Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Survey"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Perception of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Personnel on Society Recommendations on Personal Protective Equipment, Case Selection, and Scope Cleaning During Covid-19 Pandemic: An International Survey Study
Parit Mekaroonkamol, Kasenee Tiankanon, Rapat Pittayanon, Wiriyaporn Ridtitid, Fariha Shams, Ghias Un Nabi Tayyab, Julia Massaad, Saurabh Chawla, Stanley Khoo, Siriboon Attasaranya, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Qiang Cai, Thawee Ratanachu-ek, Pradermchai Kongkham, Rungsun Rerknimitr
Clin Endosc 2022;55(2):215-225.   Published online September 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.051
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: The Thai Association for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published recommendations on safe endoscopy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to assess the practicality and applicability of the recommendations and the perceptions of endoscopy personnel on them.
Methods
A validated questionnaire was sent to 1290 endoscopy personnel globally. Of these, the data of all 330 responders (25.6%) from 15 countries, related to the current recommendations on proper personal protective equipment (PPE), case selection, scope cleaning, and safety perception, were analyzed. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the relationships between the variables.
Results
Despite an overwhelming agreement with the recommendations on PPE (94.5%) and case selection (95.5%), their practicality and applicability on PPE recommendations and case selection were significantly lower (p=0.001, p=0.047, p<0.001, and p=0.032, respectively). Factors that were associated with lower sense of safety in endoscopy units were younger age (p=0.004), less working experience (p=0.008), in-training status (p=0.04), and higher national prevalence of COVID-19 (p=0.003). High prevalent countries also had more difficulty implementing the guidelines (p<0.001) and they considered the PPE recommendations less practical and showed lower agreement with them (p<0.001 and p=0.008, respectively). A higher number of in-hospital COVID-19 patients was associated with less agreement with PPE recommendations (p=0.039).
Conclusions
Using appropriate PPE and case selection in endoscopic practice during a pandemic remains a challenge. Resource availability and local prevalence are critical factors influencing the adoption of the current guidelines.
  • 5,507 View
  • 244 Download
Close layer
A Nationwide Survey on the Facilities and Personnel for Endoscopic Sedation: Results from 50 Qualified Endoscopy Units of Teaching Hospitals Accredited by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE)
Seon-Young Park, Jun Kyu Lee, Jung-Wook Kim, Tae Hee Lee, Chang-Hwan Park, Jae-Yong Jang, Byung-Wook Kim, Byung Ik Jang, the Quality management and Endoscopic sedation committee of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE)
Clin Endosc 2021;54(6):843-850.   Published online July 14, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.014
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: This study aimed to determine the current status of facilities, equipment, and personnel for endoscopic sedation from endoscopy units of representative hospitals in South Korea.
Methods
A questionnaire survey was conducted on 50 qualified endoscopy units accredited by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Results
All included endoscopy units had regulations and educational programs regarding sedation training for endoscopists and nursing personnel. There present one assisting nurse during endoscopy in 35 units (70%) and at least two nurses in 12 units (24.0%). All endoscopy units had examination rooms equipped with oxygen supply and suction systems. Endoscopist-directed sedation was performed in 48 units (96.0%). Propofol-based sedation was the most used sedation method. All units had a separate recovery bay. The daily number of patients per bed was greater than 10 in 17 units (34.0%). In 26 (52.0%) units, a single nurse cared for ≥10 patients per day. All the units fulfilled the discharge criteria.
Conclusions
This study presents data regarding endoscopic sedation clinical practice in 50 endoscopy units in South Korea. This study presents the current status of endoscopic sedation clinical practice in 50 qualified endoscopy units accredited by the KSGE, which provide excellent quality management.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Awareness of Endoscopy Nurses About Anesthesia Management in the Pediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit; A Survey Study
    Feyza SEVER, Şamil HIZLI
    Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease.2023; : 412.     CrossRef
  • Drugs used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Jun Kyu Lee
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(11): 735.     CrossRef
  • 4,023 View
  • 127 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Can Endoscopic Ulcerations in Early Gastric Cancer Be Clearly Defined before Endoscopic Resection? A Survey among Endoscopists
Sung Min Park, Byung-Wook Kim, Joon Sung Kim, Young Wook Kim, Gi Jun Kim, Seung Ji Ryu
Clin Endosc 2017;50(5):473-478.   Published online April 24, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.143
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Early gastric cancer (EGC) with ulcerations can be treated via endoscopic resection (ER) when it is differentiated pathologically, limited to the mucosa, and <3 cm in diameter. The presence of ulceration is a key factor in deciding treatment strategies and is usually diagnosed during endoscopic examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ulcerations in EGC can be clearly defined among endoscopists and which factors are related to the differences.
Methods
A survey questionnaire, composed of demographic features and endoscopic images of seven patients with EGC, was presented to the endoscopists via e-mail. The endoscopists were asked whether such patients have ulcerations in the lesions.
Results
The questionnaires were e-mailed to 197 endoscopists, and 103 doctors replied. The presence of an endoscopic ulceration was defined differently among the endoscopists, depending on the duration of endoscopic practice and the experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The differences were especially high in the lesions without mucosal breaks and converging folds, which were expected to be viewed as non-ulcerative.
Conclusions
Before ER, endoscopic ulcerations in EGC must be reviewed by experienced endoscopists to reduce overestimations, and adequate educational programs for trainees should be established.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A standardized pathology report for gastric cancer: 2nd edition
    Young Soo Park, Myeong-Cherl Kook, Baek-hui Kim, Hye Seung Lee, Dong-Wook Kang, Mi-Jin Gu, Ok Ran Shin, Younghee Choi, Wonae Lee, Hyunki Kim, In Hye Song, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Hee Sung Kim, Guhyun Kang, Do Youn Park, So-Young Jin, Joon Mee Kim, Yoon Jung Choi,
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2023; 57(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • A Standardized Pathology Report for Gastric Cancer: 2nd Edition
    Young Soo Park, Myeong-Cherl Kook, Baek-hui Kim, Hye Seung Lee, Dong-Wook Kang, Mi-Jin Gu, Ok Ran Shin, Younghee Choi, Wonae Lee, Hyunki Kim, In Hye Song, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Hee Sung Kim, Guhyun Kang, Do Youn Park, So-Young Jin, Joon Mee Kim, Yoon Jung Choi,
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2023; 23(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • Applicability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with early gastric cancer beyond the expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Jeong Ho Song, Sejin Lee, Sung Hyun Park, Anastasios Kottikias, Aleisa Abdulmohsen, Nasser Alrashidi, Minah Cho, Yoo Min Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Woo Jin Hyung
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(11): 8349.     CrossRef
  • Construction and analysis of an ulcer risk prediction model after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer
    San-Dong Gong, Huan Li, Yi-Bin Xie, Xiao-Hui Wang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2022; 14(9): 1823.     CrossRef
  • Discrepancy between endoscopic and pathological ulcerative findings in clinical intramucosal early gastric cancer
    Yohei Yabuuchi, Kohei Takizawa, Naomi Kakushima, Noboru Kawata, Masao Yoshida, Yoichi Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Kishida, Sayo Ito, Kenichiro Imai, Hirotoshi Ishiwatari, Kinichi Hotta, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Etsuro Bando, Masanori Terashima, Takashi Sugino, Hiro
    Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(3): 691.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Model of Nonneoplastic Pathology after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Byung-Wook Kim, Joon Sung Kim, Sung Min Park, Jeong Seon Ji, Bo In Lee
    Gut and Liver.2020; 14(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Factors that Can Predict Histological Ulcerations in Early Gastric Cancers
    Jaesin Lee, Byung-Wook Kim, Cheal Wung Huh, Joon Sung Kim, Lee-So Maeng
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(3): 328.     CrossRef
  • What is the Most Precise Endoscopic Finding for Predicting the Clinicopathological Behaviors in Ulcerative Early Gastric Cancer?
    Youngdae Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(3): 249.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Undifferentiated-Type Gastric Carcinoma
    Myeong-Cherl Kook
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Identification of Ulceration in Early Gastric Cancer before Resection is Not Easy: Need for a New Guideline for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Indication Based on Endoscopic Image
    Hang Lak Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(5): 410.     CrossRef
  • 6,800 View
  • 154 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP