Clin Endosc > Volume 46(5); 2013 > Article
Black, Guy, and Burbridge: Retroperitoneal Cystic Lymphangioma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration

Abstract

Retroperitoneal cystic lymphangiomas are rare tumors of the lymphatic system. These tumors usually present in childhood and are often diagnosed incidentally with imaging procedures. Although benign, they can grow to large sizes and become symptomatic due to their compressive effects. They can cause diagnostic dilemmas with other retroperitoneal cystic tumors including those arising from the liver, kidney, and pancreas. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an invaluable tool in the assessment of cystic lesions in the region of the pancreas. This case describes a 66-year-old female who presented with 3 months of abdominal pain. Radiographic imaging was suggestive of a cystic lesion in the region of the pancreas. EUS was performed confirming a cystic lesion adjacent to the tail of the pancreas with subsequent fine needle aspiration fluid analysis consistent with a cystic lymphangioma.

INTRODUCTION

Cystic lymphangiomas are rare benign tumors of the lymphatic system. Ninety percentage of cystic lymphangiomas are found in the neck and axillary regions.1 Retroperitoneal lymphangiomas account for nearly 1% of all lymphangiomas.2 Although often asymptomatic, they can present with a palpable abdominal mass and nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea/vomiting. They are often found incidentally during diagnostic procedures performed for unrelated clinical reasons.3 Approximately 90% of retroperitoneal lymphangiomas are diagnosed in the first 2 years of life; however, they can present at all ages and will often attain a large size prior to becoming symptomatic.4 These tumors rarely undergo spontaneous resolution and therefore treatment is usually recommended.5 Although rare in incidence, these lesions have been shown to be accurately diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound guided fineneedle aspiration (EUS-FNA).6

CASE REPORT

A 66-year-old female presented to her primary care physician for evaluation of 3 months of abdominal pain. Her pain was associated with heartburn, bloating, and indigestion and had been unresponsive to acid suppressing therapy. She denied any nausea or vomiting but did note occasional diarrhea. Further evaluation was performed with an abdominal ultrasound which revealed a 5 cm hypoechoic mass in the region of the tail of the pancreas. She underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which confirmed the mass and noted it to be cystic in nature with multiple thin septations (Fig. 1). The patient was referred to gastroenterology and underwent EUS with FNA of the cystic lesion. EUS identified a 4.7×3.3 cm cystic lesion with internal septations adjacent to the tail of the pancreas, but not within the pancreas itself (Fig. 2). White colored fluid was aspirated using a 19 gauge Cook Echotip FNA needle and initial fluid analysis was notable for lymphocytes. A fluid triglyceride level was noted to be elevated at 8,243 mg/dL. The patient was referred to surgery and underwent laparoscopic removal of the cystic lesion. Post resection, surgical pathology specimens were consistent with a cystic lymphangioma (Figs. 3, 4). At her 1 month postoperative visit, the patient noted significant improvement in her abdominal pain.

DISCUSSION

The differential diagnosis for a cystic lesion of the retroperitoneum is broad and includes both benign and malignant tumors including cystic mesothelioma, teratoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, malignant mesenchymoma, pancreatic pseudocyst, and lymphangioma.2 Retroperitoneal cystic lymphangiomas are rare tumors that are thought to arise due to an abnormal connection between the iliac and retroperitoneal lymphatic sacs and the venous system, leading to lymphatic stasis in the sacs.2 Retroperitoneal lymphangiomas are often classified into cystic and cavernous types.7 The cavernous type is usually patent to adjacent lymph flow and therefore compressible; whereas, cystic lymphangiomas are noncompressible and may be uniloculated or multiloculated.4 An additional third type, capillary lymphangioma, is rarely seen in retroperitoneal lymphangiomas. Preliminary imaging with ultrasound can be useful given that it can demonstrate the cystic nature of a lesion. Further imaging with computed tomography or MRI can help further classify cysts as unilocular or multilocular, assess the relationship of the lymphangiomas to adjacent organs, and further delineate the boundaries of the cyst.2 Most retroperitoneal lymphangiomas are diagnosed incidentally in asymptomatic patients, but complications such as severe abdominal pain, hemorrhage, infection, torsion, rupture, and obstruction can occur.8 A fluid that appears grossly chylous with a high triglyceride level is essentially diagnostic of a cystic lymphangioma.8 Surgical excision is considered to be the treatment of choice for cystic lymphangiomas given their potential to grow and develop complications.9 Alternative treatments in the form of aspiration, radiotherapy, and sclerotherapy have been reported with variable results.4
The role of EUS-FNA is less defined with respect to rare cystic diseases but has been evolving over the last decade. Just as EUS has become invaluable in pancreatic lesions, it is also beneficial in nonpancreatic tumors of the retroperitoneum. Imaging modalities can provide useful diagnostic information but cannot determine whether a lesion is benign or malignant. The ability for cell sampling with EUS-FNA makes it an important diagnostic modality in this regard and can help further guide subsequent therapeutic strategy. The performance characteristics of EUS-FNA have been shown to be quite good with a specificity of 100% and accuracy of 86% previously reported in the literature.10 The risks associated with EUS-FNA of these lesions are small, mainly bleeding, and infection. Tumor seeding or leakage of lymphatic fluid with EUS-FNA has been sparsely reported in the literature and substantial evidence for this complication is still lacking.11 Given the low risk nature, diagnostic accuracy, and ability for cell sampling, EUS-FNA should be considered a first line modality in the evaluation of these cystic lesions of the retroperitoneum.

NOTES

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

1. Hayami S, Adachi Y, Ishigooka M, et al. Retroperitoneal cystic lymphangioma diagnosed by computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and thin needle aspiration. Int Urol Nephrol 1996;28:21–26. 8738615.
crossref pmid
2. Bhavsar T, Saeed-Vafa D, Harbison S, Inniss S. Retroperitoneal cystic lymphangioma in an adult: a case report and review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2010;1:171–176. 21607159.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Nuzzo G, Lemmo G, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Boldrini G, Giovannini I. Retroperitoneal cystic lymphangioma. J Surg Oncol 1996;61:234–237. 8637214.
crossref pmid
4. Shankar KR, Roche CJ, Carty HM, Turnock RR. Cystic retroperitoneal lymphangioma: treatment by image-guided percutaneous catheter drainage and sclerotherapy. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1021–1023. 11419147.
crossref pmid
5. de Perrot M, Rostan O, Morel P, Le Coultre C. Abdominal lymphangioma in adults and children. Br J Surg 1998;85:395–397. 9529502.
crossref pmid
6. Coe AW, Evans J, Conway J. Pancreas cystic lymphangioma diagnosed with EUS-FNA. JOP 2012;13:282–284. 22572132.
pmid
7. Henzel JH, Pories WJ, Burget DE, Smith JL. Intra-abdominal lymphangiomata. Arch Surg 1966;93:304–308. 5913566.
crossref pmid
8. Jathal A, Arsenescu R, Crowe G, Movva R, Shamoun DK. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lymphangioma with EUS-guided FNA: report of a case. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:920–922. 15933705.
crossref pmid
9. Yagihashi Y, Kato K, Nagahama K, Yamamoto M, Kanamaru H. A case of laparoscopic excision of a huge retroperitoneal cystic lymphangioma. Case Rep Urol 2011;2011:712520. 22606623.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Raddaoui E. Clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: Saudi Arabian experience. Acta Cytol 2011;55:26–29. 21135518.
crossref pmid
11. Paquin SC, Gariépy G, Lepanto L, Bourdages R, Raymond G, Sahai AV. A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:610–611. 15812422.
crossref pmid
Fig. 1
Magnetic resonance imaging abdomen showing cystic lesion in region of pancreas.
ce-46-595-g001.jpg
Fig. 2
Endoscopic ultrasound showing cystic lesion adjacent to pancreas.
ce-46-595-g002.jpg
Fig. 3
H&E stain at ×100 magnification shows variably sized, dilated endothelial-lined spaces with a hypocellular, fibrovascular connective tissue stroma, and collections of lymphocytes.
ce-46-595-g003.jpg
Fig. 4
Immunohistochemistry for D240, a marker for lymphatic endothelium (×100).
ce-46-595-g004.jpg
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
XML Download  XML Download
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
8
Crossref
15
Scopus
8,537
View
61
Download
Related articles
Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary after endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts?  2022 November;55(6)
Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy  2021 May;54(3)
Technical Review of Developments in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy  2021 September;54(5)
Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles  2021 September;54(5)
Mucosal Incision-Assisted Endoscopic Biopsy as an Alternative to Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy for Gastric Subepithelial Tumor  2020 September;53(5)
Editorial Office
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#817, 156 Yanghwa-ro (LG Palace, Donggyo-dong), Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04050, Korea
TEL: +82-2-335-1552   FAX: +82-2-335-2690    E-mail: CE@gie.or.kr
Copyright © Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer