1Digestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Intelligent Image Processing Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI), Seongnam, Korea
3Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
4Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastrointestinal Medical Instrument Research, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Study | Suggested algorithm | Purpose | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Gopi et al. [6] | DDDT-CWT | Noise reduction | Improved PSNR and SSIM than other three algorithms |
Liu et al. [7] | TV minimization on MFISTA/FGP framework | De-blurring | Improved PSNR for the simulation results of CE images |
Peng et al. [8] | Synthesis from DPM with aligned nearby sharp frames | De-blurring | Improved SSD errors, showing experimental result on video sample |
Duda et al. [9] | Average of upsampled and registered low-resolution images | De-blurring | Improved PSNR |
Singh et al. [12] | Interpolation function using DWT | De-blurring | Improved PSNR, MSE, and ME |
Wang et al. [13] | Adaptive dictionary pair learning | De-blurring | Improved PSNR for the dataset of CE images |
CE, capsule endoscopy; DDDT-CWT, double density dual-tree complex wavelet transform; DPM, direct patch matching; DWT, discrete wavelet transform; FGP, fast gradient projection; ME, maximum error; MFISTA, monotone fast iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithm; MSE, mean square error; PSNR, peak signal-to-noise ratio; SSD, sum of squared differences; SSIM, structural similarity index.
Study | suggested algorithm | Purpose | outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Karargyris et al. [14] | Shape-from-shading | Depth sensing | Create three dimensional-surfaced CE videos |
Fan et al. [15] | SIFT, epipolar geometry | Depth sensing | Three-dimensional reconstruction of the GI tract’s inner surfaces from CE images |
Park et al. [16] | Stereo-type capsule endoscope, direct attenuation model | Depth sensing | Create three-dimensional depth map, size estimation for lesions observed in stereo-type CE images |
Turan et al. [24] | Vision-based SLAM, Shape-from-shading | Capsule localization | Improved RMSE for the three-dimensional reconstruction of stomach model and capsule trajectory length |
Study | No. of images for training | No. of images for testing | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Zou et al. [37] | 60,000 | 15,000 | Classify CE images according to the organ of origin, accuracy: 95% |
Jia et al. [38] | 8,200 (2,050 positives) | 1,800 (800 positives) | Bleeding detection for annotated CE images, F1 score: 0.9955a) |
Study | Suggested algorithm | Purpose | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Gopi et al. [6] | DDDT-CWT | Noise reduction | Improved PSNR and SSIM than other three algorithms |
Liu et al. [7] | TV minimization on MFISTA/FGP framework | De-blurring | Improved PSNR for the simulation results of CE images |
Peng et al. [8] | Synthesis from DPM with aligned nearby sharp frames | De-blurring | Improved SSD errors, showing experimental result on video sample |
Duda et al. [9] | Average of upsampled and registered low-resolution images | De-blurring | Improved PSNR |
Singh et al. [12] | Interpolation function using DWT | De-blurring | Improved PSNR, MSE, and ME |
Wang et al. [13] | Adaptive dictionary pair learning | De-blurring | Improved PSNR for the dataset of CE images |
Study | suggested algorithm | Purpose | outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Karargyris et al. [14] | Shape-from-shading | Depth sensing | Create three dimensional-surfaced CE videos |
Fan et al. [15] | SIFT, epipolar geometry | Depth sensing | Three-dimensional reconstruction of the GI tract’s inner surfaces from CE images |
Park et al. [16] | Stereo-type capsule endoscope, direct attenuation model | Depth sensing | Create three-dimensional depth map, size estimation for lesions observed in stereo-type CE images |
Turan et al. [24] | Vision-based SLAM, Shape-from-shading | Capsule localization | Improved RMSE for the three-dimensional reconstruction of stomach model and capsule trajectory length |
Study | No. of images for training | No. of images for testing | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Zou et al. [37] | 60,000 | 15,000 | Classify CE images according to the organ of origin, accuracy: 95% |
Jia et al. [38] | 8,200 (2,050 positives) | 1,800 (800 positives) | Bleeding detection for annotated CE images, F1 score: 0.9955 |
CE, capsule endoscopy; DDDT-CWT, double density dual-tree complex wavelet transform; DPM, direct patch matching; DWT, discrete wavelet transform; FGP, fast gradient projection; ME, maximum error; MFISTA, monotone fast iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithm; MSE, mean square error; PSNR, peak signal-to-noise ratio; SSD, sum of squared differences; SSIM, structural similarity index.
CE, capsule endoscopy; GI, gastrointestinal; RMSE, root mean square error; SIFT, scale invariant feature transform; SLAM, simultaneous localization and mapping.
CE, capsule endoscopy. The harmonic average of the precision and recall,