CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Insufflation of Carbon Dioxide versus Air During Colonoscopy Among Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
John Alexander Lata Guacho, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Bruna Furia Buzetti Hourneaux de Moura, Megui Marilia Mansilla Gallegos, Thomas McCarty, Ricardo Katsuya Toma, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Clin Endosc. 2021;54(2):242-249.   Published online 2021 March 25    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.275

Excel Download

Insufflation of Carbon Dioxide versus Air During Colonoscopy Among Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Clinical Endoscopy. 2021;54(2):242-249   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Carbon Dioxide vs. Air Insufflation for Pediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2021;9:   Crossref logo
Link1

Tu1700 Carbon Dioxide Versus Air Insufflation on Patient Comfort Post-Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2012;75(4):AB493   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Carbon dioxide insufflationvsconventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials
Colorectal Disease. 2015;17(2):111-123   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Endoscopy International Open. 2019;07(04):E487-E497   Crossref logo
Link1

Mo1687 WATER EXCHANGE COLONOSCOPY IS SUPERIOR TO AIR/CARBON DIOXIDE INSUFFLATION AND WATER IMMERSION TECHNIQUES: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2018;87(6):AB478-AB479   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Sa1025 WATER EXCHANGE VERSUS AIR INSUFFLATION FOR COLONOSCOPY: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2018;87(6):AB148   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Carbon Dioxide versus Air Insufflation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Clinical Endoscopy. 2017;50(5):464-472   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Sa1393 Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Dioxide Insufflation Versus Air Insufflation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Randomized Control Trials: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2017;85(5):AB223   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Carbon dioxide vs air insufflation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis and systemic review of randomized controlled trials
Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2015;221(4):e5   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Clin Endosc has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since March 1, 2015.