Fig. 1Endoscopic resection of a giant colon lipoma, case 1. (A) A wide-based 3×3-cm yellowish protruding mass without mucosal change detected at the ileocecal valve during colonoscopy. (B) Partial resection with unroofing technique performed twice at the center of the lesion using snare catheter (ASM-1-S; Wilson-Cook Medical Inc.). (C) A simplified illustration of the procedure. (D) Half the mass is resected, and yellow tissue can be observed on the exposed surface of the remaining lesion, indicating typical lipoma. (E) Three-year follow-up colonoscopy. There's no remaining evidence of the lipoma, except for the surgical scar.
Fig. 2Endoscopic resection of a giant colon lipoma, case 2. (A) A 3×3-cm yellowish protruding mass without mucosal change detected at the sigmoid colon during colonoscopy. (B) Partial resection performed on the center of the lesion using snare. (C) A simplified illustration of the procedure. (D) Most of the mass is resected, and yellow tissue can be observed on the exposed surface of the remaining lesion, indicating typical lipoma. (E) Colonoscopy on the next day. The remaining lipoma tissues are flowing out of the exposed lesion. (F) One-year follow-up colonoscopy. There's no remaining evidence of the lipoma, except for the surgical scar.
Fig. 3Endoscopic resection of a giant colon lipoma, case 3. (A) A 4×7-cm cylindrical protruding mass without mucosal change originating from the proximal ascending colon detected during colonoscopy. (B) Partial resection at the apical end of the mass resulted in serious thermal injury on the adjacent tissues without proper conduction of the electric current. (C) A simplified illustration of the procedure. (D) Since the diameter of the mass became decreased toward the base of the cylindrical mass, partial resection was retried slightly apart from the origin. (E) Yellow tissue can be observed on the exposed surface of the remaining lesion, indicating typical lipoma. Thermal injury of the adjacent tissues is not observed. (F) The resected specimen of the mass. The apical end of the mass was too thick to apply electric current without inflicting severe thermal injury on the adjacent tissues, while the actual resected part was relatively thinner and the electric current was well-applied with rare thermal injury on the adjacent tissues.