei Ning, Bing Zhang, Fan Wang, Qiu Zhao, Jun Fang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy on Intraocular Pressure
    Maddalena De Bernardo, Antonella Santonicola, Marco Gioia, Livio Vitiello, Ferdinando Cione, Sergio Pagliarulo, Paola Iovino, Nicola Rosa
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(5): 1224.     CrossRef
  • The Diagnostic Performance of Linked Color Imaging Compared to White Light Imaging in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jae Gon Lee, In Kyung Yoo, Abdullah Ozgur Yeniova, Sang Pyo Lee
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(3): 444.     CrossRef
  • Optimal number of images and 2-year interval affect cancer detection in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy: An observational study
    Kazuhiro Ksahiwagi, Toshifumi Yoshida, Kayoko Fukuhara, Rieko Bessho, Hitoshi Ichikawa, Nagamu Inoue, Hiromasa Takaishi, Yasushi Iwao, Takanori Kanai
    Medicine.2024; 103(26): e38774.     CrossRef
  • Sistema de auditoría automática para la exploración endoscópica del estómago con Inteligencia Artificial – Gastro UNAL: Gastroendoscopy UNit for Automatic Labeling
    Martín Alonso Gómez Zuleta, Diego Fernando Bravo Higuera, Josué Andre Ruano Balseca, María Jaramillo González, Fabio Augusto González Osorio, Edgar Eduardo Romero Castro
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2024; 39(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer
    Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(5): 781.     CrossRef
  • Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia: A Latin American Perspective
    Arnoldo Riquelme, Felipe Silva, Diego Reyes, Gonzalo Latorre
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2024; 24(3): 218.     CrossRef
  • Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Quality Improvement and the Role of Topical Antiperistaltic Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Eoghan Burke, Patricia Harkins, Mayilone Arumugasamy
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Imaging for the Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Pre-Neoplastic Conditions of the Stomach
    Bruno Costa Martins, Renata Nobre Moura, Angelo So Taa Kum, Carolina Ogawa Matsubayashi, Sergio Barbosa Marques, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
    Cancers.2023; 15(9): 2445.     CrossRef
  • The effect of short-term training about depth predicting score on the diagnostic ability of invasion depth for differentiated early gastric Cancer among non-expert endoscopists
    Hui Li, Hui Hu, Ping Geng, Panhui Guo, Yuanrong Zhu, Lulu Zeng, Jun Liu, Xiangpeng Hu
    BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Variation in the rate of detection of minute and small early gastric cancers at diagnostic endoscopy may reflect the performance of individual endoscopists
    Daisuke Murakami, Masayuki Yamato, Yuji Amano, Takayoshi Nishino, Makoto Arai
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2023; 10(1): e001143.     CrossRef
  • Improving the quality of the esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer
    Jae Myung Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 453.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends
    Caesar Ferrari, Micheal Tadros
    Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Antispasmodic Agent Administration Improves Gastric Neoplasm Detection Rates during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
    Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2022; 22(3): 246.     CrossRef
  • Clinical features of gastric adenoma detected within 3 years after negative screening endoscopy in Korea
    Hyun Young Kim
    Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 12,598 View
  • 663 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer
Quality Indicators in Barrett’s Esophagus: Time to Change the Status Quo
Samuel Han, Sachin Wani
Clin Endosc 2018;51(4):344-351.   Published online July 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.099
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The push for high quality care in all fields of medicine highlights the importance of establishing and adhering to quality indicators.In response, several gastrointestinal societies have established quality indicators specific to Barrett’s esophagus, which serve to createthresholds for performance while standardizing practice and guiding value-based care. Recent studies, however, have consistentlydemonstrated the lack of adherence to these quality indicators, particularly in surveillance (appropriate utilization of endoscopy andobtaining biopsies using the Seattle protocol) and endoscopic eradication therapy practices. These findings suggest that innovativeinterventions are needed to address these shortcomings in order to deliver high quality care to patients with Barrett’s esophagus.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoskopische Diagnostik und Therapie des Ösophaguskarzinoms
    Alanna Ebigbo, Andreas Probst, Helmut Messmann
    Die Onkologie.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders
    Alexander T Reddy, Joshua P Lee, David A Leiman
    Diseases of the Esophagus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Residing in Below Median Household Income Districts on Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Barrett’s Esophagus
    Suqing Li, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Sechiv Jugnundan, Gary May, Norman Marcon, Jeffrey Mosko, Christopher Teshima
    Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2023; 6(4): 137.     CrossRef
  • Clinical variation in surveillance and management of Barrett’s esophagus: A cross-sectional study of gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons
    Jamielyn DC Cruz, David Paculdo, Divya Ganesan, Meredith Baker, Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne, Nicholas J Shaheen, Sachin Wani, John W Peabody
    Medicine.2022; 101(51): e32187.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Self-Expandable Metal Stent Complications in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Scoping Review
    Connor K. Wilson, Sara R. Frankowski, Susan C. Steelman, Issam Makhoul
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2020; 2(8): 1163.     CrossRef
  • 6,328 View
  • 108 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP