Photodynamic Therapy in Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: Not for the Uncommitted

Jayant P. Talreja; Marisa DeGaetani; Kristi Ellen; Timothy Schmitt; Monica Gaidhane; Michel Kahaleh

doi:10.5946/ce.2013.46.4.390

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Clin Endosc > Volume 46(4); 2013 > Article

Original Article Photodynamic Therapy in Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: Not for the Uncommitted: Jayant P. Talreja¹, Marisa DeGaetani², Kristi Ellen¹, Timothy Schmitt¹, Monica Gaidhane², Michel Kahaleh²; Clinical Endoscopy 2013;46(4):390-394.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.4.390
Published online: July 31, 2013

¹Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

²Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Correspondence: Michel Kahaleh. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 4th Floor, 1305 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA. Tel: +1-646-962-4000, Fax: +1-646-962-0110, mkahaleh@gmail.com

• Received: October 17, 2012 • Revised: January 10, 2013 • Accepted: February 28, 2013

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

7,106 Views
65 Download
16 Crossref
23 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Background/Aims
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma has been associated with improved survival. We report a single tertiary care center experience over the past 6 years.
Methods
Fifty-five patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma received PDT between 2004 and 2010. Plastic stents were placed after PDT to prevent cholangitis.
Results
Twenty-seven patients (49%) showed Bismuth type IV, 22 (41%) showed Bismuth type III, and six (10%) showed Bismuth type I and II. Twenty patients (37%) received chemotherapy and radiation therapy, five (9%) received chemotherapy only; and one (2%) received radiation therapy only. Mean number of PDT sessions was 1.9±1.5 sessions (range, 1 to 9). Mean survival duration was 293±266 days (median, 190; range, 25 to 1,332). PDT related complications included three (5%) facial burn, three (5%) photosensitivity, and two (3%) rash. Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing the survival means of patients who received PDT and chemotherapy/radiation therapy (median survival 257 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 166 to 528) versus who received PDT only (median survival 183 days; 95% CI, 129 to 224) showed no significant difference (log-rank p=0.20).
Conclusions
PDT has a measurable impact on survival in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma but requires aggressive stenting posttherapy.
Keywords: Photodynamic therapy; Cholangiocarcinoma; Single operator choledochoscopy

INTRODUCTION

Cholangiocarcinoma, a malignancy that arises from the epithelial cells of the biliary tree, causes significant morbidity and mortality, with an average 5-year survival rate of 5% to 10%.1 Cure is achieved only through surgical resection; yet, greater than 80% of patients present at an advanced and unresectable stage,2 resulting in a 3- to 6-month median survival from the time of diagnosis.3 Various palliative treatment strategies have been offered, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy and biliary drainage (endoscopic or percutaneous), but none have shown a definitive survival benefit.2,3 Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising new treatment modality for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Its benefits include symptomatic improvement and prolonged survival with relatively few complications.2

With PDT, a photosensitizing agent is preferentially retained by the malignant tissue. Following laser activation at a distinct wavelength, toxic oxygen radicals induce apoptosis of malignant cells and cause tumor necrosis.2-4 PDT has been reported to have a minimal side effect profile, with the most frequently encountered adverse effect being phototoxicity to the skin.2

In the last few years we have seen the rise of cholangioscopy-guided PDT, which allows better identification of tumor margins, permits targeted laser illumination, and aids in evaluating the response to therapy.5,6 We now report our experience with PDT, in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma over the past 6 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Fifty-five patients (31 males, 24 females) with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma received treatment with PDT between 2004 and 2010. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 69 years (range, 30 to 87). Twenty-seven patients (49%) showed Bismuth type IV, 22 (41%) showed Bismuth type III, and six (10%) showed Bismuth type I and II. The median median model for end-stage liver disease score was 15 (range, 7 to 25). Twenty patients (37%) received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Five patients (9%) received chemotherapy only and one patient (2%) received radiation therapy only.

Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed comparing the group of patients who received PDT and chemotherapy/radiation therapy versus those who received PDT only.

Procedure

Photofrin (porfirmer sodium) 2 mg/kg body weight was administered intravenously 48 hours prior to irradiation. PDT was delivered through a 3.0-m length fiber with a 2.5-cm-long cylindrical diffuser at its distal end (Pioneer Optics, Windsor Locks, CT, USA) (Fig. 1). Single operator cholangioscopy (SOC) was utilized for fiber placement in 18 patients (Figs. 2, 3). Photoactivation was performed at 630 nm with a light dose of 180 J/cm², fluence of 0.250 W/cm², and irradiation time of 750 seconds.

The single operator cholangioscope was inserted into the bile duct over the wire. Direct visualisation of the cancerous stricture was conducted macroscopically which permitted exchange of the wire for the diffuser, which was centered within the stricture and allowed target administration of light.

Placement of plastic stents was performed systematically after the photodynamic treatment to prevent cholangitis. All patients received perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (31 males, 24 females) with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma received treatment with PDT between 2004 and 2010. Twenty-five patients received chemotherapy with various combinations of gemcitabine and capecetabine; and one received radiation therapy only along with PDT. Twenty-nine patients received PDT only.

The median age was 69 years (range, 30 to 87). Results are summarized in Table 2. The median interval between presentation and first PDT session was 63 days and there was a median follow-up of 133 days (range, 11 to 1,190). The mean number of PDT sessions was 1.9±1.5 sessions (median, 1; range, 1 to 9). There was a mean survival of 293±266 days (median, 190; range, 25 to 1,332). Median survival of patients who received PDT and chemotherapy/radiation therapy was 257 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 166 to 528) while medial survival duration of the PDT only group was 183 days (95% CI, 129 to 224).

During follow-up, 49/55 patients died from progression or complications of their underlying disease. There were no procedure related deaths.

Twenty-eight (51%) developed interval cholangitis requiring stent revision. All of these patients showed Bismuth type III and IV lesions. Other non-PDT related complications included: six (11%) hepatic abscess, one (2%) gallbladder perforation, two (3%) peritonitis, related to systemic infection, two (3%) pancreatitis, two (3%) hemobilia, and three (5%) cholecystitis. Eight patients experienced PDT related adverse events, including the following: three (5%) facial burn, three (5%) photosensitivity, and two (3%) rash.

Kaplan-Meier analysis (Fig. 4) was performed comparing the group of patients who received PDT and chemotherapy/radiation therapy versus those who received PDT only.

After adjusting for age, sex, and Bismuth classification, there was no significant difference in the survival means of both groups (log-rank p=0.20).

DISCUSSION

Palliative therapy is the mainstay of treatment in patients who present with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Biliary decompression, which is usually accomplished via endoscopic stent placement, can result in symptom improvement and prevent complications such as cholangitis and sepsis; however, stent placement has not been shown to have any survival benefit2 and is limited by recurrent stent occlusion. Additionally, successful drainage through stent placement proves to be more difficult in proximal tumors,7 necessitating the search for a better treatment modality.

Numerous studies, including two randomized clinical trials, have found that PDT is superior to biliary stenting alone in the treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, improving both survival as well as quality of life.2,3,8-13 Additionally, it was recently shown that survival in patients who underwent PDT was similar to those in whom curative surgery was attempted but who had positive resection margins, despite the fact that the PDT group had more advanced clinical T stages.14

Utilization of cholangioscopy with PDT allows direct visualization of the biliary tree, leading to improvements in diagnosis and treatment. It also has been shown to influence decisions regarding patient management.5,6 Our group compared PDT versus SOC directed PDT and found the therapies to be comparable without an increase in adverse complications, but with decreased radiation exposure in the SOC-directed group.15 Another recent study demonstrated that direct POC-guided PDT using an ultraslim upper endoscope is both feasible and safe in select patients with inoperable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.16

Our center's cumulative experience with PDT for the treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, which is one of the largest studies to date, again demonstrated its survival benefit, with a mean survival of 293±266 days (median, 190; range, 25 to 1,332). No difference in survival times was noted between those treated with PDT alone and those with PDT and chemo or radiation therapy. However, despite its benefit, PDT was also associated with a substantial incidence of cholangitis requiring stent revision, occurring in just over 50% of our patients. A review of 20 studies of PDT in cholangiocarcinoma found the overall incidence of cholangitis to be 27.5%,2 with the largest clinical trial showing an incidence of 56%.17 Another recent study showed a 57% incidence of cholangitis with PDT.12 Although cholangitis can be a complication of stenting itself, seen in 20% to 40% of cases using plastic stents and 4.9% to 6% of cases using bare metal stents,18 the high rate of cholangitis post-PDT is likely the result of necrosis associated with this therapy. Given the frequency with which this complication occurs, aggressive stenting posttherapy is required. This is a commitment that both physician and patient must be aware of before commencing therapy.

In conclusion, use of PDT for the treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma is associated with increased survival compared to stenting alone. However, PDT therapy is associated with high rates of cholangitis and stent revision, indicating the need for aggressive stenting posttherapy. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm the benefit of PDT with stenting versus stenting alone as well as the benefit of PDT plus chemotherapy and radiation therapy compared with PDT alone.

Acknowledgments

Data presented in this manuscript has been collected from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approved database protocol (IRB #11325 ERCP in Pancreatico-biliary Disease; Original Approval on 2004 May 24).

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Anderson CD, Pinson CW, Berlin J, Chari RS. Diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Oncologist 2004;9:43–57.Article
2. Gao F, Bai Y, Ma SR, Liu F, Li ZS. Systematic review: photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2010;17:125–131.Article PubMed
3. Wiedmann M, Berr F, Schiefke I, et al. Photodynamic therapy in patients with non-resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: 5-year follow-up of a prospective phase II study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:68–75.Article PubMed
4. Zoepf T. Photodynamic therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2008;10:161–163.Article PubMed PMC
5. Judah JR, Draganov PV. Intraductal biliary and pancreatic endoscopy: an expanding scope of possibility. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:3129–3136.Article PubMed PMC
6. Fishman DS, Tarnasky PR, Patel SN, Raijman I. Management of pancreaticobiliary disease using a new intra-ductal endoscope: the Texas experience. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:1353–1358.Article PubMed PMC
7. Cheon YK. The role of photodynamic therapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Korean J Intern Med 2010;25:345–352.Article PubMed PMC
8. Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2426–2430.Article PubMed
9. Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, et al. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology 2003;125:1355–1363.Article PubMed
10. Kahaleh M, Mishra R, Shami VM, et al. Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of survival in biliary stenting alone versus stenting with photodynamic therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:290–297.Article PubMed
11. Harewood GC, Baron TH, Rumalla A, et al. Pilot study to assess patient outcomes following endoscopic application of photodynamic therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;20:415–420.Article PubMed
12. Fuks D, Bartoli E, Delcenserie R, et al. Biliary drainage, photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma with jaundice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;24:1745–1752.Article PubMed
13. Quyn AJ, Ziyaie D, Polignano FM, Tait IS. Photodynamic therapy is associated with an improvement in survival in patients with irresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2009;11:570–577.Article PubMed PMC
14. Matull WR, Dhar DK, Ayaru L, et al. R0 but not R1/R2 resection is associated with better survival than palliative photodynamic therapy in biliary tract cancer. Liver Int 2011;31:99–107.Article PubMed PMC
15. Talreja JP, Degaetani M, Sauer BG, Kahaleh M. Photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: contribution of single operator cholangioscopy for targeted treatment. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2011;10:1233–1238.Article PubMed
16. Choi HJ, Moon JH, Ko BM, et al. Clinical feasibility of direct peroral cholangioscopy-guided photodynamic therapy for inoperable cholangiocarcinoma performed by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:808–813.Article PubMed
17. Witzigmann H, Berr F, Ringel U, et al. Surgical and palliative management and outcome in 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: palliative photodynamic therapy plus stenting is comparable to r1/r2 resection. Ann Surg 2006;244:230–239.Article PubMed PMC
18. Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Iacono C. Surgical Treatment of Hilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Verona (IT): Springer; 2008.

Fig. 1

Fluoroscopy demonstrating malignant stricture involving the confluence.

Fig. 2

Single operator choledochoscope placed below the stricture to be treated.

Fig. 3

(A) Choledochoscopy after centering the fiber diffuser at the level of the stricture. (B) Choledochoscopy after 3 months postphotodynamic therapy.

Fig. 4

Kaplan-Meier analysis. (A) Photodynamic therapy+chemotherapy+radiation therapy. (B) Photodynamic therapy only. CI, confidence interval.

Table 1

Patient Characteristics

Values are presented as median (range) or number (%).

MELD, median model for end-stage liver disease; PDT, photodynamic therapy.

Table 2

Complications

PDT, photodynamic therapy.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Ablation Therapy of the Biliary Tree
Marina Kim, Darshan Parekh, Michel Kahaleh
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Ablative Therapy in Non-HCC Liver Malignancy
Tyler P. Robinson, Travis Pebror, Matthew E. Krosin, Leonidas G. Koniaris
Cancers.2023; 15(4): 1200. CrossRef
Benefits and safety of photodynamic therapy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis
Pengcheng Chen, Ting Yang, Peidong Shi, Jiangbo Shen, Qingchun Feng, Jingen Su
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy.2022; 37: 102712. CrossRef
Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) With Biliary Stents in Palliative Treatment of Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Babu P. Mohan, Saurabh Chandan, Shahab R. Khan, Lena L. Kassab, Suresh Ponnada, Everson L.A. Artifon, Jose P. Otoch, Stephanie McDonough, Douglas G. Adler
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 56(2): e153. CrossRef
Comparing palliative treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma: photodynamic therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation
Tayyaba Mohammad, Michel Kahaleh
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 347. CrossRef
New approach to the treatment of cancer of large duodenal papilla and extrahepatic bile ducts with photodynamic therapy
E. P. Stranadko, A. V. Baranov, V. A. Duvansky, A. I. Lobakov, V. A. Morokhotov, M. V. Riabov
Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; (5): 78. CrossRef
Endoscopic palliation of malignant biliary obstruction
Andrew Canakis, Michel Kahaleh
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 14(10): 581. CrossRef
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Guided Ablation for Cholangiocarcinoma
Ross C.D. Buerlein, Andrew Y. Wang
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2019; 29(2): 351. CrossRef
Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
Robert Wentrup, Nicola Winkelmann, Andrey Mitroshkin, Matthias Prager, Winfried Voderholzer, Guido Schachschal, Christian J, rgensen, Carsten B, ning
Gut and Liver.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis
Yi Lu, Lei Liu, Jia-chuan Wu, Li-ke Bie, Biao Gong
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology.2015; 39(6): 718. CrossRef
Biliary Tumor Ablation with Photodynamic Therapy and Radiofrequency Ablation
Ioana Smith, Michel Kahaleh
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2015; 25(4): 793. CrossRef
The Role of Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma
Ajaypal Singh, Uzma D. Siddiqui
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2015; 49(9): 725. CrossRef
Role of photodynamic therapy and intraductal radiofrequency ablation in cholangiocarcinoma
Janaki Patel, Nada Rizk, Michel Kahaleh
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2015; 29(2): 309. CrossRef
Impact of Radiofrequency Ablation on Malignant Biliary Strictures: Results of a Collaborative Registry
Reem Z. Sharaiha, Amrita Sethi, Kristen R. Weaver, Tamas A. Gonda, Raj J. Shah, Norio Fukami, Prashant Kedia, Nikhil A. Kumta, Carlos M. Rondon Clavo, Michael D. Saunders, Jorge Cerecedo-Rodriguez, Paola Figueroa Barojas, Jessica L. Widmer, Monica Gaidhan
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2015; 60(7): 2164. CrossRef
Randomised phase II trial of photodynamic therapy plus oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1, versus photodynamic therapy alone for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Do Hyun Park, Sang Soo Lee, So Eun Park, Jae Lyun Lee, Jun Ho Choi, Hee Jung Choi, Ji Woong Jang, Hyoung Jung Kim, Jun Bum Eum, Dong-Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim, Jung Bok Lee
European Journal of Cancer.2014; 50(7): 1259. CrossRef
Is There Any Evidence for a Role of Local Treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma?
Arndt Vogel, Oliver Dudeck
Visceral Medicine.2014; 30(4): 254. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Photodynamic Therapy in Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: Not for the Uncommitted

Clin Endosc. 2013;46(4):390-394. Published online July 31, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.4.390

XML Download

Figure

Photodynamic Therapy in Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: Not for the Uncommitted

Fig. 1 Fluoroscopy demonstrating malignant stricture involving the confluence.

Fig. 2 Single operator choledochoscope placed below the stricture to be treated.

Fig. 3 (A) Choledochoscopy after centering the fiber diffuser at the level of the stricture. (B) Choledochoscopy after 3 months postphotodynamic therapy.

Fig. 4 Kaplan-Meier analysis. (A) Photodynamic therapy+chemotherapy+radiation therapy. (B) Photodynamic therapy only. CI, confidence interval.