CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Risk Stratification in Cancer Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65, and Development of a New Scoring System
Matheus Cavalcante Franco, Sunguk Jang, Bruno da Costa Martins, Tyler Stevens, Vipul Jairath, Rocio Lopez, John J. Vargo, Alan Barkun, Fauze Maluf-Filho
Clin Endosc 2022;55(2):240-247.   Published online 2022 January 21    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.115

Excel Download

Risk Stratification in Cancer Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65, and Development of a New Scoring System
Clinical Endoscopy. 2022;55(2):240-247   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2016;83(6):1151-1160   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

155 Risk Stratification in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: AIMS65 Is Superior to Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall Scoring Systems in Predicting Inpatient Mortality
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2014;79(5):AB112   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China
BMC Gastroenterology. 2018;18(1):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Tu1739 Mortality Risk Assessment in Non Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Comparison Between Rockall, Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 Scales in Hispanic Population
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2015;81(5):AB578-AB579   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of the AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford score for risk stratification in elderly patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
European Geriatric Medicine. 2017;8(1):37-41   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 Scoring Systems for Risk Stratification in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department
Academic Emergency Medicine. 2014;22(1):22-30   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

926 THE RISK STRATIFICATION IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING (RUGB) STUDY: AIMS65 IS SUPERIOR TO GLASGOW-BLATCHFORD AND ROCKALL SCORING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTING INPATIENT MORTALITY IN A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE STUDY
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2018;87(6):AB129   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
BMC Gastroenterology. 2019;19(1):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

1082 Use of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score Improves Risk Stratification in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Prospective Comparison Against the Glasgow Blatchford, Pre- Endoscopy Rockall and Full Rockall Score
Gastroenterology. 2012;142(5):S-193-S-194   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Clin Endosc has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since March 1, 2015.