Endoscopic resection utilizing bilateral endoscopies for complete membranous anastomotic closure

Article information

Clin Endosc. 2024;.ce.2024.104
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 August 20
doi : https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.100
Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Correspondence: Tong Zhang Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, South China University of Technology, Panfu road 1, Guangzhou 510100, China E-mail: eyzhangtong@scut.edu.cn
Correspondence: Jie Cao Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, South China University of Technology, Panfu road 1, Guangzhou, China E-mail: eycaojie@scut.edu.cn
Received 2024 April 30; Revised 2024 June 18; Accepted 2024 June 19.

Anastomotic stenosis (AS) is a common postoperative complication of colorectal surgery, predominantly affecting the middle and lower rectum.1 AS poses a significant challenge for surgeons because it not only affects postoperative recovery but may also necessitate reoperation, exacerbating patient discomfort and financial burden.

Recently, endoscopic techniques have emerged as pivotal tools in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. Owing to their minimally invasive nature and swift recovery, endoscopic procedures have been used to manage anastomotic complications.2-4 Endoscopic interventions offer precise manipulation of affected areas through natural lumens, circumventing the need for abdominal incisions and thus minimizing surgical trauma and associated complications.5

Herein, we present a unique case of complete membrane anastomotic closure successfully treated using a novel endoscopic technique. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to the submission of the case report, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of Guangzhou First People’s Hospital (F-2024-001-01).

A 63-year-old woman was diagnosed with familial polyposis, presenting as carcinoma in the ascending and rectosigmoid colons. On April 21, 2022, the patient underwent a laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, coupled with prophylactic ileostomy. The ileorectal anastomosis was positioned approximately 12 cm from the anus. The patient was discharged 7 days after the procedure. Despite being advised to undergo follow-up examinations, the patient did not comply.

Three months later, the patient underwent ileostomy reversal. Prior to the reversal, a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation was performed. Abdominal computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, barium enema, and endoscopy revealed complete membranous atresia at the ileorectal anastomosis site (Fig. 1). Owing to the significant trauma and risks associated with surgery, and with the consent of the patient and her family, we opted for endoscopic resection to address the issue. The procedure was monitored using two endoscopes, with surgery considered as an alternative approach.

Fig. 1.

Imaging findings. (A, B) Abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging images depicting the narrowing of the intestinal lumen at the anastomotic site (arrow). (C) Barium enema revealing barium in the middle and lower parts of the rectum with no contrast agent entering the ileum (arrow). (D) Endoscopy revealing complete closure of the anastomotic site surrounded by anastomotic nails (arrows).

To initiate the endoscopic procedure, one endoscope (Endoscope I) was inserted through the anus, and the other (Endoscope II) was introduced through the proximal ileostomy (Fig. 2A). The closed anastomosis site was visualized 12 cm from the anal side using Endoscope I. Strong illumination observed from the other side indicated thin tissue at the site of anastomotic closure (Fig. 2B). Subsequently, methylene blue was injected through Endoscope I, with immediate visualization of the needle using Endoscope II, further confirming the thinness of the closure (Fig. 2C). Under bilateral endoscopic monitoring, an incision knife was employed on the anal side to make an incision from the closed center, followed by the removal of the central tissue along the circumference of the anastomotic nail ring (Fig. 2D). After resection, the diameter of the anastomosis was approximately 2 cm, allowing smooth passage of the endoscope through the anastomosis (Fig. 2E).

Fig. 2.

Endoscopic resection. (A) Illustration of bilateral endoscopy. (B) Strong illumination is observed. (C) Immediate visualization of the needle and methylene blue staining. (D) Resection of membranous closure. (E) Smooth passage of anastomosis.

After resection, plain abdominal radiography revealed no pneumoperitoneum, indicating the absence of intestinal perforation (Fig. 3A). A barium enema demonstrated a wide, patent anastomosis, confirming the success of the endoscopic resection (Fig. 3B). Three days after the procedure, an ileostomy reversal was performed, and the patient was discharged after a 7-day hospital stay. The patient remained healthy throughout the 1.5-year follow-up period.

Fig. 3.

Imaging findings after endoscopic resection. (A) Abdominal plain film. (B) Barium enema.

The etiology of AS encompasses various factors, including disease-related elements such as local tumor recurrence, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and anastomotic fistula,1,6 as well as surgery-related factors such as low rectal anastomosis, ischemia of anastomotic tissue, and inappropriate use of staplers.7,8 Additionally, patient-related factors such as obesity, smoking, and postoperative loss to follow-up can contribute to this complication.6 In this case, potential factors contributing to AS included the protective ileostomy and patient’s postoperative loss to follow-up.

AS typically manifests as annular stricture or closure of the anastomosis ring around the surgical site.2 However, the distinctive feature of the AS in this case is the complete closure of the tissue at the anastomotic site, confined solely to the mucosal layer, rather than involving the entire thickness of the intestinal wall. Such a presentation is exceptionally rare. Deng et al. similarly reported two cases in which anastomotic closure occurred entirely because of a membranous structure following colostomy.2 This highlights the unusual nature of the mucosal layer-limited closure observed in this case.

For severe AS, invasive interventions are often necessary, with treatment options including endoscopic dilation or surgical revision of the anastomosis.9 Endoscopic treatments such as electrocision, balloon dilatation, and self-expanding metal stents, are typically considered as initial treatment options.10 In this case, we adopted a new endoscopic method, which involved two endoscopes entering the anus and ileostomy simultaneously. With the guidance of the two endoscopes, we identified the membrane structure or intestinal wall to avoid perforation and performed complete membranous anastomotic closure through endoscopic resection. The successful application of this method provides new treatment options for similar cases.

Compared with balloon dilation and self-expanding metal stents, this method resects the membranous anastomotic closure directly and completely, offering satisfactory results at lower costs.3 However, this technique has some limitations. A proximal ileostomy is essential for bilateral endoscopic procedures, and two experienced endoscopists are required to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the procedure.

In conclusion, we report a case of complete membranous anastomotic closure after total colectomy with prophylactic ileostomy. A novel endoscopic technique using bilateral endoscopes was successfully employed to perform closed mucosal resection and is worthy of clinical application.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (202201010031), Guangzhou First People's Hospital Frontier Medical Technology Project (QY-E10), Guangzhou First People's Hospital Red Cotton Youth Plan (KY14020001), and the Natural Science Foundation of the Xizang Autonomous Region (XZ2022ZR-ZY45 (Z)).

Author Contributions

Data curation: PY, SZ, JW; Funding acquisition: TZ; Project administration: JC, TZ; Writing–original draft: JW; Writing–review & editing: all authors.

References

1. Asari SA, Cho MS, Kim NK. Safe anastomosis in laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a narrative review and outcomes study from an expert tertiary center. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015;41:175–185.
2. Deng S, Cao Y, Gu J, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of complete anastomosis stenosis after colorectal resection without protective ileostomy: report of two cases and literature review. J Int Med Res 2020;48:300060520914833.
3. Hu C, Zhang H, Yang L, et al. Anastomotic occlusion after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a rare case study and literature review. World J Surg Oncol 2022;20:145.
4. Kraenzler A, Maggiori L, Pittet O, et al. Anastomotic stenosis after coloanal, colorectal and ileoanal anastomosis: what is the best management? Colorectal Dis 2017;19:O90–O96.
5. Nissotakis C, Sakorafas GH, Vugiouklakis D, et al. Transanal circular stapler technique: a simple and highly effective method for the management of high-grade stenosis of low colorectal anastomoses. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008;18:375–378.
6. Gu J, Deng S, Cao Y, et al. Application of endoscopic technique in completely occluded anastomosis with anastomotic separation after radical resection of colon cancer: a case report and literature review. BMC Surg 2021;21:201.
7. Polese L, Vecchiato M, Frigo AC, et al. Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic stenoses and their impact on quality of life: what are the lessons to learn? Colorectal Dis 2012;14:e124–e128..
8. Kim MJ, Shin R, Oh HK, et al. The impact of heavy smoking on anastomotic leakage and stricture after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients. World J Surg 2011;35:2806–2810.
9. Davis B, Rivadeneira DE. Complications of colorectal anastomoses: leaks, strictures, and bleeding. Surg Clin North Am 2013;93:61–87.
10. Biraima M, Adamina M, Jost R, et al. Long-term results of endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Surg Endosc 2016;30:4432–4437.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Imaging findings. (A, B) Abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging images depicting the narrowing of the intestinal lumen at the anastomotic site (arrow). (C) Barium enema revealing barium in the middle and lower parts of the rectum with no contrast agent entering the ileum (arrow). (D) Endoscopy revealing complete closure of the anastomotic site surrounded by anastomotic nails (arrows).

Fig. 2.

Endoscopic resection. (A) Illustration of bilateral endoscopy. (B) Strong illumination is observed. (C) Immediate visualization of the needle and methylene blue staining. (D) Resection of membranous closure. (E) Smooth passage of anastomosis.

Fig. 3.

Imaging findings after endoscopic resection. (A) Abdominal plain film. (B) Barium enema.