Laser-cut-type versus braided-type covered self-expandable metallic stents for distal biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma: a retrospective comparative cohort study

Article information

Clin Endosc. 2022;55(3):434-442

Publication date (electronic) : 2021 October 28

doi : https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.161

Koh Kitagawa, Akira Mitoro, Takahiro Ozutsumi, Masanori Furukawa, Yukihisa Fujinaga, Kenichiro Seki, Norihisa Nishimura, Yasuhiko Sawada, Kosuke Kaji, Hideto Kawaratani, Hiroaki Takaya, Kei Moriya, Tadashi Namisaki, Takemi Akahane, Hitoshi Yoshiji

Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan

Correspondence: Koh Kitagawa Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan E-mail: kitagawa@naramed-u.ac.jp

Correspondence: Akira Mitoro Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan E-mail: mitoroak@naramed-u.ac.jp

Received 2021 May 17; Revised 2021 July 10; Accepted 2021 July 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) is a common complication in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Endoscopic stent placement is the treatment of choice for palliation of MDBO.1–4 Several types of stents, including plastic stents, uncovered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs), and covered SEMSs (CMSs), are available for use in clinical practice. It should be noted that the usefulness of SEMSs has been widely reported since the 1980s.5 In particular, in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction, SEMSs are considered to have better patency, larger diameters, and are more cost-effective than plastic stents.6–10 However, conventional uncovered SEMSs (UMSs) are prone to occlusion, mainly by tumor ingrowth through the mesh. To overcome this issue, CMSs, in which the stent mesh is covered with a thin membrane, have been developed. In some randomized controlled trials, CMSs have been reported to be more useful than UMSs in terms of longer patency;11,12 however, on the other hand, CMSs are associated with specific complications, such as sludge formation13–15 and stent migration.16–21 In particular, migration is an important issue because CMSs are not embedded in the bile duct. Conio et al.20 reported that CMSs had worse patency than UMSs; therefore, it remains controversial whether UMSs or CMSs are more useful.17,19,21–24 Recently, several types of CMSs with anti-migration systems have been developed to prevent stent migration.25–28

There are two types of CMSs: laser-cut-type and braided-type. Differences in the manufacturing process may affect mechanical properties, such as the axial force (AF), which is a straightening force, or the radial force (RF), which is an expanding force.29 It is unclear how the mechanical differences in CMSs affect stent patency and the incidence of adverse events (AEs), as well as the superiority of the CMSs type.

To the best of our knowledge, there have been no direct comparisons of the laser-cut-type CMSs and braided-type CMSs reported in the literature. This study aimed to assess differences in stent patency and safety between the laser-cut-type CMSs and braided-type CMSs. Considering that the critical problem of CMSs is stent migration, we decided to conduct the study using CMSs equipped with anti-migration systems.

METHODS

Figure 1 shows the patient flowchart of this study. Fifty-one patients underwent initial SEMS placement for MDBO caused by pancreatic carcinoma between April 2014 and March 2019 at our institution. The diagnosis of MDBO was made based on pathological and/or radiological findings and/or clinical courses. Data before stent insertion were also analyzed, including patient age, sex, the World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, tumor size, presence of distant metastasis or duodenal invasion, length of biliary stricture, total bilirubin, and the presence of prior plastic stent drainage or endoscopic nasobiliary drainage.

Fig. 1.

Patient flowchart of the study. SEMS, self-expandable metallic stent; MDBO, malignant distal biliary obstruction; CMS, covered self-expandable metallic stent; UMS, uncovered self-expandable metallic stent.

We performed endoscopic biliary stenting using laser-cut-type CMSs (ZEOSTENT covered; Zeon Medical, Tokyo, Japan) from April 2014 to March 2017. The total number of SEMSs placements for MDBO caused by pancreatic carcinoma in these 3 years was 24. All 24 patients with ZEOSTENT CMSs placements were assigned to the laser-cut group. We used the braided-type CMSs (WallFlex Biliary RX Partially Covered Stent System; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) from April 2017 to March 2019. The total number of SEMSs placements for MDBO caused by pancreatic carcinoma in these 2 years was 27. Of these, three patients who underwent the laser-cut-type CMS placement because of technical difficulties when placing the braided-type CMSs were excluded from the study. Another patient who received an uncovered SEMS because of pancreatitis on the previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with a plastic stent was also excluded. The remaining 23 patients with a partially covered WallFlex stent were included in the braided group. Finally, 47 patients (laser-cut group, n=24; braided group, n=23) were enrolled in the retrospective cohort.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

A total of 47 patients (24 in the laser-cut group and 23 in the braided group) were included in this study. The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Other than age, there were no significant differences in the other patient demographics, including sex, the WHO performance status, tumor size, the presence of distant metastasis or duodenal invasion, length of biliary stricture, total bilirubin, and the presence of prior drainage between the laser-cut-type and braided-type groups. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy before and after CMS placement was also not significantly different between the laser-cut and braided groups.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Endoscopic procedure and AEs

The endoscopic procedures and AEs are presented in Table 2. In the laser-cut group, one patient received an 8-mm diameter stent, and the remaining 23 patients received 10-mm diameter stents. In the braided group, all 23 patients received 10-mm diameter stents. Stents measuring 6 cm in length were more often used in the braided group; however, 7-cm long stents were more often used in the laser-cut group. ES was performed in three patients in the laser-cut group and two patients in the braided group, and there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients requiring ES. None of the patients underwent pancreatic drainage.

Table 2.

Endoscopic procedure and adverse events

Mild acute pancreatitis, as an early AE, occurred in two patients (8.7%) in the braided group. Acute cholecystitis, as a late AE, occurred in one patient (4.2%) in the laser-cut group and two patients (8.7%) in the braided group. One patient belonging to the laser-cut group had mild cholecystitis. Two patients in the braided group had moderate cholecystitis, stent removal was performed in one patient, and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage was performed in the other patient. The severity of cholecystitis was graded according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018.34 There were no procedure-related severe AEs or mortality.

Patient survival

The median follow-up period was 187 days (range, 55–1,052 days) in the laser-cut group and 261 days (range, 28–765 days) in the braided group (p=0.516). The Kaplan-Meier curve for patient survival is shown in Figure 2. The median survival was 187 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 140–273 days) in the laser-cut group and 269 days (95% CI, 169–381 days) in the braided group. There were no significant differences in the OS duration between the laser-cut and braided groups (p=0.618).

Fig. 2.

Kaplan-Meier graph showing the overall survival duration of the patients. No significant difference in the overall survival duration was observed between the laser-cut-type and braided-type CMS groups. CMS, covered self-expandable metallic stent.

TRBO

The Kaplan-Meier curves for TRBO are shown in Figure 3. The median TRBO was 217 days (95% CI, 125–285 days) in the laser-cut group. In contrast, TRBO analysis could not be performed in the braided group because most patients died by the time stent dysfunction occurred. The median TRBO was significantly longer in the braided-type group with the partially covered WallFlex stent than in the laser-cut group (p=0.0008). Figure 4 shows the median TRBO or patient death. The median TRBO or patient death was also significantly longer in the braided group (265 days; 95% CI, 126–357 days) than in the laser-cut group (141 days; 95% CI, 104–203 days; p=0.023).

Fig. 3.

Kaplan-Meier curve showing the stent patency. Cumulative stent patency was significantly higher for the braided-type CMS than for the laser-cut-type CMS. CMS, covered self-expandable metallic stent. ^a)Because most patients died by the time stent dysfunction occurred, the median time for stent patency could not be calculated.

Fig. 4.

Kaplan-Meier curve showing the cumulative patient survival without stent dysfunction. The cumulative time to stent dysfunction or patient death was significantly higher in the braided-type CMS group than in the laser-cut-type CMS group. CMS, covered self-expandable metallic stent.

Stent dysfunction

The results of stent dysfunction are presented in Table 3. Stent dysfunction was observed in 13 patients in the laser-cut group and four patients in the braided group. The rate of stent dysfunction was significantly higher in the laser-cut group than in the braided group (p=0.015). There was a slight trend towards a higher incidence of stent migration in the laser-cut group, although no significant difference was observed. There were no significant differences in the incidence of tumor ingrowth/overgrowth and sludge formation between the two groups. The anti-cancer effects of chemotherapy and stent length on stent migration are shown in Table 4. In the laser-cut group, successful chemotherapy significantly increased the rate of stent migration, whereas there was no significant difference in the stent length between the groups.

Table 3.

Stent patency duration, dysfunction, and causes in the covered self-expandable metallic stents

Table 4.

Factors associated with stent migration

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to directly compare two different mechanical types of CMSs used with anti-migration systems in patients with MDBO due to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. In this study, TRBO was shown to be significantly longer in the braided group than in the laser-cut group. In both stent groups, stent migration was the main cause of stent dysfunction; however, there was a trend towards a lower incidence of migration in the braided group, which may have contributed to the difference in TRBO. It was generally expected that laser-cut-type SEMSs, which have a lower AF and higher conformability, would show less migration; however, our results were different. This difference may be related to the differences in the anti-migration systems. Moreover, the laser-cut-type CMSs with less AF and RF and better conformability were thought to be less likely to cause pancreatitis and cholecystitis; however, the frequencies of these complications were similar to those of the braided-type CMSs.

Many types of SEMSs with varying mechanical properties are commercially available. Isayama et al.29 investigated the physical properties of various stents in desk experiments and found that braided SEMSs, such as the WallFlex stent, tended to have a relatively strong RF and AF, whereas laser-cut-type SEMSs had a slightly weaker RF and AF, with good conformability. The major advantage of the laser-cut-type SEMSs is that it undergoes less shortening than that of the braided SEMSs, which makes positioning easier. However, there have been no reported comparisons of the effects of these different mechanical properties on stent patency and safety in clinical practice. The ZEOSTENT CMS is made of laser-cut nitinol (nickel-titanium alloy), and the covered membrane comprises polyurethane and polyolefin elastomer.35 The outer surface of the stent is covered with a polymer membrane. In addition, this stent is equipped with an anti-migration system. The ZEOSTENT CMS has a “flare and bank” structure, both ends of the stent are flared (1.5 cm), and a raised band is added at each end, 1 cm from the 1.5-cm flared portion. On the other hand, the WallFlex Biliary RX stent is partially covered with a single silicone membrane on the inner side of a metallic stent except for a 5-mm section at each end.25 Some reports have demonstrated the usefulness of the partially covered WallFlex in MDBO due to pancreatic carcinoma and found that the incidence of stent migration was lower.12,36

There have only been a few reports on covered laser-cut-type stents for MDBO.35 Isayama et al.35 and Marui et al.37 reported stent migration rates of 12% and 4%, respectively. However, the migration rate of the laser-cut-type CMSs remains unclear. Furthermore, few studies have examined whether the anti-migration features of biliary SEMSs prevent migration. Park et al.38 compared the anti-migration effects of two types of fully covered metallic stents (FCMSs), concluding that the anchoring design was superior to the flared-end design. Thus, our tested laser-cut CMSs with a flared design alone may have had a weaker anti-migration effect. Minaga et al.39 also investigated the anti-migration properties of several types of FCMSs in desk experiments. In this desk experiment, it was pointed out that there is a strong correlation between the anti-migration effect and RF when the stent is not fully expanded; however, once the stent is fully expanded, the flare structure variables affect the anti-migration properties of the stent. It was also pointed out that laser-cut stents have a strong anti-migration effect when not fully expanded; however, the effect is greatly reduced when the stent is fully expanded.39 In our study, we found a significant correlation between response to chemotherapy and increased migration rate, especially in the laser-cut group. The flare and bank structure of the laser-cut stent may have exerted an anti-migration effect in situations where the stent was difficult to fully expand due to compression by a growing tumor. However, in a situation where the tumor had shrunk, and the stent was more likely to fully expand, the flared, uncovered end of the braided-type stent may have been more likely to be embedded into the bile duct, making migration less likely.

In fact, some reports have suggested that stent migration may be related to the mechanical properties of metallic stents and the influence of chemotherapy.40,41 In recent years, advances in chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic carcinoma have occurred, as shown by reports of prolonged prognosis and improved local control.42,43 Therefore, the effect of such intensive chemotherapy on the patency of the stent should be considered in future studies. Stent dysfunction is primarily caused by stent migration in both stent types, and controlling migration is the most important factor associated with prolonged stent patency. The fact that both the inner and outer surfaces of this laser-cut-type CMSs were covered with membranes may have also contributed to the high incidence of migration.

On the other hand, in this study, there was no difference in the OS between the laser-cut-type and braided-type groups, although there was a difference in the TRBO. In both stent groups, there was no significant difference in the OS, probably because of appropriate reinterventions, such as additional placement or replacement of stents even when RBO occurred and continuation of chemotherapy for as long as possible. However, from the perspective of quality of life, the braided-type partially covered SEMSs is superior because it reduces the number of reinterventions. In addition, further development of chemotherapy may prolong the prognosis of patients with pancreatic carcinoma, and stents with longer TRBO enable continued chemotherapy, which may affect the OS in the future.

Our study had certain limitations. First, the study population was relatively small. If the population had been larger, a significant difference in the incidence of stent migration between the two groups would have possibly been observed. However, we used the same stent consecutively for a certain period in the retrospective comparative cohort study. We believe that the statistical reliability should be high in general because most patient background factors were eventually aligned, and no significant differences were observed between the two groups. Second, this study only compared one type of laser-cut CMSs and one type of braided CMSs, which limits the generalizability of the study findings to other types of biliary SEMSs.

Our study is the first to compare laser-cut-type CMSs and braided-type CMSs, both of which have anti-migration systems. In this study, no significant differences in safety and the median OS were observed between the laser-cut CMSs and braided CMSs. However, the TRBO was longer for the braided-type CMSs than for the laser-cut-type CMSs. The braided-type CMSs with an anti-migration system would be preferable for palliation of patients with MDBO due to pancreatic carcinoma. Our results should be corroborated by additional studies. However, stent migration is the major cause of stent dysfunction even in CMSs with anti-migration systems, and controlling migration is of paramount importance for prolonged stent patency.

Article information Continued