Gastric Schwannoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Trucut Biopsy

Sung Wook Hong; Won Young Cho; Jin-Oh Kim; Chang Gyun Chun; Kwang Yeun Shim; Gene Hyun Bok; Wook Hyun Um; Ji Eun Lee

doi:10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.284

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Clin Endosc > Volume 46(3); 2013 > Article

Case Report Gastric Schwannoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Trucut Biopsy: Sung Wook Hong, Won Young Cho, Jin-Oh Kim, Chang Gyun Chun, Kwang Yeun Shim, Gene Hyun Bok, Wook Hyun Um, Ji Eun Lee; Clinical Endoscopy 2013;46(3):284-287.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.284
Published online: May 31, 2013

Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence: Jin-Oh Kim. Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 59 Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 140-743, Korea. Tel: +82-2-709-9581, Fax: +82-2-709-9696, jokim@schmc.ac.kr

• Received: April 2, 2012 • Revised: July 18, 2012 • Accepted: August 25, 2012

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

6,651 Views
52 Download
11 Crossref
15 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
CASE REPORT
DISCUSSION
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Schwannomas of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are rare subepithelial tumors comprising approximately 3.3% to 12.8% of all mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. On endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) they are seen as hypoechoic tumors arising most commonly from the 4th proper muscle layer. Although EUS helps to distinguish tumor characteristics, tissue sampling is required for differentiation with other more common tumors such as GI stromal tumors. Both EUS-guided fine needle aspiration and EUS-guided trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB) can be used for tissue sampling. However, only EUS-TCB allows core biopsy and a high yield of immunohistochemical staining. We report a case of a gastric schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-TCB.
Keywords: Gastric schwannoma; Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided trucut biopsy

INTRODUCTION

Schwannoma of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is considered to be a rare and distinctively different neoplasm from conventional schwannomas that arise in soft tissue or the central nervous system. Histologically, GI schwannomas are S-100 protein-positive spindle cell tumors with a microtrabecular pattern, peripheral lymphoid cuffing, and occasional germinal centers.1 They are benign tumors associated with an excellent prognosis after surgical resection as reported by Daimaru et al.2 GI schwannomas occur most commonly in the stomach (60% to 70% of cases), followed by the colon and rectum.1 Esophageal and small intestinal schwannomas have been rarely reported.2

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsies are reliable, safe, and effective techniques in obtaining samples for cytological or histological examinations either as a primary procedure or in cases that other biopsy techniques have failed. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA), as well as EUS-guided Trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB), has been proven to be of significant value in the diagnostic evaluation of benign and malignant diseases, as well as in staging of the malignant tumors of the GI tract and of adjacent organs.3 This is a very rare case report of gastric schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-TCB to our knowledge.

CASE REPORT

A 72-year-old female was referred for the evaluation of right colon cancer. During staging workup, esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed submucosal elevated lesion with bridging folds located at the greater curvature side of the antrum (Fig. 1A). EUS (UM-2000; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) demonstrated a 40.7×31.7 mm-sized round, hypoechoic mass with internal hyperechogenicity originating from the proper muscle layer (Fig. 1B). Abdominal computed tomography scan showed 5×4 cm-sized heterogenous mass located at the greater curvature of the stomach without enlarged lymph nodes (Fig. 1C). EUS-TCB with a 19 gauze needle (QuickCore; Wilson-Cook Medical Inc., Winstom-Salem, NC, USA) was performed (Fig. 1D). The tissue from the tumor was composed of spindle cells that were only stained with S-100 on immunohistochemistry. Staining for CD 117, CD34, smooth muscle actin, and desmin was negative. These results corresponded with schwannoma of the stomach (Fig. 2). Laparoscopic gastric wedge resection was performed with right hemicolectomy of the colon cancer. There was an intramural solid mass from muscularis propria of the stomach, measuring 5.5×3.5 cm. On section, the cut surface showed a yellowish gray and myxoid appearance (Fig. 3). On immunohistochemistry, diffuse and intense positivity for S-100 protein indicating neurogenic differentiation of the tumor cells was observed. The tumor did not show any expression of CD117, CD34, smooth muscle actin, and desmin, identical with the result of TCB. This suggested that final pathologic diagnosis was also gastric schwannoma.

DISCUSSION

Schwannomas arise from Schwann cells of the nerve sheath, which encompass the axons of peripheral nerves. Schwannomas of the GI tract have rarely been reported and occurred predominantly in the stomach. Their reported prevalence ranges from 3.3% to 12.8% of all GI mesenchymal tumor.1,2 In contrast to gastric GI stromal tumors (GISTs), which may be malignant or have malignant potential, schwannomas behave in a benign fashion and there have been no recurrence, metastasis, or tumor-related mortality reported after curative resection.1

EUS is a useful technique to further characterize subepithelial lesions and surrounding structures of the GI tract.4,5 It can be verified to ascertain the layer of tumor origin and differentiate intramural lesions from extrinsic compressions. EUS measurements of tumor size, cystic spaces, and extraluminal margins have a positive predictive value in differentiating between benign and malignant submucosal tumors.6 Ji et al.7 reported the positive predictive value of 98.7% for locating GI mesenchymal tumors with EUS and 80.3% positive rate of differentiation between benign and malignant tumors using EUS.

It is also difficult to obtain tissue specimens from muscularis propria or muscularis mucosa by conventional endoscopic biopsy. These types of tumors, which cannot be clearly diagnosed with EUS, require EUS-FNA or EUS-TCB for better evaluation. Preoperative diagnosis using EUS-FNA or EUS-TCB may be improved with the application of immunohistochemical analysis. As was in our case, subepithelial tumors originating from the proper muscle layer of the stomach are GIST, leiomyoma, etc. All these subepithelial tumors showed hypoehic lesions originating from the proper muscle layer in the EUS. EUS imaging alone cannot make a differential diagnosis among these subepithelial tumors. Thus, obtaining tissues from submucosal tumor with EUS-FNA or TCB and performing immunohistochemical analysis will help to make accurate diagnoses and improve patient prognosis.8,9 In a recent study, Fernández-Esparrach et al.10 evaluated the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB in 40 patients with gastric subepithelial lesions. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA was 52% and that of EUS-TCB was 55%, because of technical failure and inadequate sample. They are reported cases that were diagnosed by EUS-FNA as mediastinal schwannoma11 and retroperitoneal schwannoma.12 Until now, gastric schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-FNB are reported seldom.

Spindle cell neoplasms of the GI tract show considerable morphologic overlap. Thus, immunohistochemistry is an essential tool for proper diagnosis of these lesions. Several immunohistochemical stains are particularly helpful in the evaluation of these spindle cell lesions, each with its own strengths and limitations. The strength of S-100 protein expression in spindle cell neoplasms of the GI tract lies in its ability to identify schwannomas. Schwannomas show strong and uniform nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for S-100 protein in 100% of cases in reported series.13-16 In this case, the tumor was successfully diagnosed as gastric schwannoma by EUS-TCB with immunohistochemistry and curative resection was performed by laparoscopic surgery.

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Sarlomo-Rikala M, Miettinen M. Gastric schwannoma: a clinicopathological analysis of six cases. Histopathology 1995;27:355–360.Article PubMed
2. Daimaru Y, Kido H, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Benign schwannoma of the gastrointestinal tract: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol 1988;19:257–264.Article PubMed
3. Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology: an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009;23:743–759.Article PubMed
4. Logrono R, Jones DV, Faruqi S, Bhutani MS. Recent advances in cell biology, diagnosis, and therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Cancer Biol Ther 2004;3:251–258.Article PubMed
5. Hwang JH, Kimmey MB. The incidental upper gastrointestinal subepithelial mass. Gastroenterology 2004;126:301–307.Article PubMed
6. Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Roseau G, Barbier JP. Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut 2000;46:88–92.Article PubMed PMC
7. Ji F, Wang ZW, Wang LJ, Ning JW, Xu GQ. Clinicopathological characteristics of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors and diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;23(8 Pt 2):e318–e324.Article PubMed
8. Stelow EB, Stanley MW, Mallery S, Lai R, Linzie BM, Bardales RH. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration findings of gastrointestinal leiomyomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;119:703–708.Article PubMed
9. Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Y, et al. The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:37–43.Article PubMed
10. Fernández-Esparrach G, Sendino O, Solé M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy 2010;42:292–299.Article PubMed
11. Pakseresht K, Reddymasu SC, Oropeza-Vail MM, Fan F, Olyaee M. Mediastinal schwannoma diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2011;5:411–415.Article PubMed PMC
12. Kudo T, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, et al. Three cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-FNA. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:3459–3464.Article PubMed PMC
13. Kwon MS, Lee SS, Ahn GH. Schwannomas of the gastrointestinal tract: clinicopathological features of 12 cases including a case of esophageal tumor compared with those of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Pathol Res Pract 2002;198:605–613.Article PubMed
14. Miettinen M, Shekitka KM, Sobin LH. Schwannomas in the colon and rectum: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 20 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:846–855.Article PubMed
15. Prévot S, Bienvenu L, Vaillant JC, de Saint-Maur PP. Benign schwannoma of the digestive tract: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of five cases, including a case of esophageal tumor. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:431–436.Article PubMed
16. Turner MS, Goldsmith JD. Best practices in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: spindle cell neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:1370–1374.Article PubMed PDF

Fig. 1

(A) Gastroscopy shows a submucosal elevated lesion with bridging fold. (B) Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) shows a 4 cm-sized hypoehoic mass with internal hyperechogenicity originating from the proper muscle layer. (C) Contrast enhanced computed tomography scan shows a round, enhancing extraluminal-growing mass. (D) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy with 19 gauze needle was performed.

Fig. 2

Pathologic findings of Trucut biopsy. Tissue was composed of broad bundles of elongated cells (A, H&E stain, ×100). Immunohistochemistry (IHCS) findings; (B) the tumor strongly stains for S-100 (arrow). IHCS staining for (C) CD 117, (D) CD 34, (E) smooth muscle actin, and (F) desmin are negative (H&E stain, ×100).

Fig. 3

Gross specimen of the tumor. The resected specimen shows an unencapsulated homogenous tumor. A Trucut biopsy induced scar (arrow) can be seen.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Differential diagnosis of submucosal gastric tumors: gastric schwannomas misdiagnosed as GISTs
Mutlu Unver, Suleyman Cağlar Ertekin, Eyüp Kebapcı, Mustafa Olmez, Erhan Ergin, Safak Ozturk, Erkan Sahin, Ragıp Ortac
Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
What About Gastric Schwannoma? A Review Article
Sara Lauricella, Sergio Valeri, Gianluca Mascianà, Ida Francesca Gallo, Erica Mazzotta, Chiara Pagnoni, Saponaro Costanza, Lorenza Falcone, Domenico Benvenuto, Marco Caricato, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2021; 52(1): 57. CrossRef
Intramuscular ancient schwannoma of the axillary nerve
Vishali Moond, Preeti Diwaker, Reshma Golamari, Rohit Jain
BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(5): e239445. CrossRef
Gastric schwannoma: a case report and literature review
Changsheng Pu, Keming Zhang
Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastric Schwannomas Misdiagnosed as GIST: A Comparative Study of Clinic Strategies Based on Membrane Marker Detection
Quanyong Cheng, Kun Zhao, Jing Wang, Yu Guo, Hui Pang
Journal of Cancer Research Updates.2020; 9(1): 82. CrossRef
Clinical characteristics and surgical treatment of schwannomas of the esophagus and stomach: A case series and systematic review
Jesús Morales-Maza, Francisco Ulises Pastor-Sifuentes, Germán E Sánchez-Morales, Emilio Sanchez-Garcia Ramos, Oscar Santes, Uriel Clemente-Gutiérrez, Adriana Simoneta Pimienta-Ibarra, Heriberto Medina-Franco
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2019; 11(9): 750. CrossRef
Axillary schwannoma, preoperative diagnosis on a tru-cut biopsy: Case report and literature review
Hager Aref, Georges A. Abizeid
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2018; 52: 49. CrossRef
Spectral Computed Tomography Imaging of Gastric Schwannoma and Gastric Stromal Tumor
Jianli Liu, Yanjun Chai, Junlin Zhou, Chi Dong, Wenjuan Zhang, Bin Liu
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2017; 41(3): 417. CrossRef
Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric schwannoma
Jinlong Hu, Xiang Liu, Nan Ge, Sheng Wang, Jintao Guo, Guoxin Wang, Siyu Sun
Medicine.2017; 96(25): e7175. CrossRef
Two Synchronous Colonic Adenocarcinomas, a Gastric Schwannoma and a Mucinous Neoplasm of the Appendix: a Case Report
Diogo Sousa, Miguel Allen, Alda Pinto, Andreia Ferreira, Ana Cruz, Diogo Marinho, Pierpaolo Cusati, José Augusto Martins
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2015; 46(3): 304. CrossRef
Benign Gastric Schwannoma: How Long Should We Follow Up to Monitor the Recurrence? A Case Report and Comprehensive Review of Literature of 137 Cases
Xiafei Hong, Wenming Wu, Mengyi Wang, Quan Liao, Yupei Zhao
International Surgery.2015; 100(4): 744. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Gastric Schwannoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Trucut Biopsy

Clin Endosc. 2013;46(3):284-287. Published online May 31, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.284

XML Download

Figure

Gastric Schwannoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Trucut Biopsy

Fig. 1 (A) Gastroscopy shows a submucosal elevated lesion with bridging fold. (B) Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) shows a 4 cm-sized hypoehoic mass with internal hyperechogenicity originating from the proper muscle layer. (C) Contrast enhanced computed tomography scan shows a round, enhancing extraluminal-growing mass. (D) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy with 19 gauze needle was performed.

Fig. 2 Pathologic findings of Trucut biopsy. Tissue was composed of broad bundles of elongated cells (A, H&E stain, ×100). Immunohistochemistry (IHCS) findings; (B) the tumor strongly stains for S-100 (arrow). IHCS staining for (C) CD 117, (D) CD 34, (E) smooth muscle actin, and (F) desmin are negative (H&E stain, ×100).

Fig. 3 Gross specimen of the tumor. The resected specimen shows an unencapsulated homogenous tumor. A Trucut biopsy induced scar (arrow) can be seen.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Gastric Schwannoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Trucut Biopsy