Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

Search
Advanced Search
OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Clin Endosc > Volume 49(1); 2016 > Article
Focused Review Series: Current Issues and Future Directions of Small Bowel Endoscopic Evaluation Current Status and Research into Overcoming Limitations of Capsule Endoscopy
Won Gun Kwack, Yun Jeong Lim
Clinical Endoscopy 2016;49(1):8-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.8
Published online: January 28, 2016

Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea

• Received: August 11, 2015   • Revised: September 16, 2015   • Accepted: September 16, 2015

Copyright © 2016 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 26,918 Views
  • 275 Download
  • 42 Web of Science
  • 39 Crossref
  • 45 Scopus
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • Endoscopic investigation has a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. Since 2001, capsule endoscopy (CE) has been available for small-bowel exploration and is under continuous development. During the past decade, CE has achieved impressive improvements in areas such as miniaturization, resolution, and battery life. As a result, CE is currently a first-line tool for the investigation of the small bowel in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and is a useful alternative to wired enteroscopy. Nevertheless, CE still has several limitations, such as incomplete examination and limited diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities. To resolve these problems, many groups have suggested several models (e.g., controlled CO2 insufflation system, magnetic navigation system, mobile robotic platform, tagging and biopsy equipment, and targeted drug-delivery system), which are in development. In the near future, new technological advances will improve the capabilities of CE and broaden its spectrum of applications not only for the small bowel but also for the colon, stomach, and esophagus. The purpose of this review is to introduce the current status of CE and to review the ongoing development of solutions to address its limitations.
  • Keywords: Capsule endoscopy; Small bowel; Colon; Esophagus
Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been available in clinical practice for the evaluation of small-bowel disease since 2001. CE has most commonly been used in cases of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) [1]. Several small-bowel capsules (PillCam, Given Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel; EndoCapsule, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan; MiroCam, IntroMedic, Seoul, Korea; OMOM, Jinshan Science, Chongqing, China; CapsoCam, CapsoVision, Saratoga, CA, USA) are now available worldwide [2]. CE has many advantages compared to conventional wired endoscopy, such as convenience and less invasiveness. However, CE still has several significant technical limitations that need to be addressed technically. First, the gastrointestinal (GI) lumen is not inflated in CE, and only passive images can be obtained while the capsule passes through the GI tract. Therefore, lesions may be missed in CE, and the ampulla of Vater or ileocecal valve could be undetected in small-bowel CE. Moreover, CE often produces obstructed images because of bile, mucus, and other factors. It takes too long to administer CE and interpret capsule images. Second, CE cannot be used to take a biopsy specimen, nor does it have therapeutic capabilities. To overcome these limitations, several groups have suggested alternatives, and these alternatives are currently in development. Here, we introduce results from recent research about the future of CE.
Small-bowel capsule endoscopy
With the advancements in CE technology, CE has rapidly expanded the indication for investigations of the GI tract. Given Imaging has installed more than 4,250 centers in about 60 countries and has sold >650,000 capsules. CE is a particularly useful tool for patients with suspected small-bowel disease, including OGIB, iron deficiency anemia, Crohn’s disease (CD), tumors, polyposis syndromes, and celiac disease. A recent clinical guideline has recommended CE as a first-line investigation tool in patients with OGIB. The first available video capsule, brand name M2A (mouth to anus; Given Imaging), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001 as an adjunctive tool for small-intestine imaging. At present, there are five small-bowel capsule endoscope models on the market worldwide [3,4]. Capsule endoscope models with U.S. FDA approval consist of PillCam, EndoCapsule, and MiroCam. Although the various capsules are similar in size and shape, they differ in dimensions, frame rates, operating time, field of view, image sensor, and optical enhancements (Table 1). PillCam and MiroCam capture images by using a complementary metal oxide silicon sensor, whereas EndoCapsule and the OMOM capsule use a charge-coupled device [5]. In 2013, the third generation of PillCam SB3 was launched and received FDA clearance. This capsule system has improved image detail and adaptive frame rate technology (two to six frames per second [fps]), leading to increased visualization of the small bowel and improved efficiency [6]. The CapsoCam has four cameras that provide a 360° field of view, 12 to 20 fps, and 15 hours battery life. The CapsoCam camera takes images at a rate of 5 fps for the first 2 hours and thereafter at a rate of 3 fps, resulting in 12 and 20 fps, respectively. Smart Motion Sense Technology also enables the capsule to activate its cameras only during capsule motion [7].
To improve the specificity of small-bowel CE findings, fecal calprotectin (FC) is considered a noninvasive, “gold standard” marker of GI inflammation. An FC level of >100 μg/g is a good predictor of positive small-bowel CE findings, and FC >200 μg/g is associated with higher small-bowel CE yield (65%) and confirmed CD in 50% of patients [8].
Colon and esophagus capsule endoscopy
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs in high-risk populations were reported to result in a 90% decrease in CRC incidence. However, no more than 25% compliance has been achieved in screening programs [9]. Colon CE could be a good alternative in patients refusing conventional colonoscopy or when conventional colonoscopy is inappropriate or not possible. In a series of 328 consecutive cases, the rate of complete colon visualization before the end of the lifetime of the battery was 92.8% [10]. In two prospective studies with the newer colon capsule endoscope PillCam COLON 2 (Given Imaging), the sensitivity reached 84% and 89% for detecting polyps >6 mm [11,12]. Although colon CE showed similar detection capabilities when compared with conventional colonoscopy in some studies, conventional colonoscopy remains more accurate than colon CE, and allows the simultaneous removal of polyps. The colon capsule has a potential future for CRC screening; however, more data are needed to answer many pending uncertainties such as the best preparation method, best scoring method (CECDAI [CE CD Activity Index] or Niv score), best booster, and suitable indications.
In 2004, the PillCam ESO (Given Imaging), which is also capable of studying the esophagus, was developed and approved by the FDA. It has two lenses at both ends and takes 18 images per second over approximately 30 minutes to maximize visualization. Although CE can be used for detecting esophageal diseases such as esophageal varices, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal cancer, conventional upper GI endoscopy is still the gold standard.
Improvement of detectability during small-bowel investigation

In vitro chromoendoscopy

The Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy (FICE) system is a new virtual chromoendoscopy technique that processes reflected photons to reconstruct virtual images with a choice of different wavelengths by using computerized spectral estimation technology. The addition of the FICE technology to small-bowel CE may improve diagnostic yield. However, there is some controversy concerning its effectiveness. In a study by Gupta et al. [13], FICE-assisted small-bowel CE analysis was no better than analysis with white light for the diagnosis and characterization of significant lesions in the evaluation of OGIB. Matsumura et al. [14] found that although there was no improvement in diagnostic yield, FICE detected a significantly higher number of small-bowel lesions per examination than did conventional imaging (2.5±2.1 and 1.8±1.7, respectively). Krystallis et al. [15] compared FICE and white light in a total of 167 images. FICE was ineffective in improving endoscopic images except in the blue mode. Blue filter provided image improvement in 83% of images when compared with white light. Imagawa et al. [16] suggested the usefulness of FICE for visualizing small-bowel lesions such as angioectasia, erosions, ulcerations, and various tumors, in a retrospective study. However, in a prospective study, FICE improved the detectability of only angioectasia [16].
Efficient microcancer detection in the small intestine can be realized with infrared fluorescence endoscopy. Infrared fluorescence levels emitted by the fluorophore indocyanine green (ICG) at different concentrations are able to discriminate low concentrations of ICG in early cancer in the small intestine [17].

Three-dimensional reconstruction

In recent years, research has been carried out to produce a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the GI tract; 3D imaging in CE is not currently feasible because of hardware limitations (i.e., packaging and size constraints, and power consumption). As an alternative method, a software-based approach (shape from shading) that enables 3D reconstruction from monocular 2D images has become available [18]. Koulaouzidis et al. [19] determined enhanced visualization for 56% of vascular and <10% of protruding structures (p=0.007 and p=0.008, respectively). Rondonotti et al. [20] showed that the adjunction of 3D reconstructions to their standard 2D counterparts does not enhance the performance of expert small-bowel CE readers (p=0.245), although it significantly improves the performance of novices in differentiating masses from bulges (p=0.045).
CE has many advantages, but also has several drawbacks (Table 2). Fortunately, many promising solutions have been proposed to resolve these problems (Table 3).
Incomplete small-bowel examination

Air insufflation

During its transition along the GI tract, the capsule endoscope is limited by air inflation in exposing the entire mucosa. Several groups have developed a novel device to achieve untethered controlled carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation suitable for CE. This device shows the feasibility of controlled inflation to facilitate visualization [21,22].

Retention or delayed transition

The most common causes of incomplete examinations are delayed gastric emptying and prolonged small-bowel transit. These result in the exhaustion of the battery before the capsule reaches the cecum. Administration of water or intravenous metoclopramide could be used in an effort to overcome this problem; however, it is necessary to use this method carefully in patients with dysmotility, as rapid transit time may diminish the diagnostic yield. Use of the external real-time viewer to check the progress of the capsule significantly improved the completion rate (86% vs. 66%, p=0.002) and the rate of positive findings (80% vs. 67%, p=0.04) compared with the nonviewer group [23]. In addition, retention can be detected by localization using a capsule emitting a magnetic field or electromagnetic waves. Olympus Medical Systems Corporation has developed new software with 3D triangulation [24]. In a study on this method, the average total spatial error with attenuation was 13.26 cm3.

Low battery life

The capsule battery life is usually 8 to 15 hours. Size reduction and battery life extension have become important challenges, as novel capsule endoscopes and accessory tools have been developed to improve diagnostic yield and perform therapeutic work. Frame rate modulation decreases the frame rate outside of the targeted area and saves battery power, yielding a longer operating time. Consequently, completion rate and diagnostic yield has increased significantly [25]. Consumption can also be reduced by video compression and transmission technology such as compressed sensing theory and impulse radio ultra-wideband [26]. One group has proposed primary magnetic coils in a power-generating device outside of the body to send power to a capsule within the body to save space [27].
Controlled locomotion and positioning of the capsule endoscope
Currently, the movement of the capsule is absolutely dependent on gravitational and peristaltic force. Thus, many methods have been proposed for self- or external ordinary positioning or propulsion (Fig. 1) [28-31]. Although there are differences among capsule models, they are classified into three types: magnetic force, motion of leg or paddle, and propeller. The magnetic-enabled PillCam and magnetic upper GI Olympus capsules have been devised for this purpose. The magnetic-enabled PillCam was based on the Niobe magnetic navigation system (Stereotaxis, St Louis, MO, USA). The core of this system consists of focused-field permanent magnets, made of a neodymium-iron-boron compound. These large magnets are mounted on automatically operated arms to be easily arranged and oriented on either side. In an in vivo experiment, the capsules showed an accuracy of 1° and a localization error of 1 mm [32]. In another study, the camera could be rotated in steps of 1.8°. Full 360° visualization was possible in the stomach but only a 45° visual field was possiblein the colon [33]. In 52 human subjects, a feasibility study on a magnetically guided capsule from Olympus demonstrated that visualization of the antrum, body, fundus, and cardia were at 98%, 96%, 73%, and 75%, respectively, and the feasibility of gastric examination was shown [34].
Endoscopic devices with flexible legs for ambulation have also been proposed. Legged locomotion mimicking inchworm motion has several advantages, including better adaptability to different geometries of the GI tract, higher velocity, and simplified adhesion induced by friction between the device and the tissue [35]. A new prototype with eight legs has been devised. The two leg sets (each leg set consists of four legs) open independently in opposite directions; the rear legs are useful for propulsion, whereas the front legs are useful for stopping. In in vitro tests, the eight-leg capsule showed a speed of 6 cm per minute, and capabilities of backward and vertical locomotion [36]. A paddling-based locomotion mechanism enhanced CE by using a paddling stroke. It provided fast locomotion speed and long travel distances. In one study, the mean velocity was 37.5 cm per minute in the extracted porcine colon and 17 cm per minute in the colon of a living pig [37]. Another study reported that CE with feedback controlled paddling had higher locomotion speed, showing an increase of 58% compared with the previous control method based on a given timer value [38]. A capsule endoscope with an integrated propeller has been developed, and recently, a novel capsule endoscope with four propellers has allowed for a reliable 3D locomotion if the capsule has neutral buoyancy. The number of blades per propeller usually varies from one to five, although three-blade propellers are commonly used [39]. However, this type was useful only for situations in which a large amount of liquid was present. Therefore, liquid intake is required for filling the GI cavity.
For better locomotion and steering, some groups have suggested a hybrid of the magnetic system and self-propelled capsule endoscope, as well as of the magnetic system and legged locomotion [40,41]. However, these methods require further development concerning the need for bulky and complex equipment for generating the magnetic field, and concerning accuracy and stabilization levels, which remain relatively low.
Beyond detecting lesions (ongoing projects)
A tagging module can mark the precise location of a target lesion for future surgical or wired endoscopic therapy [42]. One prototype microbiopsy module consists of a trigger with a paraffin block, a rotating tissue-cutting razor with torsion spring, and a controller. It is constructed to operate sequentially so that the tissue sampling, sealing, and fixing are performed in one operation [43]. Another form with a microactuator has been designed to perform microbiopsy. A microspike was incorporated into the capsule endoscope to obtain biopsy specimens. Experimental tests demonstrated that the developed microactuator with microspike successfully extracted tissue samples from a pig’s small intestines [44]. One study reported that a magnetically maneuvered capsule with a nitinol clip-releasing mechanism successfully clipped an iatrogenic bleeding lesion in a pig model [45]. Two new capsules, Intellisite (Innovative Devices, Raleigh, NC, USA) and Enterion (Phaeton Research, Nottingham, UK), have been developed for the collection of absorption data in the GI tract and can be used in the future for drug delivery [46]. Nonvideo capsules that can deliver drugs with a pH-activated or temperature-activated release mechanism have also been evaluated. Wood et al. reported that a capsule endoscope prototype with pH, temperature, and pressure sensing, and a pin for anchoring with a holding mechanism, demonstrates the feasibility for targeted drug delivery [47].
The NEMO (nano-based CE with molecular imaging and optical biopsy) project is developing a new capsule that combines optical and maneuvering technologies, biosensing, and nanotechnologies to enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of CE. The VECTOR (versatile endoscopic capsule for GI tumor recognition and therapy) project is in the process of developing a minirobot for the screening and surveillance of GI cancer, and for magnetic and legged motion, drug delivery, and tissue sampling [3,48]. A prototype coagulation capsule that employs an exothermic chemical reaction to generate heat through the interaction of calcium oxide and water has been tested [49]. This may be potentially useful for hemostasis through thermal coagulation. However, improvements in capsule maneuvering capabilities are necessary before these capsules can be further developed.
CE has evolved very rapidly to become an important tool for the visualization of the gut mucosa. Small-bowel CE is recommended as the first-line investigation technique in patients with OGIB and seems sufficiently accurate as an alternative tool in other small-bowel diseases such as CD, small tumors, celiac disease, unexplained abdominal pain, and/or diarrhea. For complete and perfect small-bowel investigation, several technical limitations must be addressed. Fortunately, many methods have been proposed and are in development, such as enhanced image modality, controlled air insufflation, decreased battery consumption, and several therapeutic and biopsy tools (Fig. 2). With technological developments, advanced CE could become the standard method of endoscopy for many GI diseases in the future.
Fig. 1.
New capsule endoscope proposed for self- or external ordinary positioning or propulsion. (A) A capsule that emits magnetic force. (B) A capsule with legs for mucosal ambulation. (C) A capsule that involves use of a paddling stroke. (D) A capsule with four propellers. Permissions for all pictures were obtained. (A) Adapted from Lucarini et al.28 (B, C) Adapted from Quirini et al. [29] and Kim et al. [30], with permission from Elsevier, respectively. (D) Adapted from Tortora et al. [31], with permission from Taylor & Francis.
ce-49-1-8f1.gif
Fig. 2.
Schematic illustration of future imaginary capsule endoscopy based on current research. This illustration was made by the present author, Won Gun Kwack. FICE, Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy; IRFE, infrared fluorescence endoscopy; 3D, three-dimensional; LED, light-emitting diode; DSP, digital signal processing.
ce-49-1-8f2.gif
Table 1.
Video Capsule Endoscopy
Variable PillCam
 EndoCapsule MiroCam OMOM CapsoCam
SB3 ESO2 Colon2
Dimensions, mm 11.4×26.2 11×26 11.6×31.5 11×26 11×24.5 13×27.9 11×31
Frame rate, fps 2–6 18 4–35 2 3 2 20 max
Operating time 8 hr 30 min 10 hr 8 hr 12 hr 6–8 hr 15 hr
Imaging heads 1 2 2 1 1 1 4
Field of view, o 156 169 172 145 170 140 360
Transmission mode RF RF RF RF EFP RF USB
FDA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Image sensor CMOS CMOS CMOS CCD CMOS CCD White LEDs
Optical enhancement FICE setting Contrast imaging NA NA NA

fps, frames per second; RF, radiofrequency; EFP, electric field propagation; USB, universal serial bus; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; CMOS, complementary metal oxide silicon; CCD, charge-coupled device; LED, light-emitting diode; FICE, Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy; NA, not applicable.

Table 2.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Capsule Endoscopy
Advantages Disadvantages
Convenience Incomplete small-bowel examination
 No need for sedation  Uncontrolled air insufflation
 Simple examination for patient  Retention or delayed transition
 Limited battery life
Less invasiveness Impossible to maneuver
High diagnostic yield comparable to other imaging modality No therapeutic or biopsy capability
Table 3.
New Devices and Future Development
Disadvantage Promising solution
Incomplete small bowel examination
 Low quality image FICE, IRFE, 3D reconstruction
 Uncontrolled air insufflation Untethered controlled CO2 insufflation
 Retention or delayed transition External real-time image viewer
 Limited battery life Frame rate modulation
Video compression
Impulse Radio-Ultra-Wideband
Location Software using 3D triangulation
Capsule-odometer
Impossibility of maneuver Magnetic navigation system
Mobile robotic platform
Therapeutic or biopsy capability Tagging, biopsy and therapeutic equipment
Targeted drug delivery
Delayed time of the interpretation Software to exclude useless frame
Epitomized summarization

FICE, Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement; IRFE, infrared fluorescence endoscopy; 3D, three-dimensional.

  • 1. Rondonotti E, Soncini M, Girelli C, et al. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;22:1380–1386.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Koulaouzidis A, Rondonotti E, Karargyris A. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:3726–3746.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 3. Fisher LR, Hasler WL. New vision in video capsule endoscopy: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:392–405.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 4. Eliakim R. Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2013;29:133–139.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Ladas SD, Triantafyllou K, Spada C, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE): recommendations (2009) on clinical use of video capsule endoscopy to investigate small-bowel, esophageal and colonic diseases. Endoscopy 2010;42:220–227.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Bouchard S, Ibrahim M, Van Gossum A. Video capsule endoscopy: perspectives of a revolutionary technique. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:17330–17344.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 7. Van de Bruaene C, De Looze D, Hindryckx P. Small bowel capsule endoscopy: Where are we after almost 15 years of use? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015;7:13–36.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 8. Koulaouzidis A, Douglas S, Rogers MA, Arnott ID, Plevris JN. Fecal calprotectin: a selection tool for small bowel capsule endoscopy in suspected IBD with prior negative bi-directional endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011;46:561–566.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977–1981.ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I, et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;361:264–270.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M, et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:581–589; e1.ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2009;41:1026–1031.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Gupta T, Ibrahim M, Deviere J, Van Gossum A. Evaluation of Fujinon intelligent chromo endoscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastroenterology bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:4590–4595.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 14. Matsumura T, Arai M, Sato T, et al. Efficacy of computed image modification of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2012;4:421–428.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 15. Krystallis C, Koulaouzidis A, Douglas S, Plevris JN. Chromoendoscopy in small bowel capsule endoscopy: blue mode or Fuji Intelligent Colour Enhancement? Dig Liver Dis 2011;43:953–957.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Imagawa H, Oka S, Tanaka S, et al. Improved detectability of small-bowel lesions via capsule endoscopy with computed virtual chromoendoscopy: a pilot study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011;46:1133–1137.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 17. Demosthenous P, Georgiou J. Towards a fluoroscopic cancer screening capsule for the small intestine. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2014;2014:3122–3125.Article
  • 18. Zhang R, Tsai PS, Cryer JE, Shah M. Shape-from-shading: a survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1999;21:690–706.Article
  • 19. Koulaouzidis A, Karargyris A, Rondonotti E, et al. Three-dimensional representation software as image enhancement tool in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a feasibility study. Dig Liver Dis 2013;45:909–914.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Rondonotti E, Koulaouzidis A, Karargyris A, et al. Utility of 3-dimensional image reconstruction in the diagnosis of small-bowel masses in capsule endoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:642–651.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Pasricha T, Smith BF, Mitchell VR, et al. Controlled colonic insufflation by a remotely triggered capsule for improved mucosal visualization. Endoscopy 2014;46:614–618.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 22. Gorlewicz JL, Battaglia S, Smith BF, et al. Wireless insufflation of the gastrointestinal tract. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013;60:1225–1233.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 23. Shiotani A, Honda K, Kawakami M, et al. Use of an external real-time image viewer coupled with prespecified actions enhanced the complete examinations for capsule endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26:1270–1274.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Marya N, Karellas A, Foley A, Roychowdhury A, Cave D. Computerized 3-dimensional localization of a video capsule in the abdominal cavity: validation by digital radiography. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:669–674.ArticlePubMed
  • 25. Liao Z, Xu C, Li ZS. Completion rate and diagnostic yield of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: 1 vs. 2 frames per second. Endoscopy 2010;42:360–364.ArticlePubMed
  • 26. Gao Y, Zheng Y, Diao S, et al. Low-power ultrawideband wireless telemetry transceiver for medical sensor applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:768–772.ArticlePubMed
  • 27. Xin W, Yan G, Wang W. Study of a wireless power transmission system for an active capsule endoscope. Int J Med Robot 2010;6:113–122.ArticlePubMed
  • 28. Lucarini G, Ciuti G, Mura M, Rizzo R, Mensiacci A. A new concept for magnetic capsule colonoscopy based on an electromagnetic system. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2015;12:25.Article
  • 29. Quirini M, Menciassi A, Scapellato S, et al. Feasibility proof of a legged locomotion capsule for the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:1153–1158.ArticlePubMed
  • 30. Kim HM, Yang S, Kim J, et al. Active locomotion of a paddling-based capsule endoscope in an in vitro and in vivo experiment (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:381–387.ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Tortora G, Valdastri P, Susilo E, et al. Propeller-based wireless device for active capsular endoscopy in the gastric district. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2009;18:280–290.ArticlePubMed
  • 32. Carpi F, Pappone C. Stereotaxis Niobe magnetic navigation system for endocardial catheter ablation and gastrointestinal capsule endoscopy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2009;6:487–498.ArticlePubMed
  • 33. Valdastri P, Quaglia C, Buselli E, et al. A magnetic internal mechanism for precise orientation of the camera in wireless endoluminal applications. Endoscopy 2010;42:481–486.ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, et al. Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope. Endoscopy 2010;42:541–545.ArticlePubMed
  • 35. Menciassi A, Stefanini C, Gorini S, et al. Locomotion of a legged capsule in the gastrointestinal tract: theoretical study and preliminary technological results. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004;4:2767–2770.Article
  • 36. Quirini M, Scapellato S, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Dario P. An approach to capsular endoscopy with active motion. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;2007:2827–2830.Article
  • 37. Kim HM, Yang S, Kim J, et al. Active locomotion of a paddling-based capsule endoscope in an in vitro and in vivo experiment (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:381–387.ArticlePubMed
  • 38. Yang S, Park K, Kim J, Kim TS, Cho IJ, Yoon ES. Autonomous locomotion of capsule endoscope in gastrointestinal tract. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011;2011:6659–6663.
  • 39. Tortora G, Valdastri P, Susilo E, et al. Propeller-based wireless device for active capsular endoscopy in the gastric district. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2009;18:280–290.ArticlePubMed
  • 40. Gao M, Hu C, Chen Z, Zhang H, Liu S. Design and fabrication of a magnetic propulsion system for self-propelled capsule endoscope. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010;57:2891–2902.ArticlePubMed
  • 41. Simi M, Valdastri P, Quaglia C, Menciassi A, Dario P. Design, fabrication, and testing of a capsule with hybrid locomotion for gastrointestinal tract exploration. Mechatron IEEE/ASME Trans 2010;15:170–180.Article
  • 42. Chandrappan J, Ruiqi L, Su N, Qiang TS, Vaidyanathan K. Tagging module for lesion localization in capsule endoscopy. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010;2010:1890–1893.Article
  • 43. Kong KC, Cha J, Jeon D, Cho DI. A rotational micro biopsy device for the capsule endoscope. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005 (IROS 2005) 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference. 2005 Aug 2-6. Edmont, AB, Canada: IEEE/RSJ International Conference: IEEE. 2005. p. 1839–1843.
  • 44. Park S, Koo KI, Bang SM, Park JY, Song SY, Cho DD. A novel microactuator for microbiopsy in capsular endoscopes. J Micromech Microeng 2008;18:025032.Article
  • 45. Valdastri P, Quaglia C, Susilo E, et al. Wireless therapeutic endoscopic capsule: in vivo experiment. Endoscopy 2008;40:979–982.ArticlePubMed
  • 46. Wilding II, Hirst P, Connor A. Development of a new engineering-based capsule for human drug absorption studies. Pharm Sci Technolo Today 2000;3:385–392.Article
  • 47. Woods SP, Constandinou TG. Wireless capsule endoscope for targeted drug delivery: mechanics and design considerations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013;60:945–953.ArticlePubMed
  • 48. Schostek S, Schurr MO. European research on wireless endoscopy: the VECTOR project. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013;189:193–199.PubMed
  • 49. Swain P. The future of wireless capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:4142–4145.ArticlePubMedPMC

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Interfacial adhesion-friction synergy in a balloon-small intestine bio-tribological system
      Xiaocheng Chu, Zhijun Sun, Xiongfeng Tang, Yixin Cao, Jie Yuan, Guoqing Wang, Qiran Sun
      Tribology International.2026; 221: 112054.     CrossRef
    • INTELCAPE: A Deep Learning-Powered System for Automated, High-Accuracy Crohn’s Disease Diagnosis via Capsule Endoscopy
      Dejun Fan, Yize Mao, Feng Liang, Zheng Liu, Huayu Li, Jian Tang, Yanan Liu, Mingjie Wang, Yuting Qian, Jie Chen, Neng Wang, Tao Yang, Shuangyi Tan, Guanbin Li, Feng Gao, Jiancong Hu, Xiaojian Wu
      Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Research progress on the association between lymphoid hyperplasia and intussusception in the terminal ileum of children
      Dan Gao, Qingyu Xu, Nan Cong, Yi Song, Jia Li
      Frontiers in Pediatrics.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • A Review of the Early Detection of Colon Cancer and the Role of Circulating Tumor DNA
      Arjun Kandel, Aye M Thida, Mohan Preet
      Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Galar - a large multi-label video capsule endoscopy dataset
      Maxime Le Floch, Fabian Wolf, Lucian McIntyre, Christoph Weinert, Albrecht Palm, Konrad Volk, Paul Herzog, Sophie Helene Kirk, Jonas L. Steinhäuser, Catrein Stopp, Mark Enrik Geissler, Moritz Herzog, Stefan Sulk, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Alexander Meining, A
      Scientific Data.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Indications and Outcomes of Video Capsule Endoscopy in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A 5‐Year Single‐Center Experience in Nairobi, Kenya
      Werimo Pascal Kuka, Gloria Wangechi Mugo, Emmanuel Benge Oluoch, Eric Mwenda Murunga, Nelson O. Onyango, Kofi Clarke, Lipi Buch
      Journal of Tropical Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • An ingestible capsule for luminance-based diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia
      J. Chen, A. Alexiev, A. Sergnese, N. Fabian, A. Pettinari, Y. Cai, V. Perepelook, K. Schmidt, A. Hayward, A. Guevara, B. Laidlaw, I. Moon, B. Markowitz, I. Ballinger, Z. Yang, C. Rosen, N. Shalabi, S. Owyang, G. Traverso
      Science Robotics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Preclinical study of a novel ingestible bleeding sensor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
      Kimberly F. Schuster, Christopher C. Thompson, Marvin Ryou
      Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(1): 73.     CrossRef
    • Capsule endoscopy for small bowel bleed: Current update
      Uday C. Ghoshal, Akash Roy, Mahesh K. Goenka
      Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 43(5): 896.     CrossRef
    • Real‐time small bowel visualization quality assessment in wireless capsule endoscopy images using different lightweight embeddable models
      Vahid Sadeghi, Alireza Mehridehnavi, Yasaman Sanahmadi, Sajed Rakhshani, Mina Omrani, Mohsen Sharifi
      International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • A multi-label dataset and its evaluation for automated scoring system for cleanliness assessment in video capsule endoscopy
      Palak Handa, Nidhi Goel, S. Indu, Deepak Gunjan
      Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine.2024; 47(3): 1213.     CrossRef
    • Prediction of Significant Lesions on Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Suspected Small Bowel Bleeding: External Validation of SSB Capsule Dx Score
      Tiago Lima Capela, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Bruno Rosa, José Cotter
      Digestive Diseases.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
    • Low-Power Low-Area Near-Lossless Image Compressor for Wireless Capsule Endoscopy
      Pawel Turcza, Mariusz Duplaga
      Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing.2023; 42(2): 683.     CrossRef
    • The Accuracy of Different Modalities Used for Preoperative Primary Tumour Localisation in Operated Colorectal Cancer Patients
      Mahmoud Elnaggar, Ponnuthurai Pratheepan, Baskaran Paramagurunathan, Josie Colemeadow, Basim Hussein, Varvara Bashkirova, Kavya Pillai, Lucy Singh, Mehar Chawla
      Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Utilisation of a wrinkled film-based structure for the sensing measurement of a vibro-impact capsule robot
      Haohao Bi, Jiyuan Tian, Bohan Zhang, Bo Wang, Yang Liu
      Meccanica.2023; 58(11): 2151.     CrossRef
    • KAPSUL ENDOSKOPİYASI İLƏ İNCƏ BAĞIRSAQ MÜAYİNƏSİNDƏ MÖVCUD VƏZİYYƏT VƏ GƏLƏCƏK PERSPEKTİVLİYİ
      Həbib Həsənzadə, Amalya Həsənova Həbib Həsənzadə, Amalya Həsənova
      PAHTEI-Procedings of Azerbaijan High Technical Educational Institutions.2023; 34(11): 105.     CrossRef
    • Endoscopic Operating Platforms and Advancements
      Ila Sethi, Amy Rosenbluth
      Digestive Disease Interventions.2022; 06(03): 232.     CrossRef
    • Selective Motion Control of a Novel Magnetic-Driven Minirobot With Targeted Drug Sustained-Release Function
      Zixu Wang, Shuxiang Guo, Jian Guo, Qiang Fu, Lingling Zheng, Takashi Tamiya
      IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.2022; 27(1): 336.     CrossRef
    • Clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy for small bowel investigation (Review)
      Alin Ionescu, Adina Glodeanu, Mihaela Ionescu, Sorin Zaharie, Ana Ciurea, Andreea Golli, Nikolaos Mavritsakis, Didi Popa, Cristin Vere
      Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Soft Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery and Interventions: Advances and Outlook
      Ka-Wai Kwok, Helge Wurdemann, Alberto Arezzo, Arianna Menciassi, Kaspar Althoefer
      Proceedings of the IEEE.2022; 110(7): 871.     CrossRef
    • Application of nanotechnology in the early diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of gastrointestinal cancer
      Shenghe Deng, Junnan Gu, Zhenxing Jiang, Yinghao Cao, Fuwei Mao, Yifan Xue, Jun Wang, Kun Dai, Le Qin, Ke Liu, Ke Wu, Qianyuan He, Kailin Cai
      Journal of Nanobiotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Guidelines for Robotic Flexible Endoscopy at the Time of COVID-19
      Onaizah Onaizah, Zaneta Koszowska, Conchubhair Winters, Venkatamaran Subramanian, David Jayne, Alberto Arezzo, Keith L. Obstein, Pietro Valdastri
      Frontiers in Robotics and AI.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Novel Clinical Applications and Technical Developments in Video Capsule Endoscopy
      Shahrad Hakimian, Mark Hanscom, David R. Cave
      Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2021; 31(2): 399.     CrossRef
    • A Current and Newly Proposed Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Reading Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy
      Dong Jun Oh, Youngbae Hwang, Yun Jeong Lim
      Diagnostics.2021; 11(7): 1183.     CrossRef
    • Gastric examination using a novel three-dimensional magnetically assisted capsule endoscope and a hand-held magnetic controller: A porcine model study
      Dong Jun Oh, Ji Hyung Nam, Junseok Park, Youngbae Hwang, Yun Jeong Lim, Edoardo Sinibaldi
      PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0256519.     CrossRef
    • Diagnostic Yields and Clinical Impacts of Capsule Endoscopy
      Seung Min Hong, Sung Hoon Jung, Dong Hoon Baek
      Diagnostics.2021; 11(10): 1842.     CrossRef
    • Small Bowel Malignancies in Patients Undergoing Capsule Endoscopy for Iron Deficiency Anemia
      Su Hwan Kim, Ji Won Kim
      Diagnostics.2021; 12(1): 91.     CrossRef
    • 3D reconstruction of small bowel lesions using stereo camera-based capsule endoscopy
      Seung-Joo Nam, Yun Jeong Lim, Ji Hyung Nam, Hyun Seok Lee, Youngbae Hwang, Junseok Park, Hoon Jai Chun
      Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Changes in performance of small bowel capsule endoscopy based on nationwide data from a Korean Capsule Endoscopy Registry
      Su Hwan Kim, Yun Jeong Lim, Junseok Park, Ki-Nam Shim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jaeyoung Chun, Jin Su Kim, Hyun Seok Lee, Hoon Jai Chun
      The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2020; 35(4): 889.     CrossRef
    • A New Active Locomotion Capsule Endoscopy under Magnetic Control and Automated Reading Program
      Dong Jun Oh, Kwang Seop Kim, Yun Jeong Lim
      Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(4): 395.     CrossRef
    • The Modelling, Analysis, and Experimental Validation of a Novel Micro-Robot for Diagnosis of Intestinal Diseases
      Ding Han, Guozheng Yan, Zhiwu Wang, Pingping Jiang, Dasheng Liu, Kai Zhao, Jin Ma
      Micromachines.2020; 11(10): 896.     CrossRef
    • Colored Video Analysis in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: A Survey of State-of-the-Art
      Amira S. Ashour, Nilanjan Dey, Waleed S. Mohamed, Jolanda G. Tromp, R. Simon Sherratt, Fuqian Shi, Luminița Moraru
      Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews.2020; 16(9): 1074.     CrossRef
    • A micro-tattooing device for capsule endoscope using a Wood's metal triggering mechanism
      Seonggun Joe, Dongkyu Lee, Hyeongseok Kang, Byungjeon Kang, Jong-Oh Park, Byungkyu Kim
      Mechatronics.2019; 62: 102259.     CrossRef
    • Evaluation of Gastric Disease with Capsule Endoscopy
      Seung-Joo Nam, Hyun Seok Lee, Yun Jeong Lim
      Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(4): 323.     CrossRef
    • Predictive factors of an incomplete examination and inadequate small-bowel cleanliness during capsule endoscopy
      Ana Ponte, Rolando Pinho, Adélia Rodrigues, Joana Silva, Jaime Rodrigues, Mafalda Sousa, Jo�o Carvalho
      Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The Usefulness of New-Generation Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Portal Hypertensive Enteropathy
      Seung-Joo Nam, Ji Hyun Kim, Sung Chul Park
      Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(6): 505.     CrossRef
    • Application of Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy: Where Are We Now?
      Youngbae Hwang, Junseok Park, Yun Jeong Lim, Hoon Jai Chun
      Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(6): 547.     CrossRef
    • Small bowel endoluminal imaging (capsule and enteroscopy)
      Alberto Murino, Edward J Despott
      Frontline Gastroenterology.2017; 8(2): 148.     CrossRef
    • Colorectal cancer, screening and primary care: A mini literature review
      Athanasios Hadjipetrou, Dimitrios Anyfantakis, Christos G Galanakis, Miltiades Kastanakis, Serafim Kastanakis
      World Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 23(33): 6049.     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Current Status and Research into Overcoming Limitations of Capsule Endoscopy
      Clin Endosc. 2016;49(1):8-15.   Published online January 28, 2016
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.8
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    • 1
    Related articles
    Current Status and Research into Overcoming Limitations of Capsule Endoscopy
    Image Image
    Fig. 1. New capsule endoscope proposed for self- or external ordinary positioning or propulsion. (A) A capsule that emits magnetic force. (B) A capsule with legs for mucosal ambulation. (C) A capsule that involves use of a paddling stroke. (D) A capsule with four propellers. Permissions for all pictures were obtained. (A) Adapted from Lucarini et al.28 (B, C) Adapted from Quirini et al. [29] and Kim et al. [30], with permission from Elsevier, respectively. (D) Adapted from Tortora et al. [31], with permission from Taylor & Francis.
    Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of future imaginary capsule endoscopy based on current research. This illustration was made by the present author, Won Gun Kwack. FICE, Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy; IRFE, infrared fluorescence endoscopy; 3D, three-dimensional; LED, light-emitting diode; DSP, digital signal processing.

    Fig. 1.

    Fig. 2.

    Current Status and Research into Overcoming Limitations of Capsule Endoscopy
    Variable PillCam
    		 EndoCapsule MiroCam OMOM CapsoCam
    SB3 ESO2 Colon2
    Dimensions, mm 11.4×26.2 11×26 11.6×31.5 11×26 11×24.5 13×27.9 11×31
    Frame rate, fps 2–6 18 4–35 2 3 2 20 max
    Operating time 8 hr 30 min 10 hr 8 hr 12 hr 6–8 hr 15 hr
    Imaging heads 1 2 2 1 1 1 4
    Field of view, o 156 169 172 145 170 140 360
    Transmission mode RF RF RF RF EFP RF USB
    FDA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
    Image sensor CMOS CMOS CMOS CCD CMOS CCD White LEDs
    Optical enhancement FICE setting Contrast imaging NA NA NA
    Advantages Disadvantages
    Convenience Incomplete small-bowel examination
     No need for sedation  Uncontrolled air insufflation
     Simple examination for patient  Retention or delayed transition
     Limited battery life
    Less invasiveness Impossible to maneuver
    High diagnostic yield comparable to other imaging modality No therapeutic or biopsy capability
    Disadvantage Promising solution
    Incomplete small bowel examination
     Low quality image FICE, IRFE, 3D reconstruction
     Uncontrolled air insufflation Untethered controlled CO2 insufflation
     Retention or delayed transition External real-time image viewer
     Limited battery life Frame rate modulation
    Video compression
    Impulse Radio-Ultra-Wideband
    Location Software using 3D triangulation
    Capsule-odometer
    Impossibility of maneuver Magnetic navigation system
    Mobile robotic platform
    Therapeutic or biopsy capability Tagging, biopsy and therapeutic equipment
    Targeted drug delivery
    Delayed time of the interpretation Software to exclude useless frame
    Epitomized summarization
    Table 1. Video Capsule Endoscopy

    fps, frames per second; RF, radiofrequency; EFP, electric field propagation; USB, universal serial bus; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; CMOS, complementary metal oxide silicon; CCD, charge-coupled device; LED, light-emitting diode; FICE, Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy; NA, not applicable.

    Table 2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Capsule Endoscopy

    Table 3. New Devices and Future Development

    FICE, Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement; IRFE, infrared fluorescence endoscopy; 3D, three-dimensional.

    Table 1.

    Table 2.

    Table 3.

    Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
    © Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
    Close layer
    TOP